Compromise and pandemic define the 2020 AFL Draft

By Josh / Expert

There never has been and, let’s hope, never will be another AFL draft like 2020. The combination of compromise and pandemic will define this draft as likely the most complex and uncertain in AFL history.

A common past criticism of the AFL draft has been that the top ten is often telegraphed well in advance, taking away some of the theatre and turning those much-awaited early picks into a predictable anti-climax.

Not so in 2020, or at least so far, as the identity of Adelaide’s No.1 draft selection – or any of the picks set to follow – remains shrouded in mystery, and even this close to the draft the Crows themselves appear genuinely undecided.

It’s not scientific, but I ran a Twitter poll last week asking followers who they’d like their club to take in that position – and WA key forward Logan McDonald stands out above the rest as the leading contender.

But there is a group of nearly four in ten voters who would not take McDonald with the first selection, albeit one that does not possess a clear consensus on which prospect to select instead.

Like just about everything else in this year’s draft, the pick 1 decision will be impacted by the presence of some very talented father-son and academy players in the pool. For 12 months now it has been called the most compromised draft in history.

By some measures it could be just that. It seems likely that 2020 will break the record for the most bids made in a draft, currently held by the 12 bids total from the 2016 event.

And, there’s a good chance the bid for Jamarra Ugle-Hagan will become the earliest made in the draft’s history. Under the current system Melbourne’s bid of pick 3 on Callum Mills is the earliest we’ve seen, Ugle-Hagan is likely to outdo that.

That said, many of the bids are likely to come in the second half of the draft, on players who’ve shown some promise but are not standouts.

Ugle-Hagan could feasibly be the only bid made inside the top ten and it’s possible we’ll only see three bids made in the top 20, with Lachie Jones and Braeden Campbell the other names to watch out for.

Compare that to 2015 when no less than five bids were made inside the first 16 picks, and seven in the top 25. It would be a surprise to see the 2020 draft match those numbers.

So, the most-compromised-ever tag is debatable. What’s more clear is that 2020 should (hopefully) be the last of the severely compromised drafts.

The AFL has already announced a significant scaling back of the generous NGA access over the next two years which will see clubs only able to match bids for pre-tied players if they come outside the top 40 selections (or top 20 in 2021).

Northern states academies and the father-son rule will continue, and the draft will no doubt always remain compromised to some degree. But perhaps some compromise is needed in the interests of the competition, and that seems a manageable load to bear.

Ugle-Hagan could well make history as the first pre-tied played ever bid on with pick 1 – that’s a decision for the Crows to make, and like many it’s made more difficult by the unequal impact of COVID-19.

Many consider him this year’s best talent – but like every other Victorian prospect he’s played little to no football this year, while others like Logan McDonald have had the chance to shine.

Jamarra Ugle-Hagan. (Photo by Martin Keep/AFL Photos via Getty Images)

McDonald’s season – finishing only two goals behind the leading WAFL goalkicker and being named in the league’s 2020 team of the year – is, relative to the circumstances, one of the most impressive we’ve ever seen. Some consider him a generational talent.

Who’s to say Ugle-Hagan would not have been just as impressive given the same opportunity? On the other hand, what are the odds he might’ve played a 2020 season that was just ok, allowing McDonald to overtake him and become the clear No.1?

A similar narrative surrounds Victorian midfielder Archie Perkins, who in the final weeks before the draft is threatening to jump from being a likely early teens pick to perhaps the top five.

Perkins – again, like every Victorian – hasn’t been able to show his wares this season, but tested very well athletically and could play that dual midfield-forward role that so many of the most valued current AFL players fill.

Hawthorn are reportedly looking at drafting him with pick 4, which would be higher than his body of work suggests – but bodies of work are so hard to judge by in 2020.

Every year we see players break out in their under-18 season and who knows – had it gone ahead as planned, complete with a national championships, perhaps the 2020 competition would’ve seen Perkins do just that.

Adding one last layer to the uncertainty is live trading, which after two years of action is a tool that AFL clubs are becoming more comfortable with.

Whereas in previous years the draft order was locked from a long way out and clubs could feel more confident sharing intel with those unlikely to influence their picks, now it’s dangerous to let anyone know what you might be planning.

Sports opinion delivered daily 

   

In particular there’s plenty of speculation around the possibility of clubs trading to move up the order – like Gold Coast did on draft night last year for example, swapping two later first-rounders to get pick 11 from Carlton and draft Sam Flanders.

The difficulty in that deal is that it takes two to tango and while the likes of Essendon (6, 7, 8), Collingwood (14, 16) and GWS (10, 13, 15, 20) might all like to trade up, that relies on finding a team willing to trade down.

It’s hard to see a club in this year’s top five wanting to trade out of it – in a draft of uncertainty, there’s a comforting level of confidence in those top five prospects that the clubs likely to land them will be reticent to give up.

But, stranger things have happened. And as the 2020 AFL Draft grows nearer but not clearer, all the can be said for sure is it will be one to watch – and undoubtedly fascinating to look back on in years to come.

The Crowd Says:

2020-12-04T14:29:30+00:00

ben marsh

Guest


draft picks have changed again I don't know what their doing swap picks this years draft is boring keep changed it oh well

2020-12-03T11:28:59+00:00

ben marsh

Guest


dockers probably be unikely get a tall forward in this years draft maybe or not the problem with the dockers be a rocky ahead its unikely to get a tall forward the dockers will get a small forward its going to be a boring draft and disaster for the dockers be rely on other clubs

2020-12-03T10:35:10+00:00

Parklane7835

Roar Rookie


Will Carlton Trade Pick 78 on Draft night on Wednesday,also heard that they are interest in Ruckma N Shannon Neale and Henry Walsh,and a Tall Defender who would that be ?

2020-12-03T10:26:02+00:00

Parklane7835

Roar Rookie


Which AFL Club do you think Henry Walsh will be Picked up in this year Draft?

2020-12-03T09:13:32+00:00

Rowdy

Roar Rookie


Ha ha ha. Difficulties getting ODI telecast.

2020-12-03T08:32:07+00:00

Micko

Roar Rookie


What the hell are you doing? It's cricket season! :cricket: :silly:

2020-12-03T08:27:37+00:00

Rowdy

Roar Rookie


You'd hazard a guess that's not what Adelaide would be doing re BPBs.

2020-12-03T07:43:06+00:00

Russ

Roar Rookie


Whilst you Doggies may think you are nabbing the No 1 draft pick not so sure even if JUH is available the Crows would pick him over Logan Macdonald given Logan’s year – 11.2 disposals, 4 marks, 2.4 goals/game as an 18 y.o. in the WAFL as well as RU Leading Goal kicker, Team of the Year etc, I think they use the term Generational Player when they speak of him.

2020-12-03T00:07:19+00:00


Is that right guru - still sore after those finals beatings you've taken at the hand of the AFC! Poor comment from you!

2020-12-03T00:05:05+00:00


AFC determine an order - if JUH sits atop that order thats who they select. If it was me I'd be selecting JUH then Campbell then Jones - knowing all three of the clubs these NGA kids are aligned to will match - then take McDonald. Its a cut throat business, other clubs havent done the AFC any favours over the years so make em pay max for NGA's

2020-12-02T14:14:08+00:00

ben marsh

Guest


steals and bargains which clubs will steals and swap picks dec 9th afl draft winners and losers which clubs will be the best players in the draft who will go to a club

2020-12-02T06:26:28+00:00

Mark.

Roar Rookie


Not comparable at all.

2020-12-01T13:16:44+00:00

Chanon

Guest


What a farce this Treloar saga has become the Collingwood Football Club have changed the future landscape of drafting players from other clubs in one single hit. Due diligence has been thrown under the bus courtesy of Collingwood; the rest of the competition is sitting back in awe of this train wreck! Collingwood owe Treloar $850,000 on back ended contract. It’s mind boggling to think they want the dogs to pay this amount on top of his contract. I hope the AFL fine Collingwood heavily over there silver spoon blunder!

2020-12-01T09:43:25+00:00

Parklane7835

Roar Rookie


Do you think Carlton Will Trade any of there Draft Picks 31,38 and 78, on Draft night next week..What are the Players they hope to get..?

2020-12-01T02:56:40+00:00

Pumping Dougie

Roar Guru


Peter, I think you've misread what I've said or misinterpreted. I never said "besides his two stints at the Pies". I was referring to his career before his current stint at the Pies. Anyway, from his point of view it's probably a good time to bring forward retirement plans and leave the mess in his rear view mirror. :happy:

2020-12-01T02:20:49+00:00

Peter the Scribe

Roar Guru


Doug, he was going to retire last year but was kept on for one final shot at a flag. He is 64 so although he can carry the fall guy, was likely to retire anyway. Your points 1 and 2 are likely spurious. He actually had two stints at the Pies including nabbing the 2010 flag so suggesting his career was long and distinguished besides his two stints at the Pies is putting a fair dose of mayo on it on your behalf. I'd just leave it that he had a long and distinguished career.

2020-12-01T01:11:53+00:00

13th Man

Roar Rookie


Honestly, either every club should get an academy or none of them. Teams like Sydney and GWS have been benefitting from academy selections for years. I'm glad to see some other teams finally getting a slice of the pie.

2020-12-01T00:33:04+00:00

Pumping Dougie

Roar Guru


Yeah I agree, the smart thing to do is bid on them, to force other clubs to use maximum points to match - but only if you're actually prepared to take them with that pick.

2020-11-30T23:13:52+00:00

Macca

Roar Rookie


I don't get this show the player you back him in argument, if a player is so mentally fragile he can't recover from a club bidding on another player he shouldn't be going in the top 10. And besides, the Blues bid on Setterfield before taking SPS then managed to pick up Setterfield later on, no doubt they were telling him "we rated you back in the draft so much we bid n you".

2020-11-30T22:23:35+00:00

Pumping Dougie

Roar Guru


The intent of the NGA was designed to increase the amount of young talented players exposed to the sport and provide them a pathway into the AFL system where they otherwise might not have access. So it makes sense to have them in non-football states such as Qld and NSW. It also helps Brisbane, Gold Coast, GWS and Sydney retain players, if they can find more locals. I'd argue it makes sense to have the NGAs in NT too, given their football system is not as developed and professional as the other traditional football states. But Ugle-Harran played in SW Victoria. The clubs playing in traditional football states are all just trying to exploit it and create an advantage over other clubs, which is exactly what the draft system was designed to stop.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar