'Worst thing I’ve ever seen in cricket': Broad, McCullum whinge about Bairstow drama but McDonald returns serve

By Paul Suttor / Expert

Andrew McDonald remains adamant his side did nothing wrong despite England coach Brendon McCullum’s claims the hosts no longer want to have a drink with Australia’s players after Jonny Bairstow’s controversial Ashes stumping. 

McDonald jumped to the defence of his players over the dismissal, which came after the England star wandered down the pitch and was stumped on Sunday as the second Test reach fever-pitch.

The Australia coach revealed it was a set plan to attempt to dismiss Bairstow in that fashion, after players noticed he regularly left his ground after a delivery.

England remain furious over the matter, with McCullum and captain Ben Stokes claiming they would have withdrawn their appeal if the situation were reversed.

“I can’t imagine we’ll be having a beer with them any time soon,” McCullum told the BBC when asked about relations between the two teams. “You’ve got to live with the decisions you make, and that’s life. But I feel … if we were in the same situation, we might’ve made a different decision.”

Ben Stokes speaks to the umpires after Jonny Bairstow was run out. (Photo by Ryan Pierse/Getty Images)

McDonald was left unimpressed by his opposite number’s take on the situation, saying he was “somewhat disappointed” by McCullum’s comments.

The England criticism is likely to raise eyebrows in Australia’s camp, after McCullum twice ran players out through his Test career as batsmen were celebrating milestones.

Veteran seamer Stuart Broad lashed out at Alex Carey over the controversial dismissal of Bairstow by sledging the keeper with “That’s all you’ll ever be remembered for” in a comment that was picked up by the stump microphones.

Broad was also overheard saying Carey’s stumping was “literally the worst thing I’ve ever seen in cricket”.

He kept up the gamesmanship by mocking Carey at the end of several overs by deliberately placing his bat well behind the crease and asking the fielders if the ball was officially dead so he could move out of his crease.

Social media lit up with the hypocrisy of Broad’s comment given his infamous decision not to walk after edging Ashton Agar to slip in the 2013 Ashes series.

There was also another clip which showed McCullum doing the same thing while representing New Zealand in a one-dayer in 2009, coincidentally trying to dismiss Paul Collingwood, who is now also on the England coaching staff.

On that occasion, Collingwood was given not out because the umpires had called over and the ball was considered dead.

Interestingly, in 2016, McCullum apologised to Sri Lankan duo Kumar Sangakkara and Muttiah Muralitharan for running out the bowler in a Test 10 years earlier.

Sangakkara hit a single to bring up a century as the last wicket pair completed their run. Before the ball was “dead”, Muralitharan was walking back to celebrate with his partner but was run out by McCullum.

In his MCC address, McCullum said he was entitled to do what he did but, in hindsight, believed his act went against the ‘spirit of the game’.

“As much as it pains me to talk about it publicly, I’ll tell you about how I ran out Muttiah Muralitharan,” McCullum said in 2016.

“We were playing Sri Lanka at Lancaster Park in Christchurch in late 2006. Kumar Sangakkara scored a magnificent hundred in the second innings. When Kumar reached his hundred, Sri Lanka was nine [wickets] down. The ball was still in the air, being returned to me as the wicket-keeper. When Murali left his ground to congratulate Kumar on reaching his hundred, it landed in my gloves. I removed the bails and appealed. Murali was given out and we went on to win the match.

“Not surprisingly, the incident created controversy and bad feelings. The Sri Lankans were stunned. Their captain Mahela Jayawardene – another good man – said at the time, ‘Legally it was run out, the ball was alive but we play in an age where we talk about the spirit of the game. Hopefully it won’t happen again, it’s not the way to play cricket.’

“If I could turn back time, I would. We were within the laws of the game, but not the spirit. And there is a very, very important difference which is glaringly obvious to me years later.”

England captain Ben Stokes claimed after the match he would have withdrawn the appeal had he been in Australia’s shoes, reasoning that Bairstow had thought the ball was dead and it was over.

Australia have argued the decision lay with the umpires, and Bairstow left his crease before over was called.

McDonald said he understood the dismissal may be polarising, but was adamant his team had done nothing wrong in claiming the wicket in the 43-run victory.

“It got sent upstairs and ultimately the officiating third umpire decides it’s out and it’s within the laws of the game,” McDonald said. “I don’t see too many issues with it.”

England’s main gripe was that Bairstow thought the ball was dead, given it was the last delivery of the over.

However, replays showed the England man regularly walked out of his crease after deliveries, a point Australia had also picked up on.

“When a player is leaving their crease or leaving their ground at certain periods of time, you take that opportunity,” McDonald said.

“There was some conversation around Jonny leaving the crease, and Alex Carey took that opportunity. The ball is still live in our minds.

“It’s like when a player is running down the wicket to Nathan Lyon, does he take the opportunity to fire a ball down leg side because he’s leaving his crease?

“There’s no doubt about that.”

Australia’s captain Pat Cummins pointed out post-match that Bairstow had regularly underarmed the ball at the stumps himself when wicketkeeping after players left the crease.

“You see Jonny do it all the time … it’s a really common thing for keepers to do,” Cummins said.

McCullum also indicated he would have ensured England would have withdrawn the appeal, while attacking Australia’s sportsmanship.

“I was lucky enough to play for a long period of time and you learn over a long period that the game and the spirit of the game is so vital to this great game,” McCullum said. 

“It’s one thing we’ve got that other sports maybe don’t have, and to uphold that is such an important part of it. 

“In the end you’ve got to live with the decisions you make, and that’s life. 

“But I feel from our point of view, if we were in the same situation, we might’ve made a different decision.”

The Bairstow wicket left England 5-193 in pursuit of 371 for victory, before a counter-attacking 155 from Stokes allowed England to get 327 before they were bowled out in pursuit of 371.

Australia were jeered continually by the crowd after that point, and have claimed they copped verbal abuse and physical contact from fans as they walked through the Lord’s Long Room at lunch.

with AAP

The Crowd Says:

2023-07-06T15:11:23+00:00

Stuart B

Roar Rookie


They should erect a wire fence between the toffs and where the players walk past, so the members understand that they're really like football yobs in clown jackets.

2023-07-04T23:50:19+00:00

Don Freo

Roar Rookie


Call back Shane Warne after getting out on 99...off a no ball.

2023-07-04T23:48:52+00:00

Don Freo

Roar Rookie


In this post-religious age, there's not many who believe in Spirit...sadly.

2023-07-04T23:47:27+00:00

Don Freo

Roar Rookie


Perhaps the best comment of all of the thousands made on this issue.

2023-07-04T23:43:40+00:00

Don Freo

Roar Rookie


I like the idea of no longer walking through the Long Room. Those old WASPs will have nothing left to live for.

2023-07-04T05:57:49+00:00

Ben Pobjie

Expert


Omg how cutting

2023-07-04T05:09:08+00:00

Khun Phil

Roar Rookie


No it's not the childish "he done it first" argument.I was taught as a junior cricketer,never to leave your crease.Bairstow attempted exactly the same type of dismissal,which is totally legal,and you see many keepers try it.Ironic that he got out the same way.If Carey had held onto the ball and waited until Bairstow left the crease,then I would condemn his actions too,but he threw at the stumps the moment after catching the ball.Big difference!

2023-07-04T03:31:44+00:00

JamesH

Roar Guru


:laughing:

2023-07-04T00:32:03+00:00

RayinSydney

Roar Rookie


The comment was 'but hey, it was devised by a Kiwi'....what's that got to do with anything?...

2023-07-04T00:26:16+00:00

Jez North

Roar Rookie


Well he is a kiwi and he is lecturing Australians in sanctimonious fashion, blissfully ignorant of the fact he is a posturing hypocrite. Do you honestly think you wouldn’t have noticed if an Australian coach attacked the integrity of the New Zealander national team ?

2023-07-04T00:08:25+00:00

DaveJ

Roar Rookie


No, your comment was dumb.

2023-07-03T23:48:32+00:00

Barb Dwyer

Roar Rookie


Yep. Australians should not go through the long room again. The members have shown they are no better than the plebs in the outer, probably worse. Despite the fact that they believe their stripey jackets somehow make them superior; this attitude is hundreds of years in the making.

2023-07-03T23:37:02+00:00

BigGordon

Roar Rookie


Thanks for letting me know about this story Barb. I just read it and as you say, it's a great article which highlights an obvious problem with English cricket - how can those being abused expect change when MCC members are allowed to say what they like with impunity? The shameful part for me about the incident in the Long Room was that no members at the time seemed to try to stop it. That implies all members were in agreement that abusing cricketers was acceptable. I've heard guys swearing at footy games and they're quickly called out by other people - and that's in the general areas. This was many times worse behaviour yet it was almost condoned by all present.

2023-07-03T22:59:42+00:00

Barb Dwyer

Roar Rookie


Great article by Chip Le Grand in the Age this morning regarding this.

2023-07-03T21:53:16+00:00

JohnB

Roar Rookie


So it's a do as I say, not as I did situation.

2023-07-03T21:39:55+00:00

BigGordon

Roar Rookie


I also question why those MCC members who abused the Australian players and were identified by Khawaja, etc weren't escorted from the ground. As you suggest, the spirit of cricket was alive and well at Lords - not!!

2023-07-03T17:40:32+00:00

Ben Pobjie

Expert


Every batter who has ever been mankaded had a warning. The warning is called the Laws of Cricket.

2023-07-03T16:41:36+00:00

Ben Pobjie

Expert


It was. The bat was dumb, the field was smart. The field won.

2023-07-03T16:39:16+00:00

Ben Pobjie

Expert


And also no matter what the reason he leaves the crease, as long as the ball is not dead.

2023-07-03T16:33:45+00:00

Ben Pobjie

Expert


Geez, how long have you been watching cricket, that it's THIS Australian team you find too arrogant?

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar