Time has been unofficially called on Shaun Marsh’s career more times than his dodgy hamstrings have twinged. Now, though, it really does look like we’ve seen the last of the veteran batsman in Australian colours.
Marsh, who turns 36 years old on Tuesday, was withdrawn from Australia’s World Cup squad yesterday after being hit on the right forearm by a short ball, causing a fracture which will require surgery.
Even before this injury it looked as though this World Cup could be Marsh’s last outing for Australia. His vast experience was a key reason he was in this squad. But once this tournament is over, and Australia’s ODI team returns to playing comparatively meaningless series, they will very likely look to inject youth into the line-up, just as they’ve done after previous World Cups.
The likes of Peter Handscomb and Ashton Turner will surely get opportunities ahead of Marsh, who will be retired by the time the next World Cup rolls around in 2023. Meanwhile, it seems as if the selectors had already moved on from Marsh the Test cricketer.
Had they wanted to try to revive his flagging Test career they would have given him the two Tests against Sri Lanka last summer to fill his boots. Instead, he got the axe. In his absence, the likes of Kurtis Patterson, Travis Head and Marnus Labuschagne got Test opportunities.
Each of those batsmen are at least ten years younger than Marsh. It seemed like a clear changing of the guard. Any slim chance of Marsh making an unlikely Test comeback in this Ashes, perhaps if the selectors gambled on experience, was erased yesterday by a nasty Pat Cummins bouncer.
It was unfortunate to see many Australian fans verging on celebration at the news of Marsh’s injury. “Thank god, finally he’s gone,” was the rough sentiment of a slew of comments I read online. The West Australian has become a lightning rod for hate.
As opposed to his long-time teammate David Warner, who is widely disliked by fans due to his boorish on-field antics and admitted cheating, Marsh has always been a decent character. He has done nothing to bring scorn upon himself. Aside, that is, from failing to meet the expectations of thousands of people he’s never met.
It is a curious element of cricket fandom that so many people get furious at players for supposedly not justifying their selection. These fans are well aware the players do not get to pick themselves, yet rail at them regardless.
There is no doubt Marsh has been fortunate to be selected in Tests as often as he has been. I’ve written articles criticising his inclusion in the Test XI. More than once. But I never felt the need to denigrate Marsh the man. It wasn’t his fault he kept getting picked.
Many others didn’t agree though. Some felt he was the beneficiary of “nepotism”. Never mind that Shaun is in no way related to Rod Marsh, the former Australian selector. Barely more intelligent were the snide remarks whenever Shaun Marsh was picked in the Australian ODI side. Never mind that he was utterly dominant at domestic level, had performed consistently for Australia and, if anything, was a tad unlucky not to have got more opportunities in ODIs.
Marsh may have been an inconsistent and, ultimately, ordinary Test player. But he was an excellent ODI cricketer, from the start of his career to the end. What’s more is that he was one of very few Australian players who stood up to be counted when the ODI side was falling apart last year.
With Warner and Steve Smith banned, and their gun quicks often unavailable, Australia were a hot mess in 2018. They won just two of their 13 ODIs for the year as England and South Africa bulldozed them. Marsh was not flattened, though. He scored four tons in the space of nine matches against England, South Africa and India, three of the top four ranked teams in ODIs.
Yet, so fervent were his critics, that when Australia’s squad was picked for the March ODI tour of India there were endless comments deriding his selection. Four tons in nine matches? That means nothing. Get someone else in.
Had Marsh never played Test cricket I think he would have been perceived far differently as a cricketer. I believe he would have been more highly valued as a white ball player by Australian fans. Instead he has had to suffer in a similar manner to Shane Watson, who was criminally underappreciated as a limited overs cricketer due to fans conflating Test and white ball performances.
If, as I suspect, Marsh has played his final match for Australia, then he should be tremendously proud of what he’s achieved. He is a key reason that Australia managed to turn around their ODI fortunes and are in a World Cup semi-final.
Brainstrust
Roar Rookie
I took the averages since Marsh one day debut and got Warner 46.1 95.6 Watson 42.1 93 Finch 40.7 89.53 Clarke 45.12 76.72 Smith 40.9 86.7 Hussey 44.4 87.3 Bailey 40.6 83.51 S.Marsh 40.8 81.4 Ponting 37.19 79.94 Khawaja 42.0 84.0 Voges 44.94 86.43 Carey 39.9 94.3 What date did you use.
Brainstrust
Roar Rookie
I think you lot need to wake up. In the age of the flat wicket Shaun Marsh at 40 with 80 strike rate is not that good. In the 80's players generally averaged 10 less in one day cricket , then it became about even and now its about 5 more in one day cricket. Maxwell has got the best strike for batsman averaging over 30 , thats why he has a lot of value. Plus bowling and fielding on top of that makes him extremely valuable. Shaun Marsh is older and slow between the wickets and in the field so not really of any value. Shane Watson has 40 at 90 is about the same age and won the award for best player in the PSL.
Nick
Roar Guru
And yet, Michael Clarke never actually did that. He was an attacking captain, but only to a point. His commentary is borderline reckless, or at least risky to the point he would never had done it if he was actually captain.
Insult_2_Injury
Roar Rookie
He came in with 42 overs to face in one game, had 30 odd against the Saffers. Carey was able to make 80 odd batting behind him.
Insult_2_Injury
Roar Rookie
No, Scorchers were playing their own game and Marsh is definitely a domestic opener. I'm just saying he's savvy and adaptable enough to make an ODI no 5, who can rebuild if necessary, or take a few balls and score at 133. I guarantee you from here on out, Carey will be a domestic opener, but his value in ODI is 567 and Australia will benefit for years with him there.
Jeff
Roar Rookie
True. But Scorchers wouldn't have been playing/positioning Marsh in their team with the objective of getting him selected/positioned in the Aus ODI squad. I think they just wanted to see him go big and long so maximised his overs. But agreed, by the by now.
Squirellgrip
Roar Rookie
Actually he has come in with plenty to go in most games to date.
Squirellgrip
Roar Rookie
Tongue in cheek mate, dont get too precious.
JD St George
Roar Pro
Pretty harsh using Maxy's average against him considering how many balls he gets to face at the end of the innings.
MarkD
Guest
G'day U , he must be really conflicted with the Stoinis injury! As for the Khawaja injury , Don reckons he deserved it for stealing Shaun's spot .
DaveJ
Roar Rookie
Shaun is a fine stroke player on his day. Geoff was a battler - amazing to think he played over 100 ODIs with a strike rate under 60, slow even for those days.
Insult_2_Injury
Roar Rookie
Mitch Marsh averages 43 in Tests.........with the ball!
Insult_2_Injury
Roar Rookie
Never wish injury on anyone mate, it's insulting.
MarkD
Guest
Don, you really are funny!
Insult_2_Injury
Roar Rookie
Coming in at 5 in an ODI with his experience still allows him to strike at 133 as he did in 20/20. In this tournament with the wickets we've seen there were at least 3 games where he'd have had 25+ overs and one game where number five came in with forty overs. I believe he is flexible enough to up the ante and at times have more overs than an opener in 20/20 has from the outset. The other thing is IPL and BBL are domestic cricket and you needed to fit 4 20/20 openers and a no3 into this ODI squad. Of all of those openers Marsh has the pedigree of batting in other positions. Anyway, not to be.
Don Freo
Roar Rookie
You are happy to see injury as well? What a strange view!
U
Roar Rookie
Forgive Don. Can’t be easy for another one of his fellas to be near the end.
U
Roar Rookie
The longer the time since Watson’s retirement, the better his career is remembered. The Aussies would certainly take him now if he was younger
U
Roar Rookie
Amazing how the fine limited overs play and mediocre at best test play runs in the family. Are they allergic to the average of 40 in test cricket?
Don Freo
Roar Rookie
This WC us anither case in point. Oh to have had Marsh! You can celebrate Marsh's injury. Proper Australians won't.