2018 AFL mock draft: Round 1

By Brent Sternberg / Roar Guru

Well. That was hectic.

After one of the most chaotic and vertigo-inducing trade and free agency periods of the modern era, the order for the 2018 NAB AFL Draft is set.

Actually, no it’s not.

With clubs now having the power to trade picks up until draft night (including on draft night itself), expect the draft order below to change quite dramatically before November 22.

With this draft class being spoken about as one of the best in recent memory, as well as the likelihood of a bunch of academy bids expected, the new stand-alone Round 1 looks like it could go on forever.

Bearing in mind just how implausible it is to predict how the first round will unfold given all the variables, below is any early prediction as to how the first round might unfold, 1 month out from the real thing.

1. Carlton – Sam Walsh, Midfielder, Geelong Falcons
Though I discussed how the Blues couldn’t afford to pass on South Australian key forward Jack Lukosius in an article during the season, I’ve come to my senses. Walsh would add another exciting prospect to an all-of-sudden budding midfield group of co-captain Patrick Cripps, Paddy Dow, Will Setterfield and Zac Fisher.

Dare I say bust proof?

(Photo by Michael Willson/AFL Media/Getty Images)

2. Gold Coast – Max King, Key Forward/Ruck, Sandringham Dragons
Really intrigued as to what the Suns will do if they hang on to both picks on draft night. Taking the King boys would be one for the romantics, while also filling two huge areas of concern. Max is the key forward capable of pinch-hitting in the ruck who, despite a devastating ACL injury early in the season, would still be worthy of the second overall pick.

3. Gold Coast – Ben King, Key Defender, Sandringham Dragons
The best defender in the draft, Ben played up forward for the Dragons this year after Max went down with an injury. Capable at both ends, but should slot in at fullback for the Suns from day one.

4. St. Kilda – Jack Lukosius, Key Forward, Woodville-West Torrens (SA)
Awkward position for the Saints, as the supremely talented Lukosius doesn’t exactly fill a ‘need’. However, it would have been unfathomable six months ago to predict Lukosius would fall to pick four. Clearly best player available.

5. Port Adelaide – Izak Rankine, Half-Forward/Midfield, West Adelaide, (SA)
Port get their wish by adding South Australia’s second-best product at pick 5. Rankine is a supreme talent who gets better as the occasion gets bigger. A freak who arguably boasts the most naturally gifted talent in the draft class.

6. Sydney (bid) – Nick Blakey, Forward/Midfield, Sydney Swans Academy
Didn’t have the year he wanted due to persistent injuries, but the 195cm specimen still showed glimpses of his enormous potential. Expect a bid to come around this mark for the Swans next academy gem.

7. Gold Coast – Bailey Smith, Midfielder, Sandringham Dragons
The Suns should keep it simple here and take the best midfielder at this point. That’s Smith, a quality, well-rounded midfielder that possesses speed, endurance and ball-winning ability.

8. Western Bulldogs – Jye Caldwell, Midfielder, Bendigo Pioneers
Caldwell is another who was hampered by injuries seemingly all season. Still, recruiters would have seen enough to know that the hard-working inside midfielder would be a valuable addition to any engine room.

9. Adelaide – Connor Rozee, Half-Forward/Midfielder, North Adelaide, (SA)
A really exciting local prospect with a bag of tricks that, in all honesty, would be a steal at pick nine. Has the ability to have an impact off half-back, in the middle or on a half-forward flank.

10. North Melbourne (bid) – Tarryn Thomas, Midfielder, North Launceston (NM Next Generation Academy)
The 189cm midfielder was another who didn’t quite have the season he would have liked due to injuries and inconsistencies with form. Some believe he may slide in the draft but whenever the bid comes, the Roo’s will pounce (or bounce?).

11. GWS – Jordan Clark, Half-Back, Claremont (WA)
The Giants have lost quite a bit of outside run with the losses of players such as Nathan Wilson and Tom Scully. With Heath Shaw nearing the end as well, Clark would be a nice heir apparent to play the quarterback role off halfback.

12. Port Adelaide – Jackson Hately, Midfielder, Central Districts, (SA)
The Power go back to the South Australian well. Hately, another big midfielder at 190cm, can also go to halfback and have a profound impact on the game.

13. GWS – Liam Stocker, Midfielder, Sandringham Dragons
Stocker has been one of the draft bolters after missing time with a broken jaw earlier this season. Mature bodied already with a good kick on either foot.

14. Geelong – Sam Sturt, Half-Forward, Dandenong Stingrays
Athletically gifted medium forward who come on late this season. There is generally a shock in round 1, and the Cats have a history of pulling draft night surprises.

15. Adelaide – Ian Hill, Midfielder/Half-Forward, Perth (WA)
With the elite South Australian talent off the board, the Crows turn to the young cousin of Fremantle’s Stephen and Brad. Ian is lightning fast and capable of the spectacular.

16. Fremantle – Zak Butters, Midfielder, Western Jets
Butters is a classy ball user who would add some outside dash to the Dockers. Lauded among recruiters for his character, Butters season ended prematurely after shoulder surgery in July.

17. Collingwood (bid) – Isaac Quaynor, Half-Back, Oakleigh Chargers (Collingwood Next Generation Academy)
The Pies are getting a quality prospect in the versatile rebounding Backman. A bid this late in the opening round would be a bonus.

18. Port Adelaide – Xavier Duursma, Midfielder, Gippsland Power
The Power will be looking to replace some run and carry lost by the departures of Polec, Pittard and, to a lesser extent, Wingard. Duursma is a rangy, versatile player capable of restocking the Power’s run and carry arsenal.

19. Adelaide – Chayce Jones, Midfielder, Launceston (Tas)
The Crows may consider taking another South Australian prospect here, but Jones is probably the best available at this stage. A no fuss midfield talent with pace and above average foot skills.

20. Richmond – Riley Collier-Dawkins, Midfielder, Oakleigh Chargers
A really interesting midfield prospect at 193cm. RCD’s ceiling is as high as any in this draft. Could be a special talent with the right coaching and development.

21. Brisbane – Ely Smith, Midfielder, Murray Bushrangers
Another bulldozing midfielder ready to potentially have an impact in the emerging Lions midfielder from round 1.

22. GWS – Bailey Williams, Forward/Ruck, Dandenong Stingrays
While unlikely to help the Giants immediately, they could sure up their ruck stocks with the highly talented Williams. The jury is still out on where Williams plays his best footy, but GWS will be happy to find out.

The Crowd Says:

2018-11-13T01:52:00+00:00

Max

Guest


its a joke that the swans are penalised for developing these kids with their own funds and have to pay a premium price

2018-10-28T08:00:15+00:00

Andrew

Guest


I will also be very disappointed if the Crows draft Hill, we got McAdam and Stengle in the trade period to go with Betts and Gallucci so I highly doubt another small forward is a priority. If we go in with our current picks i think we'll go Hately, Stocker, B.Williams, Vallente. I'd be happy with that definitely

2018-10-24T10:39:02+00:00

IAP

Guest


That's pretty much what I was saying. No need to be nasty. I was just asking a question.

2018-10-24T00:16:49+00:00

Paul D

Roar Guru


They know full well how it works. They just want an opportunity and an excuse to moan about academies

2018-10-24T00:12:03+00:00

SportsFanGC

Roar Guru


How is it that several years into the AFL Draft with points values attached to picks, father-son and academy bidding etc. footy fans still don’t know how this process works and why teams drop down the order of the draft?

2018-10-24T00:06:34+00:00

SportsFanGC

Roar Guru


Zero chance of happening I would think. Can't see the Suns trading any of those Top Picks because they need the talent in the door now and they won't sell two top ten picks for 1 and a future 3rd round - that is wishful thinking.

2018-10-23T22:48:34+00:00

JamesH

Roar Guru


I just can't see the Suns going for the King boys over Lukosius and Rankine. The same logic in picking the Kings applies to selecting the two SA boys together (who are high school mates), if not quite to the same degree. Besides, by all accounts they are two of the three most talented players in the draft. Passing them over in the hope there will be slightly less 'go-home' factor for the Kings is defeatist. That sort of attitude will be a bigger roadblock to the Suns' success than losses, location or membership size. They need to back their revamped setup to create an environment where players want to stay. If they can't do that then they were doomed to fail anyway.

2018-10-23T06:23:32+00:00

Papa Joe

Roar Rookie


You may be right Pedro, I am basing that on the 'noise' of comments in forums such as this. As a GC supporter, I hope we don't trade any Picks out and just take the best available fit for the club.

2018-10-23T00:44:29+00:00

Paul D

Roar Guru


And knowledge and understanding isn't your strong suit. Worthless commentary. You've followed nothing about QLD teams on the ladder and players such as Bowes, Hipwood, Keays, Skinner etc? Your opinion is demonstrated to be devoid of all knowledge and understanding on the subject.

2018-10-23T00:11:06+00:00

DingoGray

Roar Guru


The "AFL" has nothing to do with the development of these kids. These kids have been working in the those academies often from as young as 14, the Clubs spending the money on developing them should get 1st crack at them.

2018-10-22T22:53:55+00:00

IAP

Guest


Nah, I don't follow it that closely. That sounds to me like a way for teams to jump the queue in the draft to the detriment of other teams. I guess that's how the AFL rolls though isn't it; fairness isn't one of their strong suit.

2018-10-22T22:29:17+00:00

Pedro The Fisherman

Roar Rookie


"...the Adelaide clubs appear to be desperate to outdo each other for the home grown SA talent." Really? Perhaps you are thinking of Port, which has sold the farm (Wingard, Polec and Pittard) to move up in the Draft to get in front of Adelaide)? Adelaide has not traded any of its early picks to move up and have always taken the best available talent (regardless of origin). Perhaps both Port and Adelaide can see that there is more SA origin talent than just Lukosius, Rankine and Rozee in this draft. Why would Adelaide or Port give up their picks (they each have 4 picks in the top 25) to speculate on unproven youngsters. It is a good year for SA talent but giving up 2 or 3 earlish picks to get 1 slightly earlier pick makes little sense.

2018-10-22T21:22:28+00:00

Tim Tyler

Guest


I believe my club will just pinch points from the following year's draft if they need to.

2018-10-22T13:02:37+00:00

Dalgety Carrington

Roar Guru


Two reasons. One is that the club trying to select that player thinks that F/S or Academy player is the best one available at that pick and hope the linked club doesn't value them as highly (ala Josh Dunkley). The second reason is that it means the linked club has to spend more on the player and take them at a more realistic value.

2018-10-22T12:12:52+00:00

Clayton

Guest


What it does it forces that club to use a certain number of points for that pick. It then forces them further back in the next round of the draft depending on the points. For example if Sydney are forced to pick Nick Blakey with pick 6 it will cost them 1,751. Minus a 20% discount for being an academy player. (1400) Sydney would then need to give up pick 26 worth 729 points, pick 33 worth 563, pick 38 worth 465 to be able to bid for him. Hence why they loaded up with second round picks this year. I am not 100% sure on this part I am just assuming so correct me if I am wrong but I they will have 357 points left from this and I think that becomes pick 45.

2018-10-22T10:44:39+00:00

Tim Tyler

Guest


Can anyone please tell what the advantage is of jumping in on some father son or Academy pick that another club is going to take.It seems to me it just pushes everybody one further pick down the list.

2018-10-22T10:02:28+00:00

Papa Joe

Roar Rookie


Ditto - don't read too much into the Hombsch trade. Below is an extract of an interview with Craig Cameron, the Suns list manager: "Cameron said including Kolodjashnij in the same deal with the Demons was part of an overall strategy to bring in Port Adelaide defender Jack Hombsch, which is why the SUNS did not receive any later picks from Melbourne. “The way that these trades are presented on the board is not necessarily the machination of the trade,” Cameron explained “The way we look at it is part of that whole deal (with Melbourne) included Jack Hombsch coming to us for very little. “They get written up a certain way but it’s not the way we actually have negotiated it.”

2018-10-22T08:46:46+00:00

Lroy

Guest


Ok, thanks.

2018-10-22T08:39:44+00:00

Cat

Roar Guru


Every time an academy player or father/son pick is matched every pick after it slides back. Because Nick Blakey, Tarryn Thomas and Isaac Quaynor are predicted to be bid on early WCE picks 20 and 22 become picks 23 and 25.

2018-10-22T08:30:43+00:00

Lroy

Guest


Ive read it and cant work it out either.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar