The Wrap: Hurricanes and Waratahs triumphant in South Africa

By Geoff Parkes / Expert

On a weekend where all the best action and controversy came towards the end of the round, the Chiefs did all they needed, professionally holding off a determined Sharks 24-22 in New Plymouth.

Without the swagger one might expect of a ladder leader, the Chiefs have found the knack of covering for injuries, and while their little men, Damien McKenzie, Aaron Cruden and Brad Weber, look in need of a rest, big men like Michael Leitch seem happy enough to carry the load for now.

On another day the Sharks may well have won; three well-taken tries reflected a willingness to use the ball positively, and if they take this as a benchmark for the remainder of the season they may yet challenge for a wildcard play-off spot.

Western Force fans, unfortunately, have no such playoff aspirations. A tough tour of New Zealand featured some spirited performances, a fresher, more inclusive style of play and a run of home matches signalled reason for optimism.

Which only makes their insipid performance against the Bulls all the more disappointing. Not because it refuels the argument of doom merchants to chop Australian Super Rugby sides back to four or three, but because it simply doesn’t have to be this way; there are enough good players in this squad to be far more competitive than this, as indeed they have been in the past.

But when a centre takes a clean intercept against the run of play yet is run down with ease; when there is no straight chasing line when following kicks, when soft tries are leaked through lack of collective will in the defensive line, these are fan killers. And quite likely, coach killers as well.

It’s hard to get a handle on exactly where the Bulls are at, so token was their opponent. We should know more after they visit Canberra next week.

In Auckland, things started off badly for the Rebels with the late withdrawal of Lopeti Timani, and continuation of their kick-off receive woes.

They paid the ultimate price, allowing Steven Luatua to storm through and take one on the fly, setting up Ihaia West for a try. That the Rebels were able to work themselves back into the match was testimony to their own tenacity, Sefanaia Naivalu’s 95-metre scamper, and the Blues still being unaccustomed to closing out games when ahead.

But the Rebels’ final lineout maul went awry, a theme for travelling Australian sides this week, and James Parson’s men took the chocolates. Or perhaps Parsons kept them for himself, stripping the spitting image of Matt Dunning in his podgy heyday, albeit without Dunning’s flair on the dropkick.

I’m not convinced that the Highlanders playing without the ball was a deliberate ploy to nullify David Pocock’s turnover ability, or perhaps coach Jamie Joseph is a student of Muhammad Ali’s “rope-a-dope” strategy, but the longer the match in Invercargill went on, the more obvious it became that the Brumbies didn’t have the nous or skill to take advantage of the Highlanders generosity – a whopping 73 per cent to 27 per cent possession skew.

Brumbies lock Sam Carter might wonder about the injustice of the maul obstruction law – it was a fine line – but he shouldn’t wonder why, if he repeats the exact offence three times, referee Nick Briant kept penalising him.

Saturday night provided a choice, an invite to the debut album launch for the delightfully named ‘Shepparton Airplane’, or the safety of the couch and the Reds versus the Cheetahs. A preview of their single “Got no head” made my mind up – subtlety isn’t their strong suit, nor is melody – yet by halftime of this very ordinary match I was ruing my decision.

As was, I suspect, Roar ironman blogger Diggercane, who, into his third game on the trot, might reasonably have expected a match of better quality.

So uninspiring was it I found myself easily distracted, learning that “The Voice” judge, Jesse J, has a tattoo on her right hip which reads “Don’t loose who you are”, a timely warning to all those considering a tattoo to do a spellcheck before the ink goes on.

And the rugby? Three votes to the Brisbane humidity, two votes to the Reds’ scrum and minus one vote for referee Ben O’Keefe’s bizarre decision to yellow card Cheetahs replacement Willie Britz. If it had been for Britz’s hairstyle perhaps fair enough, but to banish him for foul play, a supposed strike for which he had no vision to support that finding, was ludicrous.

Nick Frisby bagged a double, doing his Wallabies selection prospects no harm, unlike Samu Kerevi, who had the look of a man whose wrist injury may cruel his selection hopes.

Thankfully the quality of the rugby picked in South Africa, the Hurricanes irresistible in the first half, on the way to putting 50 points on the previously high-flying Lions. This match was won by assertive turnover play, a willingness by backs and forwards to contest at the breakdown, thus not allowing the Lions to stamp their pattern of play on the match.

Prop Reggie Goodes provided a try for the highlights reel, slamming the ball down in the corner after a 20 metre run from a lineout, while Dane Coles once again reminded a South African audience of his explosive running, pace and deft passing skills.

The Lions will be back to cause trouble in the playoffs, and not just because captain Warren Whiteley says so. They are well balanced and play with good intent. Here, as much as anything, they simply struck a hot team having a hot day.

Dean Mumm shelling the opening kick-off in Cape Town didn’t bode well for the Waratah’s chances against the Stormers, neither did their stuttering lineout, yet two superbly taken set-piece tries to Kurtley Beale and Israel Folau were enough to keep them within striking distance at half time.

The to and fro which followed had a real test match feel to it, helped along by a noisy crowd, and when standout for man of the match, Pieter-Steph Du Toit crossed for his second try with only five minutes remaining, it seemed as if the Stormers had done enough to win.

Crucially, it was their scrum which let them down, eight versus eight, which conceded the turnover which allowed Michael Hooper to squeeze his way over, under the posts, and the Waratahs back into favouritism for the Australian conference.

That the crowd was so noisily engaged was no surprise, in the wake of Leolin Zas being marched in the 55th minute for taking out Bernard Foley in the air, causing Foley to land awkwardly and dangerously on his head/neck.

The emotional reaction afterwards was understandable; Zas had eyes for the ball, he slipped at a crucial moment, there was no intent to hit Foley illegally, all of which are true. And referee Mike Fraser’s initial reaction was indeed to play on, advantage Stormers, for Foley’s knock forward.

But Fraser deserves credit not condemnation, keeping his cool and getting the decision dead right, according to the law. All of those excuses or mitigating factors are furphies.

The law requires that a player jumping for the ball is not interfered with in the air, and there is no provision in the law for any such interference being non-intentional. Further, the law also guides the referee in the application of any sanction, stating that how the player lands determines whether a yellow card or red card is issued against the offending player.

In short, had Foley landed on his backside, Zas would have received a yellow card, but because he landed in a dangerous position – not unlike Willie Le Roux in Dunedin – he received a red card.

Also an overreaction are claims that players will no longer be able to contest balls in the air, lest they risk being sent off if something goes wrong. This is garbage. Attacking players will always be able to set themselves and jump in unison with the defending catcher, and may the best man win. Mid-air collisions between two fairly and equally competing players will be seen as normal or incidental contact.

What players can’t do is to enter these zones at high speed and make contact with a catching player who is already in the air. Eyes on the ball or not, they are courting with danger and, unless they are able to slow down and jump together with the defender, they should keep out of the contest until after the ball is caught and the catcher has landed.

What is being overlooked by those who complain about the game going soft, is that neither Zas nor Jason Emery last week, actually jumped for the ball. They may have intended to, but they didn’t. They just got themselves into awkward positions where they caused another player to land on their head.

If there is a price to be paid for that, it is a far more palatable price to pay than the alternative Foley and Le Roux could easily have been faced with.

As a guide, Rugby League is a game where there are countless high kicks and remarkably few controversies or injuries in this area. I have no doubt that Super Rugby coaches and players will similarly and quickly adapt, and the game will move on.

Notably, the Waratahs did what sides often fail to do when provided with a numerical advantage; they intelligently tested the edges of the Stormers defence to make the numbers count. The reaction of the bench to Hooper’s try shows that this maligned team, and its coach, if nothing else, have plenty of spirit, and may well have put their worst performances behind them.

It may have taken the Kings to be served up to them to do it, but at last Buenos Aries fans got some joy from their Jaguares side, which ran in tries in all directions, three of them to veteran No.8 Leonardo Senatore.

While this was always a match the Jaguares were going to win, it was important for their credibility (and the competition’s credibility) that they did so, and did so with style. And for the first time, they played with consistent, clinical precision.

What can you say about the Kings? They scored four tries, the last one a real corker. Shame though about the eleven they conceded.

With an eye to the ladder, most interest resides in Australia, where it appears increasingly likely that the Rebels, Brumbies and Waratahs are now competing for one playoff spot only.

The looming clash in Melbourne between the Rebels and Brumbies clearly becomes pivotal. Meanwhile the Waratahs are now back in charge of their own destiny, and moving from the outhouse to the penthouse with some purpose.

The Crowd Says:

2016-05-05T15:45:33+00:00

Carlos the Argie

Roar Guru


KPM, you assume that there is only ONE elite team. How arrogant of you to believe that only SR makes an elite team! For Argentines, and this is something that your obturate mind seems to miss, their club is an elite team. You must have some reading comprehension issues! I said that Argentine rugby is very tribal. Of course I would want more people to attend, how stupid of you to assume otherwise. But the conditions in BA make it very difficult. Have you gone to Velez at any time in your life? Maybe your pompous pontificating will make you happy. It doesn't resolve anything. Grow up, not everything is controlled by you. By the way, you could have checked and there are around 12 million in the Gran Buenos Aires area. Not 17 million.

2016-05-04T17:11:44+00:00

kingplaymaker

Roar Guru


I'd heard that Argentine rugby was very defensive to even the smallest criticism from the outside and I think you two prove it. In a country with 40 odd million and 17 million in Buenos Aires, and a broad and strong rugby presence, it's reasonable to ask if 12,000 is a good crowd if there is only one elite club team. But it seems that that question cannot be asked. Better to accept things as they are. Don't listen to anything from the outside.

2016-05-04T15:43:24+00:00

Carlos the Argie

Roar Guru


Apparently, KPM knows more about Argentina than Nobrain and me. Maybe we should ask him more questions. Why do they call La Plata "Los Canarios"? Google not allowed.

2016-05-04T09:05:43+00:00

Machooka

Roar Guru


Hey Kirky... salutations and blessings. I have let Muzzo know you have re-surfaced here at the Roar :) I think you know my thoughts on all things Aussie Rugby needing to be strong... and with-in that Qlds Rugby needing to be strong! As far as your hope I'm right regards these problems not 'translating' to Wallaby problems 'cause Eddie's English are coming... yeah we'll put out a team capable of defending of honour. Although, as what seems now eternal, I don't hold much hope that we can pull your lot's pants down... but I'm sure we'll give it go :)) Congrats on your U20s dacking our U20s... and with one more game to go there's still hope!!

2016-05-04T07:37:19+00:00

Kirky

Roar Rookie


Answering your query Chook'!, you're bang on about the Chiefs, (I won't call them Chefs'), yeah' the're right up there with the Hurricanes and Crusaders but you can't pick'm all mate, all conjecture cobber! Howdy Muzzo', Ehoa' didn't know you were on here, might lock horns again someday mate who knows. I wasn't in fact having a go at Aussie rugby by any means in my previous write up on here, I was just putting it as I see it, for all that's worth. It's imperative that OZ rugby is strong as the overall scene demands it these days Domestic or International as it makes for healthy and vibrant rugby all round. I was but stating the bleeding obvious of the situation in Aussie' Super rugby in particular . All Super teams will struggle here because of over representation in the number of Franchises ~ For five Super teams to be viable, healthy and strong there needs to be a strong player base at all times as per New Zealand (as an example), but Australia hasn't got that player base and what player base they do have has to be spread far too thinly. As I mentioned earlier there are two teams too many here in Australia for all five to really fire on all six!, but have them you do and it'd be incredibly unlikely that two Super teams will disappear any time soon, so it's ''carry on regardless". There's nothing inherently wrong with the players available to the Force, in fact they have as we all know, Wallaby players in their ranks, ~ Coaching I feel is the problem here in Perth, as if the confidence in the Coaching department is lacking, it shows on game day, and I feel that to be the case. The Rebels appear to be going reasonably well, better in fact than a couple of the original Super sides. This all goes back to the paucity of the quality players available to furnish five teams, Australia just does not have them. Chook, I hope you're right mate in your assumption that this problem shouldn't translate to the Wallabies, we need your boys to kick Pom butt! How was the headline in the New Zealand Herald this morning? ~ "New Zealand U20 swat aside Australia U20": ah well!! Damien McKenzie has turned down a regular first five eight possie' at the Blues and possibly the Crusaders, to stay at the Chiefs for another two years, not a bad problem for the Chiefs to have.

2016-05-03T15:43:40+00:00

Harry Jones

Expert


backrower always chatting no 8 is just a 9 supersized

2016-05-03T12:55:21+00:00

Ailanthus

Guest


Sorry Dave, I thought it was self evident, I do have a bit to say and have mastered the art of giving other people jobs to do. Harry meanwhile, I understand if you are confused Dave. He writes so well, yet claims to be a front rower. How can that possibly be?

2016-05-03T11:01:25+00:00

Dave_S

Guest


A scrummie! Things like that really should be declared up front, Allanthus. Where was the whining self-interest and constant fingerpointing to tip me off!!?? ?

2016-05-03T10:48:44+00:00

Harry Jones

Expert


DaveS Allanthus is a scrumhalf, I believe, so he is better at talking... :)

2016-05-03T04:42:06+00:00

Rugby Tragic

Roar Rookie


Apologies Shop ... yes while I was very aware of the Bulls win but what I did was fail to correct was my comment to ... "..all South African franchises playing other than the Bulls, lost..."

2016-05-03T04:32:30+00:00

Dave_S

Guest


I agree Peter, I don't mind intent (etc) coming into it when it's a relatively innocuous breach like slapping down the opposition's pass, but when it's an action that has a significant risk of very serious consequences it is arguably inherently careless and it is better to tip the scales well in favour of there being little or no benefit of the doubt if harm ensues. Driving on the highway at 200 kmph is just banned, there does not need to be any proof of your state of mind if you cause harm

AUTHOR

2016-05-03T04:29:28+00:00

Geoff Parkes

Expert


You're a good man Dave! Harry will be disappointed to lose one over to the dark side but there'll be other days and other arguments to be won and lost I'm sure.

2016-05-03T04:25:21+00:00

Ailanthus

Guest


It might have been dodgy defence CUW, but you can't take away from a hooker running in a try like that. That was a superb effort - there's nothing like a front rower running one in from distance to bring the house down.

2016-05-03T04:24:03+00:00

Dave_S

Guest


Allanthus, I'm pretty late to the party (once, in grade 5 I turned up to a party a day early, boy that was embarrassing ...) thanks for another great read. In particular the Zas card issue was well thought out and convincing. I was in the "too-harsh" camp but you won me over.

2016-05-03T04:04:40+00:00

CUW

Guest


@ Allanthus : if ur referring to the HOOKEr's try , then that was mainly a result of pathetic defence of the crusaders center fonotia. if u watch it again , u will see that he does not chase the hooker thinking the fullback volavolla will cover. now why doesnt a center chase a hooker?? even if u cant catch him , at least u shud try for the team . on the other hand watch how moala chases the rebel wing all the way 80 yards , before giving up becoz he could not catch him. he does not give up untill the last 10 yards. fonotia is rubbish in defence , just cant wait to get freuean back !!!

2016-05-03T03:09:44+00:00

PeterK

Roar Guru


perhaps but not to add intent, careless or reckless is sufficient.. It is far too easy to get out of then and far too hard to prove. So if it was careless or reckless then he still gets sent, if it was not then if it is accidental then maybe not even a penalty. But in that order ie careless / reckless takes precedence over accidental. So running at full speed and not jumping earlier than he did is careless if not reckless IMO.

2016-05-03T02:58:25+00:00

Harry Jones

Expert


Fair enough, Allanthus, Nic, and PeterK (an intimidating troika!). My main point isn't that the law isn't as you all say it is (you're right), but rather that the law needs refinement; nuance.

2016-05-03T02:44:51+00:00

Nobrain

Guest


Carlos, you have to add that all soccer games were played that Saturday also due to labor day on Sunday. That will take away some people also.

2016-05-03T02:26:27+00:00

Suzy Poison

Guest


Can't really argue with that. I guess I hoping the Bulls get the playoff spot ahead of the Sharks purely because their game plan has evolved. But you are correct, should they make the finals, they will get smashed by one of the Kiwi title prospects.

2016-05-03T01:24:41+00:00

PeterK

Roar Guru


Suzy Poison - I do write off the bulls being any chance of winning the comp. Agree like the tahs they are middling team. I only noted they have soft opposition because you stated they are racking up victories and getting little credit. Since they are beating weak teams that is understandable. Rebels got undeserved credit since they too have only beaten weak teams and a mid table team, no one in the top 8. Agree also that Tahs got undeserved credit. Until the stormers they beat only bottom teams. Only the last game deserves any credit. Brumbies still more likely to top the oz conference, they have an easier draw left. Why watch out for the bulls? They are competing with the sharks for a wildcard spot and neither team have much chance after that. Sharks have a slightly easier draw left but are 6 points behind. It could easily come down to bonus points.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar