Former Australian wicketkeeper Brad Haddin has urged selectors to go back to a horses for courses selection policy as they try to find an edge in the Test series against Pakistan.
Haddin, speaking on Fox Cricket at the lunch break, as the first Test was headed for a spirit crushing draw in Rawalpindi, called for legspinner Mitch Swepson and allrounder Mitch Marsh to come into calculations, as doubts were raised over Josh Hazlewood’s work load.
“The one thing [selectors] had an appetite in the past couple of years is horses for courses – we saw it in the away Ashes where Peter Siddle played in front of Starc and maybe that might be the thinking going into the last two Tests,” said Haddin.
“You’ve got to find a way to get the leg spinner in so you’ve got options – you only need two quicks, two spinners and maybe a Mitch Marsh comes into the equation so you’ve got two allrounders as well.
“You need balance in the attack but you also need options over here to get wickets.
“Nathan Lyon has looked dangerous at times, Starc didn’t really swing that new ball, they didn’t use their bouncer much. On these wickets you need variation , you need to do different things to get them to make a different decision.”
Hazlewood, who missed the majority of the Ashes series through injury, bowled 26 overs in the first innings but on Tuesday bowled just two overs in the first session and three in the second.
“There’s a little bit of a cuddle there or is there a problem?” said O’Keeffe. “We’re going to find out later. Australia have won so many Tests through that triumvirate – Cummins, Starc, Hazlewood – and it would be in Pakistan’s interests if the back ups had to be used on slow pitches.”
Former Test batsman Simon Katich, commentating on the game in Pakistan, backed Swepson to get the call over left arm spinner Ashton Agar if there are changes.
“Mitchell Swepson hasn’t made his Test debut just yet but he’s been brought here for a reason so he’ll definitely be in the frame,” Katich said.
“I don’t know the conditions in Karachi well enough, having never been there, but if you’re saying it’s going to spin then I think you’d be mad not to look at that extra option.
“We’ve seen Ali get six wickets here on a wicket that hasn’t been conducive and if you’re telling me it spins there it will either be Agar or Swepson who will come in the mix.
“If you’re going on first class results then Swepson deserves the opportunity – he’s played more first class cricket in recent times than Ashton Agar who’s been in Australia’s white ball set up.”
Swepson has played 51 first class games, taking 154 wickets – the same as Agar who has played 10 games more.
Horses for courses was a bit hit in the recent Ashes as well where Scott Boland came in for a sensational debut in Melbourne.
“I think Boland will be in the frame as well and it would have been a tough decision to leave him out.
“The three big quicks have got phenomenal records and they do like to be consistent .”
Australia’s struggles with the ball continued on a docile Rawalpindi fifth-day wicket, with the players eventually shaking hands after an inevitable draw that saw Pakistan amass 0-252 in their second innings.
In another dominant day for batters, Abdullah Shafique scored his maiden Test century with 136, while opening partner Imam-ul-Haq made it twin tons for the game with his 111.
In truth, Australia were never really interested in a contest that was over long ago as captain Pat Cummins saved his bowlers with the second Test in Karachi starting Saturday.
He bowled himself for just four overs on Tuesday, as spinners sent down 55 of the 77 bowled.
Australia, Pakistan and the ICC will all be hoping for a better wicket there, with the Rawalpindi pitch offering next to nothing for the bowlers throughout the five days.
But there will still be some concerns for the Australians with their inability to make any dent into Pakistan’s batting.
Australia took just four wickets for the Test, their least in history when sending down more than 200 overs.
Their wickets also came at a cost of 182 per scalp, a figure only toppled by a Test in Faisalabad in 1980 where they took just two wickets in the only bowling innings.
Mitchell Starc and Hazlewood each ended up going wicketless for the match, while Cummins and Lyon claimed one each.
There was also a second missed review for the match, with Imam-ul-Haq surviving a ball that went to bat pad.
But given the low intensity of day five it was hard to judge them for that.
The day was best summed up when Shafique defended a ball and as it began to roll backwards, the right-handed picked it up with his hand.
Attention will now turn to what mark the ICC give the Rawalpindi wicket, with match referee Ranjan Madugalle the same man who gave the MCG a “poor” rating in 2017.
Under rules currently laid out by the ICC a poor rating incurs three demerit points.
Any ground which accumulates five over a five-year period receives a 12-month suspension from hosting international cricket.
Only 14 wickets were taken across the entire match, with Pakistan’s bowlers accounting for 10 of those as Usman Khawaja and Marnus Labuschagne narrowly missed centuries.
In a sign of the bat’s dominance, Shafique and Imam-ul-Haq’s unbeaten stand made it the third opening stand in the match to pass 100 – a first in 145 years of Test cricket.
Any faint hope of a result was ended on Tuesday morning when Nauman Ali finished with career-best figures of 6-117, killing off Australia’s tail in quick fashion.
It meant there was no target for Pakistan to make the tourists bat again, as Australia finished at 459 in reply to Pakistan’s first innings of 4(dec)-476.
(With AAP)
Ace
Roar Rookie
Latr reply. I don't think Head will disappoint you. His track record will keep him in the spotlight. This tour would have been the time to have taken someone like Sanghar to get exposure around the team instead of Marsh I sense he could be a future no5
John66
Roar Rookie
I don't rely on him either, but apart from Khawaja, nobody averaged more against England, so no, not everybody dined out on the Engliah bowlers. In fact, for all that dining out you speak of, only two Aussies averaged 42 or better. I do dislike Head but can't agree he should be dropped yet. That time will come when his performances justify it.
Ace
Roar Rookie
Not a single failure. I did talk of consistency over his journey. His current average flattered by his series against England where everyone dined out on them I don't dislike Head . I just don't rely on him
TozzaTim
Roar Rookie
Agar over Swepson for me. Labuschagne and Smith cover the legspin option
TozzaTim
Roar Rookie
Depends on conditions
TozzaTim
Roar Rookie
Well, what we've heard from the Aussie camp is that all options are on the table depending on conditions and the bowlers haven't done a lot wrong - no one is indispensable. I am inclined to agree tho that one of our pacers being left out for the 2nd spinner is the better option
TozzaTim
Roar Rookie
Okay. I was mainly just floating ideas for how to fit in the 2nd spinner. I also suggested that Starc is the one to make way for Agar. Upon further thought this is probably the better option
Tim Carter
Roar Pro
I like Agar, but he does seem to have the Xavier Doherty limitation of needing the batter to start slogging to be a threat. He can keep it tight, but that's not enough in Test cricket.
Tim Carter
Roar Pro
Wade was the keeper a few years back, so that skill isn't a prerequisite.
Rowdy
Roar Rookie
Give Carey a decent go.
Rellum
Roar Guru
From 2020/21, the last Season all three played significant FC cricket Lyon - 9 games 42 wickets 25.97 average Swepson - 5 games 32 wickets 23.40 average Agar - 4 games 14 wickets 42.21 average If you saw Swepson bowl you would have thought Warnie was reborn such was the turn and control he was showing. It was like he finally reached his full potential. Then he got injured. If he didn't get injured he would have taken near 50 wickets. Pope - 4 games 8 wickets 86.25 average Webster - 8 games 17 wickets 39.58 average Kuhnemann - 3 games 4 wickets 56.75 average Other front line spinners. Webster had a better a better record than Agar. Agar is not a Test spinner, certainly not what so many think he is based I assume that he plays white ball cricket for Aus.
David
Guest
It’s time to give Inglis a go as well. Bring in Inglis , Sweepson, Boland. Push out Starc, Hazelwood, Carey.
Rowdy
Roar Rookie
Akram - Ooh Ah Younis - Dizzy ???
Rowdy
Roar Rookie
I just don't rate Starc. He's too fairweather. Boland is the guy, he looks like he wants to take wickets.
qwetzen
Roar Rookie
How is Cummins Capt’n Backstab? Just curious… Umm, the over-heard conversation in a Hobart pub before the Test?
Rowdy
Roar Rookie
One innings and you are calling for his head? Yes it was stupid but there is no lead up match for him to acclimatise. Yes l know it was a road, etc. But heck.
Rowdy
Roar Rookie
It sounds like you don't have a lot of confidence in your team if you need other's to lose points in a match your team isn't playing in.
John66
Roar Rookie
First, we need to determine what type of horse Mitch Marsh is... Sired by a steady and consistent performer but rarely has made a successful run when it mattered. Recently has moved to shorter distances with some success. Very few backers when spoken about for longer tracks. In fact, some wanted a stewards enquiry into him getting a spot in the stable.
Choppy Zezers
Roar Rookie
Stop papering over the issue. It was rough at the time but it was smoothed over and now everything is back into the swing of things. Stop spitting bile. There's too much dribble about this issue.
John66
Roar Rookie
Love the possible trophy design for the Lillee-Miandad series...