We’re two Test matches into the Ashes and we have started to see an idea of the form that the players from both sides are in.
I understand numbers and averages don’t tell the whole story, but I thought it would be interesting to see who would make it into a combined XI based on averages.
1. David Warner
As stated in my previous article, Australia’s vice-aptain and the so-called ‘pocket rocket’ would have been disappointed not to have capitalised on the starts he had, yet he still averages third highest for both teams and highest among all openers. With three tests to go, you can be almost certain to see Warner ton-up.
2. Cameron Bancroft
Cameron beat his English counterpart, Mark Stoneman, by 0.17 of a run in the average department to make it into this combined statistical XI. A relatively unlucky start to his test career, he should be happy with his efforts and even more so with his victory when compared to the English openers
3. Joe Root
Grinding his way into the order is Root, England’s captain and leading run-scorer. A key player for the English coming into the series, he has had mixed performances, passing 50 twice but failing to go on and make it big. His one wicket is also handy. He comes in at three as he has a history of batting there; however, there are also statistical reasons he can’t be fourth.
With the bat
With the ball
4. Steven Smith
Busting the door down to captain this combined statistical XI side is the Aussie captain Steven Peter Devereux Smith. The second highest run scorer of both sides and averaging in the 90s for the series, he not only makes the side but captains it with two victories to his name compared to Root’s zero.
Smith also holds one of the two centuries scored by either side so far this Ashes. Below are the statistical reasons I was talking about on Joe Root’s positioning.
5. Shaun Marsh
He silenced the critics and then went beyond. He has scored more runs than any other person, English or Australian, this series, and with the next test being at his home ground of the WACA, he’ll be looking to make the gap larger between his teammates and opposition alike. Fun fact: He averages the same with the bat as Moeen Ali does with the ball.
6. Moeen Ali
It was a tight contest for sixth position, with a non-statistical choice needing to be made. Do you drop Usman Khawaja down from three to six to boost the batting or go with an all-rounder who has a lower batting average?
Ultimately the latter was chosen. Even though Moeen Ali has the second worst bowling average between both teams just behind Jake Ball, he still has the knack of taking a wicket and can hold up an end. His batting has been subpar, however, considering how much the English rely on his runs down the order.
With the bat
With the ball
7. Tim Paine
This position is where the team gets even more tricky. Jonny Bairstow and Tim Paine have exactly the same batting average and each have pros and cons in terms of averages. Bairstow has a 5 per cent higher strike rate, which in Test matches is negligible. Paine has scored a 50 (57 in Adelaide) whereas Bairstow’s high score is 42.
Ultimately, I had to go with Paine. Not only has he arguably provided more with the bat, but he has taken double the catches as that of Bairstow as well as completing one stumping.
At the stumps
8. Patrick Cummins
The fourth-best bowling average for both sides and the fourth highest batting average, Cummins finds and cements his foothold into the combined XI with two scores in the 40s and an average higher than any English batsman. He has made the Australian tail wag and provided plenty of runs down at the end. His bowling has also been above par, and with ‘2013/14 Ashes Ryan Harris-esque’ statistics he should (statistically) end the series with 18 wickets.
With the bat
With the ball
9. Nathan Lyon
The go-to nightwatchman for the Australians, his usual position of batting has been elevated for this combined XI. Nathan Lyon has been in absolutely stellar form with the ball, bowling the most overs of any bowler for both sides, bagging the second most wickets and maintaining the second best economy rate as well as the second highest bowling average.
With the bat
With the ball
10. Mitchel Starc
The highest wicket-taker for both sides, Starc has taken more wickets than Stuart Broad and James Anderson combined. The X-factor of the Australian bowling line up, Mitchell Starc’s raw pace has been too much for the English, taking the crown for most wickets and lowest average of all players. Out of touch so far with the bat, he and the rest of his side have been lucky that Cummins has provided.
With the bat
With the ball
11. James Anderson
To cap off the list of the playing statistical XI, James Anderson has managed to nick a spot with his bag of five under lights in Adelaide. He has the most economical bowling rate as well as the most wickets for the English side, and he has the third-best strike rate for any bowler.
With the bat
With the ball
Once again, I understand that numbers aren’t everything, yet I still found this interesting, and I hope you did too.
BleakCity
Roar Rookie
This
BleakCity
Roar Rookie
Haha
Ronan O'Connell
Expert
A struggling England side missing Ben Stokes, already 1-0 down away from home, was never going to win after giving up a 215-run first innings lead.
jeznez
Roar Guru
Because he has had so few tests. I get he method. But to keep it to the author’s criteria. They have identical averages and one has been facing England’s bowlers while the other has faced ours. The batting isn’t line ball. If Paine has kept significantly better then fine but the case hasn’t been made for that.
The Barry
Roar Guru
I’m no fan of Anderson but that’s a tad harsh. The series wasn’t over when he got his fivefa and that was the effort that almost dragged England back into the series. It’s only with hindsight that the horse had bolted.
Maxwell Charlesworth
Roar Rookie
*Anderson, and yeah, outrage probably not the best choice of words.
magic
Guest
*SLOTTED
magic
Guest
so, what about RT ponting wasn't he the best batsman in the side and he batted at six in his early day's and with not a bad record than why he had been sloted at 3 because any other batsman like D martyn also could have bat at three and now on clarke he had never enjoyed at 3 did he? Yes he didn't but look at SPD smith record at 3 you will find another RT ponting type player leading from the front and never the less you could be right bro
nick
Guest
Haha. Mitch Marsh never let statistics get in the way of his enormous potential.
Don Freo
Guest
Why not quote Paine's Test average? Max, however, is talking about this series so far. Why is that hard to grasp?
Don Freo
Guest
You are talking to some, Max, who think a stat from 10 years ago has some bearing on how a player plays now. It's not hard to see you are looking at the stats from this series. Bear may well be excused because he would have had his spreadsheets and stats all covering your article and may not have read the premise.
Don Freo
Guest
Statistically, Cummins is the all rounder at #6.
jeznez
Roar Guru
Not sure there is outrage is there? I seem to be the main guy plumping for Bairstow over Paine (I've seen one other poster say they'd have him in over Ali) I think the fact he is averaging the same as Paine while facing the Aussie attack is key to comparing them.
jeznez
Roar Guru
Neville has an FC average of 39.69 and a test average of 22.28 - you really think the selectors wouldn't have Bairstow in there? They dropped him for the supposed super bat Wade if you need a bit of evidence on how they think.
Ronan O'Connell
Expert
Anderson's stats viewed in isolation are very misleading, I believe. In the first 3 innings of the series, when the Ashes was up for grabs, Anderson took 3 wickets at an average of 51. Once the series was all but lost, he produced a fantastic performance but one which was fairly irrelevant because the Test was already gone, England could never win from that position. As the leading Test wicket taker in the world, Anderson needed to have an impact in the first 3 innings of this series when the series was up for grabs and he didn't. His five-for in the second innings at Adelaide was sublime, but he's received way more fan fare than he deserves for what was a horse-has-bolted effort not all that different from old Watto's tons in dead rubbers.
HB
Guest
Yes, that's my point.
Maxwell Charlesworth
Roar Rookie
Sounds good, thanks for the input again mate
John Erichsen
Roar Guru
Actually, and end of series review might be interesting. Who will cement their spot? Who, from outside your XI, will play their way into a best XI side? Worth considering, I think. It might just be too early in the series for this article to have enough credibility. A pre-series/ post-series comparison for future series perhaps?
John Erichsen
Roar Guru
Understand that, but looking at this series performances and Ali's must spoken about spin-finger injury,in a team with Lyon bowling off-spin, Ali would virtually never bowl.
John Erichsen
Roar Guru
How many chairs should we get to field for that?