Australia vs India: Five first-Test takeaways

By The Regulator / Roar Rookie

It wasn’t the result the country wanted, but the first Test of the summer was a beauty.

A game that ebbed and flowed for both teams ultimately ended with India drawing first blood, winning by 31 runs, but the first Test on home soil for the new Australian Test team, one without Steve Smith and David Warner but featuring ‘elite honesty’, raised more questions than it answered.

Soft dismissals, DRS dilemmas and the all-rounder debate are issues that will be focused on in the short three-day turnaround to the second Test at the new Optus Stadium in Perth. That being said, here are five takeaways from the game that I, as a fan, learnt from a cracking opening Test to the Aussie summer.

1. It only takes one
Cheteshwar Pujara. The man they compare to former Indian No.3 ‘The Wall’ Rahul Dravid was just that, playing beautifully in both innings for 123 and 71 respectively, top-scoring for India in both and being named man of the match.

The beauty of Pujara’s innings was he did it his way. He admitted after his century that it was tough batting out in the middle, but that didn’t affect the way he went about his business. Playing his game, placing a high price on his wicket, waiting patiently for his deliveries – Pujara’s innings was unlike anyone else’s.

He was the only one to play two valuable innings throughout the game, and ultimately he was the difference between the two teams. If Travis Head had have been able to replicate his first innings or had Shaun Marsh delivered in the first, the Aussies may very well have gone 1-0 up.

2. Should the Aussie six be nervous?
I don’t think so. Even though none of them really performed to an expected level, five of the six showed glimpses of their capabilities, showing why Justin Langer and the Australian selectors think this is the best side to represent the nation.

Travis Head’s gutsy 72 with the tail in the first innings is to be applauded. His first Test on home soil at his home ground would have been a fantastic moment for him in his career, but it was a pressure-filled match in front of his home-town fans.

Half the nation blew a gasket after his poor first innings, albeit despite his dismissal being somewhat unlucky, but his 60 in the second innings showed exactly why he deserved selection.

Technically brilliant for 165 of 166 balls, he produced some of the best strokes you’ll see not just in this Test but in the entire summer – until the faintest of nicks saw him caught behind.

Marcus Harris showed potential on debut, Usman Khawaja and Peter Handscomb showed a bit of promise in the first innings and Tim Paine’s 41 in the second innings was a massive improvement on the first.

(Francois Nel/Getty Images)

3. Down the order
Aaron Finch didn’t impress with the bat in any way, shape or form. He was out on a third-ball duck in the first innings and could have easily have gone similarly cheaply in the second had it not been for an Ishant Sharma no ball.

He was excellent in the field, but making runs is what he is in the side to do. While he opened well in the UAE, the new ball doesn’t have the same affect on Australian soil, and he looked uneasy at the crease.

There is no doubt Finch can devastate bowling attacks when he gets going, so a move down to six, where he has batted for the majority of his first-class career, may be more comfortable and ease some of the pressure on the one-day and T20 captain.

Sports opinion delivered daily 

   

4. Come in, all-rounder?
But not Mitch Marsh. That’s not a slight on Marsh at all, but 21 and 11 to go along with match figures of 1-102 in a Shield game do not earn you a recall. But if the selectors and Justin Langer have pencilled in Finch as only an opener, along with a quick turnaround, hot Western Australian conditions and a tendency for Australian fast bowlers – mainly Mitch Starc and Pat Cummins – to break down, do the Aussies play an all-rounder in Perth to lighten the load?

Marcus Stoinis would be the man to fill the role. He’s averaging 42 with the bat and has taken ten wickets this Shield season to go along with an impressive ODI series against South Africa at the start of the summer. Batting Stoinis at six with Finch to miss and the rest of the order from Adelaide sliding up one to pair Harris and Khawaja at the top makes sense.

However, an ankle injury Stoinis suffered in the Shield game against Victoria at the weekend may quash any chance of a personal change to the team.

(Jono Searle – CA/Cricket Australia/Getty Images)

5. Poster boy Patty
Pat Cummins could be the next poster boy of Australian cricket. The enforcer of the bowling cartel, a more than handy lower-order batsman, and that run-out in the first innings, Pat Cummins has all the tools to be the next golden boy of Aussie cricket.

He’s a big moment player. Nicking off Virat Kohli in the first to a super catch from Usman Khawaja, the before-mentioned run-out of centurion Chet Pujara on the last ball of Day 1 after bowling 19 overs in nearly 40-degree heat, and a very watchful, very gritty 28 from 121 deliveries kept Australia’s chance of victory afloat on Day 5.

If he keeps producing moments like those, he could very soon be Australia’s favourite cricketer.

The Crowd Says:

2018-12-12T15:09:24+00:00

Maxwell Charlesworth

Roar Rookie


Im surprised no mention of Neser for the all rounder option. 4 fifties this season (Same as Joe burns in 1 less game) with an average of 52 with the bat and 13 wickets at around 32. Not too shabby.

2018-12-12T15:05:15+00:00

Maxwell Charlesworth

Roar Rookie


Only maybe for Head? You joking? Played 3 tests, saved one, 2nd highest Australian scorer in the second and now the highest Australian score in the 3rd. The most consistent player bar Khawaja.

2018-12-12T12:54:12+00:00

Boycey

Roar Rookie


Why not? They closed that box almost right after he got a test century. And all he’s done since is score first class runs. His value in the field also cannot be understated. I think he’d be our best fit at six if we were to can Finch and move everyone up. Put it this way: Maxwell or Mitch Marsh?

2018-12-12T04:17:34+00:00

Bearfax

Roar Guru


In my opinion only Khawaja, Shaun Marsh and maybe Head deserve their place in the second test. I wouldn't be going for Stoinis and Mitch Marsh needs to do more to get back. I would be looking at Patterson and Henriques, both players who value their wicket. Unfortunately until some of the young blades start pushing for a place, the cupboard is bare without Smith and Warner

2018-12-12T04:10:11+00:00

anon

Roar Pro


Starc and Cummins are all rounders. Their batting averages are only 5 runs worse than Mitch Marsh and vastly superior bowlers. Stoinis is not a Test player. He's not Andy Symonds. Let's calm down about this Perth pitch. For the last 15 years the curator has said it will be a fast, bouncy track that harks back to the WACA pitches of the 80's. And then it ends up being a road or spin friendly. I don't understand what Langer is doing with Finch. Finch is not good enough to open in Shield matches, let alone against the best Test team in the world. I don't think he's even good enough to be a middle overs batsman at Test level. The Finch selection cost us the First Test and the series. The Mitch Marsh (and Shaun) selection cost us the UAE series. In previous years you could get away with playing favourites, picking mates, picking "good blokes" because we were so dominant at home. Not now. You've got to nail every selection and not have obvious holes in the line up much like Finch is and Mitch Marsh was. To me this in unforgivable to not get something as basic as not picking Finch right. Langer's record is now 6 wins, 1 draw and 17 losses from 24 matches as coach. 5 of those wins came in T20 matches. Of those 5 wins, 3 of those wins were against the UAE and Zimbabwe. This is absolutely appalling.

2018-12-12T03:12:47+00:00

IAP

Guest


The answer to your question is in the last line you wrote. If the Australian captain carried on the way Kohli does when we get a wicket he'd be hung, drawn and quartered by the Australian media. Alas, not a word written about Kohli carrying on like a pork chop.

2018-12-12T01:22:43+00:00

pakistanstar

Roar Rookie


Australia has never need an all-rounder in the side and honestly, we shouldn't be picking one unless a test level all-rounder is in our ranks (rules out both M Marsh & Stoinis) and our keeper is able to bat in the top 6. The "all-rounder" that is close to being test level quality is Glenn Maxwell but I'm not keen on opening that box again.

2018-12-11T23:56:46+00:00

doug heffernan

Guest


Another talking point: How was their keeper Pant not fined for unsportsmanlike conduct?? Talking back to the umpire, contacting the batsmen, sledging using offensive slurs. Kohli should have been fined for his over the top celebrations too and throwing the ball into the ground delibrately. How come the first test wasnt at the GABBA as per usual? Alll evidence that Team India is above the law and will use their bulk to get their way.

2018-12-11T23:53:12+00:00

doug heffernan

Guest


Finch is the new "walking wicket" that was once mitch marsh. Absolutely terrible terrible technique and will continue to fail. This patethic experiment has already cost AUS the series. More crucial is to drop Finch from opening! He will be slaughtered on the fast Perth wicket. If hethought Adelaide was rough, my goodness Finch will be slammed. The XI for perth should be (but wont be) Harris Burns Uzzy S Marsh Handscomb Head Paine Bowlers

2018-12-11T23:19:39+00:00

Chris Kettlewell

Roar Guru


Patto is a really good number 8. He's certainly not a solution for the "batting allrounder" position!

AUTHOR

2018-12-11T22:28:55+00:00

The Regulator

Roar Rookie


I'm a massive Patto fan mate, would love to see a Test featuring Starc, Hazelwood Cummins & Pattinson as the bowling attack. But hes averaging 16 with the bat (his last four knocks have been 3, 9, 0 and 6*) and 33 with the ball, so he is still working his way back into it. Maybe not as a genuine all-rounder but I would still like to see Patto play Test cricket for Australia again.

AUTHOR

2018-12-11T22:12:10+00:00

The Regulator

Roar Rookie


Thanks John, I appreciate the kind words. I should have been clearer in describing Finch's move down the order was more in relation to batting in the middle order throughout his first class rather than at the number 6 position. The main point I was making was that the pressure of opening, a new ball moving around and patchy form, a move down the order may release some of that pressure for him to play more of his natural game effectively. While it wasn't a well executed drive, Shaun Marsh can definitely play that shot well, as seen in the second innings, and to drag on from that far outside off stump is unlucky. Pat Cummins was literally nutmeg'd and it didn't hit the stumps. But thanks again for the advice, I'll be a little more careful next time and I'll be posting another one very shortly.

2018-12-11T20:06:13+00:00

bazza200

Guest


if you want an allrounder bring in Patto he is only allowed to bowl not more than 10 over a day that is fine from an all rounder and averages the same as our previous allrounder.

2018-12-11T11:41:14+00:00

John Erichsen

Roar Guru


All in all, I enjoyed the article. I look forward to the next contribution. Just a quick fact check- Aaron Finch most certainly has not batted at six for "the majority of his first class career career". In Shield cricket, Finch has only batted there 3 times. He has opened 8 times, batted at four 8 times, batted at five 23 times and batted at first drop 41 times. As for Shaun Marsh's first innings dismissal being unlucky... You are not the first to suggest it, but it was more a poorly executed drive than it was unlucky. Pujara showed his class, Cummins is a seriously good player. I am not convinced an all-rounder is the solution. If we need another bowling option, it is only because for parts of the game Mitch Starc looked flat. We don't have an all-round option deserving of a test cap, despite Stoinis in half decent shield form, in my opinion.

Read more at The Roar