AFL Finals Focus: Okay, let's try and unpack the greatest game of footy ever played. Controversy and all

By Tim Miller / Editor

Not every road needs lead to the grand final. Sometimes, the beauty of our game is more important than whether it’s a stepping stone onto the path of something greater.

There will be enough talk about that controversial finish, and whether Tom Lynch should have been awarded what in the end would have been surely a game-sealing goal. We’ll get to it here.

But much like in another contentious finish to a Tigers game this year, against Sydney in ‘the Chad Warner game’, that shouldn’t take any gloss off one of the greatest football matches ever played.

You’d have a fair case to be aggrieved if your heart bleeds yellow and black. There will be time to grieve. You probably won’t care about the result of this game.

Equally, Brisbane – and the same would have been said of Richmond, had it been they who had ended the best match of the season with their noses in front – probably can’t win the flag with the way they play. But this was so compelling, so brash, so phenomenal to watch, that it just doesn’t matter.

No Lions fan right now gives a damn about a flag right now. They’ve had the privilege of watching an absolute classic, a game as captivating, thrilling, frenetic and magnificent as this sport gets; and thanks to being on the winning side, get to watch the replay again and again and again.

This game had something to watch for everyone: injury strife for the lovers of chaos, electric footy for old-school fans, stacks of goals for Channel 7, and intriguing tactical battles and match-ups for nerds like me. And, of course, a finish to drive the content wheel into overdrive.

It would have been compelling viewing, if not quite as memorable, if one team had taken the match by the scruff of the throat early on and kept the advantage all the way through. Instead, we got seven thousand lead changes (okay, 17) and an edge-of-your seat finish that could easily have gone the other way with five extra minutes.

We’ll unpack it in just a second, but if you can’t look at Charlie Cameron weaving his way through traffic and snapping a beauty, of Maurice Rioli making a very good opponent in Keidean Coleman look an absolute goober with the tiniest of sidesteps, of Trent Cotchin winding back the clock and lacing out targets inside 50 like prime Scott Pendlebury, of Jack Riewoldt threading the most high-pressure set shots in the final term with the coolest of heads, and not think our little game is the best thing on the planet, then I have questions.

Sparking it all was the Lions’ newfound desire to play like, well, prime-era Richmond; and the Tigers’ desire to play as they have all year, like 1990s Geelong with a bit more system and a slightly better defence. Both sides had the utmost confidence that their strengths could outmuscle the other by the end, never relenting from the frenetic, all guns blazing approach that made this match so watchable from start to finish.

Often after an eight-goal first quarter, the coaches stiffen up the structure, one team or the other or sometimes both strive to lock the footy down and keep things in tight, and scoring dries up. Damien Hardwick and Chris Fagan, and their charges, looked at that and thought ‘Nup. Dial it up to ELEVEN!’

I’m not sure enough credit has gone to Hardwick’s ability to get a team with so many premiership heroes on their last legs playing such freewheeling, dashing footy, reinvigorating some and opening up the rest to the pure enthusiasm of youth.

He’s known all year, and most of last, that the titanic, intercept-marking backline that led to three flags in four years just isn’t what it was: Alex Rance is long gone, Dylan Grimes hamstrung and well past his prime anyway, Nick Vlastuin now often encumbered by punching above his weight against a taller opponent, as he was on Thursday night with Eric Hipwood, and Noah Balta hasn’t quite been at his best after they spent much of the first few months of the year trying to turn him into a forward.

His response has been to turn the Tigers into slingshot kings of a different kind. No longer do they just whack the ball on the boot and back the next bloke to win or neutralise a contest, then do it all again until the opposition cracks. The ball movement is sharper, the play more inclined to take a high-percentage option slightly further afield or sideways than go for broke, and they look for the sensible kickers – think Daniel Rioli or Jayden Short – with great frequency.

The reasons are obvious: the Tigers’ defence is now vulnerable enough to be scored upon heavily, especially with a weak midfield (we’ll get to Dion Prestia’s influence in a sec), and the forwards a sizeable upgrade from the ones that netted them a hat-trick of flags.

Shai Bolton of 2022 might be the best player in the game. Instead of Jason Castagna and small-forward Dan Rioli, fine but limited pressure players, there’s Noah Cumberland and Maurice Rioli Junior, who do everything the others do in terms of harassment but have magic at their fingertips too.

Tom Lynch is in the form of his life as a contested-marking, straight-shooting colossus, and Riewoldt’s incredible final quarter made me recall 2020 when he could scarcely kick over a jam tin and wonder just how he’s managed to flip Father Time the bird.

The results weren’t always obvious – for a side with that many attacking weapons, such speed of ball movement, and against a shaky Lions backline without Marcus Adams and Noah Answerth, and kicking 16 goals from 63 entries feels like a pretty low ratio.

But it was an absolute truth that whenever the Lions looked to have cracked the game, the Tigers would respond with a goal. Within seconds. Nothing summed it up more than Brisbane busting a gut in the third quarter with seven of the first eight inside 50s, finally securing the go-ahead goal Daniel McStay, only to watch the Tigers crash through out of the centre square, have the ball spill into the hands of Kamdyn McIntosh, who made a difficult snap look exceptionally easy.

The other secret to the high scores was the Tigers’ incredible accuracy. They booted 10.3 from set shots, with Riewoldt’s stellar twin strikes in the final term the peak.

Throw in the menace of Bolton and Rioli Jr whenever the ball hit the ground – the threat was always in the air, like a shark in the water – and if anything, the Lions did well to hold their opponents to ‘only’ 16 goals.

Brandon Starcevich, a notable absentee from the last time these two sides played, did a wonderful job on Shai Bolton – restricting arguably the most impactful player in the game to 10 disposals was a magnificent effort. Someone described him recently as ‘Brayden Maynard with better PR’, and it’s the most fitting possible description for probably the best small defender in the game right now.

But with two goals, Bolton still found a way to make his presence known – and his second-quarter snap, speeding up the boundary line in the forward pocket when given an inch of space and snapping an incredible major, was of the absolute highest quality.

As interesting as Richmond were, though, the Lions’ style, particularly in the first half, was doubly fascinating. Faced with underdog status due to their horror finals record under Fagan, as well as the twin suspensions to Answerth and Cam Rayner that saw Darcy Wilmot called up for a rare finals debut, Brisbane decided that their best hope was to meet fire with fire.

It was the ultimate ‘whatever you score, we’ll score one more’. Ditching their usual high-kicking style in favour of handballs aplenty, largely through the corridor, and keeping the ball moving at all costs – sometimes to their detriment – the Lions were able to shift the momentum whenever the Tigers, the better side for most of the evening, broke away, and when it was their turn to hold the upper hand were frightening.

Their only downside was a tendency to get caught up in the moment and blaze away with that crucial final kick inside 50: none of Joe Daniher, Eric Hipwood and Dan McStay are monsters in the air like Lynch, especially with the latter required in the ruck following Oscar McInerney’s early-minutes concussion.

The result was, too often, Cameron as the one man underneath the high ball against a sea of Lions, which never ended well. When they lowered their eyes and hit up targets, the results were far better: even when unable to mark, Hipwood won a pair of free kicks late in the first term against the outsized Vlastuin and the out-speeded Balta; he’d flush both straight over the goal umpire’s hat.

Equally, their desire to move the ball on at all costs came to their detriment at times, with the Tigers’ breathtaking speed on the counterattack a damaging beast to give turnovers to. After winning a holding the ball free kick on an attempted Bolton sidestep, Zac Bailey summed up their approach: quickly moving to play on, he attempted to hit up Callum Ah Chee with about half a millimetre of space on Vlastuin. He couldn’t mark, Noah Balta arrived to lend support, the Tigers switched the play wide, and it would result in a goal.

The Lions played chaos footy, with Lachie Neale in the engine stabilising the whole thing. You’ll struggle to find a better, more impactful performance by a midfielder in the modern game. Without a recognised ruckman, the Lions could easily have been overwhelmed out of the guts; instead, barring a brief period in the second term, they kept a clearance ascendancy throughout the evening.

Neale had 16 of his own – one short of the all-time AFL finals record. While to start the game, he was mostly contained to handballing to the likes of Hugh McCluggage on the outside, he ended with more metres gained than any Lion bar that man and Daniel Rich.

Neale had a hand in four of the Lions’ seven goals from stoppages. He won them the game. Everything that they did started with him. Everything.

A chasedown tackle on Bolton near the end, a game-saving play, was the most fitting of conclusions.

Helping matters even further was the loss of the one Tiger that could fight fire with fire against Neale; Prestia had been the prime factor in the Tigers surging back into the game in the second quarter, when the Lions had surged to an 11-point lead.

With seven of eight clearances, booting three quick goals as a result of the territory domination, the Tigers instantly retook control. Prestia had three of them by himself, plus four inside 50s. His loss after half time with a latest hamstring injury felt crucial then, and was crucial at the end.

Would the Lions have ended with a 47-41 clearance differential, a small but vital edge, with the Tigers’ best midfielder in the guts? We’ll never know.

Bizarrely, the final five minutes saw with it more calm than for the rest of the match. Both sides made deliberate efforts to slow the play, not be gung-ho, and replace madness (glorious madness, but madness still) with method.

In the end, it came down to a score review. Another brilliant Lynch mark right on the line, a checkside right over the goal post – or just to either side of it, depending on who you ask – and a score review to decide the game.

Despite the on-field call of goal, the ARC – showing a conviction that would be admirable at a normal time, but would of course lead to debate regardless of the decision here – found sufficient evidence to overturn it. The cowardly call would have been to wash their hands of it, and divert to the on-field call. Whatever you make of the decision, kudos must go to the review system being confident enough in itself to make it.

From there, the Lions worked it forward, ending in the hands of Zac Bailey – no stranger to the clutch himself. His kick was touched, and it was there where the Tigers, for the misfortune that befell them at the other end – made the decision that truly cost them the match.

THREE Tigers – Jack Riewoldt, Toby Nankervis and Noah Balta, plus an onrushing Robbie Tarrant – flew for the ball. All got some measure of knuckles on it, but could only spike it in the air.

Enter Joe Daniher. For much of the night, aside from a crucial 55m bomb in the third quarter just when the Tigers seemed home and hosed, his timing had been woefully out. A moment in that third term, jumping over Tarrant about a year too late and giving away a hugely embarrassing ‘unrealistic attempt’ free kick, pretty much summed up his evening.

This time, he arrived a second too late to impact the contest, as he had all night… and saw the ball leak out the back, just past the Tigers trio, just to his side of Tarrant. He had a second to get his left foot (he was on the perfect side of the goalsquare for a lefty, too) to ball. He produced it.

With a minute to go, there was still time. But Balta’s head in his hands told the story as much as the Lions’ joyful celebrations. It was done.

Much will be made of that score review, of the Tigers’ defensive blunder at the end, of the silly 50m penalty against Liam Baker for gobbing off in the second term, that gave Wilmot his first goal and proved one of a million crucial moments that led to it.

But there will be time for an autopsy later. Instead, look at Chris Fagan’s beaming smile, his embrace with Lachie Neale after the match, as the weight of five finals defeats, four of them at home, two of them by under a goal, was lifted from his shoulders. Look at Joe Daniher – a finals victor at last, after maybe the worst big game he’s ever played.

Damn the controversy. This was one of the greats. We were all lucky to have witnessed it. If everyone played the game like Brisbane and Richmond just did, there’d be no need for heaven; we’d already be there.

The Crowd Says:

2022-09-06T06:15:00+00:00

23rd best player

Roar Rookie


I love how the Richmond supporters are blaming the free kick differential when they haven't won a free kick count in the last decade. Tigers play dirty (not a knock on their style, It's just how the play, like grubs). I enjoy how they go about it, but you can never complain about losing free kick count when the players walk a fine line every game

2022-09-05T11:24:52+00:00

Johnno

Roar Rookie


I can understand being supportive of your team. But this blaming the umpires....it was the 50 metre, no the ARC, no some other umpire decision. Talk about the game. Stop trying to blame anyone but your players & coaches.

2022-09-05T08:57:56+00:00

O M

Roar Rookie


Are you a Wizard?

2022-09-05T06:58:17+00:00

O M

Roar Rookie


You wouldn't know. How could you know definitively from that footage or that camera angle. No-one could. The ARC guessed and that's against their rules and processes. They effed it up, which resulted in Richmond losing a game they would have won and the AFL do not have the balls to own up to that.

2022-09-05T05:14:36+00:00

Yattuzzi

Roar Rookie


Well I wont again. Begone.

2022-09-05T05:12:32+00:00

Brendon the 1st

Roar Rookie


I agree that the process was wrong, but I rewound it about 10 times and it was either hitting or in front

2022-09-05T05:01:05+00:00

RT

Roar Rookie


Correct. I am a bit tired of people saying it was the right result, when they don’t know for sure that is true with the camera angles (which means it was the wrong result). On Lynch’s reaction, I heard Broad interviewed today and he said that Lynch told them he didn’t know what either way, which is why he didn’t react. I can live with an umpire error (they are unavoidable) but not such a poor error by the ARC which throws integrity into doubt.

2022-09-05T04:44:56+00:00

O M

Roar Rookie


Curious that you turned up to respond????

2022-09-05T03:30:35+00:00

O M

Roar Rookie


The replay, (that was in no way inline with the kicker, flight & trajectory of the ball) showed that the ball might have actually gone just inside the post but with the footage available it was impossible to be totally sure. Umpires Call was the only outcome possible. The ARC for some unknown reason went against their own rules and process. Result = Richmond robbed of their victory.

2022-09-05T03:20:20+00:00

O M

Roar Rookie


1. The call was right, it would have hit the post, if anything it was in front of the post as it went past. How can you tell? How would you even know? The only footage that would have given a definitive and precise indication as to the ball’s trajectory is if it was directly inline with Lynch’s kick and no such footage exists which means the ARC was guessing. In that case the Umpire’s Call can never be overturned. Everyone here knows that but their bias comes into play defending the indefensible. I bet if this was Charlie Dixon kicking it you’d be up in arms B1.

2022-09-03T07:59:33+00:00

Rowdy

Roar Rookie


No game without em.

2022-09-03T05:51:08+00:00

RT

Roar Rookie


:sick:

2022-09-03T05:50:50+00:00

RT

Roar Rookie


:sick:

2022-09-03T02:39:45+00:00

Simoc

Roar Rookie


Nah. The greatest game was when WA beat Victoria at Subiaco Oval and I was there. We were ecstatic. But then J Longmuir from about 10m in front of me kicked straight to beat Essendon after the siren and we were still jumping up and down minutes later after evading his dive at us.

2022-09-02T11:43:07+00:00

Don Freo

Roar Rookie


Compelled?

2022-09-02T11:31:13+00:00

RT

Roar Rookie


Sometimes stupidity is.

2022-09-02T10:02:42+00:00

Don Freo

Roar Rookie


Greater efficiency too.

2022-09-02T10:01:30+00:00

1dawg

Roar Rookie


Thinks he owns the site and has an inside man. Sad situation for him. Not the best of lives lived. Hope he’s ok mentally…

2022-09-02T09:52:36+00:00

ScottyJ

Roar Rookie


The joke is he had more touches at the strip club than he did at the Gabba...

2022-09-02T09:22:02+00:00

Yattuzzi

Roar Rookie


Pass on what? Do you think that I am Homer, Oracle, Brendon or the Cat? All been here longer than you. Too many after the loss?

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar