ANALYSIS: 'A try every day of the week' - Carr blows gasket over bunker's strip call as desperate Eels run down Dragons

By Danielle Smith / Editor

Parramatta’s flickering finals hopes were fading at CommBank Stadium on Sunday but they stormed home to douse the Dragons’ fire with a 26-20 win riding on the back of a controversial no-try call.

Not even wrecking ball Mikaele Ravalawa becoming the first Dragon since 2009 to score four tries in a match was enough to steal the win from the Eels.

With Parramatta recently dropping from seventh to 11th on the NRL ladder, they entered Sunday’s match with their September footy hopes on the line. Boosted by the return of playmaker Dylan Brown following his seven-match suspension enforced by the NRL for an off-field incident, many expected an easy win for Parramatta at home.

With the Red V sitting in 16th spot following their disappointing season, along with officially being unable to make the finals, there didn’t seem to be much to play for. But they played like their season was on the line, making the Eels fight until the last minute to remain in the hunt for September footy.

“We kept our composure,” said Eels coach Brad Arthur. “Plenty of times in the past we would have thrown that away.”

Dragons coach fumes over ‘no try’

The Dragons could have gone 16 up in the 55th minute when Talatau Amone touched down but the bunker ruled Jacob Liddle knocked on due to a loose carry when he had the ball stripped from his possession by fullback Clint Gutherson’s last-ditch tackle.

When Gutherson knocked the ball from Liddle’s hand on his way to scoring a try, it had a huge impact on the result.

Mikaele Ravalawa. (Photo by Brett Hemmings/Getty Images)

“This was the moment of the match,” said Fox League’s Braith Anasta. “They would have gone to a 16-point lead … Gutherson came up with a great stop. A lot of Dragons fans were thinking that may have been a one-on-one strip but it was a loose carry and they couldn’t have given that a try.”

But not everyone agreed with Anasta’s take on the incident, and the controversial call left Dragons interim coach Ryan Car seething.

“I don’t want to blow up about it … I’m sick of talking about it,” said a frustrated Carr when asked his thought on the official’s decision to deny the try.

“I don’t know the answer. Maybe they (the bunker officials) should come down and answer the question for you (in the media conference) so everyone in the world can understand why that wasn’t a try.

“If you Google a strip, it’s hands on the ball and he strips it out and it’s play on … it’s a try every day of the week.”

Playing for a finals spot vs playing for pride

It was a tough start for the Dragons, with Francis Molo being sent for an HIA in just the first minute and failing to return. It was a different story for the Eels who gained early control, with winger Arthur Miller-Stephen crossing the line on debut and when second-rower Bryce Cartwright got his name on the team sheet moments later, the home side was up 10-0 and looked on their way to an easy victory.

But as they have done so many times this season, they invited their opposition back into the match with silly errors, and the Dragons took full advantage.  

Ravalawa barged his way over the corner for St George Illawarra’s first four-pointer and levelled the scores when he crossed for his second shortly after. He brought up his hat-trick just before the half-time break, with the Red V heading to the sheds with a 16-10 lead.

The Dragons seemed to be on a mission to spoil the Eels’ finals chances and show everyone they are a much better team than their ladder position suggests.

The second half started out how the first had ended, with three tries seemingly not enough for Ravalawa who grabbed his first-ever four-try haul when he crossed out wide and the Dragons looked set to cause an upset.

It was just the momentum shift the home side needed, and with their finals hopes hanging by a thread, the Eels hit back with two quick tries to Sean Russell and Junior Paulo, with the scores locked up at 20-20 with 15 minutes left.

It was a case of right place right time for Cartwright, with a crosskick from Brown ending up in his hands for an easy stroll over for his second try to give the hosts a six-point buffer.

The Dragons threw everything they had at the Eels during the dying minutes, but they were beaten by the clock and the desperate Eels’ defence.

With a tough run home including the Broncos, Roosters, and Panthers, Sunday’s two points were a must for Parramatta in their fight to stay in the hunt.

Sin bin, send-off, or play on confuses the masses

A contentious point that has frustrated many rugby league fans this season has been the inconsistency surrounding sanctioning a player for making contact with the head during a tackle.

This round alone has seen Roosters forward Nathan Brown and Titans forward Moe Fotuaika both sent off for high shots while Panthers playmaker Jarome Laui escaped on-field punishment for his contact to the head of the Storm’s Nelson Asofa-Solomona on Friday night.

Zac Lomax is the latest player to enter the discussion, being allowed to remain on the field following his dangerous tackle on Parramatta’s Andrew Davey on Sunday that saw him taken off for an HIA.

“Whether you want to call it a back slam or a head slam, Davey’s head smashes the ground,” said Fox League analyst Greg Alexander. “We play a tough game, it’s a physical game … every now and then we find ourselves in this situation where we are again discussing if a payer should have been sin-binned or sent off for contact to the head.

“That was a head slam that caused some damage to Davey. I’m surprised that he (Lomax) wasn’t sin-binned for it.”

The Crowd Says:

2023-08-10T04:36:23+00:00

KenW

Roar Rookie


Not sure what Annesley does or doesn't believe about head slams - but Lomax wasn't pinning Davey's shoulders either. He had an arm around the chest and drove him flat to the ground. It was vaguely over-aggressive and the ref took up the option available to him to penalise. It's correct that no charges were laid for a head slam though, because it wasn't a head slam.

2023-08-10T04:10:52+00:00

wilbas

Roar Rookie


Yes...It is ridiculous to say a player has a loose carry when he entered the tackle with a firm hold on the ball.It is only Gutho's directed attempt to dislodge him that saw the ball loss. Whether it went forward is up for debate too but I would rule on the doubt it went back and player momentum made it appear backwards...Most important fact is whose hand was last to touch ball before the ground and that was Gutho....I believe it is play-on but the bunker who should not know the score ruled a 'grandstand finish' was needed and said 'loose carry'''......everyone who loses the ball has a loose carry if we go by bunkers ruling...the jaws of life could be used to pry the ball out and these guys would say 'loose carry'...The bunker makes up the rules by precedence every week and it is BS.

2023-08-10T03:59:07+00:00

wilbas

Roar Rookie


If Annesley believes the head has to be held for a head slam then he is tripping...If your shoulders are pinned to the ground from 5 feet above to the ground in a rapid manner then your head will slam the surface,.

2023-08-10T03:56:17+00:00

wilbas

Roar Rookie


With Gutherson's hand being last in contact then the ball was stripped...You can not say loose carry when the ball had a firm hold on it before Gutherson levered the ball out...If Liddle's hand was last to leave ball we could say he knocked on but I believe Gutho had last contact so play on. We are getting stupid with this 'loose carry' observation by the bunker because anybody at the moment the ball is dislodged could be ruled loose carry.That could mean the tightest hold of the ball and two or three players extricate the ball from your possession then it becomes 'loose carry'...Referee or bunker have to observe the player had firm grasp on ball before it was stripped.

2023-08-07T12:12:41+00:00

Forty Twenty

Roar Rookie


Good to see GA being realistic on the loose carry nonsense. Better late than never as long as they keep it up.

2023-08-07T08:39:28+00:00

KenW

Roar Rookie


I was surprised that he didn't play the straight bat. And agree that the Ese'ese one is an odd decision to criticise, seems like a penalty that the ref should be congratulated for getting right.

2023-08-07T08:06:35+00:00

souvalis

Roar Rookie


I'm surprised GA conceded that one considering other 'loose carry' precedents we've seen and the game impact it carried, and the fact that his on field referee and bunker weren't convinced as he was. More surprised with his criticism of the Herman E. penalty that was a deadset gimme.

2023-08-07T07:56:45+00:00

E-Meter

Roar Rookie


Blue and gold army!

2023-08-07T07:25:12+00:00

KenW

Roar Rookie


Annesley has come out and said it was a strip and that the Lomax tackle was not a head slam. Now I’m starting to doubt my positions!

2023-08-07T07:13:31+00:00

KenW

Roar Rookie


It's pretty much the whole picture. Gutho could feel that he was slipping off the tackle so he wrapped his arm around the ball and raked it out with the assistance of his falling body weight. He weighs 100kg, no loose carry was required.

2023-08-07T07:04:24+00:00

KenW

Roar Rookie


Yes but that aside I'm sure he's still a good bloke.

2023-08-07T06:35:54+00:00

andrew

Roar Rookie


I think E is Parra supporter K.

2023-08-07T05:02:26+00:00

wilbas

Roar Rookie


That's right...he had firm possession and only become loose after the stripping motion...these bunker people are looking at the point the ball drops.

2023-08-07T03:32:24+00:00

DP Schaefer

Roar Rookie


Thanks mate. :thumbup:

2023-08-07T03:16:33+00:00

Bernie

Roar Rookie


J.Bird .... groan .....

2023-08-07T03:11:11+00:00

souvalis

Roar Rookie


Annesley can defend it by saying Gutho’s tackle began at the shoulder and dragged down due to Liddell continuing forward. The Dragon has a one handed feint (loose) grasp on the ball,as Gutho cups it ( which is the still shot the media are using to criticize the decision). But that’s not the whole picture.

2023-08-07T02:19:59+00:00

KenW

Roar Rookie


Max didn't play. Bird ended up taking Suli's centre spot. I would say not all of those tries were Rava's fault. He's never going to be the most secure defender but was being let down by the inside and constantly given 2 players to mark. There was no flying in off the wing to try for a big hit this week.

2023-08-07T02:12:57+00:00

KenW

Roar Rookie


These are separate problems though. The call was wrong, Gutho very clearly stripped it - that's on the bunker. Whether or not the Dragons should be good enough to put a bad call behind them and keep their momentum is different. You're right that good teams do that, the Dragons have repeatedly shown this year that they can't - that's on them.

2023-08-07T02:05:46+00:00

KenW

Roar Rookie


Great work Gutho? If he wasn't stripping it then all Gutho did was miss a tackle....

2023-08-07T01:55:27+00:00

Andrew01

Roar Rookie


I can see how a Dragons fan would feel aggrieved over the Gutherson tackle, but at the same time do I want to see a team rewarded with a try when the guy can't hold onto the ball...? Not really. One person did his job, the other didn't, so in the scheme of things, no complaint. Bizarre coaching from Brad Arthur in this game. Rava scores a first half hat trick (after being taken into touch by the winger on debut and then by Brown in cover defence shortly after) and Arthur gets the wingers to switch sides at half time because the centre (in Simmonsen) who was a liability against the Cowboys and Storm the last two weeks, is again failing to defend his direct opponent or rushing in to defend the 3rd man in when he doesn't need to, leaving his winger posted.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar