Northern View: It's not whingeing if it's true - this Ashes anti-climax was completely avoidable

By Mick Cleary / Expert

Here’s a thing – why are you reading this tale of Ashes-losing woe at a sodden Old Trafford and not feasting on the exhilarating details of a rain-deferred Monday’s play?

It rains. In England. In the summer. For most of Saturday. And all of Sunday. Who’d have thunk it? Who could have forecast that in benighted Blighty? So not only did a rip-roaring Test match (ok, that’s from an England perspective) become a literal damp squib but so did the entire raison d-etre of the series get settled on a weather-related technicality. To the victor the spoils. Bye ‘bye little urn.

But it could have been different. What about having a reserve day as a matter of course built into what is admittedly a ludicrously cramped schedule? It happens in other tournaments. It used to happen at Wimbledon until someone had the clever idea of putting a roof over the showpiece courts.

Meanwhile, as the increasingly gloomy weather bulletins came from Old Trafford during the day, so did shots of the world’s best golfers, admittedly swaddled to the gills, playing to the top of their game at Hoylake (under an hour’s drive away from Manchester) fill TV screens. It’s not easy hitting golf balls in the wet either. ( All right. All right. No one is hurling a golf ball at your head at 90mph).

The point stands, though. Cricket doesn’t help itself with its tortoise-like over rates, its slavish devotion to start and finish times, particularly in an English summer when it is light until 9.30-10pm, its faffing about with light meters including the ludicrous sight of umpire Joel Wilson telling England it was too dark to operate their fast bowlers on Saturday, an instruction handed out by a man wearing sunglasses.

Why not start early, cancel lunch or tea or just do something, anything to make sure a contest is settled out there is should be settled and not from under an umbrella?

This is not meant to be a typical whingeing Pom piece (Irish passport holder since you ask), a straw-clutching bleat about how England deserved better from the series, that they had played the more forceful, match-shaping cricket, that they ought to have had at least a share of the spoils as they headed to the Oval for the fifth and final Test.

No, they didn’t. They lost fair and square at Edgbaston and at Lord’s. The scoreboard tells you that. Loud and clear. Bazball is not some sort of Hollywood gimmick. Yes, there may be a secondary purpose to the whizz-bang style in getting bums on seats for Test cricket as shown by the fact that there has scarcely been a seat to be had no matter how well-resourced a bum you might be, but it’s essential objective was to get the best from this generation of England cricketer, to bring them out of their shells in order to WIN. Yes, to win. And it has worked. From one victory in 17 matches to ten wins in the preceding 11 Tests at the start of the summer. But not this time.

England captain Ben Stokes after day five of the Test at Old Trafford. (Photo by Stu Forster/Getty Images)

Ben Stokes of England looks on during the end of match presentations. (Photo by Clive Mason/Getty Images)

The style of play in this Ashes has been a delight, a buccaneering, odds-defying, adrenalin-fuelled joy ride. But Australia came to Old Trafford with a 2-1 advantage. They also came with the Ashes. They are the holders. They get the benefit on both counts of any weather-related hocus-pocus.

Cricket is about many things, from warm beer on village greens to fast-track mayhem in the Caribbean to dusty turners in Delhi, and chief among its wonderful traits is luck. The toss. The edge over the slip cordon. The cloud cover. It is about dealing with random fate at times and getting on with it.

It’s about recognising the sport for what it is – flawed in many ways but cricket nonetheless. We love it for what it is and what it produces as those lovely scenes of Zak Crawley being congratulated by a cavalcade of Aussies when his barnstorming knock of 189 in 182 balls finally came to an end on Thursday afternoon. That was a proper bit of sport.

Zak Crawley celebrates reaching his century. (Photo by Martin Rickett/PA Images via Getty Images)

The Great Old Trafford Anti-Climax should not dampen our spirits for too long. There is a final Test to round off a series that was much-anticipated yet which has managed to exceed even those fingers-crossed expectations. There has barely been a dull session let alone a below-par match. England have set the tone but Australia has played its part. They might well have lost their way in this Test match, going all England of old, cautious and conservative, lily-livered time-wasters, reactive rather than proactive, reducing Pat Cummins to a boggle-eyed, what the f— is going on at one point, but they found a way to endure. And anyone who thinks that they will settle for merely retaining the urn as mission accomplished knows nothing of the Aussie psyche. Australia have not won a series here since 2001.

They know that will be a galvanising force at the Oval. As do England. It doesn’t matter that England had by far the better of this match, in fact, of this series. History books, though, don’t contain asterisks against an outcome. Nor should they. England will be mega-desperate to end the summer at 2-2. To lose 3-1 would give them no get-out clauses. It would be a stuffing.

They will head south to London with good reason for optimism. Crawley is in fabulous nick (I know that has been said before) while Joe Root also looked set fair only to get daisy-cutting snorter. Bazball has many strands but if it can be reduced to one element it is a trust in people. It’s a sporting tree-hugger. It is life-affirming in its way. Crawley has benefited and finally, finally, so too has Bairstow, taking a ripper behind the stumps before thrashing the spinner-less Aussie bowlers to kingdom come.

The urn may be heading back to Oz but at least cricket has done its bit to cement its place in the British sporting consciousness which can be a fickle habitat. English cricket has led the way. Even a snarky Eddie Jones should acknowledge that. The feats of Stokes and his merry men – chapeau to Mark Wood and Chris Woakes in particular as well as Stuart Broad, Aussie-like in his spikey-competitiveness – have been the talk of the land over this past five to six weeks. If only it hadn’t rained in Manchester. Could be a mournful Smiths’ song that one.

The Crowd Says:

2023-07-25T10:41:13+00:00

The Barry

Roar Guru


You haven’t at all I’ve just posted a detailed response, it’s been held up for moderation. Hopefully it gets through…

2023-07-25T10:36:27+00:00

The Barry

Roar Guru


Well the first six paragraphs are literally bemoaning not having an ‘extra’ day, or playing late, or starting early, or playing through lunch and not having umpires stop play for bad light… Which all would have been great points before a ball was bowled in the series, but just sound like a load of sour grapes after a rain delay that may have cost England a win The rest is littered with gems like “England have set the tone” and “It doesn’t matter that England had by far the better of this match, in fact, of this series” and “English cricket has led the way” and “If only it hadn’t rained in Manchester”. What part of any of that is “the exact opposite” to saying England was the better team??? You literally wrote that England had had the best of the match and IN FACT the series Even the statement, oft repeated over the past week: “Australia have (sic) not won a series here since 2001” while true paints one side of a story, suggesting that Ashes cricket has been one sided to England. However fails to acknowledge that since (not including) that 2001 series, the series score is 5-all, with one drawn and Australia leads the head to count 31-17 I don’t know mate, maybe you had different intentions, but this has just come across as the most recent in a long like of “we shoulda, woulda, coulda, change all the rules cuz we wuz the best team but we wuz robbed…”

AUTHOR

2023-07-25T08:37:08+00:00

Mick Cleary

Expert


Think you’ll find I’ve said the exact opposite

2023-07-25T04:58:49+00:00

The Barry

Roar Guru


It’s ridiculous. Both teams held momentum at various stages of the first three tests and the score stood at 2-1 Australia Getting sick of this sour grape English “yeah but, but we were the better team”

2023-07-25T04:56:53+00:00

The Barry

Roar Guru


If this really was a “who’d have thunk it?” why is this article being written after the 4th test and not before the series started…?

2023-07-25T01:58:16+00:00

Rellum

Roar Guru


In the history of CricViz!!!

2023-07-25T01:37:48+00:00

Opeo

Roar Rookie


In all cricket? Ever? Or is this just for England, or just this series? Sorry for all the questions but I want to be sure I have understood you right.

2023-07-25T01:26:21+00:00

Rellum

Roar Guru


It was some metric of lowest correct shots played in a century

2023-07-25T01:03:24+00:00

Opeo

Roar Rookie


the luckiest century they have recorded.” What are the details here? Are you saying that it was the luckiest innings ever?

2023-07-24T21:51:56+00:00

Curmudgeon1961

Roar Rookie


Well lately they have been Colin incl the WTC. Cummins has driven that

2023-07-24T18:25:27+00:00

Rowdy

Roar Rookie


The WTC was devoid of much

2023-07-24T18:19:42+00:00

Rowdy

Roar Rookie


If PiE don't throw, l don't eat

2023-07-24T18:18:42+00:00

Rowdy

Roar Rookie


I get by 38% of the time like that.

2023-07-24T13:50:08+00:00

Wes P

Roar Rookie


I enjoyed this article too. And totally agree with the view that test cricket wastes time. For mine it's 2-2 heading into the 5th. Much to play for if you have any pride.

2023-07-24T12:57:40+00:00

Buster

Roar Rookie


"chief among its wonderful traits is luck. The toss. The edge over the slip cordon. The cloud cover." England had this trait in spades until the rain in Manchester Can't ever remember a team winning 4 tosses in a row Seemed like very time we batted the clouds rolled in and as soon as it was their turn the sun shone brightly. The luck had to change and it did

2023-07-24T12:54:42+00:00

Warren Turner

Roar Rookie


Didn't the Poms win the first Test - sure I can recall one of them saying that. Waiting for them to say they won Old Trafford too!

2023-07-24T12:52:22+00:00

Warren Turner

Roar Rookie


What will be they be like if they ever get a Pommy captain or Coach again!

2023-07-24T12:50:31+00:00

Warren Turner

Roar Rookie


Might have something to do with the fact that they can't win at sports they invented!

2023-07-24T11:26:20+00:00

Art3mis

Roar Rookie


. . . and I struggle with the narrative that England dominated the rain affected game. This narrative assumes weather conditions instead of downpours were cloudy and favourable to swing bowling. If the last two days were sunny and not overcast and wet who is to say Marnus instead of getting out on 111 scored over 150 and Marsh, Green and Carey flourished in ideal batting conditions. The game would have perhaps gone to the wire again. Any scenario, other than the rain that fell, is speculation and hypothetical. Personally, I thought Cummins decision to bowl ‘dry’ and burn time threw the gauntlet down to Stokes which he failed to pick up. Stokes needed 20 wickets to stay in the series. That should have been his priority. With an innings in hand and weather closing in his best chance of winning was get the wickets first chase the runs later. His non-declaration was more flawed than his edgbaston declaration.

2023-07-24T11:15:57+00:00

Doctor Rotcod

Roar Rookie


Polishing the ordure you mean

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar