Time for revolution: A hostile takeover of Australian rugby, led by Twiggy, is the only thing that will save it

By W Evans / Roar Rookie

Geoff Parkes’ article last week suggesting the game was entering ‘Chinese Water Torture Territory’ was one of the best-written pieces of 2023 regarding the plight of the game in Australia – but it still fell short.

Geoff’s suggestions for taking the game forward, while admirable, were unfortunately fantasy.

Without centralisation, the product is flawed. Without a good product, there is no money. Without money, there is no possibility to implement Geoff’s plan.

Increasing participation, funnelling resources to grassroots, clearing pathways and free-to-air coverage are all fantasy land without serious financial investment.

Hunter Fujak, a university lecturer and the author of Code Wars, highlighted the problem recently in the Sydney Morning Herald:

“After turning professional in 1996, it was about $21 million [in revenue] for rugby, versus about $85 million for AFL… now it is about $130 million versus $940 million-odd. And that’s a huge challenge. Especially with AFL about to have a $650 million turn in broadcast rights in 2025, at the same time rugby has a $30 million, or sub-$30 million deal. People say, ‘You have to invest in grassroots’, but with what money?”

Australian rugby must be the subject of a hostile takeover where no quarter is given to those who wish to obstruct centralisation.

The takeover can and should be led by Andrew Forrest, a man who has shown a genuine love of the game as well as a passion for resurrecting Australian Institutions.

Twiggy has the wherewithal to lead a corporate decapitation of the unions that can’t or won’t centralise.

I believe he would have grassroots support too.

Before I presume to tell Australia’s richest man how to save our game, I want to be clear about the need for the Australian rugby community to avoid distractions.

Eddie Jones, rugby league, Fiji and the future of Quade Cooper are dead-end discussions.

Wallabies coach Eddie Jones. (Photo by Chris Hyde/Getty Images)

We were one bad refereeing decision away from being eliminated by Scotland in the quarterfinals in 2015. We were perhaps one 35yo, mercurial fly-half away from losing to England in a quarterfinal in 2023.

We must get real now.

Those who dwell on these matters, these peripheral distractions, do so because it is easy to, and because grappling with the real issues causes sleepless nights.

And that’s fair enough. Thinking about the 3-0 whitewash Cheika’s Wallabies suffered against England in 2016 is almost as painful as the quarterfinal thrashing in 2019 or the series loss at home to the same opponent last year.

It’s also no fun to remember the 40 straight losses to Kiwi Super Rugby sides or the crucifixion of good men, good coaches like Rob Penney.

Isn’t it ironic that Penney was deemed not good enough for the Waratahs but is the heir to Scott Robertson’s dynasty in Christchurch?

Just think about what that says for a moment.

For too long, we have all accepted the disconnect between the states and the national body. Accepted the constitutional voting structure that was supposedly revolutionary in 2012 but only encourages Sydney and Brisbane to discourage growth elsewhere.

We have allowed ourselves to be distracted from what matters.

New South Wales, having caused many of the problems in Australian rugby is now a financial basket case that is both distrusted and maligned by other unions.

There has been little indication that the state unions are prepared to cooperate without being forced to. All statements on the topic have been wishy-washy and say little of substance.

An agreement in principle by the five unions to pursue a model that would give RA oversight of high-performance programs and key personnel changes is a bit like a fire brigade agreeing to think about fighting a fire while one is raging.

“Everyone is screaming out, and we probably said it before the World Cup, even: if not now, then when?” Melbourne Rebels chief executive Baden Stephenson said.

We all share that sentiment in one way or another. Yet there is dithering and deliberate obfuscation by decision-makers.

It is ironic that so many see Hamish McLennan’s removal as some sort of panacea or cathartic gesture when he is one of the few advocating for centralisation.

Rugby Australia chairman Hamish McLennan. (Photo by Tom Dulat/Getty Images for Rugby Australia)

John O’Neill desperately tried to centralise the game in 2012 with David Nucifora but both were obstructed.

Why are we not as angry with the board of the NSWRU? Why are we not marching on Ballymore or conducting a sit-in in the nation’s capital?

Wedges must now be driven, divide and conquer should be employed where necessary to break what is an unsatisfactory status quo.

The first thing Twiggy should do is approach the clubs in all major competitions and propose a funding arrangement that severs them from the state unions. One they can’t say no to.

Secondly, a national club competition, one that is semi-professional, owned by Tatterang, Forrest’s private investment group would create a centralised competition capable of stoking the types of tribal rivalries and cross-state border animosity that drives all Australian professional sport.

For that very reason, it is also capable of drawing substantial free-to-air interest if properly funded and marketed from inception.

It is also the type of third-tier competition that could mirror a Currie Cup or NPC as well as lead into a State of Origin type series or even a playoff series against foreign rivals.

Third, such a nursery would lend itself not just to a draft by the five Super Rugby franchises but also the creation of high-performance pathways for school boys.

Partial tertiary scholarships tied to semi-professional contracts of say $50,000 per year for the nation’s top 50 schoolboys would cost about $ 2.5 million annually or the equivalent of about 4750 pairs of R M Williams boots. Almost nothing in the world of Andrew Forrest.

This is not pie-in-the-sky stuff.

Tribalism, grassroot club sausage sizzles, mate against mate. All the things our code competitors harness so well and our state unions squander.

We also know that Tatterang met with Rugby Australia just last month and that it is likely the game’s $ 2 billion valuation was considered unrealistic.

CVC Partners, who have invested in La Liga as well as Silver Lake were also sniffing around but are no longer.

An astute businessman like Forrest will know exactly where the pressure points are, exactly what his leverage is with Rugby Australia. Exactly the time to strike.

But to truly succeed, to make the reforms necessary, he needs to wrench the game away from the states once and for all.

A Rugby Revolution.

The Crowd Says:

2023-10-10T18:45:04+00:00

Around the Ankles

Roar Rookie


There are some good ideas here. You might find that Nicola Forest is more passionate about Rugby than Andrew though. Either way, a syndicate of private investors might be better than appointing a demi god. The most important thing is the creation of comps that allow developing players to play under pressure. A red hot 19 year old in Australia plays less than half the games his equivalent does I. France each year. That experience compounds.

2023-10-10T00:46:09+00:00

Jdog

Roar Rookie


Whatever happens with the politics and centralisation there has to be free to air rugby. At the moment all the kids growing up idolising their stars, Thursday night Friday night Saturday night Sunday night, and the only stars they see are either in AFL or rugby league. AFL in all the junior schools offering free caps AFL balls and backpacks. So I needs to be a massive injection of money but that's where the future is the kids

2023-10-09T06:10:19+00:00

piru

Roar Rookie


Weren't the Rebels sold for $1 last time around as well? I could own two SR teams just with what I've got on me!

2023-10-09T06:08:39+00:00

piru

Roar Rookie


Only reason there is a love for Forrester is because of his money. Stop. We love him because he used his money to save the Force after ARU tried to kill it

2023-10-09T06:06:50+00:00

piru

Roar Rookie


Actually if you were Twiggy, you'd put your money into revolutionising it. It's exactly what GRR was going to be, curses to that kung flu that killed it off

2023-10-09T01:46:05+00:00

AndyS

Roar Rookie


Not the whole of rugby perhaps, but maybe he should take over SR. He already has one team, and based on the last sale price for a SR team should be able to get the Waratahs for a dollar. Well on the way at that point... :laughing:

2023-10-08T13:02:37+00:00

ScouseinOz

Roar Rookie


It's not going to happen. He obviously didn't show much of an interest when RA were looking for PE and have now had to turn to debt to run until the BIL funds come in 2 years time.

2023-10-08T07:49:31+00:00

Coker

Roar Rookie


Unfortunately, the only way Australian rugby players could ever become as aerobically fit as AFL players would be by sacrificing an awful lot of body mass, and the vast majority of such players wouldn't last a minute in professional rugby. One might just as well wish for the Wallabies to be as aerobically fit as the Kenyan distance running squad — it mixes up the demands of different sports.

2023-10-08T01:25:20+00:00

BlouBul

Roar Rookie


Show me articles where fans were begging the rich to take over. As I said you're trying to find relevance where there are non. Rebels are privately owned so that is not new.

2023-10-07T23:07:15+00:00

Rocky's Rules

Roar Rookie


@ W Evans Well I sure don't trust H McLennan. And there's no way I trust Twiggy either. Both very poor options imo :laughing:

AUTHOR

2023-10-07T14:42:31+00:00

W Evans

Roar Rookie


So consortiums led by some of South Africans richest men taking over the Sharks and Stormers (as well as all amateur western province clubs) just this month are irrelevant? Think we’ll need to agree to disagree.

2023-10-07T10:35:14+00:00

BlouBul

Roar Rookie


You're trying to find relevance with SA teams but there are non. Every punter has jumped on the Twiggy bandwagon and the reality is that it ain't going to happen.

2023-10-07T06:40:40+00:00

Paul D

Roar Rookie


There is nothing new about private ownership of sporting clubs. But that’s a long way short of what you are suggesting.

AUTHOR

2023-10-07T06:35:13+00:00

W Evans

Roar Rookie


I really don’t have strong feelings for Hamish McLennan, although many do appear to have a real infatuation. 2016- thrashed 3 nil in a home series by England with Cheika at the helm. 2019- thrashed in the RWC QF by England. 2022- soundly beaten by England in a home series with Dave Rennie ‘building’. And that’s before you count the coaches that haven’t got close to winning a Bledisloe for over 2 decades. Or the coaches (Penney, Coleman, Thorn etc) who can’t seem to make provinces competitive. I repeat, this isn’t a coaching problem fundamentally. But it makes people feel better to focus on that because it’s easy to.

AUTHOR

2023-10-07T06:19:43+00:00

W Evans

Roar Rookie


Interesting thing Paul is that a very similar proposal has just been accepted by the Stormers in South Africa - amateur clubs handing over the reins to very prominent SA businessmen. The Sharks have done it. Plenty of money to be made.

AUTHOR

2023-10-07T06:15:21+00:00

W Evans

Roar Rookie


Hi Bloubul Is it really all that different to Marco Massotti at the Sharks? What about the Stormers and affiliate amateur clubs handing over the reins this month to Red Disa (a private equity consortium of some of SA’s richest men). The same thing happened with the Bulls from memory. I’m curious, great for SA but not a good path for Australia?

2023-10-07T06:09:24+00:00

Paul D

Roar Rookie


Never a shortage of people lining up to tell people with money how they should spend it…

AUTHOR

2023-10-07T06:06:48+00:00

W Evans

Roar Rookie


Hi there. Just curious… what is the difference between Tatarang (Twiggy’s Investment house) and say CVC Partners? And why would an Australian businessmen with a track record of involvement in the game be worse than international private equity? The money must come from somewhere.

AUTHOR

2023-10-07T06:03:36+00:00

W Evans

Roar Rookie


Hi Blink My point is this. Centralization won’t print money, it will merely introduce conditions conducive to creating an asset not a liability. In other words, if you have money but no centralization you can’t fix the problems. The same is true in reverse. And… lots written about the Tahs handing over the keys. Will QLD and the Brumbies follow … not so sure.

2023-10-07T04:44:08+00:00

Gary

Roar Rookie


Twiggy has already had a taste of running/funding a rugby franchise and 'tournament' in the form of Western Force and the GRR - Global Rapid Rugby. This was definitely a passion project, and also an education. He maybe emboldened, but, more likely, would be wary of what actual value/fulfilment would be derived. Also, with FMG's massive project investments in green energy etc, i would imagine there would be pushback from investors of having his focus distracted elsewhere. I think Twiggy's interest will be limited to Western Force only. And not that Twiggy would, but, do you want to risk a Space Karen scenario if he took over RA?

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar