Ten takeaways from the Sheffield Shield

By Paul / Roar Guru

These are my thoughts after another round of Shield action.

1. The Test pieces are falling into place… almost
Justin Langer and the selectors must be equal parts thrilled and worried by what they saw from the likely Test players over the weekend.

Mitchell Starc looked good during both innings against Queensland, while Matthew Wade knocked off the rust with a couple of good half centuries against WA. Nathan Lyon was solid, Tim Paine gloved the ball well and Marnus Labuschagne scored another very good hundred.

Joe Burns, however, continues to under-perform. If an opener’s role is to take the shine off the new ball, Burns achieved that in an 87-ball, 29-run first innings, but a second-innings duck has allowed many to suggest his days at the top of the order for Australia are numbered.

He still has plenty of time to turn things around, but he’ll want to make a convincing big score soon.

2. It’s nice to see something for the bowlers
It’s pretty much been all systems go for the batsmen so far this Shield season, but the conditions on Friday must have thrilled the bowlers. Batsmen found it hard going and first-innings scores were more reflective of an even contest between bat and ball. Now the trick will be maintaining a balance, so batsmen are challenged to earn their runs and bowlers are rewarded for hard work.

3. The lowest scoring game was the best game
Neither NSW nor Queensland broke 300 in four innings but this was a terrific game of cricket. There was just enough in the pitch to give the bowlers some hope, which makes the century Labuschagne scored all the more impressive. NSW tried hard to lose this game but in the end they just prevailed despite the best efforts of Mitchell Swepson (more on him later).

4. He’s like a vintage wine
There were some terrific innings played over the weekend, but for mine, the best was by Shaun Marsh. His hundred – at a time when the ball was dominating the bat – was impressive.

(Photo by Cameron Spencer/Getty Images)

I’m not suggesting he’s in contention for a Test spot, but on form, there’s lots to like, especially when you throw in a second-innings 88 off 74 balls.

5. Great catches don’t earn Test recalls
Kurtis Patterson took arguably the catch of the season to help Trent Copeland to his fifth wicket. It was a stunning piece of fielding, but sadly his batting has not been equally as stunning.

Patterson has made double figures in three of his four innings this season, but has not passed 50. This is at a time when other Test contenders are scoring big hundreds.

He’s still only 27, so time is on his side, but only if he converts these starts into decent scores.

6. Mitchell Swepson is putting a distance on the challengers
A ten-wicket haul at any time is a great feat but to do so when conditions didn’t suit his style of bowling made Mitchell Swepson’s effort all the more remarkable.

Sports opinion delivered daily 

   

Ignore the wickets for a second and look at the second-innings challenge. Usman Khawaja needed Swepson to both take wickets and be economical, given Queensland had only set NSW 205 runs for victory. That Swepson was able to get through 29 overs and only concede 74 runs is a terrific achievement for a leggie.

Nathan Lyon’s position in the Test side is a done deal, but Swepson, in two games, has made himself the obvious successor.

7. How much should we be impressed by Will Pucovski’s innings?
As a feat of concentration, focus and technique, this was an outstanding knock, especially considering it was his first Shield game of the season and he was opening the batting.

Pucovski looked in total command of his game and played some wonderful shots all round the ground. What stood out for me was the time he had to play shots and his confidence, which suggests he’s in a pretty good mind space.

(Photo: Paul Kane/Getty Images)

Many have suggested on the basis of one innings he should be opening the batting in the first Test, but remember his mate at the other end?

Marcus Harris scored an equally impressive double hundred, but has shown how great a step up it is from Shield to Test cricket. Harris was scoring hundreds for fun in Shield cricket when he was selected to open against India, but an average of 24.5 from 17 innings shows how quickly bowlers will hone in on any batting weakness.

That’s not to say Pucovski can’t or won’t thrive as an opener, but one innings on a very flat pitch against an underwhelming attack does not make a Test opener.

8. Did Cameron Bancroft hurt or help himself?
In Bancroft’s previous innings, he’d looked pretty solid and there were suggestions he might be a chance to regain his Test spot. Nine balls into his first innings against Tasmania, he might have played his way out again.

Many, including me, had hoped Bancroft had fixed the issue that caused him to play up-ishly behind square leg, but Matthew Wade put a fieldsman at a wide leg gully and Bancroft somehow managed to hit a catch there.

Yes, he scored a confidence-building hundred in the second innings, but does that and his earlier efforts with the bat offset an issue that has dogged him for more than a year?

9. Cameron Green was impressive
He only bowled 12 overs for the match, but Cameron Green looked very good. He certainly impressed Merv Hughes, who was commentating when Green was bowling in the second innings. He was seriously sharp and got life out of a very flat deck.

10. Finally, something you don’t see every day
No, I’m not referring to Pete Siddle’s haircut, but Tasmania’s first innings.

Every batsman got to double figures as did sundries in a score of 432. The bottom three provided more than 100 runs alone. Jackson Bird’s 39 off 19 balls is an innings he’ll no doubt proudly talk about.

The Crowd Says:

AUTHOR

2020-11-08T22:16:34+00:00

Paul

Roar Guru


" is Pucovski starting to tick the boxes a bit more yet". Perhaps that's a question best directed to Justin Langer and the other selectors. Even Puckovski's State coach concedes he'd be better off having a full Shield season, so perhaps guys like him are better placed than you or I to know when Puckovski will make his Test debut. He'll certainly be included in the Test squad, but what happens after that....

2020-11-08T20:48:00+00:00

Munro Mike

Roar Rookie


Going into Day 2 on 183* is Pucovski starting to tick the boxes a bit more yet? He's a serious, serious talent. It's not if but when. And yes - he's made the WA attack look particularly lame as well.......... Never underestimate the task of opening against the new ball. That nondescript SA attach had Burns 10 and Labuschagne 0 back in the rooms and QLD 2-11 after 7 overs. And the 255* v Sth Aust was after they'd been knocked over for just 200....okay.....the pitch went on to become a road.....but clearly wasn't a road right from the start.

2020-11-07T03:20:20+00:00


Was never thrown into it, he moved voluntarily, so maybe get your facts straight?? And he is good enough, as 4 hundreds in 21 tests, albeit a quiet summer last year, should attest to. We have no other opening options that havent already been tried. Bancroft and Harris are both abject failures, any other suggestions genius?

2020-11-05T22:12:52+00:00

Spanner

Roar Rookie


Still thrown into the role though and does not ever look comfortable at test level - not good enough and thats that !

2020-11-05T05:16:39+00:00


And isn't it convenient that Harris only starting scoring runs when he moved to Victoria, where the MCG is the road of all roads. Still averages less than Burns in FC cricket, and Burns plays at the Gabba, one of the hardest places for an opener.

2020-11-05T02:39:13+00:00

bowledover

Roar Rookie


Yeah, Whiteman seems to have been in good touch.

2020-11-05T02:38:25+00:00

bowledover

Roar Rookie


I really hope he recovers and well, for Australian bowling stocks because he offered a genuine alternative to 'big 3' and brought something different to the table.

2020-11-05T02:04:02+00:00


Having major shoulder surgery after an injury that clearly limited him isnt easy to comeback from. Im just saying he might never be the same player he was pre injury.

2020-11-05T01:56:19+00:00

Ace

Roar Rookie


This is so true. It's about the future so they need to learn by playing very serious cricket now. With wise heads around them to ease the nerves and in front of home "crowds" it would be a treat to see them. It would probably boost the senior players having them under their wing My life in sport was always about getting the skilled youngsters in and learning. They were still there when I left.

2020-11-05T01:09:36+00:00

Tory

Roar Rookie


This seems very hyperbolic. Decided to recover without surgery the first time and still manage to have a successful summer, winning the Scorchers player of the year and finding himself back in the Australian squad for the tour of SA. With COVID happening, it seemed the logical time to have surgery and tighten everything up to allow him to get his fielding back to what it was. Currently back bowling and will have a few months under his belt by the time Big Bash rolls around.

2020-11-04T23:37:28+00:00

Steve

Guest


Green should be given at least half the matches Mitchell Marsh was given, who made 87 in his first match so was then given around 25 tests on the trot till his first century because he could bowl a bit.

2020-11-04T13:43:59+00:00


THIS!! Wade has earned an extended run in the test side by virtue of being the form in the Shield over the last 20 or so games, 5-6 hundreds and close to a dozen half centuries to add. If he fails horribly in the first two tests against India....then sure replace him with Green/Pukovski but jesus are we seriously back to the 'fast tracking' crap that screwed our ODI side for several years.

2020-11-04T08:15:25+00:00


Burns has opened since 2014 lol, what are you talking about.

2020-11-04T05:51:41+00:00

Jeff

Roar Rookie


Since mid 2019, Wade has passed 100 twice in *Tests*, plus another half century. Plus another 5 half centuries in Shield. Since mid 2019, Pucovski has passed 100 twice in *Shield*, plus 2 half centuries (one of his centuries was last week's 255*). Batted 7 Shield innings in that time. He may have had another big Aus A score? Wade had a far far more outstanding pair of lead-in FC seasons to his Test recall last year than either Pucovski or Green have ever generated. Yes, how would a selector explain an axing to Wade at this point?

AUTHOR

2020-11-04T05:14:25+00:00

Paul

Roar Guru


I liked the second innings wicket especially because he beat the batsman for pace.

AUTHOR

2020-11-04T05:13:32+00:00

Paul

Roar Guru


There are a couple of other aspects as well Jeff. How does a selector explain to Wade in particular, that, although he’s shown some good form in Shield cricket he’s been dropped from a settled Test side that has taken all before it in the past 12 months, to be replaced by a guy who’s a complete unknown at Test level? And how would that decision sit with the team? I’m also wondering how Trevor Hohns would justify to the Australian public sacking Burns & Wade, if the new comers fail and/or Australia don’t win the series? The first point would cause huge ructions in the Aussie side and the second would probably see the selectors sacked.

2020-11-04T05:11:55+00:00

cruyff turn

Roar Rookie


I think they can be accommodated, when you factor in the experience/quality of Warner, Smith and Labuschagne in the top six. Had it been two years ago, when Smith and Warner weren't there, then maybe I would have had my doubts.

AUTHOR

2020-11-04T05:02:06+00:00

Paul

Roar Guru


he'll be a candidate for Test selection for the next Ashes for sure. He's such a quality bowler, if that injury comes good, I can see him playing a lot of Tests over an 8 or 10 year career

2020-11-04T04:45:13+00:00

Jeff

Roar Rookie


I'd say talent-wise, potential-wise, Pucovski definitely is ahead of the other guys. As is Green. I guess my position is coming from, what is the potential transition period for Pucovski/Green to realise that potential, and whether we can ride with that in the immediate context of this upcoming tough series?

2020-11-04T04:38:52+00:00

cruyff turn

Roar Rookie


Fair enough, Jeff. I understand the logic behind your thinking. I guess the question is: Can they improve what is already a very good side? My answer is yes. I believe Pucovski is already a better player than any of the three alternatives you mention, despite his relative inexperience. As for Wade, it's tough on him because he's done OK since being brought back. However, I think when you have two players as precociously talented as Pucovski and Green, and they are in form and and producing, then fast-track them.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar