Justin Langer should stand down as ODI coach

By Stephen Vagg / Roar Guru

The World Cup is done and dusted, which means we can go back to not caring about ODI cricket until the next World Cup.

This means that we need to start thinking about that campaign, and to kick things off Justin Langer should step down as ODI coach.

There’s no reason one person should coach all three formats. Actually, yes there is: it’s called ‘the coach wants control’.

This isn’t a personal slight on Langer. I don’t think he should be national coach – I think that job should go to Jason Gillespie – but even if Gillespie were in the job, I would suggest he should step down too.

(Scott Barbour/Getty Images)

Coaching a national side is a very tough job. You’ve got to deal with media, managing egos, politics, travel, selectors, officials, executives, and fans as well as the actual, you know, coaching.

It’s unrealistic to expect one person to be on top of his or her game over three formats. A specialist ODI coach will be able to focus on that format.

He or she will be able to be more across what domestic one-day playing talent is out there, what tactics other teams are using, what forward planning needs to be implemented et cetera without being distracted by thinking about what Test and T20 series were coming up.

This would enable the Test coach to focus on that format, and I think there should be a specialist T20 coach too.

Sports opinion delivered daily 

   

Has any country really prospered in all three formats under the one coach? It adds to a workload and grinds down coaches. Maybe if Darren Lehmann had resigned after the 2015 World Cup, sandpapergate wouldn’t have happened.

Justin Langer wanted to coach the team to a World Cup. I get that. But he’s done it, it’s time to move on. I’m sure he wants a chance at revenge, but tough – he had a go, it didn’t work out, move on.

I think coaches, like captains, are only entitled to one World Cup campaign and two Ashes series. After that they are just being greedy. And they get stale.

There are plenty of other options out there to coach Australia. Pick a state coach. Or someone from overseas. Or a former international coach.

Our preparation for this World Cup was not great. We wasted a lot of time and effort trying to pretend T20 stars were ODI stars – Chris Lynn, Billy Stanlake, D’arcy Short. We didn’t develop a pool of all-rounder talent to take the place of Shane Watson and James Faulkner; we just shut our eyes and hoped Marcus Stoinis would come good. We weakened the domestic one-day competition and wasted time, money and energy on the Cricket Australia XI experiment, which failed to produce one ODI star.

Who are our up-and-coming one day all-rounders? Our one-day spinners? Medium pacers? Middle-order sloggers?

One person needs to be in charge of looking at these issues. An ODI specialist coach. There’s no reason why we can’t start right now.

The Crowd Says:

2019-08-01T01:47:27+00:00

Josh H

Roar Rookie


They didn't pick Hazlewood because he was obviously not uninjured enough. He's in our top 3 best bowlers; you don't just not pick him for kicks and giggles Look, aside from injuries, he picked the best side he had. My only change would have been Handscomb for a bowler (probably Richardson). We could have tried to pick an out-of-form Faulkner or M Marsh, or a Turner off the back of a disastrous IPL or a Christian who hasn't played the format for 2 years or a Short or Lynn out of position, but the reality is, we don't have a strong middle order, period. We just don't have the cattle. That's my point. "Why not give someone else a go?" Uhh... because Langer performed well above expectations and got the world's 5th best ODI team one batting collapse away from the final? Let's not administer change for change's sake here. That would be daft.

2019-07-30T04:23:20+00:00

anon

Roar Pro


I'm not sure he should be Test coach given what happened over the summer and in the UAE before that. Finch opening and still picking a 35 year old Marsh despite the worst run in 120 years was a real head scratcher. Not only selected Labuschagne ahead of guys like Burns or Patterson (or even Maxwell with his 40 FC average), but made him first drop. The series loss to the Indians was on Langer and it's a stain on our proud Test record.

2019-07-29T02:14:35+00:00

Insult_2_Injury

Roar Rookie


Maybe they see the same thing in Short that they saw in Carey and were trying to fast track him? He'll only be better for the exposure. A few months of game based batting coaching from Ponting is invaluable at his age.

AUTHOR

2019-07-28T16:37:39+00:00

Stephen Vagg

Roar Guru


Josh do you mean Hazlewood? He was available for selection wasn't he? They just didn't pick him. I do admire the way Langer has turned things around - by not trying to be England, by picking experienced players in the side (Khawaja, Lyon). He also had the benefit of Mitchell Starc. The main mistake they made during the World Cup IMHO was not picking middle order back up. They had four openers but only two middle order batsmen, both all rounders. But anyways my point is that he's had a world Cup why not give someone else a go?

AUTHOR

2019-07-28T16:33:05+00:00

Stephen Vagg

Roar Guru


I think all countries should have separate coaches for separate formats. It's simply too hard for them to stay on top of their game in all three. Also maybe Stanlake and Short will come good - just feel they should learn their trade at domestic level a bit more. I actually thought it was worth playing Short in the middle order a bit more - but they gave him this long run as opener when we had plenty of opening options.

2019-07-28T15:05:42+00:00

Don Freo

Roar Rookie


Oh Steven! Have you noticed we have about 40 players all worthy of playing for Australia now? Before JL took over, we had a core of about 7 and the rest were hopeful selections. I say put him in charge of the country's politics as well...and, maybe, the church and schools.

2019-07-28T08:54:35+00:00

Peter Warrington

Guest


self fulfilling we on;y see nickers and nudgers because we only see what we want to see' i think langer wanted t get games into the bulk of the test team and hope that Maxwell has another 15 campaign to make up for it someone like Lynn getting 4 games, when he both destroys T20 but has a 43 FC average - the only thing limiting the playing pool is the limits imposed.

2019-07-28T08:42:10+00:00

Derek Murray

Roar Rookie


I thought Howard was high performance. Different role altogether from coaching director.

2019-07-28T07:15:11+00:00

Josh H

Roar Rookie


Justin Langer has done nothing wrong with the One-Day side. In the space of just over 12 months, he’s changed the team completely from a mismatch of T20 sloggers and mediocre domestic players to an extremely competitive 50 over lineup. Crucially, he pinpointed 2 strengths that his (rather limited) player pool possessed; the depth of batting accumulators, and the breadth of fast bowling options. With this in mind, he adopted a simple gameplan: nick and nudge our way to a score of 280-310 and back our bowlers to defend it. We don’t have the slogging cattle of England, nor do we have the perfectly balanced bowling cartel of India, nor do we have the luxury of having a small but consistent and stable squad like New Zealand. Langer devised a simple, realistic plan. I daresay Australia would have won, had 2 things not happened: 1. 2 of our best 4 quicks in Jhye and Josh got injured. They were an enormous part of our tactic and would have allowed us to drop NCN and Kane, our two weakest players on the plane. 2. Smith and Warner disrupting the flow of the squad by coming in late. There was nothing we can do about this because it was inevitable, but it stalled Khawaja and Marsh’s form immensely and meant they were moved and up and down the order like a yo-yo. We have our 2 best bowlers and the top order isn’t volatile, we win most matches, and Langer is a genius.

2019-07-28T05:47:46+00:00

Insult_2_Injury

Roar Rookie


It’s all a bit confusing! If you aren’t interested in ODI until a coupla months out from the next World Cup, why care? Also why should CA waste time and money on searching for, interviewing and overseeing a separate coaching apparatus to look for the next big thing? Seems you just aren’t a fan of Langer, as all the other WC countries had coaching staff who steer their whole cricket program. Also don’t know why you think Short and Stanlake won’t become longer form players. Warner started out as a hit and giggler, having played T20 before a first class game, but his maturity in the WC crafting different hundreds showed players can transcend T20. Considering Short & Stanlake’s ages, they’re a monty for 2023. You seem to intimate that it’s a negative having control in one person’s hands – Langer, but it then is confusing that you believe the future of ODI’s needs the attention of only one person. As Langer had only been Australian coach for about 12 months and his CV is filled with short form success with Perth, WA & Somerset, then he is surely as qualified as Gillespie and that CV undoubtedly got him the job.

AUTHOR

2019-07-28T01:47:31+00:00

Stephen Vagg

Roar Guru


isn't there already a director type figure? whoever took over Pat Howard's job?

2019-07-27T23:28:11+00:00

The Bush

Roar Guru


It’s actually interesting Paul that Langer was a red ball specialist as a player, yet as a coach his domestic success is all in white ball cricket. Having said that, domestic cricket is unique in the sense that you don’t really “recruit”, instead you tend to have a squad made up predominately of local players, so I guess you’ve gotta make the most of what you’ve got.

2019-07-27T22:56:27+00:00

Paul

Roar Guru


The issue that you don't touch on Stephan is mindset. A guy like Langer who was so successful at Test cricket, clearly has the knowledge about the way this game is played, the tempo, the levels of concentration, etc. He played little if any T20 cricket which is clearly a completely different mindset, so unless he's a supercoach ( and I don't think there are too many of them in world cricket) he would struggle mightily at coaching T20. I know he's won the BBL, but there's a huge difference between a domestic comp and coaching national teams, IMO, especially when focus has to change quickly between the different formats.

2019-07-27T11:24:21+00:00

PG

Guest


I don't disagree with your sentiment, however I think the problem can be solved by the coach taking more of an oversight role and letting the captains have full control of their formats. Need the right captains of course (i.e not Smith) - Paine & Finch. Maxwell T20

2019-07-27T09:04:02+00:00

Dwanye

Roar Rookie


Hi ozinsa. I agree, a director is good idea. Maybe a director over all three and a coach for each of the formats. It would need something or someone in place to stops squabbling over team selection and availability. At moment I don’t think they treating it as professionally as possible.

2019-07-27T07:50:02+00:00

Peter Warrington

Guest


Lynn. One of the great T20 players.And averages a stellar 43 in FC. There is reason on earth he wouldn't be a ODI jet We put 4 games into him. 4. Not 40. I am happy for Langer to be moved on however. Maxwell as player/coach, with Watto as cheerleader. I'd like to see that!

2019-07-27T07:24:38+00:00

Derek Murray

Roar Rookie


Not sure what I think on this. Prefer a compromise where Langer is Director and there are specialist ODI and T20 coaches under him. No matter how you cut it we need to consider the overall squad regardless of format

Read more at The Roar