How much is too much or not enough? No easy answer to dilemma of what Origin players should be paid

By Paul Suttor / Expert

The problem with the ongoing issue of how much should State of Origin players get paid is that there is no right answer. Certainly not one that will keep everyone happy.

Origin is Australian rugby league’s biggest cash cow and the sacrifices players make to put their bodies on the line for 80 of the most gruelling minutes of any sport on the planet is all but impossible to quantify. 

Pre-pandemic the men’s Origin representatives were pocketing $30,000 a game. That was slashed in half during the past couple of years as the ARL Commission tried to mitigate the financial impact of COVID-19.

Like most aspects of rugby league, coming up with a solution to the question of how much do the players deserve for an Origin game is inextricably linked to the eternally complex, complicated and combative relationship between head office, the clubs and the players.

The RLPA wants the Origin pay to go back up, which is of course what the players should demand. You don’t get what you don’t ask for in rugby league.

For some players, even if the match fee goes back up to $30,000 an Origin, that’s actually a pay cut compared to their club salary.

Even if a player took part in every match over the 24 rounds of the regular season, plus all four finals and two pre-season trials (when most play one at the most), that’s 30 games a year. Therefore, anyone earning more than $900,000 a season – and there are a fair few of them around these days – is actually getting less than a standard match for Origin.

In a sport like cricket in Australia where the governing body enlists the top talent to centralised contracts, it is much easier for head office to dictate how much players receive per match.

(Photo by Ian Hitchcock/Getty Images)

The top players receive most of their salary via their contract which is then topped up by match fees on a sliding scale for Tests, one-dayers and T20 appearances.

Cricket Australia has the advantage of being able to direct its funds set aside for elite player salaries to a small group of the top cricketers and then use the rest of the money from its main income streams like TV rights and ticket sales to prop up other areas of the sport down to the grassroots.

In a sport like soccer in which the world’s best players earn eight-figure salaries, FIFA leaves it up to each nation to determine how much it pays its national representatives. 

England, for example, reportedly paid their players £2,000 per appearance for the 2018 World Cup. This money is often donated to charity anyway. Players in many sports they are in it for the love of the game, not the money, and this is one of those cases where that holds true.

You could take the cynical view that it’s easy to say that when you earn six figures a week from your club contract but these players also don’t have to risk a serious injury derailing their career in the international arena.

Daly Cherry-Evans. (Photo by Matt King/Getty Images)

Origin players could easily make the argument that they deserve more money for the amount of effort they put into those three matches every year, risking significant injury that will affect their earning capacity from their main source of income – their NRL club.

But the ARL Commission has many more areas of the game in need of financial support – whenever any money is seemingly “wasted” on the already wealthy elite players, there is an outcry that the dollars would be better off being spent on the many other areas of the game in need of attention like juniors, country areas and women’s rugby league.

There’s also the issue of equal pay between the men’s and women’s Origin teams – another item in rugby league’s big bucket of unsolvable problems.

Interest in women’s Origin is growing at a great rate of knots. The investment is paying off and TV ratings for the June 24 clash at GIO Stadium will more than justify the increased wages that the players are now getting. There are several other high-profile men’s sports who would move heaven and earth to get the prime-time free-to-air billing that the Women’s Origin match has rapidly earned over the past few years.

While it will still be dwarfed by the men’s Origin series, like pretty much everything else in rugby league, that should not be used as a reason to not pay up to the women’s representatives of each state. 

They already get paid a relative pittance to play in the NRLW so only the most churlish of dinosaurs would bemoan them getting a decent earn once a year from Origin. Thankfully, that will expand to a two-match series next year.

(Photo by Dan Peled/Getty Images)

The QRL has at least announced its women’s Origin players will this year receive the same amount – $15,000 – as the men. The NSWRL, which is badly in need of some good publicity after its recent battles with the ARL Commission over its boardroom governance, is paying its female Origin representatives around $8800 each.

For those who make the final squad, Queensland’s women’s players are paid their $15,000 for attending multiple camps in the lead-up to the game as well as the match. The NSWRL is boosting the pay of the women by paying ambassador fees to its players for promotional duties not just during the Origin period.

A NSWRL spokesperson said the match payment fees were set by the ARL Commission. “The NSWRL is committed to women’s rugby league across NSW and invests significant amounts of money across all levels of the women’s game, not just the elite level at State of Origin.

“The NSWRL would be totally supportive of the ARLC increasing match payments for women’s State of Origin players – subject to the capacity of the ARLC to do so – and ultimately to bring them in line with the payments for our men’s State of Origin players.”

Hopefully the NSWRL is able to come up with a solution soon to this discrepancy, otherwise women’s Origin will have its first Greg Inglis style NSW-born player coming up with a reason why they’re actually eligible for Queensland.

League has made great strides in sorting out the selection eligibility criteria in recent years but it will always be a murky area, nearly as hard as solving the riddle of how much an Origin player – male or female – should be paid.

var request = new XMLHttpRequest();

request.open('POST', '/wp-admin/admin-ajax.php', true); request.setRequestHeader('Content-Type', 'application/x-www-form-urlencoded;'); request.onload = function () { if (this.status >= 200 && this.status

The Crowd Says:

2022-06-07T13:54:35+00:00

Saints

Guest


I think SOO is a dinosaur & has been done to death. Get rid of it , or play one game, after the end of the season. The split rounds are a pain too. AFL started having interstate games & found that they were just a waste of time. Please take note of that NRL.

2022-06-07T13:42:41+00:00

Justin

Guest


None of what you’ve written has anything to do with what I wrote? The club still has to foot the bill ( in contract terms & because their players aren’t available ), when a player contracted to the club gets injured in rep games. They also don’t have those players that they’re paying contract payments to available for some club games. All because of rep games. The player may not be available for a year or more . If they’re seriously injured in any rep games. Why should the club have to pay for this? It would also be up to the individual clubs, whether there is any upgrades in contract amounts, for any players who pay rep games. Which I said nothing about before? Where’s your proof of any more sponsorship , advertising revenue being available to any club, because they have rep players. Such as SOO players? You may think that, but it doesn’t necessarily make that true? Also, the club can also be forced to pay more to try & keep the players that they have produced , because their players may be chosen in rep games. For example, in Penrith’s case. I don’t see any big extra sponsorships , advertising money allowing them to keep more of their own players?

2022-06-07T07:44:57+00:00

Megeng

Roar Rookie


Yeah but the players are what we go to see, not the staff. Think of them as performing artists, getting ripped off by the record companies or spotify

2022-06-07T07:03:44+00:00

Jason

Guest


State of Origin payments should be treated like restaurant tips - centrally collected then redistributed to all players evenly.

2022-06-07T03:04:00+00:00

Tom G

Roar Rookie


It’s true enough.. a showcase that boosts their next club contract significantly at that

2022-06-07T03:02:39+00:00

Tom G

Roar Rookie


Just like international rules during the RLWC

2022-06-07T02:31:16+00:00

The Barry

Roar Guru


15-30% is a pretty big window. That payroll figure is also made up of all employees, not just the sales staff…

2022-06-07T02:29:55+00:00

Nat

Roar Guru


Hey factsy, you haven’t answered my questions back on the other thread? Why not? Hiding again? Starting something you have no intention of finishing? Come on factsy, give us just one more “fact” that us old leagues don’t like hearing? Right now you are 0-5 so keep trying little fella, you’ll land one soon. Well, TBF, you may have a point on this one. How do the Wallabies get paid per test? You are right, the players cannot get that much money anywhere else.

2022-06-07T02:14:39+00:00

Albo

Roar Rookie


I reckon they all would , Tony ! Its the pinnacle of their sport and must be experienced often if possible by players, I would think ?

2022-06-07T02:03:43+00:00

Albo

Roar Rookie


100 % Baz . Furthermore, if the players were asked to play the 3 match Origin series pro bono , I bet there would be very few of them who would refuse to play ! Its the best level of footy in our code that all players strive to get a shot at each year.

2022-06-07T01:41:14+00:00

DR

Guest


The other consideration is that performing well at origin would certainly be used in the negotiation for a players club contract. A breakthrough origin campaign might push your contract value up far more that any increase in individual origin payments and it would be for multi years regardless of whether you play origin the next year.

2022-06-07T00:04:13+00:00

Tony

Roar Guru


I'll bet that Josh Addo-Carr would run out for NSW tomorrow night for free

2022-06-06T23:39:41+00:00

Kent Dorfman

Roar Rookie


proof that money is more important than the honour of representing your state or country. How much more can these players demand with their club contracts because they are an Origin player? Maybe they should have a chat to rugby players from the 80’s and 90’s to see what it was like to represent your state and nation for NOTHING – it was about the jersey and the badge on the chest

2022-06-06T23:31:41+00:00

Tony

Roar Guru


Great news....Eric's back everyone

2022-06-06T23:26:35+00:00

Eric

Guest


It's the pinnacle of Rugby League so pay them their 20 odd grand. They can't get that anywhere else

2022-06-06T23:01:39+00:00

Adam

Roar Guru


I feel like the eligibility thing can be so easily solved. They just chose to make it as murky as possible so that they can twist the rules when a really high profile player needs to be fitted into Origin somehow... On the main point of the article. I think with all dilemmas the middle ground is usually the sensible place to land. Make it back to 30k and increase it proportionally to the rise in wages next tv deal/salary cap increase. So if the cap increases by 20% increase Origin payments at the same rate. Simples. In relation to the women's Origin. Someone has to bite the bullet. The QRL has obviously been happy at the 15k level. Not so sure that they would if it were 30k per player per game though. So that's obviously fraught with danger. But 15k for both NSW and QLD players seems reasonable and the NRL should foot the bill and just be done with it.

2022-06-06T22:12:13+00:00

Tom G

Roar Rookie


I hate the notion that young blokes who give so much of themselves to a game can cop such scrutiny from the mob. For every ‘over paid’ player there are thousands who have ended up having to find something else as a career only a few years later. Because most have been deeply committed to the game from a really young age they are ill prepared for life outside the footy bubble.

2022-06-06T11:52:23+00:00

Megeng

Roar Rookie


The key question is how much does the NRL make out of the origin series? In most businesses, payroll runs to 15-30% of sales. Anything less and the players are being ripped off, especially considering the physical risk they take and the effort that made to get to this level

2022-06-06T11:13:19+00:00

Nat

Roar Guru


Correct me if I'm wrong but I think Origin payments are taken into consideration when contracting a player. Sure the club and player risks injury, as they do every week, but in return they get one of the top 44 players in the competition. Is it enough? If a player deems it another game than it probably does equate to the upper echelon. If they think it's something more than they are from Qld. :stoked: "so only the most churlish of dinosaurs would bemoan them getting a decent earn once a year from Origin." There is still a few of them out there and on this site. Whatever the women's game generates on it's own merit doesn't enter the discussion if Fox news tells them it's all some big agenda.

2022-06-06T09:56:57+00:00

Muzz

Guest


Clubs pay players a rep bonus for playing rep footy. It's in their contract. The more rep players in your team, the better when it comes to sponsorship, advertising etc revenue.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar