Zach who?

By JamesH / Roar Guru

Every year, at the end of the home-and-away season, the AFL’s All-Australian squad of 40 is announced.

And every year, fans and media pundits alike bemoan the omission of their own personal favourite players. Then, of course, they do it all over again once the final side is announced.

This year, the biggest snubs with respect to the initial squad were apparently directed at the likes of Steven May, Todd Goldstein, Lachie Whitfield and Jarryd Lyons.

One player whose name you probably didn’t hear thrown into the mix with other unlucky omissions is Zach Merrett. You really should have heard it, though, because it needs to be said: Zach Merrett was a star in 2020 and his absence from the initial squad of 40 was as glaring as that any of those players named above.

Ah, I can hear the arguments forming as I type these words.

“Sure, he gets plenty of the pill –”

Correct, 26.3 disposals per game, ranked fourth in the competition. Go on.

“– but he butchers it a bit, doesn’t he?”

19.4 effective disposals per game, ranked fourth, going at 74 per cent.

“Okay, but he dishes out a lot of cheap sideways kicks.”

413.5 metres gained per game, ranked seventh in the competition and second among all midfielders.

“He doesn’t really hurt opponents with his dispo–”

4.9 inside 50s per game, ranked third, with five score involvements per game (ranked 26th) in a team that struggled to post a rugby league score most weeks.

“Right, but he’s a bit of a one-way run–”

9.6 defensive half pressure acts per game, ranked 14th.

“Stats aren’t everything though, are they?”

(Adam Trafford/AFL Media/Getty Images)

Well, in the context of any rational, semi-objective attempt to determine who the best players were across each position in 2020…yeah, they kind of are. And in Merrett’s case, the numbers don’t lie (for the sake of transparency, the rankings above exclude players who played fewer than half of the 17 possible games for the 2020 season).

If you still aren’t convinced that Merrett would have been a worthy inclusion in this squad, then let’s look at West Coast’s Andrew Gaff for a quick comparison.

Why Gaff? Well, for starters he was picked in the 2020 All-Australian squad. He’s become something of a fixture too, having now made the squad in five of the last six seasons and being named in the final teams in 2015 and 2018.

Gaff also plays a very similar role for his side to that of Merrett, being a modestly-sized, outside midfielder, who bounces between the centre and the wing.

So, how do their numbers per game in 2020 stack up? Ignoring statistics where there was no significant difference between the two players, or where each player’s ranking was so low as to be negligible, here are the key categories in which Merrett comes out on top:

Disposals (+1.9), tackles (+1), inside 50s (+1.7), uncontested possessions (+1.7), effective disposals (+1.6), metres gained (+74.3m), clearances (+1.4) and score involvements (+1.5).

And here are the key categories in which Gaff is notably ahead:

Marks inside 50 (+0.5), intercepts (+1.7) and intercept marks (+0.4).

I want to be clear that I’m not picking on Gaff. He’s an exceptional footballer who had a good season. He just happens to be an ideal player against which to draw a meaningful comparison.

(Photo by Paul Kane/Getty Images)

We don’t have to stop at Gaff, either. We could hold Merrett’s season up to those of Cam Guthrie and Hugh McCluggage – two other similar players who also made the cut for the All-Australian squad (in Guthrie’s case, the final side) – and Merrett would compare favourably.

If this still isn’t hitting home, feel free to jump onto footywire.com and use their handy player compare tool if you want to run the numbers yourself.

It’s not as if this season was an anomaly for Merrett, either. A quick glance at his performances since 2016 will show that he is an exceptionally consistent player. And he’s still only 24.

So why the lack of recognition?

For starters, I don’t think Merrett’s appearance and on-field demeanour aids his cause. In a world full of leg tattoos, bad haircuts and excessive goal celebrations, Merrett is about as vanilla as it gets.

Being a little on the short side, with a great poker face and a haircut that looks like it was done by his nan, isn’t going to catch many eyes. here is simply nothing flashy about the way Merrett looks or operates. Even pulling Nic Nat’s dreadlocks and breaking Jack Silvagni’s rib didn’t seem to shake up his image.

It also doesn’t help that he’s basically been doing the same thing week in, week out, for the last five years, without any major peaks or troughs. It’s so easy to take a player for granted when you know exactly what you’re going to get from them each time they step onto a field.

As soon as a hard-working, clean-cut, consistent type is no longer the new kid on the block, it seems they have to put up some absurd numbers in order to get the recognition they deserve. Just ask Lachie Neale.

Of course, there’s also the fact that Merrett plays for a middling side which apparently spent the best part of 2020 trying to relieve itself of any and all admirers. It can be tough to get noticed when people are so focused on how badly your side is travelling.

If you’re one of those people who had all but forgotten about Merrett, you can probably be excused. I’m not even convinced his own club values him as highly as they should, having stripped him of leadership duties – and the vice-captaincy – at the start of the year.

There was a rumour doing the rounds at the time to the effect that Merrett was dumped because he was too demanding of his teammates. I sincerely hope that isn’t true. Could you imagine – a club that is routinely criticised for not being ruthless enough, demoting someone for setting high standards?

Wait, don’t answer that. It does sound a little bit Essington.

And then there are the fans. A worryingly large number of Essendon supporters apparently don’t rate Merrett. In the past week I’ve found myself in three separate online debates on Essendon Facebook pages, with people who remain steadfast in their belief that he underwhelmed in 2020.

One of them actually referred to Merrett as ‘obsolete’. Obsolete? What does that even mean?

Zach who, indeed.

The Crowd Says:

2020-10-12T09:53:04+00:00

camo

Guest


zach merrett is an absolute gun he is my favourite essendon player and i think he was robbed of all australian and b&f

AUTHOR

2020-10-03T13:07:39+00:00

JamesH

Roar Guru


Do you ever say "we need to tag [player]" when playing Essendon? The fact that you're not worrying about him only highlights the point I'm making. What he does warrants attention, whether or not you personally give it to him.

AUTHOR

2020-10-03T13:04:39+00:00

JamesH

Roar Guru


Late reply, I know, but I don't think I've read something I disagreed with so strongly on this site... O.o

2020-09-29T07:21:32+00:00

Doctor Rotcod

Guest


Hi James This might answer your question Gaff averages 2 km per game more than Merrett's highest measure. https://www.afl.com.au/news/511202/marathon-men-telstra-tracker-reveals-your-club-s-endurance-kings

2020-09-28T05:06:36+00:00

Liam

Guest


Good article, and well argued. Love the faux argument with yourself at the start; I've had more or less this precise conversation with other people concerning Merrett before. And I'm not a bomber, either. Is a very good footballer, and would be much better if he wasn't playing for a team determined to jam a square peg into a round hole. Plonk him in 2014 Sydney instead of Tom Mitchell, and he's regarded as one of the game's best offensive midfielders, purely because he's not required to do the inside grunt stuff he's too small to do. As for claims he's soft, was Akermanis soft? If you're insisting that the little blokes play inside against the 190+cm midfielder that are rampant these days - or the 180cm blokes like Viney or Neale, who might not be tall but are little walls of muscle - you're not accepting reality.

2020-09-27T11:01:02+00:00

Brendon the 1st

Roar Rookie


I don't watch enough Essendon to really know how he goes about it, but I'll say he doesn't worry me when they come to town. I never say "we need to tag Merrett" In fact I'd back my mids and wingers to do him, so maybe that's why he's nowhere near it? Has anyone on this site ever worried about what he's capable of?

2020-09-26T06:08:01+00:00

TomC

Roar Guru


Merrett is less of a winger than Petracca and Bontempelli.

2020-09-26T04:02:31+00:00

pablocruz

Roar Rookie


Well that's misleading. Score involvements often go through the mids so those stats don't really tell you that much, do they? And effective disposals? When you go sideways, backwards, sideways again, then sideways, etc. as Essendon often do, you can rack up a heap of 'effective' disposals without creating a thing. Nup, stats don't tell the real story.

2020-09-26T00:30:13+00:00

Doctor Rotcod

Roar Rookie


When they were there.. Shuey, Sheed, Redden and Yeo all absent for various lengths of time.

2020-09-25T23:37:56+00:00

Pumping Dougie

Roar Guru


Great article James and well argued. His stats are good, as Fantasy Footy gurus well know. But to the naked eye he's not a player's player. I was forever put-off Merrett when I saw him pull out of contests twice weakly in a game last year. My conclusion was he is soft and couldn't be trusted to put his body in the way when required. My other observation of him is he is easily quelled when tagged (partially because I think he is a 'soft' outside player). Although nobody bothers to tag Essendon players very often. Stats are definitely a good barometer though, so well argued. Only 24 eh? Sheesh.

AUTHOR

2020-09-25T23:19:39+00:00

JamesH

Roar Guru


If you’re picking a squad of 40 then you clearly need to pick more than 6-7 mids though. And the ones you’ve listed are all inside mids. None would play on the wing.

AUTHOR

2020-09-25T23:17:09+00:00

JamesH

Roar Guru


Well if you cherry pick one stat in isolation then of course it’s meaningless. You have to give context to them by putting them together in a logical way. If you rank highly in effective disposals and score involvements then it suggests that yeah, your inside 50s are creating opportunities. None of that is about ‘racking up big numbers’.

2020-09-25T22:38:55+00:00

Don Freo

Roar Rookie


Fyfe was outstanding.

2020-09-25T22:38:07+00:00

Don Freo

Roar Rookie


This is a really good piece of writing James. Clever structure.

2020-09-25T11:27:04+00:00

TomC

Roar Guru


Sometimes there are years where the team should have more midfielders. This wasn't one of them. I'm not interested in your dull lecture.

2020-09-25T10:27:49+00:00

Jake Ramzy


Playing midfield takes the most courage because you put your head down and hunt the football at the coal face. Once a midfielder gets the footy he has to make split second decisions that effect whether or not the footy is moving forward or back. And if your slow like I was when I played club footy it's a position where you will get smashed by stronger faster players. The midfield is where the battle begins, and the forward line is where it is won. So that's why the All Australian side consists of so many midfielders.

2020-09-25T09:10:33+00:00

TomC

Roar Guru


To me there were only a handful of real standout midfielders this season: Boak, Steele, Neale, Petracca, Bontempelli, and Adams. I don't really see why the panel needed to select more than six or seven genuine midfielders, but I don't think anyone can get too upset about whoever missed out beyond that top half-dozen.

AUTHOR

2020-09-25T07:55:19+00:00

JamesH

Roar Guru


He certainly has more support than Merrett!

AUTHOR

2020-09-25T07:54:11+00:00

JamesH

Roar Guru


No offence, but that’s just a copout. Merrett’s influence on games is limited by a lack of support. He can’t get the clearances, deliver the ball into the forward line and kick the goals too. Outside of freaks like Martin and Danger, the players who make an impact in better sides do so because they aren’t playing a lone hand. How much recognition would Gaff or Guthrie have got playing in the 2020 Essendon team? Very little, I suspect.

AUTHOR

2020-09-25T07:44:00+00:00

JamesH

Roar Guru


I suspect he would be better off at the Blues for that very reason. I don’t think the Bombers would be smart to trade him though. Of him, Shiel and Parish he’s comfortably the better player. I’d sooner bite the bullet and trade Shiel at a loss. McGrath is a little different because I think he’ll settle on an inside role. He plays bigger than he is in the clinches. He needs support though. I said at the time that Setterfield would be a more sensible target than Shiel, and I still think that was the case, even before you factor in that we would have also saved two first round picks. The club got greedy chasing instant improvement and it hasn’t worked. Now they’ll have to be patient anyway if they land someone like Brodie.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar