Football will never be king until the salary cap is abolished

By Basti / Roar Rookie

“The quality is simply under par”, “The crowds are shrinking every year!”, “There’s no future in this league”.

These are only a few of the reoccurring statements being made, by ex-players, pundits, commentators, fans, and those who simply enjoy watching the beautiful game, towards FFA and its correspondence with football.

The culture of football in Australia, especially the A-League, has been held back since its establishment in 2004, by one simple and yet detrimental aspect of the game – the Salary Cap.

In light of this, it has become evident that by enforcing such a rule, the future of football in Australia appears to be nearing the end among a very competitive, successful, and globally recognised sport.

Moreover, this financial constraints which have been enforced in the A-League has hindered each of its clubs’ individual capability to thrive for growth – both within the roots of their culture, as well as the development of their youth.

Should the A-League have a salary cap? (Photo by Cameron Spencer/Getty Images)

The FFA’s implementation of the Salary Cap has been arguably the most controversial and ineffective element of the A-League, which has therefore led to the corrosion of football’s once promising image within Australia.

Australian football has simply lacked the quality and standards of other competing nations around the globe, both in regards to the A-League and the Socceroos.

For example, Scottish BT Sports commentator, Chris Sutton, effortlessly ridiculed Australian football by stating that Australians should “stick to your prawns and barbecues”.

This statement was made in light of Tom Rogic’s opportunity to represent his club, Celtic, over our nation due to a quality differentiation.

Tom Rogic is one of Australia’s brightest overseas stars. (Photo: Paul Ellis/Getty Images)

Hence, it is vital that such restrictions should be removed in order to regenerate the potential success at stake for the FFA to achieve their long term vision of making Football “the largest and most popular sport in Australia”.

The Cap was initially enforced to “facilitate competitive balance and parity between clubs”, an ideology which has been promoted around the foundations of every homegrown sporting code in Australia such as AFL, NRL etc.

Despite its initial success in the A-League by assisting clubs to develop at an equivalent rate, it can be argued that by upholding such a rule still to this day, the FFA have only restrained these clubs from growing further.

This ideology around the implementation of the Salary Cap in Australian sport can be accepted by those nationally recognised sports, however, in regards to a globally accomplished sport like football, it is simply unrealistic.

Not only will this diminish the FFA’s long-term vision to make “Football… the largest and most popular sport in Australia”, but it will also fragment the potential growth and success of the A-League.

For example, by ensuring that all clubs are on equal terms, the A-League will remain stagnant and thus fail to progress.

However, by adapting the competition to relevant tournaments elsewhere, such as the English Premier League, clubs will be provided the ability to expand.

Should the A-League look to the Premier League? (Photo by Nick Taylor/Liverpool FC/Liverpool FC via Getty Images)

Despite inequalities financially, like other leagues, the FFA must accept that a collection of clubs will inevitably triumph over the remaining clubs.

Therefore, despite their vision of a competitive and fair environment, together the FFA and A-League must acknowledge the reality. They must take the opportunity and diverge from other Australian codes to integrate a more realistic format without the Salary Cap in order to enable the A-League to ripen.

Despite record club memberships and FFA distributions designed to better market the league, according to the FFA’s 2018 Annual Review, A-League “clubs and players, traditional broadcast metrics and attendances dipped”.

For example, the 2017-18 national average attendance has been recorded at 11,332, down from between 12-13,000 over the past five years according to ABC News reporter Michael Janda.

Therefore, my immediate theory in response to the removal of the Salary Cap is that it can open up new avenues for current and future club owners to discover potential investment opportunities within these awaiting clubs that yearn for growth and success.

With large sums of money being injected into these promising clubs, current and future playing and training facilities can be modulated to meet state of the art standards.

For example, new infrastructure, such as stadiums, being built for exclusive clubs can develop an emphatic culture within the club, whereby marking a new beginning in the club’s history.

Moreover, this would rejuvenate a sense of individuality within, as opposed to having a boring, equal competitive environment, reflecting that of any other sporting code in Australia.

As a result, this would certainly enshrine the rich history and culture of the club, along with attracting a more united fan-base that is supported by loyalty and devotion to the club.

This has been successfully proven by multiple clubs across Europe, such as Liverpool FC, who have been unified through their rich history that is supplemented by obtaining a historic stadium (Anfield) and fan-base (The Kop). In turn, this would certainly bring out the best of the A-League, and finally maximise its true value within Australia.

Furthermore, with a flourishing A-League competition, minus the Salary Cap, attraction rates will dramatically increase.

Coaches, players and staff from other leagues around the world, at a more accomplished level, would therefore establish a growing interest in the A-League as a result of seeing it evidently progress.

More importantly, by attracting proficient coaches, these players in the Australian youth academy may develop skills at a higher standard.

In turn, not only would this improve their individual abilities, but also the ultimate and holistic quality of the Socceroos national squad.

Despite the threat of importing foreign players and coaches, and how it completely contradicts the ideology of establishing a well-developed Australian youth academy, the FFA must enforce more lenient policies in this regard by increasing the number of foreign players allowed to play for each club in order to attract additional players elsewhere – a chain reaction.

This could ideally be supplemented by introducing 4-6 new clubs, where hungry investors and future club owners would look to assist in their development in order to compete in the A-League.

In turn, this would provide far greater opportunities for clubs to utilise a much larger proportion of the Australian youth, along with having the freedom to sign and attract players with higher calibre to the A-League.

In correspondence with such plans to expand, it would be necessary to implement a second tier whereby those clubs who are relegated, can re-evaluate the quality within their squad to ultimately regain their position as an A-League title contender.

Further, this would promote the ideology of providing greater opportunities for the Australian youth.

For example, in light of placing a large focus on the youth, England have enforced a Homegrown Player Rule where Premier League clubs are allowed a maximum of 25 players in their first-team squad, where at least eight players must be ‘home-grown’ (English).

Likewise, this somewhat reflects and complies with the FFA’s current policy in the A-League, however, this would require some modification should the FFA take into account the potential to expand.

Therefore, by addressing the significance of removing the A-League Salary Cap, the FFA have a pioneering opportunity to re-evaluate the foundations of the A-League. Further, they must acknowledge the array of opportunities and positive outcomes available to help maximise the true potential of Australian Football.

Until then, it can be fair to say that by pursuing to uphold such a toxic and detrimental policy, Australian Football holistically will never fulfil this fantasised vision of becoming “the largest and most popular sport in Australia”.

Sports opinion delivered daily 

   

The Crowd Says:

2019-03-12T05:23:32+00:00

Munro Mike

Roar Rookie


#Fadida Ironically enough AFL Fiji are just that.....then there's AFL Canada, and then AFL England which is part of AFL Europe and includes AFL London......alas, "AFL" has become a transferable 'brand'. re Association Football (as distinct to Rugby Football or Australian Football or American Football or Gaelic Football) was always....per WWII in Australia....known as "British Association Football"....or "the English Association game". 'Always' is somewhat subjective.

AUTHOR

2019-03-05T08:22:49+00:00

Basti

Roar Rookie


Yeah well said, my aim throughout this article was to raise awareness of the potential opportunities to allow the A-League to flourish...I understand there are issues regarding the removal of the salary cap and thus by considering a range of alternations, this could sufficiently improve Australian football in the long-term. Sometimes you must pay the price in order to get what you want and in this case, it may require the FFA to retire Hyundai A-League clubs from competing in the AFC for the time being in order to re-evaluate and enhance the culture within Australia and the entirety of Australian football.

2019-03-04T15:37:08+00:00

ostle peter

Guest


Some interesting ideas, but the issue is will soccer become akin to Europe, the wealthy elite then the rest. However, instead of a 'hard' salary cap why not a luxury tax. That if you go over, for example the soft cap by more than 2.5X then for every $ you pay 10% tax, which is distributed to the clubs who are under the cap, but are also above the minimum [ie you need to be 90% of the soft cap]. Further that home grown players who come through the academy have their salary not counted in the cap. Also, their is a minimum number of homegrown players in each match day squad, and at the end of the season, or half way through the season the minutes the homegrown players have been on the pitch is used to give out certain amount of money for that team. One issue that would have to be looked at is that in the AFC games you would not be able to play the team you would have lots of Europeans - or nonAFC players - on, as they have the 3+1 rule. Or would you give up the idea of playing in AFC competitions?

AUTHOR

2019-03-03T05:54:49+00:00

Basti

Roar Rookie


That is exactly what I have stated and acknowledged in my article, in order to allow the league to grow we need this to happen. That is by expanding the league as well as implementing a second tier league where previously relegated clubs can re-evaluate their quality and financial capabilities to eventually return as a title contendor in the A-League...

AUTHOR

2019-03-03T05:51:13+00:00

Basti

Roar Rookie


Should the salary cap be removed, this would not be completed via one straightforward decision, as you said it would be wise to gradually increase the salary to which it would reach a point where it can and SHOULD be removed both as effectively and efficiently as possible. The problem with fear of smaller clubs being undermined by larger and more wealthier clubs is typical of a very large majority of Australian football fans, however, we must accept the fact that unlike every other Aussie sporting code, football is different by international means. In order for the A-League to attract more global recognition, it is important to eventually allow these clubs to freely flourish despite some clubs being more vulnerable than others.

2019-03-02T13:17:16+00:00

Beni Iniesta

Guest


You make a comparison to England. You do realise that Great Britain covers a smaller area (England & Scotland) than the state of Victoria right? This is not just exclusively about the clubs, it's a hell of a lot more expensive for fans to go to away games in Australia than in Great Britain you know!

2019-03-02T01:09:00+00:00

William Doughty

Roar Rookie


If I know anything, its that getting rid of the foreign players rule is not going to help us in Asia. The 3+1 rule is imminent in the Asian champions league and doesn't look like it will be scrapped anytime soon.

2019-03-01T22:25:05+00:00

Redondo

Roar Rookie


We should wait a season or two before thinking of ditching the cap because... 1. Independent A-League 2. Clubs get 30% bigger share of broadcast money 3. Salary cap increases by 30% 4. Increased funds and cap allows all clubs to improve their overall squad quality 5. Clubs who can afford it still buy decent marquees as well 6. Clubs who are smart spend more to get decent coaches 7. A-League quality steadily improves 8. Hopefully followed by a steady improvement in attendances and viewers On point 7, A-League quality overall is way better now than when the league kicked off. A glaring problem remains though i.e. how thin most squads are. Every team has weak points because they have a few bargain basement hoofers playing regularly or as subs. It’s in the nature of a competitive sport that opposition teams target those weak points, and the good teams have players who can do that remorselessly e.g. Castro, Ninkovic, Honda. That affects the perception of quality, particularly when the gap between the best and the worst players is starkly obvious. We want people to think Castro/Ninkovic/Honda are good because they do well against quality opposition, not that they only look good because the opposition is poor. Raising overall squad quality is the way to do that. The best teams do that well e.g. most weeks Sydney and Victory field teams where the worst player on the field doesn’t look out of place with the best.

2019-03-01T13:16:39+00:00

Brendon

Roar Rookie


Getting rid of the salary cap doesn't magically create money. Getting rid of the salary cap so a couple of rich teams in the A-League can bring in better talent is counter productive. We're not a one-sport European country where fans will keep supporting a team regardless how poorly they do. By allowing a couple of rich teams to dominate will kill the A-League.

2019-03-01T10:25:31+00:00

chris

Guest


Fad - to be fair to Sutton he was actually disparaging Jordan by talking up Australia in saying they didnt need Rogic to beat Jordan blah blah blah. But the author twisted what Sutton said to suit his narrative.

2019-03-01T06:46:50+00:00

cambrai

Guest


May be you should look up the definition of niche. Do you think that a sport that has more players than any other and has two national teams- the Socceroos and Matildas that represent our country in World Cups and the Olympics is niche sport. For me AFL is a niche sport because it is only played professionally in Australia and has no international competition.

2019-03-01T06:14:33+00:00

Football is Life

Roar Rookie


This is a great first article for a rookie, but if we remove the salary cap, the question needs to be asked, will we create another Premier League with a handful of wealthy clubs and everyone else hoping the big boys have a bad day. A raise in the cap, an adjustment to recruitment guidelines but we have not evolved enough yet. I know Australian fans are impatient for football to grow, but for the best possible outcome we need to evolve steadily. And at this point unless the football community puts unrelenting pressure on the FFA we are going to see a very slow evolution

2019-03-01T04:35:17+00:00

Chopper

Guest


I think if the salary cap goes there should be transfer fees brought in between A League clubs ans second division for that matter (NPL clubs at present). Then financial control of the game could be restricted by something like the Financial fair play rules used in Europe. Also Gallop must go as he is an anchor around the neck of foorball.

2019-03-01T04:32:50+00:00

Fadida

Roar Rookie


I grew up in Tasmania (my brother was my sister and my father). Soccer was “soccer”. AFL was “footy”. Never any confusion. In Newcastle soccer is always “football”, RL “league” and no one talks about AFL or Union

2019-03-01T04:03:36+00:00

Buddy

Roar Rookie


Before a decision or even an opinion is formed on the subject of a salary cap,I’d say we have to examine our league as a whole and what exactly the product is, and having done that, what type of fan and level of support the league is trying to engage. Despite the odious comparisons with EPL, SPL, and other euro leagues, there are many leagues in many countries that the A League could be bench marked against. What is the A League all about? Is it a showcase for the best australian talent to show its wares, ready to be snapped up by a club from one of the top euro leagues? Is it just about entertainment, trying to attract the best for the money available? Is it a youth development league? I’m not being literal here; I don’t require an answer but if you define what the product is, you may well define the type of supporter and general level of interest likely to be created. Mel City are the best exponents of causing comfusion as it doesn’t seem clear to their fans what they are about – all culminating in the departure this week of Bruno Fornaroli – who, if the A League is about entertainment, has provided more than the collective efforts of whole teams over the past three seasons. We often expect fans tobecome “nailed on supporters” but if that is what we want, we have to have a framework and an understanding of what we are nailing them to. Right now, the picture remains confused.

2019-03-01T03:55:35+00:00

Beach

Roar Rookie


But that is what happens here too...with the cap.

2019-03-01T03:40:41+00:00

alexp

Guest


whilst im sure you enjoyed penning a response laced with sneering sarcasm, it doesnt address the question i asked of waz

2019-03-01T03:30:35+00:00

Maximus Insight

Guest


Haha Maybe that's the next reset "Old football becomes new sport.....it's sport, but not as you know it"!

2019-03-01T03:19:07+00:00

Fadida

Roar Rookie


So no change? Transfer fees. Now they are needed

2019-03-01T03:18:14+00:00

At work

Roar Rookie


I wouldn’t mind if the salary cap was to go, but it shouldn’t be done until we also have in place pro/rel. In the meantime I am supportive of further relaxing of the cap rules and/or increasing it (while not necessarily increasing the cap floor).

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar