Travis Head’s unique place in Australian Test cricket history

By Brett McKay / Expert

As Australia rolled on toward their emphatic innings victory over Pakistan in Adelaide on Monday, and with it a dominant 2-0 series win leading into the three-Test series against New Zealand, a new addition was being added to a very curious piece of Test history.

Channel 9 tennis and cricket stats guy for their Wide World of Sports online division, Brett Graham, popped out the tweet that confirmed the ascension of Australian batsman Travis Head into cricket folklore and pub trivia forever more.

Indeed he had. As Australia compiled their mammoth 3 declared for 589 in Adelaide, Head had spent at least eighteen overs with the pads on as the next man in, and probably even another 27 more if he put the pads on at the fall of the second wicket as would seem likely. But he never faced a ball.

Over two innings in the field, as Australia bowled Pakistan out for 302 in 94.4 overs and then 239 in 82 overs in the second innings following on, Head’s gentle right-arm off-breaks weren’t required.

Fifteen of the twenty Pakistani wickets fell to catches. Tim Paine gloved six of them behind the wicket, David Warner claimed three, and Steve Smith jagged a couple in the cordon.

Nathan Lyon took one in the first innings, and Mitchell Starc, Labuschagne, and Josh Hazlewood each took a catch in the second innings, too.

All that time ‘in the game’, yet Head never actually got in the game. All he has to show for more than 221 overs of ‘action’ is a Test victory – and a match payment!

In doing so, he became the 14th player to play in a winning Test and not score a run, take a wicket, or take a catch. The most recent to achieve the milestone, if you can call it that, was leggie Adil Rashid, in England’s innings-defeat of India at Lord’s in 2018.

Indian wicketkeeper Wriddhiman Saha did in a match that still featured eight Indian catches, a win over New Zealand in Indore in 2016. South Africa no.6 bat Jacques Rudolph also wasn’t required in a win over England at The Oval in 2012.

Head is the third Australian – but he’s actually on his own within that group of three, and I’ll explain why.

Bill Johnston was a tall left-arm quick who also bowled a bit of left-arm orthodox, who was Australia’s leading wicket-taker on The Invincibles tour of England in 1948, and who despite not getting the same sort of fanfare, was often seen as a more reliable bowler than renowned teammates Ray Lindwall and Keith Miller.

Johnston suffered a bad knee injury in an early tour match on the 1953 Ashes Tour, which forced him to remodel his bowling action, a required tweak that many authors have since opined meant he was never the same bowler. It was an injury that would see multiple flare-ups over the next two years.

In 1955, Australia toured the West Indies for the first time, and Johnston took 2/126 and 0/60 in a high-scoring First Test won by the visitors.

In the second Test, Johnston suffered a recurrence of the knee injury and couldn’t complete the match which Australia won by an innings, thus becoming the first Australian to play in a Test victory without contributing with bat or ball.

Travis Head and Usman Khawaja. (Photo by Daniel Kalisz – CA/Cricket Australia/Getty Images)

But it happened to Johnston again, just three Tests later on the same tour. Having missed a month of cricket, including the third and fourth Tests, Johnston returned for the fifth in Jamaica, only to again injure the knee as he changed direction while attempting to catch a Clyde Walcott pull shot early on the first day.

A makeshift stretcher was fashioned out of a dressing room bench to carry Johnston from the field, and sadly, he never played another Test. His last two Test matches were Australian wins, yet he didn’t finish either them and didn’t bat or bowl.

Craig McDermott’s entry as the second Australian on the list follows a similar tune.

The second Test of the 1993 Ashes series is remembered mostly for Michael Slater’s maiden Test century – the one that made helmet-kissing a thing – and for Mark Taylor and David Boon both making hundreds in the top three as Australia amassed 4 declared for 632, and with Allan Border not waving the Australian bats in until midway through the first session of the third day.

But there was a reason for batting so deep. Steve Waugh explained why in his obligatory Tour Diary at the time in his entry for the second day of the Test.

“Some people might say we batted on too long but one of the reasons we continued to pile on the runs was that during the Tea interval Craig McDermott had doubled over in agony with stomach trouble. After consultations with doctors, he was immediately rushed to hospital,” Waugh wrote.

“There were fears of burst appendix, or possibly complications arising from two previous hernia operations. I don’t think I’ve ever seen someone is as much pain as when I found Craig in the players’ toilets, gasping for air and unable to move. He was all hunched over, with tears pouring down his face. All we can hope is that it turns out to be nothing too serious.”

The big Queensland paceman not only took no further part in the Lord’s Test, but he didn’t play another Test until the start of the home summer in November ‘93.

Which brings us back to Travis Head.

Travis Head might’ve scored a century – but we’ll never know. (Photo by Glyn KIRK / AFP)

While Johnston and McDermott were injury- and illness-enforced absences from matches underway – twice, in Johnston’s unfortunate case – Head now finds himself in unique territory.

He is now the only Australian cricketer in the history of the game to play in a winning Test match, but to not bat, bowl, or take a catch, despite being fully fit, willing and able to do so for the entirety of the match.

He’s done something no other Australian cricketer has done in 390 wins across 827 Tests going back to 1877.

It is quite the cricket fact, and one you should definitely keep that in your back pocket the next time you head off to the pub trivia night.

The Crowd Says:

2019-12-05T20:19:04+00:00

Mark Fleming

Guest


Twisted bowel

2019-12-05T06:04:19+00:00

The Late News

Roar Rookie


Both most likely!

2019-12-05T03:50:17+00:00

Pierro

Roar Rookie


just wondering if neser should have a run with extra bowler who can bat against kiwis who bat a bit deeper. Head hasntbeen needed and if boult and ferguson don't start all of a sudden I feel comfortable with our batting depth as our tail often wags a bit when needed too .

2019-12-05T03:46:44+00:00

Pierro

Roar Rookie


Im with you there paul. I wonder if head could have a shield run. I want him to play in some more tests but he's been out of form since june or a bit reckless. He also just hasn't been needed int he first two tests. I saw starc picked up a niggle with that toe second innings. NZ just batted deep against england. Tail wags. Im thinking neser could have a run as an all rounder type even though he's a bowler he can bat. Just some depth particularly if boult doesn't play and ferguson doesn't I feel like our batting will be ok . These kiwis can bat deep. The DN match does make it harder to bat at night but I think the kiwis are way better bats than Pakistan and pakistan racked up 428 at perth against Aus A. Just been dwelling on whether we need head out there for this perth tie. If we go a bowler down with an injury nigggle , two seamers and lyon looks real thin too. It cost us at oval when siddle went down and also they got tired at headingly . Ok its not perth we should do better here but still I've noticed we have been caught a bowler short a few times lately. Opening session at brisbane we didn't get a wicket and i felt neser could have got a few on his home ground there even though the result was great in the end head didn't play a part in it either there.

AUTHOR

2019-12-05T03:12:07+00:00

Brett McKay

Expert


That could easily have been the case for Glenn McGrath in 2005, too. It was only the generosity of the English team management that allowed the late team change...

2019-12-05T02:50:36+00:00

Tigerbill44

Roar Guru


The case of Norman O"Neill at Bombay in 1964 65 was interesting. He developed stomach problem just as the match began and didn't play any part in the match. It was too late to change the team. I think Norman spent the whole match at the hospital

2019-12-05T01:38:03+00:00

Pope Paul VII

Roar Rookie


One thing worse.

2019-12-05T01:35:19+00:00

Chris Kettlewell

Roar Guru


Although, in the sub-continent where there isn’t a lot of bounce, a lot more wickets are bowled and LBW and you don’t get as many caught behind’s as the edges often just don’t carry. But it’s still quite a feat. You’d usually still have a catch off a spinner or a stumping or something. Were there any byes? If so, technically that’s him on the scoresheet, though the name is never mentioned…

2019-12-05T01:23:15+00:00

Rowdy

Roar Rookie


a statless match in your own state

2019-12-05T01:21:59+00:00

Rowdy

Roar Rookie


I found it too painful to talk about my hypochondria

2019-12-05T01:20:44+00:00

Rowdy

Roar Rookie


The only person missing on the scene was the Jack of Heads

AUTHOR

2019-12-05T00:58:36+00:00

Brett McKay

Expert


Well there's a blast from the past! Hats off to your stats man, mate!! :thumbup:

2019-12-05T00:55:25+00:00

Patrick Effeney

Editor


One of the great stats.

2019-12-05T00:49:21+00:00

Damo

Guest


I remember Mitch Johnson doing something similar near the end of his career. I went to watch it and it was a huge boon for the hosting club with a few hundred people there. Mitch was awesome too, accepting photos and autographing at fine leg and during breaks.

2019-12-05T00:34:00+00:00

Paul

Roar Guru


I'm surprised he doesn't make more of that when he's commentating, Brett. That was something he could have raised when Burns & Warner were going to town in Brisbane.

AUTHOR

2019-12-05T00:33:46+00:00

Brett McKay

Expert


I have to admit, this caught me by surprise too, Flexis. Seeing a no.6 bat or a spinner not required makes some sense, but a 'keeper not even taking one catch when his team took 20 wicket?!? That's absolutely next level...

AUTHOR

2019-12-05T00:29:09+00:00

Brett McKay

Expert


Ha, desperate for a stat!

AUTHOR

2019-12-05T00:28:49+00:00

Brett McKay

Expert


Cheers Matt - I can't take credit for the initial discovery, but I surprised that I was able to expand on the background, I thought for sure it would've been covered by today!

AUTHOR

2019-12-05T00:24:06+00:00

Brett McKay

Expert


That's not a bad shout Paul, would be a hell of a lot more feasible logistically than playing in Hobart until Tuesday..

AUTHOR

2019-12-05T00:23:09+00:00

Brett McKay

Expert


Correct, M.Waugh took the new ball in both innings!

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar