Is Mitchell Barnett's time at Newcastle coming to an end?

By Joe Frost / Editor

Following his wild forearm to the head of Chris Smith in the Knights’ 38-20 loss to the Panthers on Saturday, I wonder if Mitch Barnett’s time in the Hunter is drawing to a close.

Barnett’s actions in the 33rd minute of the game in Bathurst saw him sent from the field, the first Knights player to receive their marching orders since Kade Snowden in 2013, in an act that cost his side – who were winning at the time – any hope they had of securing a rare win over the premiers.

I just don’t know the words to describe Barnett’s actions. Stupid is obviously one but that doesn’t do justice to the sheer thugishness of the incident.

It baffles my mind that people are trying to argue it was unintentional, with Newcastle Herald reporter Robert Dillon writing, “it appeared to me to be a high-speed accident, rather than an intentional or malicious act.”

With respect to a man who’s been in this game a lot longer than I have, Robert, no way.

Barnett sees the man coming and makes a decision to hit him with the kind of cheap shot that should result in a huge stint on the sidelines – and, having been referred directly to the judiciary, that’s where Barnett will surely spend his immediate future.

Speculation has him cooling his heels anywhere from a fortnight to eight weeks and I’d say the upper end of that is what’s deserved.

Because while all players are starting this year with a clean sheet at the judiciary, the act of intentionally attacking an opposing player’s head needs to be dealt with in the harshest terms.

This leaves the Knights down a player at a time they were already missing prop David Klemmer and backrower Lachlan Fitzgibbon – two holes coach Adam O’Brien had relied on Barnett to fill in the opening weeks of the comp.

Which means on top of doing the dog act of smashing an unsuspecting opponent with a horrible shot, he’s also massively let down his teammates both for that game and a number to come.

O’Brien was diplomatic when discussing the incident after the match, calling Barnett “part of our family”.

“I tell you what Mitch doesn’t need is me coming out and kicking him publicly,” said O’Brien.

“He’s part of our family and we’ll deal with it behind closed doors. There’s no one feeling any worse than Mitch.

“We’ll just deal with it during the week.”

You’ll notice the part about kicking him publicly. Great man management.

But that doesn’t mean he’s not going to kick Barnett in private.

And that leaves me wondering whether Barnett has a long-term future at the Knights.

Sports opinion delivered daily 

   

A local junior from Wingham, Barnett made his first-grade debut for the Raiders but only managed two games for them before making a mid-season move back home in 2016.

It was an absolute stinker of a season, the red and blue managing just one win all year, but Barnett was one of few shining lights.

He wasn’t the biggest bloke and had the odd error in him, but he never took a backward step, showing aggression and fearlessness that saw him earn cult status among fans.

Rep footy wasn’t on the cards but then that’s the case for most players. Besides, a guy like Bill Peden never played a rep game and is still one of the most loved and respected players in Knights history.

Honest toilers who live up to the club motto of ‘be the player others want to play with’ are the foundations of Newcastle and Barnett was shaping as another in that mould, twice winning the Danny Buderus Medal as the club’s player of the year, and even being named in a five-man leadership group last season.

The thing was, his aggression wasn’t always harnessed. Along with the aforementioned errors, he also had a brain snap in him and if he walked a fine line, he spent more than his fair share of time on the wrong side of it.

In rugby league parlance, he’s always been a bit of a grub. Thing is, when the Knights were a young side getting dominated week after week, it was kind of nice to have a grub in the team. Someone who stood up and gave as good as he got, even if it meant conceding the odd penalty.

But the Knights don’t need that anymore. Their pack is absolutely stacked, with Origin-calibre players in Daniel Saifiti, Tyson Frizell and Klemmer, while the young brigade of up-and-comers includes talents such as Brodie Jones, Jirah Momoisea and Leo Thompson. They can dominate the old-fashioned way, which is running and tackling harder you’re your opposition, rather than the old-school way, which is hitting blokes high and late.

Or completely off the ball.

Ultimately, Barnett has still got almost two years to run on his deal and I doubt any club is bashing down the door to get him out early after his shenanigans on the weekend.

But if he’s going to extend past the end of 2023, Mitch Barnett needs to show that he’s completely changed his attitude.

Because he’s not the player anyone wants to play with at the moment – how can he be, he’s going to be on the sidelines.

The Crowd Says:

2022-03-31T05:47:57+00:00

DavMan

Roar Rookie


Ming the Merciless!

2022-03-29T10:33:11+00:00

Morshead

Roar Rookie


Joe, you captured Barnett’s history as a Knight well. It provided yet another layer of disappointment and bewilderment around the incident for Knights fans. For the last six years he has been one of the first picked and the player they needed. This year (sideline stint aside), and moving forward this seems to have changed. My biggest concern for his Knights future is more focused on where he sits positionally, and to (The Barry’s point) at what price, more so than the discipline. Positionally – Always a lock for Lock, the game now favours smaller ball players of which he isn’t. Even if Kurt Mann was injured, Crossland or even Sasagi may be preferred. As a second rower (which he has played many times) the archetypal player today seems taller, faster and more mobile, more like a big centre. They can also pass. In all my time watching Barnett I don’t think I’d have to take my shoes off to count how many times he has passed on the end of a backline movement. The fast backline plays demand a second rower who can pass. He doesn’t. Which leaves prop. Where again he can play, but isn’t probably going to win you a grand final playing there. The archetypical props today are big big units but also taller. Which leaves us as a bench forward – and for this i think he is ideal. Can play middle, has an offload, and fill in at second row. But how much do you pay for that on his next contract? Interestingly, the Knights have been linked to either Heilum or Luki at least in making an offer and have said they are short in the second row. If you’re planning your roster, left edge might be the piece you need to get you into that ‘top 4’ window (although Fitzgibbon played really well before injury). So if they go after someone of note then someone would have to go and Barnett, on probably a decent wage, would at least come up in conversation.

2022-03-29T10:16:20+00:00

Choppy Zezers

Roar Rookie


Nope

2022-03-29T01:11:06+00:00

Albo

Roar Rookie


Barnett is one of better forwards in the game. He can play either on an edge or in the middle third. He is very fit and tough, tackles well and has ball skills . He is however, prone to the odd indiscretion and can give away some penalties. This latest is possibly his worst and I suspect he will spend some time on the sideline. But I don't think the Knights will be looking to get rid of him, and if they did, he would be quickly snapped up by another club. He has too much good stuff to offer.

2022-03-29T00:43:33+00:00

Gray-Hand

Roar Rookie


Kent is originally from Newcastle and has a soft spot for the Knights. It’s also why he hates Bennett.

2022-03-28T23:43:53+00:00

Nick

Roar Guru


You'd like to think that Bennett will get 8 weeks, but NAS got a $1000 fine so I'm also expecting Bennett to be paid by the NRL for the trouble of attending the judiciary

2022-03-28T21:44:22+00:00

andrew

Roar Rookie


I didn't know Paul Kent was Barnett's defence lawyer.

2022-03-28T21:01:11+00:00

The Barry

Roar Guru


He might be forced out but it may be more about how many of Frizell, Fitzgibbon, Barnett, Mann and Momoisea can you financially carry in your backrow stock than payback for a send-off There is an angle behind the goal posts that looks like Barnett is putting his arm up to push Smith away and avoid getting tangled up with him… but there’s also a second movement that brings the forearm up and across into Smith’s face. If you just watch the first bit, it does look like a high speed collision… but definitely not when you see the second bit

2022-03-28T20:22:29+00:00

max power

Guest


no

Read more at The Roar