Michael Cheika’s biggest Spring Tour questions

By Brett McKay / Expert

Stop me if you’ve heard this one before, Wallabies fans.

Australia starts a Test a little slowly and concedes an early try, but gets onto the board themselves. The Wallabies show some promising, ground-making signs through the forwards, concede another try, but claw one back late in the half. They head into the sheds in a not-completely-terrible scenario.

They then claw the margin back to less than a try, only for a combination of ordinary defence, ordinary skills, and sheer stupidity to see them ship 17 points in 17 minutes, and ultimately, the game. Late bench cameos will do enough to launch ‘he needs to start’ discussion, a late but actually well-worked try is scored, only to concede another right on the bell.

Full points for correctly identifying ‘this one’ as Saturday night’s Bledisloe 3 loss in Yokohama.

But bonus points for recognising ‘this one’ as so many of the Wallabies losses – and definitely as one of so many Bledisloe losses – in as far back through this current playing cohort as you’ll allow yourself to masochistically recall.

The loss itself was disappointing; there’s not denying that. But for mine, what’s more disappointing is that we’ve seen ‘this one’ so regularly now that we can predict the result with depressing accuracy.

It goes a little like this: a game will play out and mistakes will be made. The loss is there for all to see, and the reaction on the field is disappointment and lament of missed opportunities. Positives will be latched onto post-match and some will even make sense.

And ultimately, resolution of said issues won’t be difficult, we’ll be told.

And because we’ve become so used to predicting how it plays out, we also become attuned to latching onto those positives.

Matt Toomua of the Wallabies (AAP Image/Dave Hunt)

So we’ve seen the positives in Matt Toomua coming back from England, and the way he’s gone into familiar switch between first and second receiver. We’ve enjoyed the emergence of Izack Rodda as a lineout target, and even more so the impact brutality of Taniela Tupou. We love that Dane Haylett-Petty’s footballing ability is coming through, now that he’s been allowed to play as a proper fullback, just as the benefits of Israel Folau’s simplified game on the right wing are clear.

Thus, that’s all we’ve got again from Yokohama.

Rodda’s first half was really good, and so was that the case of his second-row partner Rob Simmons, who it felt like ran more metres and certainly made more gain line metres in I don’t know how long. That run of his to be held up over the line under the posts was the exclamation mark on what had to that point been a strong game.

Scott Sio was strong, David Pocock was strong, Michael Hooper was great in defence. Sefa Naivalu was industrious in his first game back in yonks. Bernard Foley again showed why he’s a starter and not a ‘finisher’. And on his return from injury, Samu Kerevi was so good as a finisher that he’s probably needed as a starter again.

And so, we again find ourselves in an uncomfortable position going into another Spring Tour. The domestic season hasn’t gone well at all, and not even three really good wins against Wales, Italy, and England will necessarily resolve anything.

Furthermore, with it becoming pretty obvious that the current playing a coaching group is heading all the way to the Rugby World Cup, now less than twelve months away, the question of how Michael Cheika reinvigorates, reshapes, and – hopefully – revives the Wallabies over this next year becomes the most crucial of all.

These are difficult times for Wallabies coach Michael Cheika. (Photo by Cameron Spencer/Getty Images)

So, then, how should the Wallabies approach these final three games of the season?

Three wins would still only make for a six-and-seven season, so it’s not like a winning campaign can be achieved.

Undoubtedly, these three November Tests have to become about trying new things, new positions, new players even, should any new faces actually make the tour of course.

Two months ago I floated the idea of Will Genia skipping the Spring Tour for the greater good of Australian scrumhalves, and after Nick Phipps was only able to get nine minutes off the bench with the Wallabies already down by 19, I remain as convinced as ever.

Genia is the best scrumhalf in Australia; that’s not up for debate. But he was hit by a bus tomorrow, such has been the Wallabies reliance on him in 2018, that their approach to the game would be lost without him.

And if Phipps can only nine minutes in a well-beaten side, what hope does he have of applying any pressure on Genia himself, never mind the likes Jake Gordon and Joe Powell? Powell won’t get another chance in 2018 now, paying the price for a lack of game time caused by spending so much time on the Wallabies training track during the week and in the ‘number ones’ on weekends.

Gordon and Phipps both need to start Tests on this tour. If it’s alright for Ireland to hold back starters from the first of three Tests in June with a view to them being needed later in the series, then there’s no harm in the Wallabies saving Genia for England, either.

Will Genia needs a break. (Photo by Mark Kolbe/Getty Images)

It’s time to see just what other backrow positions Hooper can play too. Pocock’s forced-hybrid game at no.8 is becoming so compromised now that he’s playing well but doing so in spite of what he has to do. If Pocock has had to adapt to blindside or at the back of the scrum, then why shouldn’t we try Hooper there too?

I don’t at all like the selection of Adam Ashley-Cooper in the training squad this week, but I can see the advantages. For one, it’s obvious that Folau’s Wallabies career at outside centre will be short-lived. And Ashley-Cooper at 13 would at least attack and defend in the same place, thus reducing the moving parts that have again crept into the backline.

And what of Tolu Latu? With two other hookers in the squad, and Tatafu Polota-Nau to join the squad in Wales, I’d argue that Latu is the expendable one. Yes, his yellow card was probably on the harsh side, given the lead-up to it, but I’m completely with All Blacks coach Steve Hansen on this.

If Latu can’t control the “dumb things” still lingering in his game, then there’s other hookers better equipped to face European front rowers who would otherwise be lining up to bait the Waratahs rake.

So what will Cheika do? How will he approach these last three Tests of 2018? And what can he do with this playing group to prove that he is the best-placed to lead the Wallabies to another World Cup?

Only he knows. But I look forward to him showing us over the next three weekends.

The Crowd Says:

2018-11-02T13:38:28+00:00

CUW

Roar Rookie


i have no idea about thesse contracts - but perhaps rugger also needs to look at the contracts of footy coaches around the world. they have performance clauses with targets built in - so that underperforming coaches can be sacked without much expense. i think Real Madrid have sacked their coach already. But funny thing is in Spain u can run a club with an interim coach only for 2 weeks. So they are under pressure to get a new coach soon.

2018-11-02T13:34:19+00:00

CUW

Roar Rookie


in France they think the first playmaker is the scrum half dont take NZ as an example - they trying to compensate for the weaknesess in Barrets game . BB at 10 does not run at the line or play high - that is why the rush defence was able to nullify his playmaking. When NZ beat SA in that epic match - it was MOUANGA who made a difference by running from 10 and suddenly the rush defence became a liability. of course he can step a lot more than Barrett - whose claim to fame is blistering pace in the first 40m. he can run past a defence becoz of the speed off the mark. but yes - 15 can be a playmaker , watch SARACENS and GOODE, who is ofcourse ignored by England :D

2018-11-02T13:28:30+00:00

CUW

Roar Rookie


i think CORY JANE was the last wing in NZ to play tests past 30 the problem in NZ is that so many wingers come every year from under 20 - its hard for the test players to hold on to a spot if not in form. J Savea is the best example of that. if he was in any other country with a strike rate like that , he will be in the team even when injured. i think ROB KEARNEY is still going strong at fulll back for Ireland. and the PISI Brothers for Samoa - over 30 for sure.

2018-10-31T23:02:48+00:00

Barney

Roar Rookie


Everyone is talking about how AAC can/will mentor or whatever Jordan P - why can't he then do that as a Mitchell-type "trainer", and then bring someone else along to actually play and develop [_I know his ask was to play_]? If not English then why not Rona I wonder - he's definitely got more recent history with the team than AAC?

2018-10-31T22:35:18+00:00

RedandBlack

Guest


Once again we have people stiffing Hannigan. I can't understand it - he is building nicely into the sort of player you can build packs around. Not the full package yet I know but he works at away at the no glory stuff in the way that you haven't had in a Wallaby pack since Finnegan. Mate you are not short on fighter pilots surely you can make room for one squaddie. I see plenty of complimentary comments on here about how the AB's blood players and develop them - Hannigan is Cheiks first real attempt to do this up front - and now we have a couple more - give him space let him grow and you'll love him in a coupla years, keep shooting the lad and some French fans will be loving him instead.

2018-10-31T18:38:49+00:00

Ken Catchpole's Other Leg

Roar Guru


We have had stunted attack for most of four years. Defence and limited attack may get you to a RWC final but more is required to win one. Cheika had an attacking 10 warming the pine through the whole 2015 final. Bernard, God love im, was gutsy to help get us to the final, but his limitations in attack were never going to be enough to win it.

2018-10-31T09:14:58+00:00

LifestyleSpecialist

Roar Rookie


Totally agree KKOL - the AAC thing has hogged the headlines. I honestly don't think it's that bad to have an uber experienced Wallaby who was one of the best defenders we ever had. Recall when he tackled 2 saffas in about 1 second to prevent a sure try? His defensive reads too were excellent - knew when to come up and when to slide etc. He can only be a good influence on young Jordan P who really does look like the next young star after Tupou in recent years.

2018-10-30T21:12:37+00:00

Don

Roar Rookie


Cheika strikes me as a guy who’s confident and comfortable that his employer won’t be putting pressure on him to improve for fear of losing his job. He’s also someone who selects the person he knows and trusts regardless of form before he brings in an unknown. I get the feeling that the more noise and criticism their is of particular players he has selected, the more steadfast he is in keeping them in the side regardless of how we were playing.

2018-10-30T20:46:22+00:00

Fox

Roar Guru


Hi KCOL - go back and watch the game again - even the Australian commentators were talking about the AB pack driving them back at most of the scrums on the Wallaby feed and the won a few penalties there as well - some dominance some technical

2018-10-30T20:39:36+00:00

Machooka

Roar Guru


:)

2018-10-30T20:13:48+00:00

Stu

Roar Rookie


"Latau".. You mean Latu, or Folau? Latau.. the fictitious combo love child of Maria and Tolu? Don't think Izzy or Jesus would go for that. Yet to pick up a yellow though..

2018-10-30T19:54:38+00:00

Stu

Roar Rookie


"it may be think again"... What does that mean?

2018-10-30T16:31:15+00:00

Lara

Guest


Some of the questions that Cheika needs to answer , have been there for sometime. Cheika ,just seems unable to solve them. He has great difficulty reading players qualities . The jigsaw to make up a team to play a sound game plan n adjust that plan to play certain countries has been a very slow painful process. Cheika does need help from outside , his current answers equal a D minus. It like a kid with one standard answer for every question n when asked why, he throws a tantrum.

2018-10-30T15:44:56+00:00

jack

Roar Rookie


am only replying because there isn't a like option

2018-10-30T15:07:04+00:00

Ken Catchpole's Other Leg

Roar Guru


Over Here, where have you been? Many on here have been asking that question for three years. Courageous Bernard Foley must be one of the most overworked backs in world rugby. There is no back up. Except tumbleweeds and the comforting hum of crickets.........

2018-10-30T15:03:34+00:00

Ken Catchpole's Other Leg

Roar Guru


Or 10’s. Or 6’s Or 8’s.

2018-10-30T14:58:49+00:00

Ken Catchpole's Other Leg

Roar Guru


James, I think Fox and P2R2 are getting a bit carried away with talk of scrum ‘dominance’.

2018-10-30T14:51:47+00:00

Ken Catchpole's Other Leg

Roar Guru


Yes Nick, your points about the scrum ‘arm wrestle’ hold water. Sure we were penalised, but I wonder if the for and against would’ve been the same under a different ref. Poite seemed a bit ‘laissez faire’ , and ‘impressionistic’ when it came to scrums, and ruck entries. Not so concerned about the scrum, atm. What to do with the ball after we’ve won a scrum, there’s the rub...

2018-10-30T14:21:18+00:00

Ken Catchpole's Other Leg

Roar Guru


Riddler, I have the same feeling about Banks. He looks to me like Latham, one who will have a crack at any level, in any moment, without hesitation.

2018-10-30T14:13:39+00:00

Ken Catchpole's Other Leg

Roar Guru


All good ideas imo, Huw. I have a couple of others. But this focusing on AAC is a bit of a red herring. Other than Jordan P. we don’t have a stand out ‘pick me’ sort of player in the zone atm. I honestly don’t know if AAC is up to it. Chances are he won’t even play anywhere but bench for a few minutes. The selection ‘panel’ has made much more contentious decisions than this one over the last three years. Such as selecting and/or developing a back up 10? Or three back up 10’s?

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar