Is Justin Langer holding Cameron Bancroft’s spot open? Part 2

By Stephen Vagg / Roar Guru

In October 2018 I wrote an article for The Roar arguing that Justin Langer might be, subconsciously, holding Cam Bancroft’s spot open for him.

I pointed to a series of actions he took after becoming coach, including omitting Matt Renshaw from the Test side despite the latter being in good form, omitting Joe Burns from the tour of the UAE, using Usman Khawaja as a temporary opener, and promoting Aaron Finch to opener despite having little first class success at that position.

Let’s look at what’s happened to Bancroft and his rivals since that article.

Renshaw went into a form spiral that he’s still not out of.

Finch had one or two effective moments as opener but eventually failed, never getting a chance to bat at number five (where he normally batted in first class cricket), getting dropped against India, didn’t come close to making the Ashes squad, and is on no one’s “will likely play Tests again” list.

Khawaja played one of the all-time classic innings as an opener in the UAE, then was put back to number three where he did less well against India but got a century against Sri Lanka, made the Ashes squad, underperformed in England and was dropped towards the end of the series.

Usman Khawaja is fighting for his Test career. (Photo by Ryan Pierse/Getty Images)

Marcus Harris came in to the Test side against India on the strength of a barnstorming Shield season and had some effective innings, did less well against Sri Lanka, made the Ashes squad but was overlooked in favour of Bancroft, got back in the team and has been dropped again.

Joe Burns was recalled to the Test side against Sri Lanka and scored 180 in the final test, putting him, one would think, in the box seat for the job of partnering Dave Warner in England.

Instead he was overlooked for the Ashes squad (let alone the first XI) as the selectors plumped for Warner, Harris and… Bancroft.

The reasons given were Harris had an excellent Shield season (which he did) and Bancroft had a strong county season (which he did, early on) while Burns missed cricket falling ill in England (which he did) and Bancroft outbatted Burns in a trial game (which he did) although Burns had a very strong domestic summer, scored a century in a trial game and had a much better first class and Test record than Bancroft.

An aside – they might’ve been able to still fit Burns in to the Ashes squad but apparently they had to make room for Mitch Marsh, who was picked on the back of 486 first class runs that summer at 32.4 and 13 wickets at 44.38.

It’s essential to take an all rounder to England, you see – I mean, look at the efforts of Trevor Chappell in 1981, Simon O’Donnell in 1985, Shane Watson in 2013 and 2015, James Faulkner in 2013 and Marsh in 2015.

Bancroft played the first two Tests in England, being picked over Harris on the basis of… um, county form, I think, and failed. Harris came in for the next three Tests and failed. Khawaja was never tried as opener.

Marcus Harris of Australia. (Photo by Michael Dodge/Getty Images)

When the Australian summer began there was a lot of chat over who would partner David Warner (there was some talk Warner mightn’t make the cut but it wasn’t that that loud).

Around a week ago it appeared the main candidates were Burns, Harris, Khawaja and Nic Maddinson… with some observers promoting out-of-the-box choices like Jake Weathereld and Daniel Hughes.

Bancroft seemed out of contention after a poor Ashes tour and bad start to the Australian summer. No one really made an irrefutable claim for selection via their Sheffield Shield matches except for Maddinson.

Harris had incumbency and a Shield century on his side; Burns had should-have-gone-to-England on his favour.

An Australian A side was picked to play Pakistan which included Burns, Harris, Khawaja and Maddinson but not Bancroft.

Maddinson dropped out due to mental health. Instead of bringing in a middle order batsman to replace him like, say, Peter Handscomb or Aaron Finch, the selectors selected opener Bancroft to bat in the middle order… where he proved to be the one person to do something decent in a dreadful team batting performance.

Didn’t make a half century, mind, but in the land of the blind, the one eyed man is king.

Now Bancroft is back in an Australian 14-man squad for the first Test. What’s more it’s a squad that excludes two potential openers – Harris and Khawaja. The only person standing between Bancroft and the resumption of his Test career is Joe Burns.

So… has Justin Langer held Cameron Bancroft’s spot for him?

Well, other people have certainly helped.

Burns, Harris and Khawaja have not covered themselves in glory with the bat over the past few months.

But neither has Bancroft. Yet he gets picked.

Khawaja, whose first class and Test stats overshadow Bancroft significantly, now appears to have a Test career that is, if not over, then in the very-hard-to-come-back-from department.

Bancroft seems to be regarded as a hey-he-might-get-better prospect worth persevering with.

I believe wholeheartedly that everything Justin Langer has ever done as coach (and as a player and a man) has been in what he believes is in the best interests of Australian cricket.

Australia head coach Justin Langer (David Davies/PA via AP)

I also believe that Langer (and the selection panel) has, unconsciously, but consistently, sabotaged the career of potential Bancroft rivals in the past 18 months.

In particular by not selecting Renshaw in the Test team in the UAE when he was in good form; not giving Khawaja an extended trial as opener despite his excellent record in that position; omitting Joe Burns from the Australian A tour of India, and the Test series in the UAE, and the Test series against India, and then the Ashes tour.

I believe that Bancroft still has to score some runs to get back into the Australian Test team.

I also believe he has to score a lot less than his rivals, especially Joe Burns, but also Usman Khawaja, Marcus Harris and even (what the hell I’ll throw his name in too) Daniel Hughes.

Oh, and now apparently Bancroft is a middle order player, so his rivals now also include Travis Head and Matthew Wade. I believe Bancroft will have to do less well than them too.

And I believe that is really, really unfair.

The Crowd Says:

2019-11-17T10:30:49+00:00

Don Lampard

Guest


Not to mention Bancroft threw Warner under a bus last year - young and dumb at 26 hah! Fact is, on form he shouldn't be in the squad.

2019-11-17T07:22:10+00:00

Rob

Guest


Gee Maxwell must shake his head if fielding was a factor in his constant snubbing for the Marsh boys. Khawaja is a grade above Bancroft with the blade.

2019-11-17T07:20:16+00:00

Lewis Atkins

Roar Rookie


I don't think it's unconscious at all, just blatant favouritism. Walks back in to the Test side in England, in what was basically an elaborate PR move, after having not spent any time working on his cricket. The technical issues that existed in his game before the ban are still there, yet he seemingly he refuses to work on them and still gets in. You could be forgiven for thinking Bancroft was a cousin of the Marshes

2019-11-17T07:15:40+00:00

Rob

Guest


That’s exactly what upset supporters. Bancroft has had several opportunities at Test level without producing a substantial good innings of note. Renshaw was the incumbent and lost his spot after starring with the bat in Tests but dropped some form and had a poor start to Shield. Obviously Bancroft is a different criteria selection.

2019-11-17T07:02:18+00:00

Rob

Guest


Nesser? He’s never played a Test and is probably a far better bowler than Mitchell Marsh who was never a top 6 batsman. Labuschange and Carey have shown the ability and Labuschange by chance showed he could step up unlike Bancroft.

2019-11-17T05:55:08+00:00

John Erichsen

Roar Guru


The English bowling in Bancroft's debut series was far from world class, apart from one or two spells from Jimmy Anderson. The English bowlers overall that series were ordinary, at best. It was a series where six of our top seven averaged over 45. The only players who didn't were Handscomb, dropped averaging 20 after 2 tests and Bancroft, playing the entire series to average 25. 82* in one good innings at the Gabba, followed by 92 runs from six innings. Apparently averaging 15 from your last six innings keeps your spot safe for the next series … for some. Looks good for Marnus this summer, doesn't it?

2019-11-17T05:19:40+00:00

John Erichsen

Roar Guru


Apparently, for a test batting spot in modern Australian cricket, you ability to field well at short leg is far more vital than runs you look likely to score. I know it sounds a little silly, but it wasn't that long ago, we dropped a decent wicketkeeper, not for a better keeper or even a better batsman/keeper, but for a louder mouth... Go figure!

2019-11-17T05:16:47+00:00

John Erichsen

Roar Guru


To be fair, I am not a Finch fan in the longer format but I can understand the concept that if any pitches offered Aaron Finch an opportunity to succeed as a test opener, it was the UAE pitches. I am not sure how any selector could really think Finch would continue his success opening at home. Fairy tale mentality, but that aligns well with the selectors method regarding the Mitch Marsh Project for large chunks of his test career. Having said that, its not all Justin Langer. Before JL, Rod Marsh, Greg Chappell, Darren Lehmann and Trevor Hohns have all shown a keen willingness to ignore proven performance and pick on promise or potential, on little more than a whim. Langer merely follows that trend, but maybe he will get lucky with Marnus?

2019-11-17T04:53:20+00:00

Diamond Jackie

Roar Rookie


Uzzie has never been a member of the Club though. He has had to fight fir every selection.

2019-11-17T00:23:38+00:00

DaveJ

Roar Rookie


They both went to the same school according to Geoff Lawson today.

2019-11-16T15:40:56+00:00

Lawrence

Roar Rookie


Bancroft has a technical fault where his front foot points in direction of cover to fullish straight balls. Unless this had been fixed up, he will continue to be in trouble against a decent enough bowler.

2019-11-16T11:51:02+00:00

Jero

Roar Rookie


I'm from WA. It seems pretty real to me.

2019-11-16T08:11:53+00:00

anon

Roar Pro


What about Finch as Test opener when he doesn't even open for Victoria?

2019-11-16T07:34:14+00:00

Gee

Roar Rookie


Stoinis in the World Cup might of been the worst selection during Langers coaching/selector time.

2019-11-16T07:24:31+00:00

Gee

Roar Rookie


Bancroft probably got the nod over Harris & Khawajas because of his fielding. Khawaja has better career numbers and Harris more runs this FC season so the only good reason for the decision is he will be the designated fielder when needed. Hopefully no batsmen gets hit and Bancroft has to bat.

2019-11-16T06:06:06+00:00

The Bush

Roar Guru


Playing England in Australia is the easiest gig in world cricket. We’ve beaten them 9 of the last 10 tests here and the other was a draw on a road. Bancroft had the easiest initiation into test cricket imaginable.

2019-11-16T04:58:33+00:00

Ben

Guest


Bias towards WA...... wow never thought I would here that in regards to Oz cricket team. Bancroft average over 10 tests against world class bowling from SA and England, 5 tests away. Burns 16 tests against mainly average attacks (West Indies, SL, NZ) Failed against SA and ave 37 v India. Hasn’t been tested as hard as Bancroft at this point IMO. Langer sees something in Bancroft. He has been picked as coach for his nous. Bias?. BS

2019-11-16T01:33:10+00:00

anon

Roar Pro


Must explain why someone with an average of 9 this Shield season found his way into the Australia A side and then propelled into the Test squad on the back of a scratchy 49.

2019-11-16T01:26:09+00:00

Diamond Jackie

Roar Rookie


The selection tragedy of the ashes squad was that they chose TWO all rounders, massive over kill, at the expense of Burns. Then 2 tests in they were searching for a right handed batsman who could open or bat down the order!!!!!

2019-11-16T01:09:33+00:00

Jason

Roar Rookie


The irony is incredible . #woke indeed.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar