Did the 'Billy Slater rule' save Parra? Talking points from the Eels' controversial win over the Knights

By Joe Frost / Editor

The Parramatta Eels have secured their place in the semi-finals, knocking the Newcastle Knights out of the NRL finals in a hard-fought 28-20 victory that went right down to the wire.

This was classic finals footy, two teams ripping and tearing at each other in what was a proper war of attrition, with the Eels ultimately proving the more resilient side.

And this is worth me clarifying: the better team won. Parramatta deserve to be going through to face the Penrith Panthers next weekend.

But tell you what…

It’s not a penalty try if it’s a knock-on
With just over three minutes left, the Eels ahead 22-20, and Parramatta hammering the Knights’ line, Clint Gutherson put a sneaky little grubber through. It looked for all money that Will Penisini would pounce to score.

Instead, Knights winger Enari Tuala grabbed Penisini without the ball, allowing Kalyn Ponga to scoop it up and take the pill dead.

Referee Ashley Klein sent it upstairs and we watched with bated breath – had Tuala stopped a certain try-scoring situation or just committed a professional foul?

Or, to put it more succinctly, were we looking at a definitively match-deciding penalty try or a sin-binning and penalty that could potentially help Parra to ice the game?

Or was it neither?

See, rather than scud the ball through, replays showed that Gutherson had aimed to drop the ball to his boot but failed to make initial contact, the Steeden hitting the grass before the Parra skipper was able to connect.

Surely that means it was a knock on. The King didn’t try to drop-kick it: he dropped it, then kicked it.

Yet in scenes that Knights fans will be left to fume over for months to come, the video ref watched it, but was seemingly only concerned with whether Penisini was onside.

He was. And Tuala tackled him without the ball. And Ponga was never going to get to it before Penisini to stop a try being scored.

If that’s all that mattered, then no worries. Except Gutherson knocked it on.

Will Penisini appeals for the Eels’ crucial late penalty try against the Knights. (Photo by Albert Perez/Getty Images)

Knights coach Adam O’Brien made his opinion clear in his post-match press conference; replying, “I’ll save meself some cash” when asked what he made of it all.

Brad Arthur similarly ducked the question, responding: “It’s a try. If [Penisini] picks it up he scores, doesn’t he?”

Well, yeah. Except if Gutho knocks it on…

What do the rules say?
For Knights fans, I reckon I’ve got the bad news that puts this to bed.

In the wash-up, there were plenty of references to Billy Slater’s similar 2018 drop-kick in a controversial win over the Broncos.

So I dug that one up.

“For this to be a drop-kick the ball must be intentionally released from the hands and then kicked immediately (after) it rebounds from the ground,” then-referees boss Bernard Sutton said in the wash-up of the 2018 match.

“It’s important to note that a drop-kick can occur at any time during a match and does not have to be an attempt at a field goal.”

So if the test is “intentionally released from the hands and then kicked immediately (after) it rebounds from the ground”, well, that pretty well sums up Gutho’s kick.

To be totally certain, I went to see if the rules had changed since 2018.

What I found was an admittedly dated set of rules, but according to the July 2020 rules, a drop kick is described as “a kick whereby the ball is dropped from the hands (or hand) and is kicked immediately it rebounds from the ground.”

No mention of trying to slot it between the crossbar. Just gotta be intentionally released and hit on the rebound.

Which is what Gutho did.

Penalty try stands.

Mitch Moses shuts the critics right the hell up
Mitchell Moses has been hammered by the critics (ahem, ahem) over the past few years, with the knock being that he was a flat-track bully – good for plenty of points against the lower-placed teams, but unable to step up when it mattered.

Well it mattered today. And Moses was brilliant.

The Parra halfback was in everything good his side did, scoring a freakish individual try from 40-odd metres out, making the break that set up Blake Ferguson’s first try, and then throwing the cut-out ball that led to Ferguson’s second.

Mitchell Moses breaks away to score a try during the NRL Elimination Final match between Parramatta Eels and Newcastle Knights. (Photo by Albert Perez/Getty Images)

Moses was in decent touch with the boot as well, kicking four from five off the tee.

All up, he was good for 12 points, a line break, a line-break assist, a try assist and five tackle breaks, tackling at 93.8 per cent efficiency as well.

And in matters that can’t be determined by stats, he was right up there. His body language was just super positive and – look, I don’t know how else to put this – his eyes looked bright throughout. There was a winning gleam that was physically visible.

I haven’t seen Mitch Moses look that way in big-stakes games before. For The Roar, Moses gets the man-of-the-match gong.

Do I retract my previous comment that he “can’t lead Parramatta to the promised land”?

Nah. Well, at least, not yet.

But Parra’s forwards…
A penalty try may have finished it, but the game was won in the middle, with Parra’s forwards immense.

The winning team’s total run metres of 1867 over the Knights’ 1439 tells you part of the story, but it’s where those extra 400 metres were made that made the difference.

The Eels were hammering the ball up through the middle third of the field, ensuring their play-makers’ fith-tackle options were either for attacking raids or suffocating, ball-in-the-corner kicks.

As for the Knights, I daresay the majority of their metres were earned in their own 20. They just spent so much of the game in yardage, trying and largely failing to slog their way out of their own red zone.

Both sides were out on their feet by the time we hit the final quarter, having played the game in the kind of heat you’d expect of Rockhampton in September, but you’d have to think the Eels just had a little bit more left in the tank that proved the difference.

Five minutes that blew that game apart
At the 34th minute, the Knights were ahead 10-6, despite the Eels having had the majority of possession.

But in the final five minutes of the first half, everything was turned on its head.

First, Moses took the defence on from 40 metres out in a brilliant individual try that reminded us all just how fast he is, then in the ensuing set the Parra No.7 made a break up field and got a quick play-the-ball that saw Blake Ferguson dive over in the corner.

Boom, suddenly it’s 16-10; and the advantage the Knights had, courtesy of a stiff breeze at their backs, was completely overhauled.

I wrote all of the above in the halftime break, so sure was I that it would be five minutes that determined the outcome (yay, pats on the back for me, but it was pretty clear).

Newcastle’s mentor saw it as such as well, O’Brien saying of the penalty try: “The two tries before halftime, they hurt us more than that one.

“We’d like to have the five minutes before halftime back again, [it] just cost us the game.

“We switched off mentally and came up with some system errors.”

Arthur similarly recognised the importance of those 300 seconds, saying, “We built our game and got our rewards at the back end of the half.”

Tyson Frizell’s Boyd Cordner moment
In the eighth minute, Tyson Frizell got his head in the wrong position when trying to make a tackle and copped Reagan Campbell-Gillard’s hip to the head.

The average human thigh bone is harder than concrete. Campbell-Gillard is not an average human.

It showed.

Frizell appeared well and truly rattled as he regained his feet, staggering backwards into a teammate, walking like Barney Rubble with his arms dead at the side of his torso.

Tyson Frizell leaves the field with the trainer after suffering a head knock. (Photo by Albert Perez/Getty Images)

You felt sick for the bloke. And two tackles later, Ashley Klein blew time off.

“That was two tackles too long,” Brad Fittler said in commentary.

Frizell left the field, and any logical footy fan would have thought that was the end of the former Dragon’s day.

But minutes later, the Knight returned to the fray.

I’m not questioning anyone’s professionalism or integrity. What’s more, Frizell’s performance upon his return would suggest he was fine. But then, rugby league’s dinosaurs love to wheel out yarns about how they staggered to their feet concussed, then played the game of their lives.

But in 2021, when a player gets to their feet as groggy and disoriented as Frizell did, that’s the end of their day. Because it should be.

I fancy this is going to be pulled apart in far more detail in the days to come.

Are Parra exactly where they want to be?
They’ve won their second finals game in, I believe the official length is ‘bloody ages’; and, having put an end to the Storm’s hopes of setting an unprecedented 20 straight wins only two games before this, you have to wonder if Arthur has actually got his side where he wants them.

Because a win over Penrith next week – and the blue and gold going to be underdogs in that match, so don’t think I’m pretending that’s a given – would have them roaring into a game against the reigning premiers. Who, again, they beat only two weeks ago – and convincingly at that.

Sunday’s was a hard win, and the Eels will be sweating on the match review committee to decide who they’ve got on hand to face Ivan Cleary’s boys. Junior Paulo, Marata Niukore and Waqa Blake have all been placed on report for incidents against the Knights; lose one or more, and toppling the Panthers becomes a mighty tough ask.

But they’ll be full of belief that they can get the win against their western Sydney rivals… and then go on to get the chocolates against the almost-all-conquering Storm, who they’ve beaten in both meetings this year.

Personally, I’m predicting a pissed-off Penrith to absolutely roll the Eels (brave call Frost, you’re a real hero).

But I’ll be cheering Brad Arthur’s boys on.

The Crowd Says:

2021-09-15T00:04:25+00:00

GregM

Roar Rookie


yeah the rule should be it must be an attempt to kick between the post, which would mean she's only going to happen when in front of the posts & within a certain range, the ref can also tell because of the set up by the kicker. Otherwise she's knock on. But will we then suffer from intense scrutiny all over the paddock with any kick where the ball gets close to the ground prior to being kicked - will someone complain saying it hit 1 blade of grass before it was kicked which then makes it a drop goal attempt?

2021-09-13T23:53:38+00:00

Nat

Roar Guru


I know how it's written and it's just vague enough to allow a ref to get away with it. It's a rule that can be adhered to by reflex not intent. For mine, it should be written out of the game because it's a vague rule that supersedes lost control in a try scoring situation. As it stands, it's correct but not right.

2021-09-13T23:01:06+00:00

Kent Dorfman

Roar Rookie


based on the rules as listed in the main article - Gutho didn't stuff up.

2021-09-13T13:09:04+00:00

Chris Love

Roar Guru


There’s no difference. Both are legal kicks. Even though in slow mo I think you can see the ball touching his foot before contact with the ground and then kicking it again, it’s irrelevant either way.

2021-09-13T10:46:11+00:00

Dan

Guest


If that’s a legitimate kick then the rule needs to be corrected. I haven’t ever seen anyone drop kick unless it’s aiming at the posts for an extra point. Farcical. Justifying it as correct by the letter of the law is even more so. Fix the rule please NRL because that was a knock on and everyone knows that.

2021-09-13T10:41:34+00:00

Phil

Guest


Plenty of times you see a grubber with the ball striking the ground and the foot at the same time.What is the difference with Gutho's one?

2021-09-13T07:57:19+00:00

Shorty Howard

Guest


This bloke most certainly an Eel licker !

2021-09-13T05:37:26+00:00

Chris Love

Roar Guru


Your interpretation of "any universe" is completely in contradiction with the NRL rules.

2021-09-13T05:31:44+00:00

Chris Love

Roar Guru


Go back and watch it again. I just did. It is 100% clear that Gutherson releases the ball with the intention of kicking it. I am not sure how anyone can come to your conclusion even on first watching at full speed let alone with slow motion replays. He is clearly shaping to kick when the ball is released from his hands.

2021-09-13T05:30:09+00:00

Chris Love

Roar Guru


It's not like he lost possession and had a swipe at it. He clearly attempts a kick. Wether that happens prior to or directly after it hitting the ground is completely irrelevant. That is NOT a knock on.

2021-09-13T05:28:47+00:00

Chris Love

Roar Guru


I'm not sure why things like intent to drop kick it are even brought into it. Gutherson clearly releases the ball so he could kick it. So it's clearly not a handling error with the ball leaving his hands. The only thing that matters after that point is wether his foot or shin makes contact with the ball before, or directly after the ball contacts the ground. Both kicks are legal kicks. The rest is irrelevant garbage.

2021-09-13T00:52:35+00:00

Larry1950

Guest


For the life of me, those bunker guru’s keep coming up with decisions that dwarf their previous blunders but this penalty try takes the cake. As a broncos supporter, I gave a wry grin when they ended up on the right side of a dodgy decision for a change earlier in the year with that strange ‘knock on’ ruling during a runaway try against, I think, the bulldogs? We often see what we know is a ‘square up’ decision after an earlier howler, despite refs denying this ever happens. In any universe, when Gutherson dropped that ball to his foot for a grubber kick it became a knock on immediately he missed his boot. No justification that it could be classed as a drop kick, that argument is absolutely ludicrous. In a poor quality game I have no doubt that Parramatta were the better side but the ends don’t justify the means, particularly for the refs & bunker officials. As a QLD tragic, I reckon the gloss is wearing off with Kalyn Ponga, his floating in and out of games is having a negative impact on whoever he’s playing for & he’s got to bring more consistency to the little things in the game. It’s ok to underplay your hand when there are plenty of other creative players in your team, but the Knights have got nothing. On the refereeing appointment front, I’m pretty sure all the officials will be actively auditioning on the way they intend to bring Melbourne back to the field to appease the Sydney clubs & media push, watch for the stories of rule ending etc in the next week or so.

2021-09-13T00:50:32+00:00

Harry

Guest


If you read the comments on this article you'll see people saying that the play should have been called back precisely because it was a drop-kick and not a normal kick: https://www.theroar.com.au/2021/09/12/controversial-penalty-try-call-helps-eels-slither-past-knights/. You can see the same thing on the Roar's live call. Your example of the fullback picking up/grounding the ball doesn't really work, because picking up the ball and grounding the ball are two opposite acts. If a player is attempting to pick a ball up by definition they can't be attempting to also force it downwards. It's not the same thing at all as a player dropping the ball and then trying to kick it. If your hypothetical fullback attempted to pick the ball up, fumbled it, and then scrambled to force downward pressure on the fumbled ball with, that would count as the ball being grounded - just as if a player attempts to catch a ball, drops it, then after the ball has been dropped deliberately swings at it to kick it, it counts as a kick. There's a split-second between accidentally dropping the ball, and intentionally deciding to try to kick the dropped ball, and that split-second is the crucial one.

2021-09-13T00:33:11+00:00

jimmmy

Roar Rookie


There is a complete disconnect between the way things are interpreted during the normal run of play by the Ref and by the bunker. The two stand out examples are the Hodgeson ' no knock on ' and the Slater ' drop kick'. Both were ruled OK by the bunker. Hodgeson was ruled ' off the chest ' , no hand contact , no knock on. Yet every second week we see that pulled up by the Ref. I ' know' its a knock on, as do you. After the game the NRL comes out and admits , yes its a knock on. Surprise , surprise. Technically correct ruling but wrong. Slater drops and then kicks, the bunker rules its a drop kick. I ' know ' it's not a drop kick. Sutton comes out after the game and says, welll no its not really a drop kick , surprise surprise. I have seen plenty of those drop and kicks in genral play over years. Virtually every one is pulled up. I have been informed Wrighton did one in a preliminary final in 2019 that was allowed by the bunker. I will have to look it up. I doesn't matter anyway, it just emphasises the disconnect between usual ' justice' and bunker ' justice'. They are a mile apart. My solution is bomb the bunker.

2021-09-13T00:30:08+00:00

KenW

Roar Rookie


There are plenty of people saying that it wasn’t a kick because the ball hit the ground before Gutherson got a boot to it. Sort of. If you add the caveat '... and he wasn't intending to dropkick' then we're on the same page. There's no thought that dropkicks are illegal, just that you need to do them intentionally. Otherwise when the ball hits the ground it's a knock on. Consider another situation where intent matters. A kick happens and the ball stop in-goal, fullback rushes in, picks it up and a moment later drops it and the other team scores. Should the ref rule that it was grounded when the fullback's hands picked it up? Of course they don't, while technically his hands were in contact with the ball on the ground he clearly was not intending to ground it, so it's a try to the other team.

2021-09-13T00:15:53+00:00

Paul

Roar Guru


You're right of course, but these types of kicks seem to only happen in high pressure games at critical moments. Ref bashing is such an entrenched sport within the NRL, I'd hate to add to the pressure those folks are under, by asking them to judge intent in this sort of situation, when it can be more easily resolved. I can see the Monday press conference with Graeme Annersley doing what he does best - throwing his ref under a bus because he disagreed with their decision around intent.

2021-09-13T00:13:14+00:00

kk

Roar Pro


TV unit on the way to catch for the 6 o'clock.

AUTHOR

2021-09-12T23:47:25+00:00

Joe Frost

Editor


Oh no, my grand conspiracy has been exposed. No need to call the police, I'll hand myself in.

2021-09-12T23:39:02+00:00

TheVoice

Guest


The bit your Newcastle supporter recap conveniently forgets is the Knights second try which was obstruction. Dylan Brown gets knocked back out of the defensive line by a lead runner and is unable to slide, then missing the tackle. It has been a penalty ALL YEAR. But for some reason the Bunker decided to make up the rules on the fly.

2021-09-12T23:36:26+00:00

TheVoice

Guest


Sorry to interrupt your story, just wanted to jot down, Flat track bullies that have beaten the Storm twice this year… Ok, continue.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar