The 2026 World Cup format: How it works and what it means for the Socceroos

By Stuart Thomas / Expert

FIFA has confirmed that the 2026 World Cup, to be held in USA, Mexico and Canada, will be a 48-team tournament and played under a new format that completely transforms the group stages of the event.

Currently the hosts and 31 qualified nations meet to decide the winner, with eight groups of four used to determine the 16 countries that advance to the knockout phase. A simple process of elimination then plays out, with the final two teams meeting in their seventh match to decide who lifts the most famous trophy in world sport.

Yet change is afoot, and 2026 will now not only allow for increased participation from countries traditionally on the fringes of qualification but also see the group stage take on a new look.

In 2026 there will be 16 groups made up of three teams, potentially determined by placing them into three separate and seeded pots and drawing one from Pot A, another from Pot B and a third from Pot C. Such a mechanism will keep the powerhouses clear of each other in the early stages and potentially see Australia as a lower ranked Pot B team or in Pot C as one of the teams certain to face two nations above them in the FIFA world rankings.

After playing against each group opponent, the top two teams from each group will advance to the Round of 32 or first knockout round, effectively removing one guaranteed match and replacing it with an extra round of cut-throat play.

In essence, that ensures that 16 nations will attend the event and play just twice, somewhat disappointing for travelling fans who have grown accustomed to the three-match structure that has made attendance at World Cups a reasonable financial expense.

(Photo by Baptiste Fernandez/Icon Sport via Getty Images)

In previous tournaments, three matches across somewhere near two weeks of play have kept the majority of nations and their fans interested and hopeful for a solid period, yet there will be a number sent packing rather briskly in 2026, potentially within a week. Should any team open with a heavy loss, they may know even sooner than that, with the chance of qualification via goal difference taken away even if the wins are shared around within the group.

The ramifications for the Socceroos are significant, with the new structure forcing immense changes to the current qualifying process in Asia, where 36 nations will participate in a nine-group round robin before the top two from each group advance to the final 18, where they will then be split into three groups of six.

Effectively, based on current rankings, such a format would see Japan, Australia, Saudi Arabia, South Korea, Iran, Qatar, United Arab Emirates, Iraq and Oman kept apart at the nine-group phase before being grouped in threes when qualifying moves to the final phase.

Using a similar pot system, Iran, South Korea and Japan would be separated as the three highest ranked teams and Australia’s current ranking of 39 would see them included in Pot B and set to join one of the three above in a battle to finish top two in the group and subsequently earn a direct spot to the World Cup.

Once the six teams that finish in the top two spots across the groups have been removed, all third and fourth-place finishers advance and are split into two groups of three, with the winners of each group taking the final two Asian qualification spots at the tournament. The runners-up in those groups will play off for the opportunity to qualify via the Intercontinental Play-off.

It is somewhat more complex than in years past, yet the eight spots now put aside for nations from the Asian Confederation will have teams like UAE, Iraq and Oman licking their lips at the chance of future qualification. Theoretically it makes the Socceroos’ path to USA/Mexico/Canada an easier one, as well as to future tournaments, yet as Asian football continues to improve and teams like Thailand, Lebanon and Vietnam force their way into the top 100 in the FIFA rankings, that may not always be the case.

It is a massive change from the governing body and one designed to broaden interest around the globe. FIFA appears well aware of the importance of continuing to grow its brand, with women’s football providing a direct path to that and a more globally representative men’s World Cup now also an obvious component in their strategy to do so.

We all knew it was coming and much discussion will now take place around exactly what the new format will bring. One thing that is for certain is that the Socceroos path to the 2026 event looks more than manageable. Although it will rob Australian fans of the pleasure of participation in another intercontinental Playoff, something we all love so much!

The Crowd Says:

2022-08-06T08:39:08+00:00

Rodger King

Roar Rookie


@ Garry - The concept of a one-off final match will always be open to the criticism of the best team of the tournament didn't win the match. However, I will always argue that on the day the best team will always win. You can throw your stats out the window about how much possession a team has or shots on goal, or how attractive they play the game. If they don't score more goals than the other side, they weren't good enough. The game can be cruel at times.

2022-08-06T00:47:25+00:00

Garry

Roar Rookie


I doubt if thats ever been true..I point out the Netherlands team of '74 & the Brazil of '70 ..and Im not sure any of the Italy teams that won were particularly great teams.

2022-08-06T00:44:25+00:00

Garry

Roar Rookie


that sb 48not 32

2022-08-05T06:56:21+00:00

Rodger King

Roar Rookie


@Waz – Well said. Those who believe it won’t work don’t understand just how important it is to nations that don’t make it. The cream will rise to the top. The best football-playing country in the world will win the World Cup.

2022-08-05T01:34:42+00:00

Para+Ten ISUZU Subway support Australian Football

Roar Rookie


Garry that was my first reaction as well back when it was only 16, I thought 32 was devaluating the WC, but I came to like the 32 finalists. I think now all 208 nations can dream further along the line with this move of 48.

2022-08-04T10:47:31+00:00

Waz

Roar Rookie


Yeah, can’t get behind the biannual thing either.

2022-08-04T07:46:41+00:00

Garry

Roar Rookie


yes..if this FIFA nonsense is not stopped

2022-08-04T07:43:55+00:00

Garry

Roar Rookie


I attended the 1978 WC and there may have been collusion there.. Brazil & Argentina finished equal. Peru conceded 6 goals to Argentina late which allowed Argentina to go through (and win).

2022-08-04T07:41:00+00:00

Garry

Roar Rookie


first official one was 13 " In total, 13 nations took part: seven from South America, four from Europe, and two from North America." then World Wars disrupted things. "In the tournaments between 1934 and 1978, 16 teams competed in each tournament, except in 1938, when Austria was absorbed into Germany after qualifying" "The tournament was expanded to 24 teams in 1982,[29] and then to 32 in 1998"

2022-08-04T07:36:40+00:00

Garry

Roar Rookie


well 64 makes more sense than 32 but I feel any expansion just devalues it more..as will any proposed biannual tournament

2022-08-04T07:35:38+00:00

Garry

Roar Rookie


still doesnt make the latest expansion right..in fact you could say us naysayers are due!!

2022-08-04T07:34:33+00:00

Garry

Roar Rookie


which shows that no matter what the WC will never be truly balanced, top European & Sth America teams will still miss out.. should be left at 32 which was simple to follow..

2022-08-04T07:30:32+00:00

Garry

Roar Rookie


exactly why I think this is a bad move..it devalues greatly the achievement of just getting there ..and is part of the slippery slope FIFA is now on..and they want the even more absurd biannual tournament..

2022-08-04T06:51:30+00:00

Tim Carter

Roar Pro


Does your comment have a point?

2022-08-04T06:40:37+00:00

Tim Carter

Roar Pro


More likely to make the likes of Indonesia, Singapore, Malaysia, or the Philippines pair with Australia and NZ rather than the Pacific nations. More likely to get Asian confederation votes that way.

2022-08-04T05:55:50+00:00

Tim Carter

Roar Pro


Japan and South Korea hosted in 2002. Their timezones are virtually the same as ours. And the distance would be more palatable than going back to the desert, etc.

2022-08-04T05:51:57+00:00

Tim Carter

Roar Pro


That China development that's been imminent for the last two decades... Australia are struggling at the moment, but they're closer to bridging the gap to the top 4 than they are to falling into a lower bracket of teams.

2022-08-03T12:04:30+00:00

Bruce

Guest


Although it cheapens the tournament as a whole it makes little difference for footballing minnows like Australia. Australia has never won the FIFA World Cup under the current format (or previous formats) and won’t ever win under the new 48 team format when it begins. As ‘also ran’ is still an ‘also ran’. Simples peeps!

2022-08-03T11:24:50+00:00

Nat

Roar Guru


You know, I'd believe you've never had a formal education. Number of stadiums - yes. Tyranny of distance and opposing time zones from the most populous, football loving countries that support the game = never.

2022-08-03T11:00:57+00:00

Nick Symonds

Guest


Qatar has a population of just 2.9 million and will host the WC at 8 stadiums and the stadiums themselves won't all be permanent. Stadium 974 was even built using 974 shipping containers, 974 is also the area code for Qatar. Australia could manage by itself if it built stadiums like QSAC again. - Qatar 2022: Fully demountable stadium is ready http://stadiumdb.com/news/2021/11/qatar_2022_fully_demountable_stadium_is_ready

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar