The one change that can ensure Wallabies success

By Bentnuc / Roar Pro

There is a lot of negativity about the Wallabies future. But we can’t forget they are just a sporting team, nothing more and nothing less and a team’s fortunes can turn very quickly.

Look at Joe Schmidt with the forever underachieving Ireland. He took them to first-ever victories over NZ, Grand Slams, and world number one rankings.

Eddie Jones inherited an English team that had been humiliated out of their own World Cup. England won their first 17 games under Eddie on their way to the recent World Cup final.

Last but not least Rassie Erasmus and South Africa. The Springboks had sunk to their lowest every ranking with losses to Japan and Italy in their resume. Now they are Rugby Championship and World Champions.

Siya Kolisi (Photo by Juan Jose Gasparini/Gallo Images/Getty Images)

A lot of people will say we don’t have the players because our Super Rugby teams are performing poorly. Well, the Saffas did not have one team in the Super Rugby Semis this year. I know, South Africa can select all their best players from over the world and we have this silly Giteau law.

Even though, the South Africans still only had six international players in their 23 for the final. Change the Giteau law or not, it won’t make any difference if we are not making the right selections.

Dave Rennie needs to make massive changes in selection from the Michael Cheika era. Cheika’s selections were almost entirely based around a player’s ability to run the ball. Defence, ruck skills, kicking were hardly looked at.

The ruck is the most important part of rugby and it is the number one part of our game that needs fixing.

The All Blacks are the masters of winning ruck ball. During Super Rugby, the players selected in the All Blacks World cup squad won pilfers and ruck penalties 225 per cent more frequently than the players selected for the Wallabies squad.

Yes, that’s right 225 per cent more frequently than the Wallabies! That’s not a typo. Just let that sink!

New Wallabies coach Dave Rennie. (Photo by Ian MacNicol/Getty Images)

That is about the equivalent to the All Blacks winning ten turnovers to the Wallabies three in a match. Winning seven more turnovers a match than your opponents will probably mean you are just about winning every match (as the All Blacks do). Coincidentally, in the last Bledisloe it was ten turnovers won to two.

Are kiwi players generally better over the ball? Well, in Super Rugby as a whole the Kiwi players won turnovers at a rate 19 per cent better than the Aussies (that even included the forever struggling Blues players who won the least turnovers of any team in Super Rugby and hence finished 13th overall).

So, they are better as a whole but not to the extent we see between the All Blacks and Wallabies. The key is that Steve Hansen and the All Black selectors emphasise ruck skills in their selection for the All Blacks whereas the Wallabies do the opposite.

Out of the top 20 per cent of ball poachers in New Zealand Super Rugby this year 11 of those players made the All Blacks 31-man World Cup squad. Compare that to the top 20 per cent of Australian Super Rugby poachers and only four of those players made the Wallabies World Cup squad – David Pocock, Tolu Latu, Taniela Tupou and Michael Hooper (with Hooper scraping in the top 20 per cent).

The point is not that we don’t have good poachers in Australian rugby it’s just that we haven’t been selecting them in the Wallaby jersey. As a result, a lot of the good poachers are either young, uncapped internationally (or have very few caps) and there are even some good backs in there too.

Here are a few quick names from different positions: Liam Wright, Pete Samu, Fraser McReight, Cornall McInerney, Lachlan McCaffrey, Harry Hoopert, Anaru Rangi, Harry Johnson-Holmes, Will Miller, Richard Hardwick, Karmichael Hunt, Henry Speight, Filipi Dangunu and Billy Meakes.

When you look at these names please remember one thing. Just because they might not be a capped Wallaby doesn’t mean they are a bad player.

All it means is that for the past five years under Cheika he did not think they were the best player for his game plan. So, don’t be biased by the ‘Wallaby’ or ‘not up to Test standards’ tag that gets unfairly attached to players.

Karmichael Hunt (AP Photo/Tertius Pickard)

To put it in perspective, current Wallaby openside and captain Michael Hooper has as massive 99 Test caps. Stealing ball is the primary goal of an openside.

Yet again if you look at pilfers and penalties won/minute he came in a lowly seventh out of the ten Australian players who had played openside flanker in 2019. Also, he came in a poor seventh out of the ten in how few penalties he conceded per minute.

Some people might say he has a great running game and a high tackle rate. That would be the same as making this comment about a Doctor (whose primary goal is to save lives).

‘Ah he isn’t that good at the old life-saving bit, but my god his paperwork is good!’

When Eddie Jones took over England. He realised that Chris Robshaw was not the answer at 7. He took the captaincy away and moved him to the blindside before he was eventually phased out the team. Will Dave Rennie have the courage to go that route with Michael Hooper?

Hooper is on a million-dollar contract so I seriously doubt it. Even if Dave Rennie does persist with Hooper at seven then there are plenty of other good ruck thieves that can be blooded in other positions to build up our pilfering game.

So please Dave. Please, fix our ruck game with some smart selections.

The Crowd Says:

2019-12-17T21:23:26+00:00

Zenn

Roar Rookie


Hi Savant Re: He [Hooper] looks about David Wilson’s size David Wilson Height 6 ft 2 in Weight 206 lb Michael Hooper Height 6 ft 0 in Weight 222 lb :stoked: :rugby: :thumbup:

2019-12-17T21:13:09+00:00

Zenn

Roar Rookie


Rugger, This is a cheap, unwarranted attack on Hunt. I'm sure that you're a better person than indicated by your comment. I'm disappointed that the editors let your comment through.

2019-12-11T02:58:17+00:00

Train Without A Station

Roar Guru


FYI, in 2015 Michael Hooper was 2nd for tackles made behind Warren Whitely so Gill definitely did not out do him for tackle figures. In 2016 Hooper was 8th. Gill did not make the top 10 in either year. So immediately half your claim is incorrect.

2019-12-11T02:37:02+00:00

Bob Coleman

Roar Rookie


I have always believed that Hooper was not our best 7, let alone captain. He has a major skeleton in the closet! (ask Link!). Cheeks ignored, and lost to Aus Rugby a player like Liam Gill, whose turnover and tackle figures bettered Hooper's over the last two years Gill played Super Rugby, and he's been blitzing French Rugby ever since.

AUTHOR

2019-12-10T08:41:02+00:00

Bentnuc

Roar Pro


Cheers, will check them out

AUTHOR

2019-12-10T08:39:13+00:00

Bentnuc

Roar Pro


Yeh it has definitely been a wallabies strategy just not to compete at the ruck as well

2019-12-10T03:08:34+00:00

Hoy

Roar Guru


There have deadest been times where Hooper has been first over the ball, and he has chosen not to compete at the ball, but rather walk through, and come out the other side of the ruck... it's bizarre to see, yet I have seen him do it about 3 or 4 times. And yet other times he performs perfectly timed steals... he's an odd one.

2019-12-10T03:04:58+00:00

Hoy

Roar Guru


Yeah, look Felix, as a pilferer, when he was in vogue, wasn't he beaten by Gill for turnovers almost every year. The selectors saw a big motor in Hooper, and went that way... but I just... I see the work Hooper does, but I still think to myself, if Hooper wasn't here, would the result be worse? No is the answer I give myself. In some ways, it might just be better... Hooper just hasn't altered a game by himself like other important, talisman players tend to... How many games would we have lost if not for Pocock alone?

AUTHOR

2019-12-09T22:05:00+00:00

Bentnuc

Roar Pro


Cheers Crashball. Thanks for the info. Will have to check it out :happy:

2019-12-09T21:47:01+00:00

Train Without A Station

Roar Guru


I use the Vodacom Rugby App for which Opta supplies the stats. I believe the numbers in that include forced penalties and clean pilfers. I could be wrong though. I believe these align with the stats on ESPN.

2019-12-09T21:36:54+00:00

Crash Ball2

Roar Rookie


Thanks for the article Bentnuc. Appreciate the considered thoughts and effort. In regards to the stats, you have rightly collated pilfers (clean steals), with forced penalties (“holding on” infringements). Though, you have not included forced ruck and maul penalties (marked FRMP in the fox stats). These are penalties gained at the ruck by a defender through strong breakdown work, focused upon opposition other than the ball carrier, and include infringements such as coming in from the side, illegal cleanouts etc. These figures aren’t commonly included in other stats sites and is one thing that FS does well. It is a very important breakdown metric as it is not just an indicator of a defender’s instinct and pace to the ruck, but also post-contest strength and resilience over the ball. You will note that with forced ruck and maul penalties added to your incumbent numbers, your point becomes even more poignant. Liam Wright’s FRMP’s this season were immense – 11; best in the comp – added to his 13 pilfers and forced turnovers, Wright was second only to Kirifi across the entire Super Rugby season for defensive turnovers and his averages were off the charts. Little has been made about the fact that – even with this huge level offensive defence and possessions won for his side – Wright also came 6th across the entire competition for tackles made at an equally successful completion rate as Hooper. That is all without considering the many non-measured breakdown interactions such as: opposition defenders committed, opposition pill slowed, “dirty” halfback presentations etc his efforts elicited. And then these also don’t take into account breakdown work on the other side of the ball / offensive ruck cleaning, which is again historically a heavy loose forward focus – the dirty work done to achieve quick pill that the outside backs use for gain line attacks on the peripheries. Wright was the (unheralded) best defender in the Australian conference, and easily our best performed breakdown merchant. Take a while to run the numbers. But you are actually more correct than you had first realised. https://www.foxsports.com.au/rugby/super-rugby/stats/players?category=defence&sortBy=forcesRuckMaulPenalty&position=opensideFlanker

AUTHOR

2019-12-09T18:10:29+00:00

Bentnuc

Roar Pro


Probably right Ken. It's a shame he didnt get to end his career on a high. Absolute champion though. The 'bradman of the ruck' in oz rugby

AUTHOR

2019-12-09T18:03:17+00:00

Bentnuc

Roar Pro


Cheers Trevor :happy:

AUTHOR

2019-12-09T18:02:35+00:00

Bentnuc

Roar Pro


Cheers David :happy: yeh Liam was a star. Shame he has missed out on a lot of international rugby. At least there are a few promising queenslanders who might get a decent shot in Wright and McReight

2019-12-09T18:01:34+00:00

Ken Catchpole's Other Leg

Roar Guru


I’m betting (with no joy or direct evidence) that it was his neck that he was being very careful with.

AUTHOR

2019-12-09T18:00:34+00:00

Bentnuc

Roar Pro


Thanks Bobwire :happy: I guess the positive is that smart selections can go a long way to fixing the ruck very quickly. One area I found when comparing with the ABs where the Wallabies have an advantage was stealing lineout ball. Rhodda was in the top 5 in all of super rugby for total lineout steals and steals per minute and so was Luke Jones. If we tie this in with a decent kicking game then there this is an area we could take advantage of (a la the Eales era)

AUTHOR

2019-12-09T15:17:35+00:00

Bentnuc

Roar Pro


Very true Harry. There is no aggression in defence

2019-12-09T15:07:58+00:00

Harry Jones

Expert


Generally, I agree. Ball protection on offense by the Wallabies was almost always poor during 2018 and 2019, because players arrived at rucks quite high, and seemed to be unsure if they were arriving to carry or clean. On defence, their tackles weren’t dominant often enough to create a steady flow of ball-slowing and pilfer chances. I agree that wiser selection is a big part of that; but also, coaching body height and quick thinking and smash tackling.

2019-12-09T14:42:49+00:00

Rugger

Guest


I really don’t think Kokemichal Hunt would be an inspired selection. He is a junkie and is only too happy to throw a team mate under the bus to save his own skin. Enjoy the snow down under this Sunny Christmas Special K. Ho ho ho indeed

2019-12-09T14:40:12+00:00

Bobwire

Guest


Good article. So, rucking was not good. Was anything good? Is there anything to build on?

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar