A test-free solution to sport's illicit drug problem

By Matt Cleary / Expert

One day in the perhaps not too-distant future there will be no scourge of illicit drugs because there will be no illicit drugs.

Because one day society will realise that there’s no point making some drugs illegal and others not, and will legalise everything.

And in this utopian future, the citizens of the world will be asked to fully take on the hackneyed notion of “personal choice”, that being if you choose to swallow, snort or otherwise ingest the filthy muck percolated in tin sheds according to science learned by outlaw bikies, then knock yourself out, you idiot.

Like cigarettes and alcohol, abuse that stuff at your peril. We can only educate you so many times about the dangers to your health.

And ultimately it comes down to you, the human, making a personal choice, as you do about smoking, drinking and spending your rent on the last at Cannington greys.

We can only only make that picture of the tongue cancer on the cigarette packet so hideous.

Premiership-winning Cronulla Sharks fullback Ben Barba made a choice and has today paid a price. And some will say: “Good riddance! Because all drugs are bad and you’re a drug-taker and you are bad, and good riddance, again, I say, as I suck the very yeast from a stubby of Carlton United Brewery’s finest hops-based alcoholic beverage, because it’s legal, and that’s just it.”

And to you, moral high-groundsman, I say this: “Screw you and the high horse you rode in on.”

Because if you think Barba will be the last high-profile sports person to be rubbed out of sport for sampling the product of Bolivian hill people, imported at great risk to Australia (top 5 with a bullet in the world’s largest consumers of cocaine) and spread about in little bags by well-paid pizza couriers, then you are a damned fool.

So – you want a fix? Here’s one: Don’t test for it.

“D-d-don’t test for it? But it is illegal? We must test for it!”

No, we don’t have to test for it.

Cocaine, ecstasy, the horrible skin-crawling, penis-hardening, wakey-wakey crystals of “ice”, these things aren’t sports-performance-enhancing, and as such aren’t cheating.

Indeed they’re arguably better than the legal drugs. Check your performance after downing ten schooners and ten vodka Red Bulls, and sucking in a packet of Winfield Reds.

Illicit drugs are no different. The only difference is in the word – illicit.

And the law, in this instance, is something of an ass, as the millionaires on Harleys would tell you.

You know who’s happy cocaine is illegal? Bikies. It’s another story. But it’s a straight-up fact.

But it’s illegal!” you screech again, whacking a few pointed missives into the keyboard with great vengeance and furious anger, the words flashing up on screen in big brassy fat font caps. “IT’S ILLEGAL DON’T YOU GET IT IT’S ILLEGAL!

I get that. Be cool.

My point is that people are still taking these things regardless. Hundreds of thousands, even millions, every weekend. It’s a fact. And a fact of life.

And testing for these things in sport and publicising the findings as a stick, it doesn’t do any good, any more than The Manly Daily publicising the crime of a 25-year-old tradesman, barman or stockbroker dabbling in the devil’s dandruff last Saturday night.

Coke, ecstasy, “Special K”, whatever that is, they’re a vice, like all of them. And the siren song is on for these things as much as it is for other drugs, like alcohol and nicotine and your aunty’s prescription stress meds.

“But wait! Employers can test their employees as they see fit!”

They can, to an extent. But there is context. You wouldn’t want airline pilots or train drivers or heart surgeons or such like to be affected by drugs, legal or otherwise, while performing their duties.

Sure.

Yet amphetamines are out of your system in 48 hours. And that’s why FIFO workers spend five days off in Bali on a bender, the next two days before getting on the plane drinking blood-purifying grassy green juice.

It’s sort of the same in sport. And you’d have to be pretty unlucky – and targeted, as Barba would’ve been – to be done twice.

And our Benny knew that, and evaluated the risks and took a punt, and enjoyed the drug’s ability to make him feel like a talkative cool person, if only for a while.

And now he’s been brushed by the Sharks, and if another NRL club wants him they’ll have to wait 12 games before he’s allowed to play, and even then he’ll have to get through the governing body which will, as ever, be acutely conscious of its brand’s appeal to sponsors.

“What about the kids? Won’t someone think of the children?”

Fair cop, also. These role models affect the youth.

So don’t test for it. Or if you must, don’t publicise it.

The NRL’s policy is first strike, you’re good. Second one is 12 weeks and it’s publicised. Third – two years and that’s likely you, out of the game.

And still they’re taking the drugs, and taking a punt, and we’ll never stop them, it’s a stone fact.

Few years ago I played golf, by chance, with an AFL club doctor. Nice fellah. And we gossiped away, as you do, about sport, and he mentioned a high-profile footy player who’d been done three times under the AFL’s “three strikes” drug-testing policy.

Anyway, this player was ordered to do a bunch of “counselling” and such forth. But because during this phase of the process he wasn’t tested again, he was all clear to go out and take all the cocaine and ecstasy and whatever else he wanted.

So by day he sat there in counselling and nodded along, “Oh yes – I must do better”. By night he was tearing it up on the dance floor with all the maidens of Melbourne.

And after all that, when he started playing again, old mate carved them up. Played great footy.

According to the newspapers his life was spiralling to shit.

But then who’s business is that?

“The clubs and the NRL have a ‘Duty of Care’!”

Sure. So educate, educate, educate. Explain, in the simplest bloody terms that you can to these young men and their still-developing brains that X will happen if you take Y.

It works with cigarettes. It appears to be getting through about the drink.

Players know that cocaine, alcohol, nicotine, they’re performance-reducing. If you want to reduce your own performance – and the quality of your very life – for mine, knock yourself out, you idiot.

It’s your body. It’s your family. It’s your life. It’s your professional sports career on the potentially big bucks.

Barba had his best year in 2016 since he so bedazzled for the Dogs in 2012, and won the Dally M medal.

Yet one would assume – and there is 99.9 per cent likelihood that one would be correct – that Barba’s two positive tests for cocaine do not represent the only two times he took cocaine in 2016. Because that would be a tad unlucky, wouldn’t it.

Look – for mine, what Barba does in his personal time, it’s none of your business. It’s none of his footy club’s business, and none of the National Rugby League’s business.

The NRL has a legitimate concern for the “look” to sponsors of their “brand”.

They’ll make noises about duty of care and welfare for the man and his family and let’s all think of Ben in these troubled times.

But money’s driving it. If Barba’s a reserve grader from Wyong, we aren’t hearing about it, any more than the tradie or stockbroker from North Balgowlah.

And anyway, get a police dog to sniff about the $50 bills in the wallets of your NRL and club heavyweights, and coaches’, and player-managers’, and media’s, refs’, and, yes you, sports fan, and there’ll be positive samples for all sorts of shit.

Nope – stuff it. Don’t test for it. Take it out of the equation. Double down on cheating, on performance-enhancing drugs.

But cocaine, eccies, all that stuff – stuff it. Don’t test for it.

“Simply too liberal! Who am I, Liberal Democrat Party Senator David “Bring back machine guns!” Leyonhjelm?”

I am not. Far from it. That guy can can swim about in the unrepresentative swill and make icky rough love with Pauline Hanson.

A pox on that guy.

But illicit drugs create mega-profits for illicit people. Take away the illegality, you take away the crime.

Yes, legalise this stuff, you’re left with social issues. But we have them anyway. That’s what we’ve got now.

Drugs are an issue. And alcohol’s by far the worst of them.

And thus sport should say that drugs, like alcohol, are a social issue, and it’s not our business, so let’s stop testing our athletes for taking stuff that negatively affects their ability to be athletes, and that’s all.

One day it’ll happen.

Hopefully before we’re all killed by President Trump.

The Crowd Says:

2016-11-16T23:57:43+00:00

world in union

Guest


Well said Matt Cleary- I totally agree and have been saying that for over 20 years

2016-11-10T04:02:21+00:00

Perry Bridge

Guest


It was ironic back in the day - when the debate was around faux 'zero tolerance' as a political catch phrase. The experts didn't like that line but Howard, Brandis and Pyne were playing politics. The Govt got confused - not realising that the AFL illicit policy was additional to and not in place of the oh so effective ASADA-WADA testing (which has found how many smoking guys? but costs heaps - although the Govt subsidises the Olympic sports). At the time the media was confused too - as they tried to suggest the ARU (with only ASADA testing) must be better than the AFL (illicit policy plus ASADA testing). Didn't make sense but Howard and media being confused really stuffed the narrative. Then the numbers game - a bit to save face - after the AFL had run with a 3 strikes policy the Govt gave the NRL a suitable nudge to adopt a policy and run with a 2 strike policy because if you can't have real zero tolerance then 2 must be better than 3 (because, sure, that's all there is to these black and white simple policies). So - the total irony when the Australian Sports Commission adopted a 3 strike policy for the AIS - total irony. Put it all a bit in perspective. There's been too much political gamesmanship and not nearly enough direct focus on the issue and its complexities.

2016-11-09T09:22:45+00:00

The Barry

Roar Guru


I'll leave your definition, spelling and overall ranking system of sarcasm alone for the moment. What I would really like to know is... Why is allowing a responsible, grown adult the opportunity to purchase clean, legally made drugs from a safe source that contributes to the economy (as opposed to something made in a toilet that makes bikies rich) anything at all like giving someone a high powered weapon or instructions on how to make a bomb?

2016-11-09T08:19:21+00:00

Bigj

Guest


Nothing, making drugs legal is just has stupid as giving me or anybody else a high powered weapon or the ability to build a bomb. There is no way I would want a high powered Weapon in my house this is sarcasim at its best. Thought you would of pick up on that.

2016-11-09T07:57:43+00:00

Chris Love

Roar Guru


Of course the dear of drug tests reduces the use of drugs in Rugby League. That's not the point, if Barba wants to sniff coke in his own time, can manage to be clear of his system by the time he starts training and can maintain a level of health and fitness to perform at training and on game day then who is he hurting? Just like Alcohol if it doesn't end there and people start showing up to work stoned, then the employer should have every right to bring down the hammer. I'm not a drug user, it's just not my thing as I much prefer a few coldies down the pub on a Friday night. But I have a lot of friends who are, very successful and never harm anyone when taking pot/coke/extacy. They self regulate by not doing it on work nights because just like alcohol, going to work the next day sucks. In all of the people I have ever known, I know only one single person who has become a full blown junkie. He was going there regardless of any law.

2016-11-09T07:51:34+00:00

Cadfael

Roar Guru


From a non sporting side, legalising it would see the money going to the government and not the dealers.

2016-11-09T07:38:42+00:00

northerner

Guest


In my little world, if you sign a contract and junk it, you pay the price. If your boss signs the contract and junks it, he pays the price.

2016-11-09T06:41:50+00:00

The Barry

Roar Guru


...and you think drugs are dangerous... How many times have you been assaulted in your house so far? Why do you think that would increase if drugs were made legal? Governments can't regulate illicit drug manufacturing and distribution because they're illegal, not the other way round. If drugs were legal the government could easily regulate. That's sort of the point. What do bombs have to do with it?

2016-11-09T04:38:42+00:00

Maestro

Guest


The AFL test is the same as AIS and Olympics which focusses on health but Roy Masters will undoubtedly have his usual biased view...

2016-11-09T04:36:56+00:00

Maestro

Guest


I assume testing has tightened up since his day 92-93 http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/league-news/ben-barba-drugs-scandal-jason-donnelly-says-cocaine-is-everywhere-after-grand-finals-20161109-gsl8l4.html but he was tested 6 times and others were never tested sounds bizarre...that's not random

2016-11-09T03:56:46+00:00

BigJ

Roar Guru


this is stupidity in the upmost, why not start bomb making class in schoosl and tell the kids not to do it and see how many of them dont blow up stuff, drugs are illlegal for a reason, manily due to the fact that the governemnt cant regulate their distrubution but as he know the health effects. Matt this is not Woodstock anymore and I never what to see illicit drugs legal. If drugs are legal then I want the right to have a full automatic 40 round shotgun in my home the right shoot off when ever the hell i please !!!

2016-11-09T02:31:34+00:00

Jacko

Guest


lease dont even start me on the "A contract is a contract" rubbish. How many EEls players were moved on? Where is Farah playing next year? Where is Hurrell playing? A contract is a waste of paper

2016-11-09T02:27:59+00:00

Jacko

Guest


Im sorry Andrew but Alcohol is just as addictive as any of the illicit drugs and Ciggerettes more addictive even than Heroine. I have witnessed first hand the results of prescription drugs making the user blind and there are many many instances of very nasty side effects with many of these. pot was outlawed for political reasons only and many of the illegal drugs are far less harmful than many legally prescribed ones. But please dont take my word for it as I would love you to do your own research. This country is silly when it comes to pot as they had to do TRIALS before allowing it to be used for medical reasons yet 99% of prescription drugs come into this country with no local testing or trials whatsoever. Meanwhile the person having 200+ seisures a day had to use drugs with bad side effects because of some draconian thinking.

2016-11-09T02:17:38+00:00

Jacko

Guest


Andrew have you seen the effects of Alcohol and prescription drugs?

2016-11-09T02:15:36+00:00

Jacko

Guest


LOL. Yes lets see who handles the drugs better than others

2016-11-09T02:04:13+00:00

northerner

Guest


Here's another thought bubble. A contract is a contract. If the contract says "no drugs" then, no drugs it is. If you don't want to accept the terms of the contract, don't sign it. Free choice. Sure, the contract imposes limitations on your behaviour that other young men might not have to worry about: in exchange, it gives you a wheelbarrow full of money. If you don't want the limitations, don't take the wheelbarrow.

2016-11-09T00:32:24+00:00

andrew

Guest


So you are saying you can take drugs as long as they don't improve performance... So when a club doctor finds a synthetic drug that isn't considered a performance enhancer (lets say 'ice' for arguments sake) and he believes that there may be some performance benefits, so since it is legal, he and the club make the players use ice. A player has an adverse reaction and dies, or a player develops an addiction or players long term health is affected adversely... Is this not a problem? is this not a reason to ban all drugs in your sport?

2016-11-09T00:24:40+00:00

andrew

Guest


Chris, Society has a right to set the rules when what you are doing to yourself can have implications on society. Is there a correlation between the use of what are deemed illegal drugs and crimes such as theft? I am not going to Google and see if there is but i will bet my left you know what that there are plenty of reports that indicate this. As for the tobacco/alcohol argument - if you want to put tobacco in the same category as illegal drugs, i have no problem with that. Ban it, thats cool with me. it has no redeeming qualities, is addictive and is known to cause Cancer. Alcohol - there are studies that will tell you in moderation it isn't bad for you and it doesn't have the addictive traits that things like cocaine and heroin have, so I can separate that from illicit drugs and most people can see that.

2016-11-08T20:39:22+00:00

Con Scortis

Roar Guru


"That guy can can swim about in the unrepresentative swill and make icky rough love with Pauline Hanson" You made me puke a little in my mouth. I have already booked into my first session at Recall Corp. to have that memory surgically removed from my brain.

2016-11-08T20:28:39+00:00

Tom Rock

Expert


I think the fear of regular drug tests minimises the use of recreational drugs in rugby league. It doesn't prevent it, but it would certainly reduce the numbers. These guys know the stakes and the cash involved. It's just like RBTs. Most people will stop themselves from having that last beer not because they think it is wrong, but for fear of consequences if they get caught

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar