Will NRL players be suspended during the finals or simply cop the Taylan May treatment?

By Stuart Thomas / Expert

In the most mind-boggling of decisions, the NRL has deferred the two-week suspension of Penrith’s Taylan May, after the winger was found guilty of assault occasioning bodily harm during an incident involving a man in Maroochydore in October, 2021.

The extraordinary decision will see the winger permitted to play in the 2022 finals series, with his playing ban bizarrely now to be served in the opening two rounds of 2023.

The 21-year-old committed the offence in the aftermath of the Panthers’ 2021 grand final win and after recently being found guilty, was issued a breach notice by the NRL.

That notice subsequently led to a two-week suspension and a $7500 fine, of which half of the financial punishment will be suspended should May keep his nose clean in the near future.

Logic suggested that May would be on the pine for the short term, with the game supposedly committed to setting standards of behaviour that society, sponsors and other participants should expect.

Instead, the league has acted in a manner that stands to set the most awkward of precedents and potentially places them at the mercy of a disgruntled club faced with the prospect of entering a crucial finals match without a key player.

Moreover, the soft treatment of the poster boy Panthers is hard to ignore. Many fans across the rugby league community will be fair in asking whether the NRL has looked after one of its most dominant and popular teams.

(Photo by Cameron Spencer/Getty Images)

The cocky men from the foot of the mountains have gotten under the skin of many across the last three years, with an arrogant confidence sometimes bubbling to the point of offence. No doubt, the football behind the bravado has been superb and Penrith’s abilities are far from questionable.

However, with the likelihood of further close matches during the finals and players being cited and judiciary bound, one wonders how the governing body can possible defend the decision to suspend May’s punishment and allow him to contribute to his side’s tilt at consecutive premierships.

It is probable that a forearm or two might drift a little high in the coming weeks, reports will taken for foul play and the odd player or two could find themselves in an unfortunate position, where a missed finals match due to suspension may well end their season.

Sports opinion delivered daily 

   

However, barring any on-field incidents, May will be amongst the fray for as long as the Penrith charge continues, whilst also being aware that he will be missing in the opening fortnight of 2023, where he will confident of his teammates covering his absence in matches far less important that what looms for the Panthers in 2022.

The statement emanating from the NRL did little to diffuse the scepticism around the entire situation, with something of an admission of guilt.

“In proposing the timing of the match suspension, the NRL considered a number of factors including when the incident took place, the date at which the proceedings were finalised and the impact of a match suspension at this time of year,” the statement read.

It is final clause of that sentence that is the kicker.

The NRL took the ramifications of a potential suspension into account when deciding May’s fate.

That effectively translates to the NRL considering the fact that the Panthers were in the finals whilst deciding the punishment and subsequently wanting May to play rather than miss out.

Of course, they still needed to apply their wet lettuce leaf discipline to the situation, thus transferring punishment to a fortnight of play that will likely have very little impact on the Panthers’ 2023 campaign.

Even considering dodgy bunker calls, ignored hip-drops and astonishingly inconsistent officiating for as long as we can all remember, this one just about takes the cake.

Whilst a few may argue that May’s error was an off-field one and that he should not be punished from a rugby league perspective, the hard fact is that the NRL have acted appropriately and connected off-field behaviour with the integrity and repute of the game.

Yet, sadly, they have dropped the ball in thinking that people are silly enough to not see behind their continued slap on the wrist approach to player behaviour, as well as the obvious free-kick they have given to the Panthers heading into the finals.

CLICK HERE for a seven-day free trial to watch the NRL on KAYO

The Crowd Says:

2022-09-10T21:39:06+00:00

NSWelshman

Roar Rookie


Lololol…..what a joke you & your team are. The darlings of the NRL get another favour. Sticking up for a thug who could have potentially caused irreparable damage to another person. Oh yeah & did it from behind like the gutless piece of $hit May actually is….like is brother. Too gutless to face the kid front on. Grub, thug will get his Lolol.

2022-09-09T05:00:26+00:00

Dumbo

Roar Rookie


Ivan Cleary missed out on the opportunity to garner HUGE respect by not saying "we're going to stand him down for the next two games, rather than wait until next year, in the interests of the integrity of the competition" PVL would have got the irts with that, but I think Ivan will be around for a lot longer than PVL.

2022-09-09T00:04:49+00:00

DP Schaefer

Roar Rookie


This chap can take a lot of credit for getting the game through a tough time, but now he's running the place by whim and personal ideology/values/$$/self interests and making calls ad-hoc, very reactionary and often biased. The Bunker is a mess, CC is a joke and waste of time, nobody knows what 6-agains are for, there are new rules every year and he seems unaccountable.

2022-09-08T23:58:22+00:00

Nick Maguire

Roar Rookie


:laughing:

2022-09-08T23:57:44+00:00

Nick Maguire

Roar Rookie


SOO time??

2022-09-08T23:56:19+00:00

Nick Maguire

Roar Rookie


Tony, Lindsay is probably thinking "what's my name again?"

2022-09-08T22:31:40+00:00

Tim Carter

Roar Pro


All true, but all irrelevant.

2022-09-08T22:19:34+00:00

Albo

Roar Rookie


Well we know he's not a Panthers fan ! :laughing:

2022-09-08T22:05:58+00:00

Albo

Roar Rookie


Exactly. That's just an NRL "sitting on the fence " suspension. Their reaction is that incident was very minor but we don't want to see it happen again. So we will give him a suspension next year as it was not bad enough to make him miss the finals this year. They should have just doubled the fine and dropped the suspension altogether.

2022-09-08T20:49:59+00:00

Rubbish Surf 69

Roar Rookie


As a lifelong watcher of NRL, I am watching less of late because I’m so sick of all the “Hollywood” BS going on. I just want to see drama in a hard fought game, not controversy.

2022-09-08T20:42:41+00:00

DP Schaefer

Roar Rookie


He's a well chosen agreeable sort. :)

2022-09-08T20:36:54+00:00

DP Schaefer

Roar Rookie


I believe he is effectively selling the game’s soul to increase viewership and interest. You hit the nail on the head. Notice the bunker, CC and other stoppages are sponsored off? They are rubbish inclusions but they bring in income so PVL then points to the $$ income. Problem is that they are rubbish inclusions and losing fans and then he has to come up with wilder stuff to bring fans back. The game is a great spectacle and does not need that kind of help. It will be damaged in the long term for what is happening here.

2022-09-08T20:17:12+00:00

DP Schaefer

Roar Rookie


You're on the wrong track. What people are jacking up about isn't the issue of May's penalty or whether it's fair. The issue is that a suspension was applied but then delivered at the whim of the chairman against all logic AND the resulting precedent that sets.

2022-09-08T20:08:49+00:00

DP Schaefer

Roar Rookie


:laughing:

2022-09-08T14:56:35+00:00

Smoked

Roar Rookie


Nope he’s a “rugba” league person

2022-09-08T14:51:22+00:00

Smoked

Roar Rookie


Don’t confuse smart politicians with smart leaders. Good leaders build organisations, make them better then when they arrived. Politicians are survivalists, experts at determining who best to appease for their own survival.

2022-09-08T13:33:34+00:00

zonecadet

Roar Rookie


Um, pretty sure 18,200 in 1998 was a sellout in the old Olympic Park days. Storm also moved some finals in the late 2000's to Etihad Stadium to cater for a bigger attendance and had crowds over 20,000 which Olympic Park would not hold. In fact they had 33,427 in 2007 versus the Eels. Almost double what they would cram into Olympic Park. As ever, the AFL finals are also on as the Storm host home finals in the NRL. That is competition that no Sydney NRL team has to counter. There will be 90,000 across the road at the MCG on Saturday night as there is every year. So, whoop dee doo, Penrith, who've been in the comp since 1967 and have hardly lost a game for 3 seasons have a sellout. That should be the norm. And the Roosters and Rabbitohs not getting a sellout should always be the story for such storied teams sellouts should be the norm as well.

2022-09-08T13:15:50+00:00

zonecadet

Roar Rookie


He might have used the guy who looked into Cronulla, if only.

2022-09-08T11:08:30+00:00

Mr Right

Roar Rookie


Yes I thought the thought the decision was strange but I thought was even stranger was was the timing of the outcome. This event that occurred last October was sentenced the week before the 2022 finals. What are the chances of that happening?

2022-09-08T10:51:24+00:00

Adam

Roar Guru


Stuart can sometimes be little impassioned

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar