'We're ready to draw a line in the sand': Strike threat looms as players boycott NRL promotions over CBA stalemate

By Danielle Smith / Editor

Well, this doesn’t sound good.

Just 44 sleeps before the start of the 2023 NRL season, the players and clubs are taking a stand against head office dragging their feet on finalising the new collective bargaining agreement.

Boycotts of promotional days have begun this week and Broncos forward Kurt Capewell, who is a member of the RLPA advisory group, could not rule out strike action as a potential option if the NRL can’t strike a deal soon.

The All Stars game in New Zealand next month looms as the first major event under threat but when asked about a player strike on Tuesday, Capewell said “hopefully it doesn’t come to that”.

“(The NRL) have belief if they wait it out long enough we’re just going to have to sign (but) we’re not going to stand here and cop it,” Capewell said. “We’re ready to draw a line in the sand and we’ll make a stand.

“We don’t want it to come to (a player strike) but if the NRL are going to sit on their heels and not budge, who knows where it’s going to go? But I’m sure they’ll be able to see we’re not happy and how connected we are.”

Cronulla Sharks were the first club to make a stand with their players refusing to be interviewed or have their photos taken at a scheduled media opportunity on Monday, according to the Daily Telegraph.

Their local derby rivals made the same call on Tuesday morning, with the Dragons cancelling a scheduled media opportunity already pencilled in for the same day. And it seems the rest of the clubs are ready to follow suit.

The NRL increased total player payments by $980m from the previous CBA, offering $1.347b. There is also a new salary cap of $12.1 million for 2023, which is a 25 per cent increase from the previous year.

And while that sound like a lot of money, it’s not the main focus for the players, according to Melbourne co-captain and RLPA leadership group member Christian Welch.

(Photo by Mark Kolbe/Getty Images)

“I think with this CBA what gets lost is the non-financial things that we’re really working hard for – agreement rights, having trust in the RLPA being able to use the players’ money how it wants without having to go to the NRL,” Welch told SEN Radio.

“The financials are one thing and a big part of negotiations, but the rest of it, the terms of employment, has been a real struggle.

“We’re not asking for anything too unreasonable. We just want to get on with our jobs and play footy.”

Capewell said the players would remain united.

“It’s the NRL’s strategy to paint a picture of us (as greedy), wave a shiny toy in our face and hope we’re silly enough to run into that CBA,” he said. “There’s still so many parts that are nowhere near (acceptable) and we’re prepared to fight for what we think is fair.

“The CBA controls a lot more than just our salaries; we want a fair revenue share, a genuine seat at the table, and want to be heard. It’s not about the wage, it’s about setting up funding for past players, welfare and tertiary education.

“We didn’t ask for a salary cap without a CBA. We wanted to negotiate and agree to a CBA that includes a salary cap – that’s how all major sports work.

“At the moment we’re not doing the NRL (promotional) stuff … it’s something we’ve all decided to do and hopefully grabs the NRL’s attention and shows we’re not happy. This is the most united the playing group’s ever been.”

The players are standing firm that this means more to them than just dollars.

“This action is being driven by the players,” a senior player said. “The NRL doesn’t understand how unhealthy the relationship is with both the men and women.

“This is not about pay. It’s about the way the NRL have lacked respect in negotiations.”

NRLW players remain in even more limbo, with their season still up in the air because of the drama.

The 10 NRLW sides in the expanded competition have also been given a significant raise in their salary cap to $884,000.

Responding to the boycotts that look certain to affect the NRL official launch, an NRL spokesman said on Monday: “We are aware of some players not participating in today’s club photo sessions with NRL staff.

“We are in ongoing discussions with the RLPA regarding these and other issues and look forward to an exciting 2023 season for our fans.”

The players have tried really hard to not let this affect the fans, but the NRL had shown a lack of respect during the negotiations making the situation difficult.

“The game is for the fans. We love rugby league, we love playing it. We don’t want to disrupt it,” said Welch.

“We’ve seen that throughout the year with State of Origin, finals series, World Cup, there hasn’t been one instance where players have taken away from the game or the fans when, at times, we probably could have where we’ve felt a real lack of respect from the NRL in terms of negotiations.”

Cowboys halfback Chad Townsend has put his support behind the cause, posting on social media “We want a well-funded Past Players Program, better funding for the Injury Hardship Fund, funding for a Medical Support Fund, agreement rights on our employment conditions, match fees outside the cap, and a first-ever CBA for women. Their salary cap announcement doesn’t resolve any of that but it’s their way of hindering our wishes.”

It would be very difficult to prepare for the year ahead in your occupation when all of the paperwork is not in order. This is how the players feel. Seeing as this was meant to be finalised last November, Peter V’landys and Andrew Abdo better get their ducks in a row before there are potential threats of strikes.

Before you start rolling your eyes and saying “You lot get paid a fortune to play footy, just shut up and play!” despite that being incorrect, what is happening here is so much more than that. Not all players are on Jason Taumalolo or Ben Hunt money.

Some are waiting for this to all be sorted so they can lock in their futures, while others just want to know that everyone is getting a fair deal and being looked after.

There is nothing unreasonable in wanting to know everything is sorted when it comes to signing a contract, what you are getting paid is correct and that what you are expecting to get is secure.

Oh yeah, and ensuring you are getting that ‘respect’ thing. My goodness, that is just as important.

The Crowd Says:

2023-01-20T20:18:45+00:00

Richard POWELL

Roar Rookie


The RLPA needs to get their own house in order first, starting with some responsible leadership. Newton has had the gig too long and is stale and ineffective. Welch and co are too emotional. And it's not "our money"; it's the game's and the fans, and the sponsors. They're the ones putting out their hard earned so the players can enjoy an idyllic lifestyle. So what if Welch got a piece of paper from Harvard? They give them out like toys in corn flakes packets.

2023-01-19T14:07:20+00:00

andyfnq

Roar Rookie


Don't pretend to know if you are right or not, but if you are going to rage and have a go at people, have the balls to set up an account rather than hiding behind a guest account. It's not doing much for your credibility.

2023-01-19T14:05:13+00:00

andyfnq

Roar Rookie


Not sure strike action would automatically reflect badly on the players seeing as the NRL are the ones failing to meet their obligations and bargain in good faith. While I don't want a strike, I'll support the players if they feel they need to. My ire will be reserved for the grifters and morons that make up the NRL commission if it come to industrial action.

2023-01-19T13:54:10+00:00

andyfnq

Roar Rookie


Good on the players for not being bullied. Would hate to see the season delayed or matches abandoned, but it's a disgrace that this isn't already sorted, and the blame sits squarely with V'landys and NRL house. Solidarity with the players all the way.

2023-01-19T08:47:10+00:00

Sydney Professional

Guest


I was approached by a recruiter for a job at the NRL last year in marketing. My salary would have been 25% higher than what I was being paid at that time. I was amazed at the offer. I turned it down and took a job at another company. The NRL is obviously paying their staff very well. They should extend this to the players past and present. Otherwise, and I have heard this from people within 2 clubs independently, another Super League is being discussed and might be expedited sooner than later.

2023-01-19T04:15:08+00:00

woodart

Roar Rookie


quite correct. formula one is also a good example of what happens when competitors run the competition. they form a cartel to protect their patch and freeze out new competitors. league is not growing, but letting the current clubs run the comp would see the game shrink quickly.

2023-01-18T12:52:14+00:00

Dave

Guest


Agree Robbo, I’ve worked at an NRL club and while the vast majority are lovely blokes, the vast majority are also as dumb as a plank. They’ll all be parroting what they’re told to by the RLPA. Classic unionism at its finest

2023-01-18T09:25:55+00:00

Succhi

Roar Rookie


Good point BA. That’s why I don’t have a problem with the 50/50 split of th fund. Spreads the risk. Plenty of business people and ex players have lost plenty of money.

2023-01-18T09:23:40+00:00

Succhi

Roar Rookie


Depends who is the ex player, their business experience and education. And would they be neutral or biased to their ex club? For me, I would opt for an independent management of the funds if that was possible.

2023-01-18T07:51:59+00:00

Brett Allen

Roar Rookie


No they don’t. As a PLC member I have a limited ownership piece of PLC, not the Eels. Separation of entities is a very common thing. PLC & the Eels are completely seperate businesses and entities.

2023-01-18T07:22:04+00:00

mushi

Roar Guru


So you're saying the owners of a parent company don't own a subsidiary? You've just blown apart modern money Laundering laws

2023-01-18T07:19:23+00:00

mushi

Roar Guru


"It has nothing to do with" but it does the the restrictions of contract and ability to redeploy your services were part of the draft decision ergo you. Are. Full. Of. It

2023-01-18T07:19:04+00:00

Brett Allen

Roar Rookie


I’m not gonna argue with you, I know what i said and what I didn’t say. You can twist my words all you want.

2023-01-18T07:16:47+00:00

mushi

Roar Guru


The interpretation of contract still has to apply local law. It's why most major contracts specify the jurisdiction

2023-01-18T07:15:05+00:00

mushi

Roar Guru


Yes you did when you cut and pasted an nba construct for the nrl. And then you've doubled down with the afl reference here

2023-01-18T07:14:02+00:00

Brett Allen

Roar Rookie


I didn’t say that. I said that NRL players are subject to the labour conditions agreed to in the CBA, not under statutory labour conditions. NRL players don’t have standardised salaries or wages, they are individually negotiated within the CBA framework. The CBA sets the players working conditions.

2023-01-18T07:11:30+00:00

Brett Allen

Roar Rookie


Not really. The 17 clubs are the premiership, or the NRL. The rest of the game comes under the umbrella of the ARL. Most people aren’t aware of this, but the NRL & ARL are actually seperate entities.

2023-01-18T07:08:57+00:00

mushi

Roar Guru


So a contract about labour has nothing to do with labour... You're a special kind of not bright

2023-01-18T07:07:38+00:00

Brett Allen

Roar Rookie


Agreed.

2023-01-18T07:06:50+00:00

mushi

Roar Guru


Um except it does given they're part of yhe same entity

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar