The Wrap: How Super Rugby can help save the environment

By Geoff Parkes / Expert

Super Rugby ran into colour issues in Round 2. More on some questionable away strips later, but the folly of SANZAAR doing away with geographic identification in favour of supposedly more marketable names was exposed in comical circumstances.

Twenty minutes into the Blues versus Waratahs match a casual rugby-watching acquaintance – who had done remarkably well to be still watching to that point – came to the realisation that the team they thought was the Blues was actually the team in white and the team in blue wasn’t actually the Blues but the Waratahs.

They weren’t the only one confused. When Waratah Mark Nawaqanitawase flew spectacularly through the air to dot down in the corner in the 60th minute, Fox Sports added five points to the Blues’ score. Was that more colour confusion or Fox clocking off early from Super Rugby?

It was a similar story in Johannesburg, where a casual fan might have been thinking, not unreasonably, that the Reds were the team wearing Red when that was actually the Lions.

In Newcastle referee AJ Jacobs got his colours mixed up too, showing the (white) Blues’ Hoskins Sotutu a red card instead of the one he intended, a yellow. It’s debatable, but if he’d sent a handful of Blues off, it might not have made any difference to the result, such was the impotence of the Waratahs.

Coach Rob Penney stated the obvious afterwards. In all reality this is a rebuilding year for the Waratahs. But none of that excuses an absence of the intensity and aggression required to measure up at this level.

(Jason McCawley/Getty Images)

With the Chiefs putting the Blues loss in Round 1 into perspective, theirs was another step forward. Their pack was solid, and winger Mark Talea enjoyed the space provided him on the left wing, helping himself to three tries. And how refreshing was it to see a side run the ball from first phase after the final siren instead of lamely kicking it out – and being rewarded for it!

The Sharks franked their good New Zealand form with a convincing 42-20 win over a Highlanders side who played as if it was their first match of the season – which it was. Another side in rebuild mode.

The Rebels sabotaged any hope they had of another away win in Canberra with an appalling start: 14-0 down in a flash and 24-0 not long afterwards. To be fair, the Brumbies were close to perfect for 35 minutes, but any side that turns up without a functioning set-piece, frittering away penalties like confetti, is asking for trouble.

Some direct play from Angus Cottrell sparked a much-improved second-half performance, even if the result was never in question. At least they now have a platform from which to belatedly kick-start their season this week against the Waratahs.

The Brumbies have a nice balance to their side – as always, they’re a threat at the lineout maul and, with two contrasting, explosive finishers on the wings.

The match of the round came in Hamilton, where Sevu Reece gave Damian McKenzie a taste of the sweet step he served up to Makazole Mapimpi in Yokohama. The Chiefs hung tough defensively, however, and fully deserved their 25-15 win over the champions.

A word for prop Ross Geldenhuys who, making his debut for the Chiefs at the age of 36, has now appeared for six Super Rugby franchises. Can he sneak another one in before the doom merchants have the competition shut down?

Aaron Cruden (Renee McKay/Getty Images)

In South Africa the Stormers shut out the Bulls who, two matches in, are yet to score a try. Best for all concerned to move on from this one.

Reds’ fans weren’t happy with referee Jaco Peyper, but a tight match with a seven-point margin is not the place to start playing silly buggers on your own goal line, not contesting a Lions lineout maul.

World Rugby’s Laws of the Game contains a preamble which states “the contest for possession of the ball is one of rugby’s key features”. The Reds, to their cost, forgot this, and those seven points, given up voluntarily, proved the difference.

Finally, it was the Jordie Barrett show in Buenos Aires, the lanky opening bowler pulling off a miraculous try-saving tackle and slapping over a 62-metre penalty that still had plenty to spare as it sailed over.

The Jaguares were by no means poor, and they led by 23-12 into the final 15 minutes. But not able to put the Hurricanes away, they were exposed by a rollicking finish, with Jamie Booth finishing off superb lead-up work by Ngani Laumape to ice the win in the 78th minute.

Emiliano Boffelli (Jason McCawley/Getty Images)

Much was made last week about reports in the News Corp press that Foxtel had walked away from negotiations with Rugby Australia and will not be broadcasting rugby from 2021 onwards.

Three points stand out:

  1. Media cross-ownership means that we should treat any reporting in a newspaper about ongoing commercial negotiations concerning a TV network under the same ownership with extreme caution.
  2. Ever tried to sell or buy a house at auction? Until the process is exhausted, comments from all parties should be taken with a grain of salt. At the end of the day what is actually important is who pays for the rights and how much they pay for them, not the brinkmanship that precedes this.
  3. Many pundits are prepared to call the end of Foxtel’s association with rugby as the ‘death of Australian rugby’. In 2019 Foxtel’s earnings were down 30 per cent over the previous year, subscriber churn was up and majority owner News Corp was required to inject $500 million into the ailing business to keep it afloat.

While the prognosis for Australian rugby is concerning, what we are witnessing is not the death of rugby but the slow, agonising decline of Foxtel.

Complicating matters are reports that South Africa is in negotiation to join what would become an expanded Seven Nations tournament following the 2023 World Cup. If correct, this would have a material effect on Rugby Australia’s broadcast rights tender. With South Africa’s place in SANZAAR up in the air, what exactly would it be that Rugby Australia is selling to broadcasters?

Long term, the potential advantages for South Africa are obvious, but cooler heads might point to them having previously affirmed commitment to SANZAAR through to 2030 and having signed agreements in place through to 2025.

There is also the matter of the all-powerful English and French clubs who won’t take kindly any proposal that further cuts into their competitions as a Seven Nations would. Oh, and the source of the report? That noble bastion of investigative journalism, Daily Mail Online.

Finally this week news is from the BAFTA awards, where best actor winner Joaquin Phoenix endeared himself to audiences when it was revealed that in the interest of environmental sustainability he has worn the same tuxedo to three awards ceremonies and will continue to wear it to other ceremonies during the awards season.

There is precedent for this. In 2014 it was revealed that in a stunt to highlight sexism in the television industry Today presenter Karl Stefanovic wore the same suit every day for a year, and nobody noticed.

Perhaps nobody would have noticed Phoenix wearing the same suit too, but we’ll never know because he and his supporters deemed that signalling his action was as important as the action itself. What they didn’t reveal was Phoenix’s travel plans for his return to the United States, although one assumes that he is a strong swimmer.

Why is this important? One, we can take comfort in the knowledge that next summer’s bushfire season will be made less threatening by this selfless gesture reversing the impact of global warming.

Secondly, there is a lesson for rugby to take. In the interest of environmental sustainability and good taste, how about Super Rugby franchises do away with ‘away’ strips that serve no purpose?

There have been some shockers in recent times: the Stormers’ ‘tangerine dream’ and the Highlanders’ ‘tradies outfit’ spring to mind. The current low marker was thought to be owned by the Hurricanes, but even their drab grey strip was outdone by the Crusaders, forever associated with red and black, adding pastel blue sleeve trim to go with their grey.

If the reason for these insipid away strips is to drive merchandising revenue, is it fair to ask if any fan ever purchases them?

We might be coming from different places, but let us #standwithJoaquin. When you find a good suit, stick to it.

The Crowd Says:

2020-02-13T08:11:47+00:00

jeznez

Roar Guru


I'll guess an argument can be made that they've put the broadcaster over fans but given Foxtel failing and the lack of attendance we can see what 7:30pm kickoffs is delivering compared to good old 3:15. Am sure RA and the broadcaster would argue that the prime time broadcast benefits the fans since its at a time that more people will watch. Which I guess loops back to them prioritising fans that watch on TV vs fans that will attend games. At least Castle seems to be doing the right thing trying to get the game out from behind the paywall - the squealing from Fox and affiliates makes me think she's on the right path there.

2020-02-13T03:41:13+00:00

sheek

Roar Guru


Jez, Well, always it's the moneyed folk at the head of the queue. I don't really care bout rationalisation matters here. Apparently, in the collapse of the George Calombaris restaurant empire, rich creditors have to wait in line behind disposed staff, if you really believe that's the case. I don't se why money should always place you at the top of the pile, but of course, i'm pissing into the wind. Of course, money matters. The world is all about money. So anyone with money is at the top of the queue - media broadcasters & mates, sponsors & mates, ARU & mates, etc. Then way down there, way down at the bottom, you have the fans. It wasn't like that in the amateur days. But now rugby is professional, & money is God. And anyone with money is a leading apostle, or disciple, or whatever. Sorry, I'm beyond jaundiced. Forgive me.

2020-02-13T03:04:53+00:00

jeznez

Roar Guru


They certainly put the WA fans at the bottom of their pile! And sure they've put followers of club rugby down their list but that has been while they've been hoping to build an NRC following and hoping to build their Wallaby fan base. I know some people will say they prioritised sponsors over fans in the Izzy saga but I'd disagree with that, I think there is a large group of fans that not only supported RA's actions but had their wishes prioritised in the matter. (I say that while recognising there is also a big group of fans that disagreed). Who do you think they've prioritised over fans? My take is they've put some fans ahead of other fans (hoping to strengthen East coast over West, woke over unwoke, Wallaby over local etc.) but I'm not sure that in everything they've done they haven't had some fans at the core of their agenda.

2020-02-13T02:41:32+00:00

sheek

Roar Guru


Jeznez, I do think the ARU tried hard at this. Depends on the definition of "irrelevant". Australian rugby fans were clearly at the very, very bottom of the so called, much hyped 'rugby family'.

2020-02-13T01:38:59+00:00

jeznez

Roar Guru


Do you really think that at any stage a professional code thought fans were irrelevant?

2020-02-12T22:38:01+00:00

sheek

Roar Guru


So, putting the environment & gaudy, unnecessary away strips aside, how do all the "experts" on The Roar, who have argued relentlessly that 'free-to-air' & 'club rugby' are irrelevant, feel now? Now that Castle has both free-to-air super rugby & club rugby as central planks in any new media rights TV deal? I'm no fan of Castle, but at least I give her kudos for trying something different. There's no doubt ARU & Australian rugby can't continue as they are. Nevertheless, it adds to the contempt when ARU comes bowl in hand, begging grassroots & fans to support them when their collective arses are hanging out. That's the way it is in this world. Grassroots & fans are irrelevant until the powers-that-be finally realised they've stuffed up. And then they need grassroots & fans to prop them up..... again.

2020-02-12T09:51:18+00:00

Paulo

Roar Rookie


They might have thought it would take away some of the AB mystique, it only served increase it for them I think. They failed to realise the ABs only have as much mystique about them as people want to give them, they are just another rugby team at the end of the day. But when people go out of their way to dress like them, or to only say Nee Zealand (not All Blacks), they create the AB aura, not the ABs.

2020-02-12T04:20:41+00:00

SD

Guest


Hunt knows how to tackle ay. ?Just what you want in a 12. Hunt is still slow with no kicking or passing skills.

2020-02-11T20:37:46+00:00

sheek

Roar Guru


Paulo, Not so long ago, we had England playing in a black jersey, & France adopted all navy blue, all designed to muscle in on the ABs look. They mistakenly thought if they looked like the ABs, they would play like the ABs. It doesn't work like that. Stupid people.

2020-02-11T20:01:23+00:00

concerned supporter

Roar Rookie


Geoff, My bugbear about time wasting & ''ball in play'' time in Rugby v NRL surfaced again. ''According to Wessels, the ball was in play for only 14 minutes of what turned out to be a 42-minute first half of the Super Rugby match against the Brumbies in Canberra last Friday night. A statistic like that is a throwback to the bad old days of how the game was in the last year of amateurism, 1995, when the ball was “live” only 30 minutes 43 seconds out of the allotted 80. These days it appears to have stabilised at around 35-36 minutes in the professional level.'' Geoff, Do the Brumbies & other teams want to increase their crowds & TV audience? The first thing is to make the game more attractive for spectators, the very capable NRL coach Anthony Seibold is concerned that ball in play in NRL has reduced from 58 minutes to 55 minutes. Super & Test Match Rugby would be better for spectators if'' ball in play'' time was increased to at least 45 minutes. Then perhaps Raelene would have more ammunition in negotiating future Broadcasting Deals, at the moment RA is so far behind NRL & AFL in $$$ per annum, but it is a must that SR & Test Matches receive FTA exposure.

2020-02-11T13:59:31+00:00

Paulo

Roar Rookie


Hi Sheek, Agree with you 100%, and this: "Back then we worked harder to notice the little differences in clubs colour patterns (hoops, bands, Vs, double Vs, etc), so we could pick them up more easily on b/w" You worked hard, but the clubs also worked hard to maintain those subtle differences and iconic features. Those features are now starting to disappear, like the (St George-Illawara) Dragons Red 'V'. It seems like the teams are bowing to the to the people who hold the money bags. None of the NZ SR teams look anything like their respective teams... https://www.superrugby.co.nz/news/adidas-unveils-investec-super-rugby-away-jerseys-2/

2020-02-11T11:04:07+00:00

RobC

Roar Guru


Yup! So is EPL AFL etc

AUTHOR

2020-02-11T10:20:22+00:00

Geoff Parkes

Expert


Fair comment Fin. And don't forget, what people in Sydney club rugby conveniently forget is that this widely praised arrangement to get a Shute Shield match on Ch 7 every week has actually been paid for by RA, stepping in to bail out Club Rugby TV when they didn't stump for the amount agreed with Seven.

2020-02-11T10:15:31+00:00

sheek

Roar Guru


Paulo, I actually agreed with Geoff re the pedantic, unimaginative away strips. The whole process is more about revenue streaming, than any practical application. I remember back in the late 60s, when I first came to Sydney as a kid at boarding school, I watched the Sydney rugby league on black & white TV, & most of us had no trouble identifying the opposing teams. So Norths Bears red & black (like Canterbury) looked like black & light grey, while Souths Rabbitohs cardinal red & myrtle green looked like light grey & dark grey. But it worked. Back then we worked harder to notice the little differences in clubs colour patterns (hoops, bands, Vs, double Vs, etc), so we could pick them up more easily on b/w. The VFL, when they introduced away strips, had a ridiculously simple plan. The away team played in white shorts & the home team in black, navy, royal, chocolate, or whatever their normal strip. Paulo, I do agree if you're going to have an away strip, you should still be able to identify it with your favourite club.

2020-02-11T09:53:33+00:00

Carlin

Roar Rookie


Egotistical as they generally only worry about their club and not necessarily about developing future National players. In away I can understand that as they need to win titles to make money generally speaking. The French and English clubs will spend their extra cash on more foreign players or if you are Saracens set up some dodgy businesses for their key players.

2020-02-11T09:11:09+00:00

Harry Jones

Expert


It’s the (throat) clear(ing)est of languages!

2020-02-11T09:10:12+00:00

Harry Jones

Expert


Yes, imagine an 8N so there is no bye. Rather than GEO, imagine ARG. That’s 7+ of the top 10 test teams; a juggernaut.

2020-02-11T09:08:46+00:00

Harry Jones

Expert


e-sports are exploding ... starting to have real leagues, 250,000 in attendance at one event, 6-figure prize money and sponsorships, and a teen-twenty demographic.

2020-02-11T09:06:08+00:00

Harry Jones

Expert


I prefer to signal my vices.

2020-02-11T08:04:23+00:00

ClarkeG

Roar Guru


Yes once upon a time - whatever the sport - one could immediately recognise most teams. Not so these days. Also the Lions home jersey. It's a completely different colour, front and back. If you didn't know better, at times you might think there are 3 teams on the field.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar