The Wrap: Don’t buy Eddie Jones taking the blame for another Bledisloe loss, buy the hope instead

By Geoff Parkes / Expert

The aftermath of last year’s Bledisloe Cup match in Melbourne, won by the All Blacks 39-37, after referee Mathieu Raynal insisted Bernard Foley shake things along faster than what he was comfortable with, was the most confusing I’ve experienced following any rugby match.

It might not always seem obvious to readers, but the task of writing about a game is always made easier when there is a clear understanding of what just played out. Sitting alone in a darkened room, well past midnight, trying to make sense of the mayhem, was not one of those moments.

The contrast to this year’s 38-7 win by the All Blacks, played in front of just under 84,000 at the MCG, couldn’t be starker.

Nothing lost in translation, no hidden messages, no last gasp heroics or heartbreak. Just two sides at demonstrably different stages of their development, doing more or less what was expected of them, each with a clear pathway up to and into the World Cup.

One of the characteristics of Wallabies coach Eddie Jones is that, outside of his inner circle, you can never quite be sure what is said in jest, what is said to pump up the profile of the sport, and what is genuinely introspective.

His post-match press conference illustrated that beautifully, with Jones inviting all and sundry to blame him for the loss, before pointing to the first half of both halves as evidence that his side is making progress.

I’m not buying the first one for a second; Jones knows he has a blank sheet, with his assignment due for submission on due date of Saturday 28th October; not this week or next. He invites criticism of himself because he knows it can’t be fully justified, and because it shields his players.

On the second point, I am inclined to buy what Jones is selling, and it is here where the framing of this loss as a Dave Rennie versus Eddie Jones, 38% versus 0% proposition, is all wrong.

Wallabies’ fans are paying for this result and two decades of similar let-downs, because Australian rugby’s historical, structural, geographic, commercial, political and cultural impediments have never been adequately recognised and addressed. Not because Jones. Not because Rennie.

That will change only when there is a leader emerge with the vision, credibility, work ethic and persuasiveness to align all of rugby in Australia behind a cohesive plan to drag its high-performance program into global rugby’s top echelon, and simultaneously, reconnect all strands of the game together.

Where Rennie versus Jones is relevant, is that Rennie invested three years of what he assumed was a four-year World Cup cycle, into trying out a wide range of players and combinations. This year would have seen the focus narrow and selection continuity increase, to meet a rightful expectation of converting some of 2022’s close losses into wins.

(Photo by Harry Trump/Getty Images)

But instead of stepping forward off what appeared – to many fair observers – to be a steadily firming base, Jones’ appointment immediately threw the switch back into development mode.

From Jones’ perspective that’s fair enough; he’s never been one to apply the icing to someone else’s cake. But with only a five-Test runway into a World Cup, that’s really too late in the day to be reverting to finding out who can play and who can’t, and at the same time, be expecting the Wallabies to offer a credible presence in France.

That folly – or genius – will form the basis for judgment of Rugby Australia chairman, Hamish McLennan; well ahead of the time Joseph Suaalii is scheduled to ride in as Australian rugby’s latest ‘white knight’.

In the meantime, Jones is right to point to demonstrable progress having been made in three matches.

The main criticism of the Wallabies in South Africa was that they asked no hard questions of their opponent. This was not the case here. For two quarters, the Wallabies fronted and looked and felt like an international rugby team.

There was shape and variation in attack, and a defensive line that wrestled hard in the tackle and was often successful in slowing down the All Black’s recycle, and putting pressure on Aaron Smith.

While hard-to-please All Blacks’ fans lament their side’s inability to carve the Wallabies up at will, coach Ian Foster had it right afterwards when he acknowledged the Wallabies combativeness.

Note also how the Wallabies’ defensive effort wasn’t compromised by the usual concession of cheap penalties for offside or breakdown infringements. Tom Hooper’s 30 tackles, complemented by Rob Valetini (20) and Nick Frost (23), hint at better days ahead.

Make sure of your place in the stands to see the British and Irish Lions in 2025. Tour packages on sale now at Wallabies Travel

Improved discipline in general play only made it the more confounding that another two players were lost during the match to yellow cards; twenty costly minutes where four of New Zealand’s six tries were scored.

Also pleasing was the Wallabies’ lineout; clean with crisp and accurate throwing, albeit the decision to go straight off the top to Tate McDermott on his own goal-line in the fourth minute, leaving the door open and the red carpet laid out for Scott Barrett, showed a startling lack of match awareness.

Angus Bell got more minutes than he would have expected, but that only allowed him to display more of his enormous – and still untapped – talent. Bell’s pace is remarkable for a man of his size; surely making him world rugby’s pre-eminent kinetic energy generator.

On the downside, there were the familiar individual lapses, including a straightforward penalty miss from new flyhalf Carter Gordon, added to a failed re-start. Gordon has oodles of talent and a thick skin. He’ll need it; after all, Quade Cooper has never been forgiven for kicking off on the full against the All Blacks, in Auckland, in 2011.

Carter Gordon of Wallabies (Photo by Pete Dovgan/Speed Media/Icon Sportswire via Getty Images)

Jones identified ‘red zone’ conversion as another necessary work-on, no better highlighted by the try scored by Will Jordan after the halftime siren, where the All Blacks patiently probed through 21 phases before finally creating an opportunity for their star winger.

By contrast, presented with an opportunity from the 2nd half kick-off courtesy of a Will Skelton steal, instead of applying immediate pressure on the All Blacks’ line, Jordan Petaia let them off the hook with a meaningless, ‘soft option’ grubber.

For all the starch in the defensive line, questions remain about the role of Marika Koroibete, for two of the All Blacks’ tries, found too far infield, in motion, looking to cover too many men.

The biggest concern for Jones however is on the tighthead side of the scrum, with Alan Ala’alatoa suffering a long-term Achilles injury, and Taniela Tupou clearly a long way from true Test match-level fitness.

Thinking on his feet afterwards, Jones offered up the prospect of switching James Slipper across, or looking to Zane Nonggorr; neither prospect likely to send shivers through the rest of the global rugby community.

Whatever happens in the front row, the Wallabies must continue their improvement in Dunedin next weekend. Almost certainly, the All Blacks will make changes; not out of disrespect, but because they need to get game time into a number of their players, and finalise the last couple of World Cup places.

Some that reasoning applies to Jones as well, but if the Wallabies can regroup quickly this week, the opportunity is there for another step forward.

Meanwhile, in the black corner, there are few concerns on the injury front, delight at the retention of the Bledisloe Cup, and further validation of the decision to determine the futures of Foster and Scott Robertson ahead of the pressure cooker environment of the World Cup.

Important players have carried their Super Rugby form into the internationals; Scott Barrett and Mark Telea at the top of that list, while new halfback Cam Roigard made a good fist of the first of what will surely be many Test matches to come.

At flyhalf, Richie Mo’unga continues to operate in the sweet spot between freedom of expression and respect for the basics of Test rugby; always a threat because of his speed. He was also unlucky not to be awarded a spectacular try, after a back-tracking, fumbling Koroibete was afforded more protection by the officials than what he probably deserved.

Both Barrett and Telea featured in the try of the match in the 65th minute; the All Blacks going ‘coast to coast’ from a kick-off, with Telea’s footwork on Koroibete a hybrid glide/shimmy of exquisite beauty.

Afterwards I queried Foster on whether the All Blacks’ hammering the blindside was a tactic designed specifically for the Wallabies, or a continuation of the desire shown this year to play a more direct, confrontational game, to avoid being caught playing behind the advantage line in midfield?

“A bit of both,” was his answer, and while some fans were frustrated by the All Blacks’ apparent lack of ambition, I’d offer that this is a sign of the growing maturity of this side, prepared to roll up the sleeves and batter an opponent into submission, rather than expect doors to open in the wider channels as of right.

Head coach Ian Foster  (Photo by Phil Walter/Getty Images)

With the Wallabies forced to make 248 tackles, there was always going to be a pay-off late in the match; as there was when three tries came in quick succession.

Another star of the match was referee Wayne Barnes, who has mastered the art of simultaneously imposing his authority on a match, whilst getting out of the way and letting the players play.

Unless England come from the clouds in France – remembering that they are on the same ‘friendly’ side of the draw as Australia – Barnes looks to be a lock for the World Cup final.

The other winner on the night was Melbourne, albeit with some qualifications. Despite widespread negativity around the Andrews’ state government ditching the Commonwealth Games, the 83,499 roll up – the largest Wallabies home crowd since 2001, for a side not expected to win – puts Melbourne clearly in the frame for 2027 World Cup final hosting rights.

That number would become 100,000 for the final and, along with whatever cash the state government throws in as a sweetener on top – because that’s what all governments do when they chase vanity projects like this – the case for the MCG hosting the final, with both semis going to Sydney as consolation, would be compelling.

All Blacks players celebrate at the MCG. (Photo by Morgan Hancock/Getty Images)

That’s where the fun ends, however. The trade-off for having 100,000 people at a rugby game in a cricket/AFL stadium, is that most of them sit two postcodes away from the action.

If it’s atmosphere you want, 26,000 people at CommBank Stadium, Parramatta, is a much better option. But of course, that’s not how these things work.

The hard times suffered by Wallabies supporters over recent years, and again here, with another match fallen by the wayside, are impactful and hurtful. Last week’s dozen reasons why the Wallabies can’t win the World Cup, remain.

At least Rugby Australia are able to bank a mini-windfall from a gate given a kick-along by the incessant and self-less promotion of rugby undertaken by Jones.

How big will the MCG need to be if one day, the hope that Jones is selling turns into reality, and the Wallabies start winning?

Sports opinion delivered daily 

   

The Crowd Says:

2023-08-02T23:26:24+00:00

Muzzo

Roar Rookie


Yeh Phil, but we all have an opinion, as in mine I actually thought he was excellent. After all he did ref more than one RWC final. Peyper is good as well, as most South african refs in the pro era are. On the Wallabies, IMO it relates back to some coaches they've had, in not being able to install, in some cases, discipline. We've seen it more so in the professional era where it's not only the Wallabies but others, & that in truth, is a coaching failure. TBH, back in the day, we used to get a boot firmly planted in you know where, along with a smack under the ear, & were told to address officialdom as ' Sir ' . How often do you see that now, or even hear of it?

2023-08-02T03:39:01+00:00

Khun Phil

Roar Rookie


Excellent summary,mz!Also thought Gordon looked right at home in test rugby and those type of mistakes can be eliminated.Still not sure of Tate's passing,although he had interference with a couple of the bad ones.

2023-08-02T03:31:34+00:00

Khun Phil

Roar Rookie


Muzzo,I was being a bit tongue in cheek about Owens.I actually liked him as a ref.It's just that a lot of people seemed to think he gave NZ an easy ride,particularly Richie,but I don't really subscribe to that. I think all teams have refs they do better or worse with,but I really don't think the refs have any bias.The Wallabies always seem to have trouble with Peyper.

2023-08-01T12:16:22+00:00

Tipene Roar

Roar Rookie


Lots of words just to say they are rubbish

2023-08-01T03:50:57+00:00

Adsa

Roar Rookie


That sounds realistic :thumbup:

2023-08-01T00:28:46+00:00

Wig

Roar Rookie


I'll move back to the moulbourough sounds top of the south after I win the lotto. I've still got work to do here being a thorn in the side of some hahaha

2023-07-31T22:46:58+00:00

K.F.T.D.

Roar Rookie


Bless you if you can be bothered to coach. My wife teaches in a very poor socio economic area. The school captain tried to stab the principal, a lot kids live with carers, in cars , parents in jail. Areas like that need team sports and what it brings. I used to captain coach.

2023-07-31T22:36:34+00:00

Cam

Roar Rookie


The other interesting thing about regional rugby, is it really debunks the elitism narrative that gets thrown around quite a lot. Currently we have a couple of engineers, but that's about it for professional careers. The majority are blue-collar, mining, construction, agricultural and industrial workers.

2023-07-31T22:18:58+00:00

numpty

Roar Rookie


I don't mind players doing so. But, and it's a huge but, that is not a solution as a third tier to improve the game in Aus which Waugh is touting it as.

2023-07-31T22:05:13+00:00

Cam

Roar Rookie


CQ, your typical rugby league heartland, but there has been a good rugby union presence in the region for about 50 years or so.

2023-07-31T21:21:33+00:00

moaman

Roar Guru


can’t get my head around where my pension would come from. There are residency period qualifications Wig that you need to be aware of should you be debating where to source your pension. I suggest you stay put in Australia and never leave :stoked:

2023-07-31T21:15:14+00:00

moaman

Roar Guru


Players who take the penalty incorrectly from the wrong mark play on as if they have taken the penalty correctly. They are required by law to take the kick again. Refs are really hot on getting the mark for a quick tap down to the nearest mil but continuously turn their backs on players kicking for touch! :angry:

2023-07-31T21:11:32+00:00

moaman

Roar Guru


That would have had a few refs scurrying for the law books! I think I saw an incorrectly-taken tap penalty that led directly to a try in the recent Canada v NZ women's Test. The excellent Canada skipper Sophie De Goede scored under the sticks. There was zero scrutiny apart from one pedantic kiwi sitting thousands of kilometres away in his armchair!

2023-07-31T21:00:46+00:00

moaman

Roar Guru


Good point. :thumbup: I personally don't like seeing players of one nationality country-hop, especially if it is only temporary. I understand people have various reasons and each to their own but it sticks in my craw anyway.

2023-07-31T20:40:17+00:00

fiwiboy7042

Roar Rookie


EJ may be looking but I doubt he'll answer.

2023-07-31T20:04:27+00:00

Rogue Estate

Roar Rookie


LOL - I knew I'd forgotten to look at someone - went back a ways as well. I apologize to TJP.

2023-07-31T19:38:46+00:00

Jeff

Roar Rookie


No-one is as personally invested as Jacko. Just read his postings after the Crusaders won the super Rugby crown

2023-07-31T17:42:17+00:00

scrum

Roar Rookie


There are 2 types of Advantage , that from an infringement which results in a scrum and that which results in a penalty and these are played differently. For an advantage from a knock on it is use of the ball not under pressure. From a penalty infringement it is the team gains an advantage equivalent to what they would have from taking the kick. So as a rough guide around 25-30 metres plus still having the ball. Also position on the field impacts the decision. If there is a possibility of scoring that has to be factored in as well.

2023-07-31T17:29:38+00:00

scrum

Roar Rookie


Not making anything up. It’s plain logic. If you fail to take the tap in accordance with Law it is incorrectly taken and that includes not making contact with your boot. Peranara made an argument on the night that Gus accepted but the Ref has to decide these things quickly, he made an error. Now there are many posters to this website constantly saying that Refs make too many mistakes but on this occasion the argument is because this has occurred once the Ref must have been correct. If you check the Law taking the kick at the incorrect mark is covered under a different section to how a PK must be taken. The sanction for not taking the kick correctly is a scrum to the opposition. As you said wrong place it is taken again but that is covered by a different And finally it is not possible to write Laws to cover every possible event, the application of Law requires use of common sense. If a player clearly acts as if he has taken the tap it is reasonable to rule that failure to make contact with the ball conforms with not taking the tap correctly.

2023-07-31T17:13:48+00:00

Bentnuc

Roar Pro


Yep, he gives away more tries rushing in than he saves. I personally don't see how any of the OS players are a leg up this year on what SR players would have been

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar