'All parts of the game': World Rugby set to follow RFU's lead and lower tackle height

By Christy Doran / Editor

World Rugby has thrown its weight behind the Rugby Football Union’s decision to lower the tackle height to the waist and indicated that they too will be introducing similar measures at the elite level.

The RFU last week banned tackles above the waistline in the community game.

The monumental change sparked outrage across the world, with huge sections of the rugby community up in arms.

RFU boss Bill Sweeney is also coming under pressure to keep his job, with reports stating that a vote of no confidence is being prepared at the community game with close to 250 clubs supporting the special general meeting in the wake of the governing body’s new tackle laws.

But, in an interview with The Telegraph, World Rugby boss Alan Gilpin backed the RFU’s stance.

“The RFU obviously is in the process of implementing some changes around tackle height that we support,” Gilpin told The Telegraph.

“Because we know, from all of the research and science and medicine, that lowering the tackle height is a really important part of making the game safer.

World Rugby is considering following the RFU’s lead and lowering the tackle height to below the waist. Photo: Cameron Spencer/Getty Images

The Telegraph also reports World Rugby is planning to stage a global law trial from January 1, 2024, initially at the amateur level on lowering the tackle height. A decision on whether the prohibition on tackles would be above the waist or the sternum.

Any changes at the top end won’t be introduced overnight.

“Yes, we’re looking to make sure that we are implementing a lower tackle height across all parts of the game,” Gilpin said.

“How that’s actually implemented is slightly different in the community game to the elite game.”

For more than a decade World Rugby have increasingly attempted to get on top of foul play and, particularly, any contact with the head.

While Sam Warburton’s red card in the 2011 World Cup semi-final sparked fierce debate, the increased prevalence of the television match official in the years either side of the 2019 tournament has been met with mixed reaction.

World Rugby’s officiating has been influenced by medical research which has shown that players are more likely to be concussed from head to head, upright contact. It also comes as World Rugby and the RFU face a number of lawsuits against them for historically failing to adequately protect and educate players around the dangers of concussion.

It has led World Rugby to come down heavily on defenders who fail to drop their tackle height and make contact with the head.

World Rugby CEO Alan Gilpin (L) says the tackling height will be lowered in the years to come. Photo: Aurelien Meunier/Getty Images

Gilpin said it was World Rugby’s duty to usher through change and said issuing clear communication was crucial to their end goal of making the game safer.

“There’s a lot of work to do to educate people. But we’ve got to, as a sport, try to find that really difficult but hugely-important balance between safety but making the game entertaining to watch,” Gilpin told The Telegraph.

“It’s not binary. It’s not one or the other. It’s how do we make the game safer and a better spectacle to watch and a better game to play?

“It’s tough because it’s a really, really complex message to deliver. On one level, it’s very simple. We know from all the research that’s been done and is incredibly comprehensive, you’re four-and-a-half times more likely to sustain a head injury when you tackle from an upright position than when the tackler is bent at the waist.

“We need to get players tackling lower at every part of the game. Obviously, there’s an elite part of the game where we’re doing a huge amount of work and we’ve used sanctions, and red cards in particular, trying to drive changes in behaviour.

“When you look at the community game, it’s challenging to roll that out on a global basis.

“It requires significant buy-in from the game in different parts of the world.

“You’ll always have the traditionalists, I guess, who understandably say, ‘Stop tweaking things and don’t change too much, because we’re really concerned about losing the inherent fabric of the sport’ – and we all absolutely get that.

“At the same time, we’ve got to make sure that we are attracting people to the sport that is safe to play – or is as safe to play as a sport that’s a contact one can be.

“There’s always work to do in implementing change and how you can consult around change and how you communicate and educate around change. But the key message is let’s get the tackle height lower at every level of the game because that will reduce – absolutely reduce – the number of head injuries that we see in rugby. And that’s really important if, again, we’re going to win the battle for the hearts and minds of not just the young people we want to play the game, boys and girls, but the mums and dads who may be concerned about injuries in rugby.

“So, we’ve got a responsibility from a World Rugby perspective, to work hard with our member federations around the world.”

The Crowd Says:

2023-01-31T20:56:09+00:00

Muzzo

Roar Rookie


Well TBH as far as the Poms go. We are still waiting!

2023-01-30T06:40:44+00:00

Danny McGowan

Roar Rookie


Fair enough Stu!! Good reply! :stoked: :laughing:

2023-01-30T04:37:25+00:00

Stu

Roar Rookie


Actually yeah, I WAS an amazing player. There’s some more BS for ya..

2023-01-29T04:30:25+00:00

Danny McGowan

Roar Rookie


Yep Rigger , I haven't the detail of the tackle rules to be honest as it only in England, but I would guess that below the waist would be just waist area, as no ref could tell exactly where anybody's waist is. And to be honest I never coached 2 man tackles, just one man/kid etc. They were kids I coached and although pretty good didn't believe in over coaching anyway.

2023-01-28T20:16:03+00:00

Passit2me

Roar Rookie


I think the French have a better idea and they are seeing positive results. It is probably more the lawyers that will drive change in other codes such as the NRL, than anything else TBH, as I mentioned in another post about Ray price and Mario Fenech.

2023-01-28T19:40:20+00:00

Jacko

Roar Rookie


Well Ill agree to disagree. I cannot see how an illegal tackle at one position on the field will be legal in a different position on the field. If the decree is waist height or its sternum height that is what will be ruled on.

2023-01-28T15:11:41+00:00

Mo

Guest


I thought the science was that stopping big concussions still wasn’t going to prevent CTE. It may but I don’t know have helped Dane haylett petty

2023-01-28T14:35:16+00:00

scrum

Roar Rookie


No I am not guessing . This was raised previously when WR announced guidelines on high tackles. It never became an issue and will not this time. All the worries proved unfounded

2023-01-28T12:50:15+00:00

vonManstein

Roar Rookie


Can't see it myself, Passit. Concussion stats would have to plummet before the cotton wool society folk jump on board. And a full flight knee/hip to the head does just as much damage. I'll have to see it to believe it, because the various body types which make rugger accessible won't be sustainable under these new rules. Radical spill off changes ahead. Hey ho.

2023-01-28T10:55:52+00:00

AndyS

Guest


Indeed; they proclaimed 'below the nipple', but never seemed to feed back how that trial went. Seemed like the most likely to succeed, but...?

2023-01-28T10:46:00+00:00

Passit2me

Roar Rookie


Personally, below the armpits deems realistic given the highly dynamic and at times unpredictable nature of the sport. As players get tired, they forget to bend their knees in defence, but they need specific training around this to avoid it happening.

2023-01-28T10:42:37+00:00

Kashmir Pete

Roar Guru


Ferret Same offer as piru. What is your preferred case, if willing to bet me my case of coopers? KP

2023-01-28T10:41:54+00:00

Passit2me

Roar Rookie


Fair enough Andy, I agree. The French and NZ trial is much more logical. The waist and below law will be a farce if it is actually fully adopted and will be short lived. Imagine trying to ref contact that is at the waist, below the lower arch of the ribs, but not at the sternum for example. It will very quickly become the biggest joke in sport.

2023-01-28T10:36:27+00:00

Kashmir Pete

Roar Guru


Play your last game? :happy:

2023-01-28T10:35:29+00:00

Kashmir Pete

Roar Guru


I'd argue the change legislates smaller players back into the game.

2023-01-28T10:33:14+00:00

Kashmir Pete

Roar Guru


Depends where they draw the line.

2023-01-28T10:30:39+00:00

Kashmir Pete

Roar Guru


:silly:

2023-01-28T10:01:59+00:00

Harry Jones

Expert


I’ll weigh in more fully after I’ve done more delving into attitudes in a schools team I’m helping coach

2023-01-28T08:27:15+00:00

AndyS

Guest


That would make it the same as below the nipple, and this is clearly not that as that was separately trialled. Solar plexus is directly below the sternum, and in no world is that the waist. If they start playing it like that, the law wont be worth the paper it's written on.

2023-01-28T07:48:21+00:00

PeterK

Roar Guru


of course not

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar