England's all-time Test XI

By Two Slips and a Gully / Roar Rookie

Our quest to uncover the best Test XI brings us to England, the ancestral home of the sport. With its vast global reach, through the British Empire, cricket would eventually spread to many nations and would eventually flourish as one of the pre-eminent global sports.

But still everything we have come to know and love about the sport originated from this tiny island nation.

England would become one of the first two nations to play in an official Test match against Australia.

The match took place in 1877, which was 320 years after its humble beginning as a children’s pastime in the 1550s, and sparked a movement that would catapult the sport into a truly global phenomenon.

England to this day remains the traditional home of cricket, with Lord’s Cricket Ground referred to in this way. The international governing body was formed in 1909 to help oversee the forming of a thriving international Test competition, and from 1909 to 2005 this body was based in England.

The Marylebone Cricket Club was founded in 1787 and is based at the famed Lord’s in London. For much of cricket’s history they were responsible for the rules of the game, and any changes were implemented through the MCC. This cricket club is still the copyright owner of the laws of cricket, and until 1989 the president of the MCC automatically assumed the role of chair of the ICC.

England lost the first Test match to Australia, and the subsequent rivalry between the two nations, known as the Ashes, would grow into one of the most famous sporting rivalries in the world – a rivalry so intense that the scramble for supremacy that it soured diplomatic relations between the two nations following the scandalous tactics implemented by Douglas Jardine’s English cricket team in the infamous Bodyline series of 1933, which reshaped the sport itself.

Despite the international growth and development of the game, England remains an incredibly influential part of the governance of the sport and its teams have boasted some of the very best players to have ever played.

Those players have helped England take the mantle as the best team in the world many times throughout its history. Of its 1055 Test matches, it has won 384 of them, with 354 drawn games.

With such an extensive history and factoring in how much the game has changed over the years, narrowing down all of these talented cricketers was a difficult feat. While there will always be some conjecture on the many talented players who miss out when you have a talent pool this deep, I feel this team balances the titans of yesteryear with some of the modern greats and the challenges they had to face.

Jack Hobbs

Tests: 61, batting average: 56.94, high score: 211

The list of accolades is immense for the batsman known as ‘The Master.’ He’s the all-time leading first-class run scorer with over 60,000 first-class runs and 197 hundreds. He was also named one of five cricketers of the century. Boasting an eye-watering average over 56 while having to deal with opening the batting on uncovered pitches in English conditions places him among the very best to ever play.

Coming onto the scene as a dynamic batsman with mixed results, he served in the Royal Flying Corps during World War I, but when a bout of appendicitis threatened to end his career he returned to the international game a more cautious batsman, which helped his consistency. The floodgates opened, and he scored prolifically at first-class and Test level.

Jack Hobbs (left), and Herbert Sutcliffe. (Photo by PA Images via Getty Images)

Len Hutton (captain)

Tests: 79, average: 56.67, high score: 364*

Wisden Cricketers’ Almanack describes Hutton as one of the greatest batsmen in the history of cricket. His career overlapped with Donald Bradman’s, and while he didn’t enjoy the same run-scoring exploits of his Australian counterpart, his name was often held in similar esteem when it came to English cricket. His score of 364 was the highest score in Test cricket at the time.

His career was also impacted due to the Second World War, in which he suffered a serious arm injury that never completely healed. Hutton altered his batting style, but his appetite for runs continued. He was the first professional cricketer to captain England and was instrumental in regaining the Ashes after a 19-year drought.

Wally Hammond

Tests: 85, average: 58.45, high score: 336*

Arguably the most prolific batsman England would have for the 20th century. He was an elegant attacking batsman who often made easy work of treacherous conditions. His total of 7249 runs would stand as the highest English aggregate from his retirement in 1947 until 1970, and it would take until 2012 for his 22 Test centuries to be bettered by an English batsman.

He was a very effective medium-pace bowler, with many of his teammates saying if it weren’t for a reluctance to bowl, he’d have been an effective all-rounder. His 732 first-class wickets at an average of 30 highlighted his ability.

Joe Root

Tests: 124, average 50.01, high score: 254

He’s one of two players in this side currently still plying their craft. Root is the second leading run-scorer for England. An elegant, aggressive stoke player, Root has succeeded in all countries save Australia. During the mid-2010s Root entrenched himself as part of the ‘big four’ batsmen, who were considered the elite of the world’s batting stocks. After struggling in the middle of his career to convert his 50s into 100s he has enjoyed one of the most fruitful periods of run-scoring ever seen and has piled on the tons, taking his total to 28.

(Photo by Visionhaus/Getty Images)

Kevin Pietersen

Tests: 104, average: 47.28, high score: 227

The No. 5 position could have gone to an obscene number of worthy candidates. Pietersen, who hails from South Africa, made an instant impact after leaving his father’s homeland for his mother’s. Immediately brought into the side after serving his naturalisation period, he went on to be one of the very best players in the world regardless of format.

Coming into the side after a period in the late 1990s and early 2000s, when England struggled, Pietersen’s confident and aggressive stroke play helped change the English mindset and usher in a new era in which they regained the Ashes in 2005, achieved the No. 1 ranking in Test cricket and won a series in Australia all before the decade was out.

He has the second highest run total from his first 25 matches, falling behind only Don Bradman and as the fastest player in terms of days to 4000, 5000 and 7000 runs.

Ian Botham

Tests: 102, batting average: 33.54, high score: 208; wickets: 383, bowling average: 28.40

One of the premier all-rounders in cricket’s history, Bothams’ swashbuckling batting netted him 14 Test centuries, and his aggressive swing bowling had him hold the record for most wickets taken until New Zealand’s Richard Hadlee overtook him. He is the second player in history to complete the double of a Test hundred and a ten-wicket match.

The pre-eminent sports personality of his day, Botham had the innate ability to drag England to victory with pure inspiration, with no truer example than his talismanic performance during the 1981 Ashes series, in which his exploits with the bat and ball led to the series being dubbed Botham’s Ashes.

(Photo by Adrian Murrell/Allsport/Getty Images/Hulton Archive)

Alan Knott (wicketkeeper)

Tests: 95, average 32.75, high score: 135, catches/stumpings: 250/19

Considered by many to be the finest gloveman to ever play, Knott regularly made keeping in the most arduous conditions look completely mundane. During his first-class career he effected 1344 dismissals, and despite often being used as the example of the antithesis of modern keepers who hold their spots as a batsman first and for their glovework second, Knott was actually an impressive batsman in his own right, scoring five Test centuries and 30 fifties as well as cultivating a temperament of being the right man for any situation. His high score of 135 against Australia remains the highest score by an English wicketkeeper in an Ashes series.

Graeme Swann

Tests: 60, wickets: 255, average: 29.96

A late start to Test cricket, not earning his debut until 2008 at the age of 29, Swann quickly made up for lost time. By the end of 2009 he became the first English off spinner to take 50 wickets in a calendar year. In 2010 he became the first English off spinner to take ten wickets in a match since Jim Laker. He managed to take 4.25 wickets per game, which puts him behind only Sydney Barnes and Fred Trueman, and his average puts him right among the best modern spinners.

Swann played a big part in guiding England to the No. 1 ranking in 2011. A handy lower order batsman who could shift momentum when he got in, his career strike rate is the highest by any English batsman with 1000 runs or more.

(Photo by Mark Kolbe/Getty Images)

Fred Trueman

Tests: 67, wickets: 307, average: 21.57

He was the first man to reach the 300-wicket milestone, and many say he would have knocked off the 400 milestone if his career wasn’t peppered with missed tours and disciplinary breaches. He took eight for 31 on debut, which remains the best figures for a bowler on debut. Originally pace was his primary weapon, but as he developed he became a complete bowler, mastering swing and seam. A precursor to James Anderson in terms of longevity, with a first-class career spanning over 20 years, Trueman took 2304 wickets at 18.29 in 603 matches.

Sydney Barnes

Tests: 27, wickets: 189, average: 16.43

There isn’t really a bowling equivalent to Don Bradman, but Barnes is one of the few who you could make an argument for. Taking an average of seven wickets per game, Barnes simply destroyed his opponents with a mastery of swing, seam and the ability to make the ball break from either off or leg. He used his long fingers to make the ball spin with nearly no movement in his wrists, with nearby fielders often commenting they could hear his fingers snap but would have no idea which way the ball would turn. In his final Test series before retiring he took a record 49 wickets against South Africa.

James Anderson

Tests: 175, wickets: 667, average: 26.22

A model of consistency and longevity, Anderson ages like a fine wine. His ability to maintain his body to withstand the rigours of Test match fast bowling is unparalleled. Long criticised for his inability to perform away from the swinging conditions of England, Anderson has consistently improved all through his 30s and now 40s to be able to contribute on the frontiers of the Subcontinent and Australia, where he struggled in his early days.

He has taken more wickets than any pace bowler in history and would be on the short list for the best exponent of swing bowling. His early days were spent looking for the ‘magic’ ball to take wickets, but as he has matured he has combined his ability to bowl the ‘magic’ ball with unwavering control of line and length.

12th man: Herbert Sutcliffe

Tests: 54, average: 60.73, high score: 194

A career that spanned the years between the world wars, Sutcliffe forged himself into one of the pre-eminent batsmen and arguably second only to Bradman during his career. His average is the highest by an English batsman and fifth highest of all time for those who have played 20 matches or more. He was known as one of the best ‘bad wicket’ batsmen, and countryman Fred Trueman described him as “a terrible person to get out” and “at his best in a crisis”.

Honourable mentions

Alastair Cook, David Gower, Ken Barrington, Bob Willis, Derek Underwood, Jim Laker, Stuart Broad

This is a powerful team loaded with talent from top to bottom and featuring some of the very best to ever grace a cricket field, with many more not quite making the cut.

The Crowd Says:

2022-11-01T03:11:29+00:00

Mike

Guest


I think Swann is a particularly weak link when comparing with other national all-time XIs. With Australia, I'd rank the following way ahead of Swann: Warne, Grimmett, O'Reilly, Benaud, and Trumble. Lyon would be at least his equivalent. So, in my reckoning, Swann would be really pushed to make an Aussie 6th team. Interesting that the England Ashes team that was hammered 5-0 by Mitch Johnson contained 4 players from this all-time England team whereas that Aussie team contained none that would make the all-time Australian team. Hard to imagine a team containing Warne, Lillee, Bradman and G.Chappell getting hammered 5-0 by any England team. It doesn't look good on the resumes of Root, Pietersen, Swann and Anderson - they were absolutely pathetic on that tour. Disgracefully so. Not one English century was scored the whole series, and Swann and Anderson's bowling was insanely inadequate. Swann actually tossed in the towel and retired after the third test. Honestly, can you imagine Warnie or Lillee giving up like that? I'm afraid that Swann and Anderson are so inferior to Warne and Lillee it's laughable. Barnes and Trueman are excellent but there's a big fall away in standard to the 3rd and 4th bowlers. Botham is good as an allrounder but, I'd suggest not quite up to Miller who has superior bowling and batting stats. Surely England can do better than Swann and Anderson?

2022-10-22T06:31:20+00:00

Micko

Roar Rookie


Vaughan faced, and succeeded against all-time greats like McGrath, Warne, Gillespie & MacGill. Plus, the terrifying pace of Lee. Plus with a dominant Australian team and a long term mediocre English team, Vaughan was a massive reason for the re-emergence of English cricket.

2022-10-21T07:02:24+00:00

Micko

Roar Rookie


Well said Bernie. What a way to announce himself on debut with that century on debut at The Oval 2005 in one of the most tense and important test matches for England in some decade or more!

2022-10-21T06:11:13+00:00

Micko

Roar Rookie


Agreed. Genuinely think KP, along with Vaughan and Stokes have to be in contention. As you and I know context matters, not just the pure stats.

2022-10-21T06:08:34+00:00

Micko

Roar Rookie


I think the only modern (by "modern" I mean playing from the 90's onwards) to be seriously in contention are Vaughan, Pietersen and Stokes. I included the latter two in my side but am now seriously considering putting Vaughan in at the expense of Hutton at #3.

2022-10-21T06:05:46+00:00

sheek

Roar Guru


DaveJ, Other Roarers should also read this! In his book on the 100 Greatest Cricketers (2005), Geoff Armstrong said this of Grace: "In 1871 [when he was aged 23] he scored 10 centuries & 2739 first-class runs at 78.25. No-one else scored more than one century or averaged more than 37.66. Between 1868 & 1880 (the year of his test debut), he topped the first-class averages 10 times [out of 13 seasons], including 7 straight years to 1874. Between 1868 & 1876 he scored 54 first-class hundreds in England. No-one else scored even 10. In the decade 1871 to 1880, Grace averaged more than 49 in first-class cricket when no-one else could do better than 26, or total even a third of Grace's runs. He also took a little matter of 1174 wickets in those 10 years, second highest across the country behind Alfred Shaw". I hope other Roarers read this & educate themselves better. Armstrong did the research while the rest of us rely on mostly anecdotal evidence. I myself wondered if Grace was really that good until I read these stats. His dominance was Bradman-esque. It's also worth noting that when he made his test debut in 1880, he was 32 & perhaps almost certainly past his prime. But based on the records relayed by Armstrong, it's no wonder English cricket experts who know their history, rave about him.

2022-10-21T05:59:01+00:00

Micko

Roar Rookie


Sorry, meant to select Underwood NOT Randall. :silly:

2022-10-21T05:55:11+00:00

Micko

Roar Rookie


Hobbs Sutcliffe Hutton Pietersen Hammond (C) Stokes Botham Knott (W/K) Underwood Trueman Barnes

2022-10-21T05:50:26+00:00

sheek

Roar Guru


Cadfael, Yes, Gubby Allen over Kevin Pietersen? How so? Allen wouldn't feature normally in the top 5 all-time England XIs, I would think. Besides, he was an all-rounder while Pietersen was a specialist batsman. Maybe you're just bored.....

2022-10-21T05:36:56+00:00

Micko

Roar Rookie


Relieved you didn't include WG Grace. :stoked:

2022-10-21T04:27:57+00:00

The Knightwatchmen who say Nii

Roar Rookie


I really am button holed by those who would deny KP’s place among the English Pantheon. One really good guide as to the worth/impact of a batsman is how he plays when he makes a century. Let’s have a squiz at KP’s 23: 1. 158 (off 187) The Oval 2005 v Australia Australian fans should need no re-introduction to this one. Smashed up Warne, Ooh Ahh and Lee at a critical point when Australia still had every chance to win the match, square the series and retain the Ashes. Had he not played this innings, all the brilliant English team work in previous tests, not least of which was Vaughan’s leadership, would have been in vain. How many English players between 1989-03 played in anywhere near the fashion KP did in his first three knocks of the series? 2. 100 (off 137) Faisalabad 2005-06 0-1 down in the series, comes in at 3 for 107 in reply to 462 with skipper Vaughan, Strauss, and first test big centurion Trescothic all gone. Only his 2nd test, and his partnership with the much slower scoring Bell was probably the difference between losing and limping to an inglorious draw. 3. 158 (off 205) Lords 2006 v Sri Lanka Not a strong attack, obviously, and in a high scoring total. 4. 142 (off 157) Headingly 2006 v Sri Lanka As with Ton 3 above, not a strong attack, but in a completed team total of 295 and the only score above 50 for England in the match. Would all indicate difficult batting conditions, and I watched the second half of this innings and the stroke play was simply majestic. 5. 135 (off 169) Headingly 2006 v Pakistan A high scoring match with all 40 wickets falling ending in a victory by a slightly above par margin in runs. A reasonable attack albeit in better batting conditions than Ton 4 above. 6. 158 (off 257) Adelaide 2006-07 A high scoring match that should have been a fizzled draw save for England’s inexplicable last day implosion. 7. 109 (off 138) Lords v West Indies 2007 A soft 3rd innings ton in a high scoring fizzled draw. 8. 226 (262) Leeds v West Indies 2007 Weak attack, high scoring declared team innings in a runaway victory. 9. 134 (213) Lords v India 2007 A very tense draw with 39 of the 40 matches falling and the opposition almost 100 runs from victory target in a series England ended up losing 0-1. This was the only ton of the match in which no team reached 300. Reasonable opposition attack that included Anil Kumble. 10. 101 (off 159) The Oval v India 2007 A high scoring draw. 11. 129 (off 213) Napier 2008 Scored in a completed team total of 253 from 2 for 4, 3 for 4, 4 for 36, 5 for 125, and 6 for 147 before being 7th out at 208. Nobody else reached 50 and this knock paved the way for soft 3rd innings tons for team mates Andrew Strauss and Ian Bell. A small run margin win by 121 with three 3rd innings wickets left unutilised. 12. 115 (off 223) Trent Bridge 2008 v New Zealand Entered at 2 for 44 which slumped to 5 for 86. Nobody else among the top 6 reached 50. 13. 152 (off 181) Lords 2008 v South Africa Opposition followed on but fizzled to high scoring 3rd innings draw. 14. 100 (137) The Oval 2008 v South Africa Steyn not playing, but Morkel was. England won. 15. 144 (off 201) Mohali 2008-09 Came in at 2 for 1 in reply to home side’s 453 and the game ended up fizzling. 16. 102 (off 92) Port-of-Spain 2009 Came in at 2 for +229 in 3rd innings, but team needed super quick runs with time running out to force a win. Ended up having opposition 8 down when time called off less than 70 overs. 17. 227 (off 304) Adelaide 2010-11 In a runaway victory, probably about the first 80-85 of his runs were genuinely useful to the team cause. 18. 202 (off 326) Lords 2011 v India Like most hundreds scored by anybody, this innings can be capped at not too much higher than 100 but it was a match winning knock. 19. 175 (off 232) The Oval 2011 v India Scored in a runaway victory. 20. 151 (off 165) Colombo 2012 In a match where all of first, second and third innings were bowled out, and England being left with a standard straight forward victory chase of around 100, Pietersen’s strike rate of 91.5 the next highest scores in those same three innings for anyone to strike at over 50 were 34 and 14. Obviously, very difficult batting conditions, so chasing over 200 in 4th innings, had Pietersen made no more than 40-45 would have been a potential nightmare. This was a rarely seen level of batting artistry. 21. 149 (214) Headingly 2012 England would probably have lost had Pietersen failed and the attack of Styen, Morkel and Philander was high class. 22. 186 (off 233) Mumbai 2013 Scored in a total of 413 with next best scores of 122 and then 26. First three innings completely bowled out leaving a small 4th innings mopping up to the tune of 57. Strike rate of 79.8 with only one half 50+ score from either side to have a strike rate of 50 or better, 68 off 114 (59.6). This is the win that wrapped up a rare series victory on sub-continent. 23. 113 (206) Old Trafford 2013 v Australia Despite the large amount of rain at the backend, England would have lost without this innings because it got England past the follow on target. A strike rate of 73 when scoring a ton, which is phenomenal and a fusion of 213, which is off the charts. 11 tons in wins, only one in a loss, and that was Adelaide 2006-07. Even some of the draws were quite intense affairs, including the Oval 2005 when his ton sealed England’s first Ashes win in 9 series, and this in his very first series. How about somebody do a similar breakdown for Hammond, Hutton, Hobbs, Sutcliffe or whoever else and show the evidence that any other England batsman of the past is unquestionably superior to Pietersen. Certainly the standard of bowling in their era/s wasn’t superior to in Pietersen’s.

2022-10-21T02:50:29+00:00

DaveJ

Roar Rookie


Good call Sheek. Always hard to compare between eras, but Grace’s test stats don’t tell the story in an era when average scoring was 10-15 runs lower than the 20th C and he was always past his prime. I imagine he might have been more of a middle order player in later eras, whereas Hutton was more of a pure opener. Good case for Larwood or Snow ahead of Anderson on all wickets.

2022-10-21T02:23:00+00:00

All day Roseville all day

Roar Guru


Every English team should contain at least one Aussie.

2022-10-21T02:21:37+00:00

All day Roseville all day

Roar Guru


* Correction- 9 of its 11 played from the '80s onwards. But my point remains.

2022-10-21T01:08:11+00:00

The Knightwatchmen who say Nii

Roar Rookie


On what basis is KP not right up there with the very best England have had?

2022-10-20T23:14:39+00:00

jammel

Roar Rookie


Reasonable team - not as strong as you would have imagined. England have many many very good players it seems, but fewer "immortals"/once in a generation players than Australia. Like many on the thread, I query whether Swann and Pietersen are in the class of some of the others. Great to see most also recognise the awesome achievements of Hobbs/Sutcliffe/Hutton/Hammond! Interesting that some players will clearly survive the test of time - eg Hobbs/Hammond. Will some of the others like Anderson/Swann/Root be in the mix in 100, 50 or even 20 years? Even Cook has dropped out of this discussion quickly.

2022-10-20T23:14:30+00:00

The Knightwatchmen who say Nii

Roar Rookie


Gubby Allen over Pietersen? How so?

2022-10-20T07:02:26+00:00

JGK

Roar Guru


I think Compton and Root are comparable - Compton played a lot of easy matches as well.

2022-10-20T06:45:51+00:00

Cadfael

Roar Guru


Would have played Gubby Allen over Pietersen, Laker, Lock or Titmus over Swann. Apart from that not bad

2022-10-20T01:23:32+00:00

All day Roseville all day

Roar Guru


Great minds think alike ?

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar