Cricket Australia contract list: Who’s in and who’s out?

By David Schout / Expert

As Cricket Australia finalises its men’s contract list for 2021/22, who can we expect to remain in the group of 20, and who will drop out?

The governing body is due to hand out central contracts next month.

And while the list does not determine playing XIs, (that is, ‘uncontracted’ players can be called into the national side at any stage), it is a strong indicator of where selectors’ plans lie.

As the governing body told us last year: “The contracts are primarily based on player performances during the past 12 months and those who the respective national selection panels believe may represent Australian teams in the coming year”.

Provided Cricket Australia opts to contract 20 mens players again, I’ve assessed who should be retained, and what changes should be made.

Retained
Running the rule over the 20 players signed last April, 17 should retain their contract.

A host of these are ‘locks’, but there’s also a number of players with question marks hanging over their head.
David Warner, Aaron Finch, Marnus Labuschagne, Steve Smith and Glenn Maxwell are five batsmen who retain their contracts, no questions asked.

Similarly, seven bowlers should have already been ticked off.

They are: Ashton Agar, Mitchell Starc, Pat Cummins, Kane Richardson, Nathan Lyon, Josh Hazlewood and Adam Zampa.

Some might question’s Richardson’s spot in that list, but he remain’s Australia’s premier change-up/off-pace seamer, whose consistent selection reflects that.

With the gloves, skipper Tim Paine (obviously) retains his contract, and while Alex Carey’s T20 international form has dropped off of late, he remains the first-choice ODI keeper and next-in-line for the Test side.

However there are three players the selectors will have mulled over.

On Cricket Australia’s own criteria, James Pattinson should struggle.

The fiery quick has not played in the last 12 months and in fact, has played just four times for Australia in more than five years.

However, without a rib injury this summer he would have almost certainly replaced Mitchell Starc in the Gabba Test against India.

And provided he stays fit (which, with Pattinson, is a considerable ‘if’), he is in the selectors’ Ashes plans.

So he gets the nod.

James Pattinson (Photo by Ryan Pierse/Getty Images)

Another bowler who has played little international cricket in recent years is Jhye Richardson.

Prior to the recent T20 tour of New Zealand, Richardson had played just once (an ODI in South Africa) in the preceding two years after persistent shoulder issues.

However, like Pattinson, the selectors will earmark him to have an impact in the next 12 months.

And given he is a three-format option, his stocks are strong.

Finally, Travis Head’s position would have been in question early this year, but two things now work heavily in his favour.

The first is that the selectors undeniably see him as a ten-year Test prospect.

The second is that he’s done exactly what has been asked of him since returning to the Sheffield Shield: score big runs.

So he should retain his central contract.

Ins
Three players without contracts are almost certain to be offered ones for 2021/22.

As new members of Australia’s best Test XI, Will Pucovski and Cameron Green are straight in.

Pucovski’s incredible start to the Shield season plus an impressive Test debut at the SCG means he is a well deserved contractee, while Green’s solid debut series was book-ended with similar brilliance at domestic level.

The third player is Marcus Stoinis, who should re-gain a contract after losing out for 2020/21.

With a heavy focus on T20 cricket this year, and Stoinis comfortably back in Australia’s best XI, the all-rounder should play a significant role.

Will Pucovski (Photo by Cameron Spencer – CA/Cricket Australia via Getty Images)

Outs
Three players with contracts in the 2020/21 season are unlikely to be offered a renewal.

Joe Burns is without doubt one of these, and a player whose international career for now is on hold.

The Queenslander’s international career is not over, but having been pushed down the pecking order will need to score big Shield runs to re-enter the conversation.

The second player is Mitch Marsh, who hasn’t quite nailed down his spot in Australia’s ODI and T20 sides, despite some impressive performances in the last year.

With Agar, Maxwell and Stoinis, it’s hard to justify a fourth white-ball specific all-rounder in the contract list.
And finally, Matthew Wade may well be given the chop in April.

Wade himself admits that he hasn’t quite taken his opportunities in the last 12 months, and while he will likely feature again in an Australian shirt, it’s hard to see him offered a central contract.

Elevation hopes
Those not selected on the list of 20 can be elevated into contract status throughout the year should they accrue 12 ‘upgrade points’.

Players receive five points for a Test match, two for an ODI and one for a T20 International.

Sports opinion delivered daily 

   

Both Marsh, Wade and even Josh Philippe are within this category, and with some luck could accrue enough points.

Perhaps the biggest chance however is Moises Henriques, who is on the fringes of all three Australian XIs.

He remains a smokey for a central contract, but may just be squeezed out.

(Predicted 2021/22 Cricket Australia contract list): David Warner, Will Pucovski, Aaron Finch, Marnus Labuschagne, Steve Smith, Cameron Green, Glenn Maxwell, Travis Head, Marcus Stoinis, Tim Paine, Alex Carey, Ashton Agar, James Pattinson, Mitchell Starc, Pat Cummins, Jhye Richardson, Kane Richardson, Nathan Lyon, Josh Hazlewood, Adam Zampa.

The Crowd Says:

2021-04-11T04:19:00+00:00

O M

Roar Rookie


We need more like him Bernie.

2021-04-04T09:45:39+00:00

Once Upon a Time on the Roar

Roar Guru


He has quite literally learned his cricket from the school of hard knocks.

2021-03-26T23:42:19+00:00

Peter Warrington

Guest


it would be bizarre. 34. FC average under 37 even with this excellent recent run. Test average 23. He's a decent cricketer and a great ambassador for on and off field. But... replacing a stopgap with a stopgap? If they want to draft him in as skipper now as part of a complete reboot and ask him to do 2-3 years, I would be OK with that as it would get Carey in the team. Otherwise, focus on mentoring of actual youth role for NSW and squad role in T20I (prefer him in the team to Smith, for example).

2021-03-26T16:47:21+00:00

Gee

Roar Rookie


If Henriques gets one that will be a big tip he is the favourite to take over Wades spot in the test team.

2021-03-24T21:03:39+00:00

qwetzen

Roar Rookie


Micheal Neser: Forgotten, but not gone.

2021-03-24T09:53:08+00:00

O M

Roar Rookie


Fingers crossed Will Pucovski can get past a rough trot with injuries and string some games together. He’s a massive talent and someone we desperately need opening with Warner and making runs.

2021-03-24T01:17:17+00:00

Brian

Guest


Don't closely follow the legalities but with 3 tours of Asia in 2022 wouldn't Swepson need a contract? More likely to play for Australia then Pattinson

2021-03-23T22:37:02+00:00

Don Freo

Roar Rookie


It would be quite likely that Stoinis misses a contract but gets a game. I'd be contracting Inglis before England comes knocking.

2021-03-23T21:36:22+00:00

Chris Kettlewell

Roar Guru


I suspect there will be some changes in the future, but with the fact that players being in teams and playing regularly effectively sees them elevated to contract status, and they still get paid for games they play, it probably works fine for the moment. But I'm sure they review things each year to work out of any tweaks are needed.

2021-03-23T17:15:19+00:00

Harry Selassie

Roar Rookie


Good analysis David with some well thought out reasoning. Personally I think it could come down to one of Stoinis or Henriques and I think I would select Henriques for his versatility.

2021-03-23T03:37:04+00:00

Paul

Roar Guru


I think you're right David, Stoinis will get a contract for all the reasons you've mentioned, but I'm not sure too many Aussie cricket fans will be thrilled with that. In fairness, I don't think he's keeping another from being considered, so if he gets the nod, good luck to him.

AUTHOR

2021-03-23T01:22:44+00:00

David Schout

Expert


Fair, but he did have a big IPL. Selectors would see him as a big part of the upcoming T20 World Cup, so think he might get the nod. Admittedly was one of the last couple I picked, so wouldn't be overly surprised if he's squeezed out.

2021-03-23T01:19:00+00:00

Paul

Roar Guru


The English system is flawed IMO. The Test contracts are worth around 700,000 pounds per year. The white ball contracts are only 170,000 pounds and are a supplement to the contracts paid by the player's county. This means there can be tug of wars happening, where the County wants a guy for a crucial game and the ECB wants that same guy for an ODI or T20. I agree it makes no sense to have fixed numbers but I'd still keep the one contract (with different tiers) and without designating whether it's for one or more formats.

2021-03-22T23:54:47+00:00

Tom


How is Stoinis comfortably back in our first T20 XI? The bloke has made one score over 50 in his last 35 international limited overs innings. Get rid of him. I’d back most all rounders we have to out perform Stoinis if they got as many chances as he has. Cant think of a worse player to have played over 70 matches for Australia.

2021-03-22T23:45:36+00:00

mrrexdog

Roar Guru


Stoinis being in Australia's best T20 XI is debatable he's had 1 good knock for Australia in about 3 years. Marsh, Henriques or Philippe should get a contract ahead of him.

2021-03-22T23:01:12+00:00

Tempo

Roar Rookie


Is it time for CA to reform its contract policy and copy England with separate white and red ball contracts? There will be times in the future where there is a lot of overlap across formats, and times where there is hardly any overlap. E.g., you could have a situation where 9 out of 11 players are first choice across all formats, but 3 years down the track only 4 test players are first choice in the white ball teams. You need to have a bigger overall pool of players when there is little overlap between formats. In the light of this, does it make sense to have a rigid total number of contracted players anymore? I quite like the English system where there separate white and red ball contracts. When there is a lot of overlap, the total contracted players will reduce because a lot of players will have red and white ball contracts. When there is less overlap, the total pool will increase because fewer players will have both contracts.

2021-03-22T22:03:50+00:00

Paul

Roar Guru


Expect a tonne of comments about Marcus Stoinis being included in this list David. I can see clear justification for all the other guys you've named, but Stoinis performances have been patchy at best for yet another year.

Read more at The Roar