Experience versus youth: How will Australia rebuild their ODI team?

By Ronan O'Connell / Expert

After being knocked out of this World Cup, Australia now have to decide whether to rebuild their ODI team with inexperienced players or stick with their veterans and aim for the No.1 ranking.

Australia’s loss to England in the semi-final, which saw them slip from third down to fourth in the rankings, has posed a tricky question to the Australian think tank.

The Aussies have re-emerged as a force in ODI cricket, having won 15 of their past 18 games. That golden run includes a series win away from home over fellow World Cup semi-finalists India and victories against the teams that feature in the final, England and New Zealand.

If they return to taking all of their ODI series seriously, Australia have the makings of an excellent side that could challenge for England’s top ranking. The alternative is to do as they did in recent years and use ODIs mostly as a venue for trialling new talent.

In the four years between the 2015 World Cup and this one, Australia rarely picked anything near their best XI. While England, for example, tried to field their strongest line-up wherever possible over that period, Australia often chose to rest key players and blood a host of newcomers.

(Harry Trump-IDI/IDI via Getty Images)

In their ODI series after winning the 2015 World Cup, Australia used ten players who were not part of the World Cup-winning XI. Seven of those fresh faces hadn’t even been in Australia’s World Cup squad.

In that series in England, Australia handed debuts to Ashton Agar, Joe Burns and Marcus Stoinis and giving opportunities to inexperienced ODI players James Pattinson, Pat Cummins, Nathan Coulter-Nile and John Hastings.

Over the following few years Australia seemed to feel that bilateral series were not important and that it was wiser to protect their best players for matches that really mattered across all formats. There were several times this descended into farce.

The most infamous example was the ODI series Australia lost 5-0 in South Africa in October of 2016. No Starc, no Hazlewood, no Cummins, no Faulkner, no Coulter-Nile, no chance.

Australia instead fronted up against the strong South African batting line-up with a quartet of uncapped quicks who all owned ordinary domestic one-day records. Combined, Daniel Worrall, Scott Boland, Joe Mennie and Chris Tremain had taken a total of 53 wickets at 37 in their List A careers.

(Andy Kearns/Getty Images)

They were coming off a JLT Cup season in which they together had grabbed just ten wickets at 49. Not one of those four bowlers was even an automatic choice for their state one-day team yet somehow all were playing for Australia.

Not surprisingly, those four debutants struggled badly in that series in South Africa, together averaging 46 with the ball and going at nearly seven runs per over. An equally strange selection soon followed.

Less than three months after that debacle in South Africa, Australia picked to make his ODI debut a 21-year-old batsman who had yet to even play 50-over cricket for his state. Imagine for a moment a player earning a Test cap before they had made their Sheffield Shield debut.

That premature ODI cricketer was Sam Heazlett, who played one match in New Zealand in January 2017 and has not represented Australia since.

Heazlett is a gifted young batsman and has now put together an impressive List A record. But there would have been a host of accomplished one-day batsmen around the country dismayed that they had been overlooked for ODIs in favour of a guy yet to even play List A cricket.

This strategy of resting key players and blooding random greenhorns destabilised the Australian ODI team and saw them tumble down the rankings. And you could argue it didn’t even help Australia unearth any future ODI stars.

The XI that lost to England in the semi-final was filled with veterans as Australia banked on tried and tested players. The youngest cricketer in that side was Pat Cummins, who has been playing for Australia for eight years.

Sports opinion delivered daily 

   

Do Australia now continue down this road, sticking with a core of 16 to 17 ODI players and picking their best possible XI wherever feasible – line-ups filled with experienced campaigners? Or do they go back to churning through an army of cricketers, taking punts on youngsters and project players?

I would prefer to see them find a middle ground. Australia cannot return to continually picking massively understrength ODI sides missing most of their best cricketers, but there is definitely merit in trialling one or two inexperienced players per series.

Such unproven talents should be better able to adapt to the highest level if they are in a team packed with seasoned international cricketers.

First and foremost, on the batting front, it should be the likes of Peter Handscomb (28), Ashton Turner (26) and Mitchell Marsh (27) who should be given plenty of ODI chances in the short term. All three players are young enough to feature in the next World Cup in India in 2023.

By the time that World Cup rolls around, David Warner, Aaron Finch and Usman Khawaja will all be 36 years old, while Shaun Marsh will be 39. There is a good chance none will still be in the Australian team.

Steve Smith will be 33 years old and should still be playing, but Glenn Maxwell will be 34 so his international career could well be over by then.

Marcus Stoinis will be 33 by the next World Cup, but as long as he can hit one ODI 50 between now and then the selectors should be convinced he’s worthy of a spot in the starting XI. Being more serious, wicketkeeper Alex Carey looks like he has a long ODI career ahead of him at 27 years old.

On the bowling front, all four members of Australia’s attack in the semi-final – Mitchell Starc, Pat Cummins, Jason Behrendorff and Nathan Lyon – could potentially still be in the mix four years from now. It seems unlikely, though.

Fortunately, Australia have plenty of promising young bowlers who should get ODI exposure in the next few years. Let’s hope, though, that rookie bowlers and batsmen get to play alongside plenty of gifted veterans.

Australia need to find a balance between experience and youth in their ODI selections as they build towards the next World Cup.

The Crowd Says:

2019-07-16T23:52:49+00:00

bowledover

Roar Rookie


I was just thinking about this. Finch, Warner and Khawaja are all going to be too old for next WC....We need to get the next generation up and performing in a fashion so there isnt a cliff where shed loads of player's bow out at or near the next WC. Id guess: Head, Carey, Jhye, MMarsh, Agar, Turner are all in the mix. I hope DArcy Short could show some potential as well.

2019-07-16T03:13:34+00:00

Dockerman

Guest


Turner is a far superior batsman to Stoinis, and much more consistent. Stoinis is still resting on his laurels of his one decent knock against the Kiwi’s a few years ago. If Turner can get his back right, and can start bowling again, then his inclusion is a no brainer.

2019-07-16T02:48:26+00:00

Omnitrader

Roar Rookie


I wouldn't mind the selectors moving Finch down the order and Ussie to open, Finch is a good player of spin and starts quickly, he can't really handle the moving ball either.

2019-07-15T12:22:19+00:00

PeteB

Roar Rookie


Selection is pretty simple. Pick your best available players. Unless they are injured or on the verge of a breakdown no rest is required. When there is less than 2 years until the World Cup than maybe some players do need to be moved on if it is considered they won’t be around for that tournament.

2019-07-15T10:39:55+00:00

Dadyl

Guest


Let's hope we don't have parochial cricket writers pushing certain players on spurious grounds. Marcus Stoinis was a case in point, an allrounder with a batting average lower than his bowling average. His World Cul return? A batting average lower than his bowling average. Shock.

2019-07-15T06:07:19+00:00

Brian

Guest


We're hosting the T20 next year and then the next one in India so basically start now Position Vacant Spinner, they're going to need 3 in the squad for India in 2023 Finch & Warner should play till the T20 WC and no further.

2019-07-15T05:27:57+00:00

aussie1st

Roar Pro


Turner is the main one I can see coming in. The rest is harder to see right now but we definitely should be planning for the 2023 WC as England did after their disaster 2015.

2019-07-15T01:08:08+00:00

Trevor

Guest


Ashton Turner is no better than Stoinis. I think it would be more of the same.

2019-07-14T23:11:36+00:00

Rellum

Roar Guru


Giving randoms ODI's was all about giving PONI's exposure to international cricket, it had very little to do with building a ODI "team" The national setup always says international experience is far more valuable than domestic experience. They were just treating ODI's like they treat State cricket now, practice matches for the selectors to toy with certain PONI's. Hopefully all that changes and I think it has under Langer so we just pick the best team with a few younger guys coming into spots where we are weak like the middle order, 3rd seamer and spinner.

2019-07-14T22:33:19+00:00

Paul

Roar Guru


I wrote a very similar piece only a few days ago. The issue for CA is how seriously they want to take ODI cricket and how they intend to build towards 2023 and the Cup in India. CA needs to give players the chance to develop the skills needed to play proper ODI cricket, which do NOT come from BBL or a 25 day ODI domestic comp, played as an embarrassing pre-runner to the season proper. The issue about whether players should be young or old in the team is moot, if there isn't a proper commitment from Cricket Australia and right now, this form of the game seems the furthest thing from their minds, now the WC has finished. No doubt they'll remember about it in January 2023 and we'll end up scrambling to knock a side together, barely make the finals, then wonder what might have been.

2019-07-14T22:19:41+00:00

McBumble

Guest


Ronan I had the best laugh when I read your comment on Stoinis mate. I could not agree more. The guy is not international or state standard. A BBL slugger at best. They should be looking at developing Ashton Turner for the future. At least Ashton would take the game seriously and do his country proud.

2019-07-14T20:10:10+00:00

Jeff

Roar Rookie


There'll be some scheduling conflicts as usual during the Australian summer months, but Australia has clear air every winter leading up to the next WC, with away ODI series in each of those winters (commencing in mid June) and no other cricket scheduled for months either side. CA needs to therefore schedule a domestic one day tournament each May in northern Australia as a lead in to each of those series and provide both players (incumbents and hopefuls) and selectors the opportunity to assess form and style, thereby creating a proper framework and real context for ODI selection and allowing the actual ODIs to be the opportunity to gel the team and establish the preferred game strategy. Australia cannot continue to use their available ODIs to trial players simply because there is no other way of assessing those players - a 5 match, three week, once a year competition in October simply isn't sufficient and is leaving T20 (domestic and international) as the only selection criteria. CA must schedule both a May and October domestic comp if it is serious about ODIs and the 2023 WC.

Read more at The Roar