The Wrap: Eight and a half crazy minutes light up the Bledisloe Cup

By Geoff Parkes / Expert

For eight and a half crazy minutes yesterday, the Wallabies and All Blacks duked it out like men, toe to toe, refusing to take the sissy’s way out and win a Test match with a drop goal after the siren.

It was thrilling stuff, intensity levels at boiling point despite the previous eighty minutes’ exertion, with both sides losing and regaining the ball, willing and thrusting their bodies into a position to win the match with a try or a penalty.

A day later and with heart rates restored to normal levels, both sides will have now reflected on opportunities spurned to win the match with a field goal. After all, if you’re prepared to accept an invitation to win by kicking a penalty, why should a Test win by a point-blank drop kick be any different?

The thing is, it’s never really been the way things are done in this part of the world. Players aren’t wired for it. That’s something that northern hemisphere players and Argentinians do.

Except however, that’s a theory that shouldn’t really add up, when you look at how ruthlessly efficient most NRL sides are when they need a field goal to break a deadlock.

This was a curious Test in that there were long periods when nothing much happened. But when they did happen, they sure happened with a bang.

A brilliant All Blacks’ counter-attack that saw the ball pass through the hands of ten different players before Jordie Barrett scored, should have been rubbed out by Rieko Ioane’s straying toenail.

Another blistering, sweeping counter-attack try, after Folau Fainga’a outfoxed himself on a line-out move, was rubbed out, this time by Ioane’s straying fingernail.

Codie Taylor then rubbed Fainga’a’s nose in it by running the exact same lineout variation, expertly sending George Bridge through a hole for Aaron Smith to beat Nic White to the corner.

But instead of the All Blacks upping the ante in the second half, as is customary against the Wallabies, the visitors maintained their possession advantage, got their line-out working, and engineered two superb finishes by their wingers, Marika Koroibete and Filipo Daugunu.

The work inside was top notch too, deception in the midfield drawing the All Blacks backline defence in too narrow for the first, and White showing initiative and skill to backhand the ball off the floor to Daugunu, for the second.

All of which were merely the support acts for what proved to be one of the most frenetic, crazy finishes in Bledisloe Cup history.

For that, Reece Hodge can claim much of the credit, his 80th minute penalty attempt, from 54 metres, instead of ending the match, cannoning into an upright – three-quarters of the way up, if you don’t mind – before rebounding into the field of play for the Wallabies to recover possession.

Reece Hodge of the Wallabies prepares for a conversion attempt. (Photo by Matt Roberts/Getty Images)

It was the All Blacks who showed their hand first, turning the ball over under intense pressure, but refusing to take the relief offered, and instead, looking to counter from their goal-line.

It was as if a challenge had been thrown down to the Wallabies – who on previous days might have gladly taken a 16-16 draw as a moral victory – and it was one accepted with relish.

Perhaps the outcome will galvanise those who seek to introduce golden point, or shoot-outs, or whatever artificial construct might be chosen to engineer a winner and a loser. But surely here was an example better than any, that in circumstances like these, a draw is a valid and just outcome. And given the way both sides played out the final stanza, an outcome as heroic and full of honour as any win or loss.

Wallabies coach Dave Rennie was clear in his post-match comments, about how there was no celebrating in his dressing room; only resolve to front up again next week, when he and everyone knows they will be facing an All Blacks team that has a brutal record when coming to Eden Park on the rebound.

Rennie was also clearly proud of the resolve and character shown by his men. Almost immediately, he has what feels like a solid platform to build from – safe in the knowledge that players like Harry Wilson, Matt Philip and Filipo Daugunu are indeed of international quality.

His defensive line operated with speed, and worried Richie Mo’unga and the All Blacks’ backline all match, on a day when conditions demanded extra care and attention on the catch and pass.

There was a nod to last year, in the way that the Wallabies played off Nic White at nine – something that confused the All Blacks in Perth, and caused them problems here again, not the least in the way it forced Smith to defend in close.

But in almost every other respect, 2019 already feels like long ago, and it was the Wallabies’ kicking game that fully underlined the transformation from the Cheika era, with Damian McKenzie – one notable exception aside – under pressure all match to deal with what was punted to him.

Wallabies coach Dave Rennie. (Photo by Henry Browne/Getty Images)

The Wallabies’ primary work-on this week will be the attacking breakdown – inaccuracy at the clean-out giving up six penalties while in possession. Halve that, and a draw becomes a win.

Ian Foster meanwhile, will be relieved not to start his international coaching career with a loss – even if for highly expectant fans, an All Blacks’ draw always feels like a loss.

He will be disappointed with the way his side failed to adjust to the swirling kicks – in the first half leaving it to deep defenders to rush forward to a ball swinging back and away from them, and in the second half, McKenzie edging too far forward, having to take the ball falling backwards, leaving himself in a passive, weak position.

Shannon Frizell started promisingly, but the possession deficit meant that neither he nor Taylor or Ardie Savea were able to assert themselves as ball runners – at least not until Savea found more of the ball in the final period.

This will be New Zealand’s work on. With or without the ball, they are accustomed to playing on their terms, but here it was the Wallabies who mostly dictated the tempo and method of the match.

Foster needs wins on the board, naturally. But more than anything, he needs his side to play with authority and – in time – with a signature stamp that is his.

He has a high-quality captain in Sam Cane, backed up by the leadership in the second row of Sam Whitelock and Patrick Tuipolotu. Expect nothing less than a more direct approach next week, aimed precisely at wresting back that initiative.

Speaking of captains, 100 Test matches remains a landmark reserved for the game’s truly elite players, a group of which Michael Hooper undoubtedly is part. His first Test, the shock 9-6 loss to Scotland in Newcastle in 2012 was a crazy match, albeit for different reasons. He now has another crazy bookend to match it.

Michael Hooper (Speed Media/Icon Sportswire via Getty Images)

The pulsating finish also showed how good rugby can be when it is played out on the pitch instead of the boardrooms. Nearly twelve months without international rugby is far too long, if only for the fact that it leaves too much space for administrators for posturing and dick-swinging, minute and note taking.

Thank heaven for the players to remind us all of why we love and follow the game. It was Wellington captain Du Plessis Kirifi, who put it best when, after a second successive agonising last-minute loss on the weekend, he said; “No more taking learnings, it’s time instead for action!’

None of which is meant to downplay the importance of high-quality off-field leadership. While this match might have stirred the loins of Wallabies fans and hinted at better days to come, Australian rugby suddenly hasn’t climbed out of the poor house as a result.

At least, not yet. The first thing Rugby Australia chairman Hamish McLennan should do today is put in a call to the Fox Sports, Nine and Ten network executives said to be still in contention for Australian rugby’s broadcast rights.

It’s very hard to sell any product when prospective buyers aren’t excited by the prospect of owning it. Those crazy eight and a half minutes might not have won Australia a Bledisloe Cup, but they should surely have shown interested bidders that both the Wallabies, and the game of rugby itself, are still worth opening the chequebook for.

The Crowd Says:

AUTHOR

2020-10-14T04:57:30+00:00

Geoff Parkes

Expert


Cheers Lorry, understand, and you're right - these things do come and go. South Africa for example reverted back to their 'natural/authentic/traditional' ways to win the World Cup last year, for example. Which can be viewed variously as a good or bad thing for the game.

2020-10-14T03:40:16+00:00


No worries I give up. You keep justifying your BS even tho I have well and truely pointed the truth out to you. NO the push for BB to 15 haz nothing to do with Mounga's form or anything else. I cannot help you see if you refuse to open your eyes. Enjoy being wrong...No probs

2020-10-14T01:26:06+00:00

Lorry

Roar Rookie


Hi Moa and Geoff, didnt mean that to come off as negative as it did, and yes I agree that different styles are a great thing about rugby. I suppose it comes down to personal preference... Many rugby fans at least on this site lament the way the game is (sometimes) played traditionally by England and Sth Africa. It is true that these things go in and then out of vogue (remember Brumbies style moves of early 2000s?)

2020-10-14T01:17:10+00:00

numpty

Roar Rookie


your words Jacko - " in 2018 Dmac played in all 3 tests v France scoring 24 points in the 3 test series all from the bench. He then played in the first 4 RC/BC tests from the bench." Starting 15 for a dead rubber and then the spring tour, the time where teams experiment, does not make a player the incumbent 15. And even if he was, the push of BBB to 15 was to account for Moungaa's form, his superior goal kicking, and to counter the rush with dual playmakers. The ABs were never short of 15s, they had jordie Barrett, Ben Smith and Will Jordan all in form and known to be proven performers if they wanted to do a like for like swap.

2020-10-14T00:16:07+00:00


Numpty give it a rest. Dmac played 15 for the last 4 tests of 2018….He played in 11 tests that year. I have no idea why you cant accept that. BB went to 15 WHEN DMAC WENT HOME FROM ARG…..He went home from Arg because his grandmother died…He missed 2 tests…..Then Dmac came back and played 15 and BB went back to 10….Therefore BB going to 15 was to cover for Dmac being at his grandmothers funeral. Therefore RM came in to the match day 23 to keep the 2 playmakers trial ( as it was then ) continuing… Just drop it because you dont read my comments accurately and you cannot argue the reality of what ACTUALLY happened…..but you keep trying…So what Im saying very very clearly is that Dmac was the incumbant ABs 15 when he injured himself and BB was the 10 apart from the 2 games Dmac missed because his grandmother died.

2020-10-13T23:49:58+00:00

numpty

Roar Rookie


So what you're saying is he wasn't playing 15 before he got injured and generally started on the bench? I agree. Therefore, BBB going to 15 wasn't to cover Dmac, it was to make room for Richie.

2020-10-13T23:33:08+00:00


Numpty in 2018 Dmac played in all 3 tests v France scoring 24 points in the 3 test series all from the bench. He then played in the first 4 RC/BC tests from the bench and did not play in the last two RC matches due to going home from Arg as his grandmother had died. ( Thats when RM came into the match day squad ) He then started the BC game v Aus in Japan and also the England and the ireland tests plus Italy. All starting at FB.....Then got injured in early 2019 SR

2020-10-13T23:15:15+00:00

numpty

Roar Rookie


My theory is simple - pick the most in form player in the position. BBBB has not played (much) at 10 this year, and Moungaa is in form. Simples. BBB only played 10 as injury cover for Otere a couple of times. Dmac didn't even make the starting team most of the time in 2018 so don't know where you're getting that from, Jordie Barrett and Ben Smith were the preferred 15s. The reason Richie came into the squad was because his form demanded it (3 SR titles in a row, now 4!) and because BBB had his own issues with kicking and dealing with the rush defense. Here look at the 2018 bledisloe lineups, Dmac on the bench - https://www.sportingnews.com/au/rugby/news/bledisloe-cup-2018-dates-tickets-kick-off-time-scores-wallabies-results-australia-new-zealand-all-blacks-injuries-haka-video/3i0mup2tza5p1lhxa4yub3djz

2020-10-13T22:04:06+00:00

scrum

Roar Rookie


I have read the posts-=please do not deny that you hand out personal insults like confetti

2020-10-13T13:00:23+00:00

RobC

Roar Guru


Too many Kiwi draws! Maybe its a sister fetish? haha

2020-10-13T11:36:04+00:00

nroko

Roar Rookie


Ha, didn't even notice that.

2020-10-13T09:57:12+00:00

Ken Catchpole's Other Leg

Roar Guru


Thanks for the link to those stats, but - Where did that ‘friendly’ category come from? When has a rugby test ever been friendly?

2020-10-13T09:53:49+00:00

Ken Catchpole's Other Leg

Roar Guru


Nah Geoff, that’s too nice. These Johnny come latelys should be put through a compliance process to knock their uniformed opinions outa them. How dare they show up now after not showing up through the desert years like us few, the hardy few, we band of brothers......... Good write up. Great game. Thank you NZ, for the game, and our new coach.

2020-10-13T09:45:31+00:00

Ken Catchpole's Other Leg

Roar Guru


Da Cheik-wreck vs da Rennievator?

2020-10-13T09:43:32+00:00

FunBus

Roar Rookie


Geez, Jacko, is that the best you’ve got? Probably best to steer clear of the ‘comedy.’

2020-10-13T09:20:47+00:00


Numpty BB DID play 10 in the SRA....So as a coach Razor would only select Crusaders would he? I dont understand your theory at all...As for Shag thinking RM was the best 10 well just have a re think about that Numpty.....Shag ONLY started RM AFTER Dmac got injured.....BB was his PREFERRED 10 prior to that injury....

2020-10-13T04:41:49+00:00

numpty

Roar Rookie


yeah the form 10 of SRNZ and the bloke he coaches week in week out at the crusaders and who Shag also thought was the best 10. OR. a bloke who hasn't played 10 for a year and wasn't even the best 15 in the comp...

2020-10-13T03:13:45+00:00

Old Bugger

Guest


Cookie, you said...."Every team that has beaten or drawn with them has nullified their physical dominance at the tackle which is exactly what the wallabies did." Then that doesn't explain how the ABs won 6 turnovers. The ABs will mostly stand and spread to defend when a WB ruck forms unless, there's time and space for a lone AB to have a crack at the ball. I don't consider this as being physically dominant or dominated. However I do agree that the ABs lacked physicality but the physicality Im talking about, is the forwards carrying the ball over the adv-line and cleaning out the ensuing ruck. Most AB forward runners got stopped in their tracks, as soon as they received the ball hence the momentum, went awol as they failed to cross the adv-line and turn the WB pack around. This phase of ball carrying and the consequential clean-out, needs to be improved exponentially. They need PT and potentially someone like Akira Ioane, to smash and clean-out to allow the momentum going forward, to continue. Then when they get up from that, its their turn to carry the next ruck ball and either SW and Sotutu, perform the clean-out. Relentless carry over the adv-line, form the ruck, clean-out any opposing forward and set off again. This was missing because, our piggie carriers struggled to get over that adv-line.

2020-10-13T03:08:12+00:00

soapit

Roar Guru


reckon if you look closely enough youll see them all doing it already. this one was actually pretty close to being 'nrl ok', just not quite. actually that was one part of the oz game i was quite pleased with that we played the ref better (ie pushed and got away with more) usually we play too far within the laws and pay the cost.

2020-10-13T03:03:36+00:00


soapit I guess its now up to NZ to adopt the same principles and do what Aus did in B1...The Wallabies constantly had a pod blocking the NZ defence in the centres and they wernt using it as a receiving player pod. Hopefully Cane is made fully aware of this and starts pointing it out to refs and his players. If refs refuse to sort it out then the ABs players should tackle the crap out of these blockers and hurt them as much as is legally allowed. I garrantee the refs would then YC the ABs for sorting it themselves. pasaimi takes Ioane out of the equation as far as getting JOC was concerned. Thats enough to usually go to the tmo on and for a no try result but I felt the ref was scared to blow against Aus incase he was called biased.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar