'All is not lost' but Rugby Australia needs to change its ways - this is how

By Robert DeHoy / Roar Rookie

All is not lost. The Wallabies have players (when in form) who would be considered for selection in a World XV:
Taniela Tupou, Will Skelton, Rob Valetini, Marika Koroibete, Samu Kerevi and Len Ikitau.

Then we have some others who are not too far away: Angus Bell, Nick Frost and Mark Nawaqanitawase. Then we have some promising youth coming through: Tom Hooper, Carter Gordon, Max Jorgensen and Josh Kemeny.

It is not the players that are the big issue. We can be competitive again. So, what is holding us back? Sure, we have a young team (not enough big game experience), are incohesive (lack of playing time together), lack leadership (too many captains in too short a period), and have coaching issues (baffling selections, unusual assistant coaches, strange game plans, weird usage of the bench, etc.). But these are all just symptoms of a greater malaise. What are the main items that need to change?

Here is the board of directors of Rugby Australia:
– Chairman: Hamish McLennan – Sydney businessman.
– President: Joe Roff – Retired Wallabies player from the ACT Brumbies.
– CEO: Phil Waugh – Retired Wallabies player from the NSW Waratahs.
– Director: Brett Godfrey – Australian businessman (born in Melbourne but has business interests in Tasmania, Victoria, NSW and Queensland – so possibly neutral).
– Director: Daniel Herbert – Retired Wallabies player from Queensland Reds.
– Director: Pip Marlow – Sydney businesswoman.
– Director: Jane Wilson – Brisbane businesswoman.
– Director: Karen Penrose – Brisbane businesswoman.
– Director: Mathew Hanning – Sydney businessman.

Rugby Australia chairman Hamish McLennan. (Photo by Matt King/Getty Images for Rugby Australia)

There are four board members from Sydney, three from Brisbane, one from ACT and possibly one neutral. They are all either elite business people or retired Wallabies. They are all from the top end of town. Interestingly, there aren’t any biographical links to these directors on the RA website. You need to do your own research.

Firstly, is this a true representation of all the rugby stakeholders in Australia? Where are NSW and QLD country represented? Western Australia? South Australia and the Northern Territory? What about schools and club rugby? Which directors look after them? It is not readily apparent, but it should be.

Secondly, most businesses have a long-term strategic plan with the first year usually being the tactical plan. The tactical plan is made up of separate projects which help to achieve the strategic plan. The tactical projects have specific objectives, they have one responsible person for delivering the project and a due date. I cannot find a strategic plan on the RA website. The closest I can find is a media-type release.

This is not a strategic plan. This is just words. RA need to show the document on their website (if it exists). They need to show the projects to achieve the strategic plan, who are the people responsible and the due dates. Here is an example strategic plan from Oceania Rugby.

This plan has plenty of action items, but no responsibilities or due dates, though they may be on another document. It could be largely ineffective without these missing items.

I need to disclose that I perform strategic and tactical plans for businesses. There are common items that all good strategic plans should consider. More importantly, there are hidden or untapped competitive advantages that all businesses also need to consider. These largely come under the heading of having great organisational health. These include (and can all be separate tactical projects):
• Improving the workplace culture (work culture beats strategy so much that the work culture becomes the strategy)
• Employing competent people (get the right people in the right jobs and doing the right things)
• Creating great leaders (lead by example, be humble, consistent, appreciative, criticise indirectly and so on)
• Creating better teamwork (have a sense of purpose, communicate well, champion trust and mutual respect, delegate, be flexible and adaptable)
• Creating a cohesive leadership team (results-oriented, accountable, committed, trusting, respectful, can have healthy conflict) aligned with the strategic plan
• Creating tactical projects to achieve the strategic plan (with persons responsible and due dates)
• Communicating the strategic plan to the wider team (elect a champion for this, usually the creator of the strategic plan)
• Encourage the 4 Cs (critical thinking, creativity and innovation, communication and collaboration) in the workplace
• Enterprise optimisation (pull revenue forward, push expense back, harness the time value of money)
• Integrate all strategic planning (consider all stakeholders, over all time periods, and you need to optimise everything and all at once)
• Measure the success (surveys, deadlines)

I don’t see evidence of any of the above happening at RA. It may be there, but they don’t publicise it. If it is there, then they need to advertise it so that people can scrutinise it and their success.

Samu Kerevi of Australia reacts to Wallabies’ loss. (Photo by Hannah Peters/Getty Images)

It would appear that over the last 20 years or so, RA have pursued a largely top-down approach to their strategic planning. That is, to mainly look after the Wallabies’ elite team, recruit high-profile players from rugby league, attend high-profile events and so on. The idea is to make the Wallabies successful first and then the rest of Australian rugby will follow.

However, a rising tide lifts all boats. From the results over the last 20 years, a steady decline in the Wallabies winning percentages, it would not be too harsh to say that this approach has not worked. It is the right time to rethink that approach and to employ a new approach.

They say a fish rots from the head. This is not true. A fish rots equally all over. They also say that a healthy organisation starts by having a great front office. This I can believe. Losing 40-6 to Wales at the 2023 RWC shows that we don’t have a great front office. We (all rugby stakeholders) need to put one in place… and soon.

We need a board that represents all rugby stakeholders. We need a strategic plan that caters to all levels of rugby in Australia. Not just the top end, the middle or the bottom. We need to optimise all levels all at once.

Another saying is to never waste a good crisis. This is a great opportunity to overhaul everything that is wrong with Australian rugby and to make it great again.

Sports opinion delivered daily 

   

It all starts with getting the right board of directors and a great strategic plan in place.

The Crowd Says:

2024-04-08T00:51:10+00:00

signpost

Roar Rookie


My faith in RA has eroded to disbelief. Repetitive poor decisions at board level has severely injured the sport here. RA's 'baggage heavy' history & ineffective structure have proven unfit for purpose. Don't try to fix it! A new National structure please, A fresh constitution with clear pathways. A NRC'ish comp. Or revitalised Shute/Hospital/etc for club, state & national champions. Phase out SRP if necessary. Charity begins at home.

2023-09-27T07:48:33+00:00

Ozrugbynut

Roar Rookie


I would personally prefer to see the board composition reflect the contribution and opportunity reflected by PI communities and representatives of communities outside of the lower north shore set. Quite aside from the awful 'optics', I think it is an important thing that new communities can see they have skin in the game.

2023-09-27T07:45:32+00:00

Ozrugbynut

Roar Rookie


The only catalyst for change will be a decline in a) sponsorship $, b) licensing $ and C) misc revenues from ticketing and merch. They may window dress to appear modern and virtue signal but only commercial factors will force change in the age of professionalism.

2023-09-27T03:29:24+00:00

jeznez

Roar Guru


Nice one Rob.

2023-09-26T13:19:52+00:00

Frank the tank

Roar Rookie


Great article. I think about this a lot. I just commented on another article comparing the performance and results of Australia relative to Ireland. Without getting into the specifics of a plan that you have highlighted in the article. I just want to say that clearly Ireland have made some strategic decisions regarding high performance to get to where they are now. And with Aussies in key positions!! Crazy. Anyway I feel like you make some great points, and it just reminds me how frustrated I get thinking about the sheer lack of leadership and accountability from the RA board(s) over the years. I don't want to speak to the merits of Raelenes work, but it seemed like it would take an outsider to actually develop a strategic vision that wasn't influenced by NSW and QLD views. I just don't know how it can be achieved in the RA without a wholesale clear out. Start again, or maybe just copy Irelands plan and add some some fins to lower wind resistance and add a racing strip which I feel will be pretty sharp.

AUTHOR

2023-09-26T10:18:31+00:00

Robert DeHoy

Roar Rookie


Good teams win close games. They are elite athletes, so it's in their heads. With winning comes self belief and confidence - they need to start winning. We should have the depth to cover the loss of 2 forwards. Argentina are on the up. No. 6 in the world? NZ will bounce back with Razor. Wallabies? Not any time soon. You need a blend of youth and experience to win a world cup - or any game really. After tight head, goal kicker must be next person picked. The soft tissue injuries are puzzling - and happened to our 2 biggest guys - must be linked to over work. No excuses for not knowing the rules of the game. Anything else?

2023-09-26T10:00:00+00:00

The Late News

Roar Rookie


Copy and paste then email it over mate! With a quote attached of course!

2023-09-26T08:31:20+00:00

Gravox

Roar Rookie


If any of the top teams lost their two best forwards they would struggle. Skelton and Tupou were critical to the Wallabies. That’s not to excuse poor decision making like not taking the points when trailing 10-6. The Wallabies need to learn tournament rugby. They almost scored twice in those first twenty minutes when they dominated territory and possession. Also a focus on winning above all else fosters anxiety. Focus on playing well. Require all selected Wallabies to take a rugby rules test and they must score above 95% to confirm their selection. Too many close games have been lost by Wallaby stupidity. Have a quota system where half the squad must be from public schools and half from private schools. The captain must be from public schools as we need a calm, smart, cunning operator at the top. Has anyone else noticed NZ And Argentina seem to have declined too? A few changes..three selectors where the coach only tiebreaks when the other selectors can’t agree in a position. Note.. coach makes no selections himself except where he agrees with the others. Other Two selectors are top two super rugby coaches each year. Less gym work as soft tissue injuries are caused by this. Also only players over two metres and 110 kilos can be selected as forwards. All backs must be able to kick with both feet. Our best goal kicker must always play even if it is Quade Cooper. Unless injured a selected player must have a minimum of three tests before being dropped and they must spend the next two tests on the bench as a replacement. We must play more tests against Japan, Fiji, Samoa, Canada, USA. We must invest more into sevens rugby. It is more fun to watch also. Fiji grew to dominate here before large scale test success as sevens requires quick and correct decision making under pressure. Younger Australian teams are doing better here. Referees from different countries should be hired to work with our players to help them understand how to avoid silly penalties. Any player who concedes more than three penalties in any test is banned from selection for two years. And perhaps the top super rugby coach in Australia should get the Wallaby job on a five year cycle. Give each coach five years or four if you feel five is too much. that should fix things ( note.. by that I mean players enjoying their rugby and having a crack without feeling the world is on their shoulders. I don’t care if they never win another World Cup. It is a game played in only a few countries and the money in the north makes it likely the Wallabies will have to be like the Socceroos, mostly from overseas.

AUTHOR

2023-09-26T07:29:11+00:00

Robert DeHoy

Roar Rookie


Perhaps Fiji's board are more cohesive, aligned and all pulling in the same direction? When you look at all the business interests of the RA board members, it's hard to see how they can cover all the issues at all levels of rugby in Oz. This is probably one reason why they only deal with the top end of town. It's all they have the time or inclination for.

AUTHOR

2023-09-26T07:25:12+00:00

Robert DeHoy

Roar Rookie


Maybe he will read it hear on The Roar! I would be surprised if they don't have someone from RA reading all the articles on The Roar and passing on information to the relevant people.

2023-09-26T06:29:43+00:00

piru

Roar Rookie


Thank you, great article I've always felt the RA (and previously ARU) board don't tell us much of what they are doing because they hope to avoid scrutiny. It always feels like they are up to something nefarious.

2023-09-25T22:25:32+00:00

Jazz

Roar Rookie


Be interesting to know who are Fiji's board of directors? Look at their rise and now look at that list of names of the AR's board of fatcats sitting in their suits!

2023-09-25T22:16:19+00:00

The Late News

Roar Rookie


Cheers Robert. Some interesting thoughts there. I assume you have put this to Phil Waugh, or at least plan to soon?

AUTHOR

2023-09-25T19:54:13+00:00

Robert DeHoy

Roar Rookie


You would have thought that transparency and accountability should just be automatic in 2023. The wearing of too many hats at board level is probably another issue. You can't get down in the weeds and check out all the issues and come up with the right solutions if you're chasing other business interests as well. The Japanese have a saying about a man who chases 2 rabbits catches neither.

AUTHOR

2023-09-25T19:49:54+00:00

Robert DeHoy

Roar Rookie


If they won't listen to all the stakeholders then I guess the only recourse we have is to vote with our wallets.

AUTHOR

2023-09-25T19:48:29+00:00

Robert DeHoy

Roar Rookie


I think Skelton has some upside...Kerevi I'm not too sure, he may have plateaued.

2023-09-25T18:36:23+00:00

Megeng

Roar Rookie


Yep, good article. But RA isn’t a democracy nor do they have shareholders as such (just disgruntled fans). So change has to be self diagnosed and corrected at the board level. Good luck with that

2023-09-25T18:35:09+00:00

Cec

Roar Rookie


Very sound and reasonable solutions from an operational & strategical perspective. RA and even Admin from state level to locals clubs have this culture of not being transparent or accountable. How do we change the culture when there’s no personal consequences? From the RA Board down to local admin volunteers, they all have other careers and interests beyond rugby.

2023-09-25T18:33:44+00:00

Rogue Estate

Roar Rookie


Skelton and Kereve I wouldn't have as world players- maybe once - not now.

Read more at The Roar