Busted knee or not, Pakistan needed Shaheen Afridi to play through the pain in the World Cup final

By Tim Miller / Editor

When Shaheen Shah Afridi hobbled from the field after bowling just one ball in his third over, Pakistan’s hopes of victory in the T20 World Cup final departed with him.

Afridi’s knee injury, sustained while taking a brilliant catch to remove England’s Harry Brook a few overs prior, was one of those freak moments that completely change the course of big games.

In mere moments, Pakistan went from jubilation at removing the set Brook, with England still more than 50 runs from the target, to despair at the prospect of losing their premier bowler – and perhaps THE premier bowler in world cricket – with two overs still up his sleeve.

To his immense credit, Afridi returned to the field, and prepared to bowl his third over. He’d last just one ball, though, before leaving the field for good, forced to watch on as a suddenly rejuvenated England bashed their way to a straightforward victory thanks to Ben Stokes and Moeen Ali’s heroics.

What is to follow here might be the harshest thing I’ll ever write, and is certainly not meant to criticise Afridi in any way. It wasn’t his fault his batters had left him and his fellow bowlers a paltry total to defend. His catch, and the brilliant inswinger to dismiss the red-hot Alex Hales earlier, had seen him do more than his fair share already.

But Pakistan’s only hope was for Afridi, even an Afridi on one leg and barely making it to the bowling crease, to bowl his last 11 deliveries. For his team to remain any chance, he needed to somehow find a way.

The proof was in the one ball he managed in that third over; stripped of much of his pace, and with only the faintest hint of swing, Afridi was still good enough to hit the perfect length and the perfect line, beating a nervous prod from a still new to the crease Moeen.

This was an MCG wicket that, all day and all tournament, had proved favourable to pace bowling of any description and any speed. Ireland’s bowling attack is hardly express pace, yet a fortnight ago they had inflicted England’s only loss of the tournament at the same venue, by hitting their lines and never wavering.

Is it too much to ask for Afridi to have tried to do the same despite his injury? Yes, absolutely it is. But nevertheless, it was the only way.

As soon as Afridi went off, a pulsating, engrossing contest died virtually instantly. Suddenly, Babar Azam had five overs to get through, and at least two needed to be bowled by spin. In Pakistan’s innings, Shan Masood had showed the dangers of that approach, clubbing Liam Livingstone for 16 off his only over. This wasn’t a deck conducive to slow bowling.

Shaheen Shah Afridi of Pakistan leaves the MCG during the T20 World Cup final. (Photo by Cameron Spencer/Getty Images)

Making it even tougher was the known strength of Stokes and Moeen at hitting slow bowling down the ground; it has been a crucial part of England’s success this tournament to have such a capable middle order against spin.

Stokes sensed a kill, and went for it; yes, he was lucky to fall only fractionally short of hitting part-timer Iftikhar Ahmed to Babar at long on, but with a four and a six to end the over, the match had turned.

Pakistan had gone from defending 41 off five overs, with Afridi still holding two overs, the brilliant Haris Rauf one and Mohammad Wasim two, to defending 28 off four with another over of spin from Mohammad Nawaz still needed to get through. That very scenario had cost Pakistan dearly in their tournament opener against India, and brought about a significant change to their set-up, bringing Wasim in as a fourth seamer and sacrificing a part of their batting depth.

That surge, kickstarted by five balls from Iftikhar that went for 13 runs, meant Rauf’s final over could be sat on, and the blowtorch applied on young Wasim. England ended up with a full over in hand – but given that over would have needed to be the spin of Nawaz, they probably could have chased another 15 in the end.

Afridi didn’t need to produce anything remarkable. He didn’t need 150 kilometre an hour inswinging yorkers, brutal bouncers, or the sort of incisive, wonderful bowling Naseem Shah had produced earlier to leave Stokes completely bamboozled.

It was an impossible, unfair thing to ask of him – being a fast bowler is already the toughest ask in our sport, let alone when carrying a significant injury to a crucial body part.

No doubt Afridi would have feared costing his side the match by bowling when underdone when he made the decision to pull up stumps. Perhaps it wouldn’t have made any difference if he’d stayed on; perhaps Stokes and Ali would have clobbered him just as they had done Iftikhar.

But the pace-friendly pitch, the game situation, Afridi’s undeniable skill even when on one leg, and the significance of the event – Afridi and Pakistan may never get another chance in his career to play in a T20 World Cup final – plus the lack of backup options available to them, left them with no other choice.

Even if it was bowling off three steps, club-cricket style, he and the team just had to try something, anything, to get through his four overs.

Busted knee or not, Pakistan needed their champion to go above and beyond the call of duty on Sunday night.

The Crowd Says:

2022-11-14T20:11:58+00:00

max power

Guest


and it is written by an editor, who should know better

2022-11-14T20:10:49+00:00

max power

Guest


were you the doctor that studied his knee?

2022-11-14T12:46:47+00:00

HR

Guest


And I'd happily pay for the content.

2022-11-14T12:45:56+00:00

HR

Guest


Author engagement is one of the hall marks of this site... Or at least it was.

2022-11-14T12:03:38+00:00

Homer Gain

Guest


I think this a very silly article (the author almost seems to suggest as much). Even if you think T20 is important (and as an England supporter I'm much more interested in the forthcoming test series in Pakistan than this slap and tickle), to suggest a player should risk serious injury to bowl an additional eleven balls is daft. Better to criticise Pakistan for failing to select a team with sufficient options to cover the ever-present risk of injury (especially given that Afridi has only just come back from a serious knee injury), or a bowler's off day.

2022-11-14T11:35:38+00:00

Chum

Roar Rookie


You’re not paying a cent for this content, you don’t deserve a darn thing. Just make your comment, and get on with your life.

2022-11-14T07:28:29+00:00

HR

Guest


In the past when an author wrote an article on this website that was so thoroughly disagreed with, they would at least have the common decency to pop up and respond to some comments and perhaps justify their position, or indeed concede they've been out argued. It's a shame someone puts up an article like this and then hides. We deserved better than that level of indignation.

2022-11-14T05:57:00+00:00

Jon Snow

Roar Rookie


Playing through injuries is fine RS, broken rib, non - bowling hand sure but he couldnt load through the knee which meant he was basically useless.

2022-11-14T05:53:21+00:00

Chris Lewis

Roar Guru


Afridi wanted to play, but after one ball he and the team knew he could not. The right decision.

2022-11-14T05:45:21+00:00

Jon Snow

Roar Rookie


Shaheen played through the pain and bowled a trash ball which should have been dispatched. No point sending down another 5 balls of trash. He knew he was done so he did what was best for the team IMO. Another 5 balls to finish his over would have went for more than 13. Pakistan showed character all night but England were the better team.

2022-11-14T04:57:04+00:00

HR

Guest


Nah, he just wanted some good peking duck.

2022-11-14T04:14:23+00:00

nics

Roar Rookie


(1) Head hits can damage your cognitive ability and render you less capable of making a reasoned decision. That is why we have umpires and concussion stand-down rules, to protect players from causing themselves long-term injury. (2) Smith wasn't courageous enough to intervene when his senior opener asked his junior opener to use some sandpaper. (3) It's one thing to pad up and face a ball. It's another thing to sprint in and deliver said ball at 140-150km/h with accuracy with one bad knee, having just come off an ACL injury. (4) Did you complain when Pat Cummins had all those years out of the Australian team because of his succession of injuries after his first Test?

2022-11-14T02:48:03+00:00

Chum

Roar Rookie


Harold Holt should have just swum harder. Didn't want it enough.

2022-11-14T02:26:06+00:00

RS

Guest


Steve Smith did in 2019 at Lords. Very courageous.

2022-11-14T02:22:31+00:00

RS

Guest


Sorry? I see sport differently to you. That’s fine. I think I’ve got a small window into your personality though.

2022-11-14T01:34:11+00:00

Naughty's Headband

Roar Rookie


Tim obviously didn't see the bounce and turn that Rashid was getting. Warnie would have licked his lips bowling on something like that.

2022-11-14T01:16:32+00:00

NickNoel

Roar Rookie


Troll time.

2022-11-14T01:01:43+00:00

The Iron Dingo

Roar Rookie


Yeah, gotta go with the consensus here - bad call. Despite the author not wanting to criticise Shaheen the article implies that a choice was involved. Shaheen was obviously aware of the stakes and did everything he could including ill-advisedly bowling a delivery while significantly injured to test it out. To continue after that and risk further possible long term damage would have been reckless in the extreme. I was watching the match and it was obvious that without Shaheen Pakistan's slim hopes of victory had vanished and it did take the sting out of the match but to put the result on an injured player obviously having given his all is really poor form.

2022-11-14T00:56:15+00:00

nics

Roar Rookie


Tell me you bet your mortgage money without saying it...

2022-11-14T00:55:13+00:00

HR

Guest


However this was a moment for him to go another step. I think the issue with a knee injury is the physical inability to go another step....

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar