One-day internationals have had a good run but it’s now holding cricket’s global ambitions back.
It’s time for the evolution of the sport to swallow up the 50-over version of the game at international level because, quite frankly, the explosion in T20 popularity has revolutionised cricket in a way that the Test and ODI formats were never able to do.
Cricket is now finally branching out from beyond its British Empire origins in places where the Union Jack has never flown.
The upsets at the T20 World Cup from the likes of Ireland, the Netherlands, Namibia and the emergence of Afghanistan can be a sign of things to come if cricket focuses on the shortest format while also retaining Test matches for the traditional nations in the red-ball arena.
CLICK HERE for a seven-day free trial to watch cricket on KAYO
Test cricket started with a timeless format which was used – not in every match – from the first contest between Australia and England in 1877 through to the Second World War.
It evolved into a five-day format and depending on who you listen to, it could shrink to four within the next decade as the ICC tries to maintain its relevance.
One-day internationals sprung up by accident in January of 1971 when the third Ashes Test in Melbourne was ruined due to rain and the only remaining option was to have a hit on the last scheduled day’s play.
They worked out a format where each team would get 40 eight-ball overs each and – this was a foreign concept in international cricket at the time – there was no possibility of a draw, only the unlikely event of a tie. Someone would win, someone would not.
Officials weren’t expecting much of a crowd to turn out for this experimental fixture but more than 46,000 flocked to the MCG and after Sir Donald Bradman – credited with coming up with the idea – addressed both teams before the start of play to reinforce the match’s importance, Bill Lawry won the toss and sent the English team in.
They managed a decent tally of 190 which Australia chased down with five overs to spare and history was literally made – one-day internationals quickly gained traction with a World Cup four years later.
After starting with 60-over matches in 1975, it was reduced to 50 for the 1987 tournament and coloured clothing with a white ball did not even become the norm until Australia hosted the 1992 event.
Cricket can be slow to change.
But now is the time to make a drastic measure and merge the ODI format with T20 to have one true World Cup.
When it comes to international sports, two’s company, three’s a crowd.
Football, the world’s most popular sport, has one true international format with futsal, indoor, beach and any other variety, including the Olympic tournament, not taking away any attention from the World Cup.
Golf, tennis, basketball, rugby, any other major international sport you can think of has a clear north compass when it comes to its main format and its most sought-after trophies.
If you’re one of those cricket fans who try to explain the global format to someone with no understanding of the sport, you would need roughly the time it takes to play a 50-over match to explain the complexities of the three formats, which countries play which version and why this trophy matters but this one doesn’t.
Part of Australia’s apathy about the T20 World Cup on home soil over the past few weeks is that there are so many of these tournaments.
If you throw in the World Test Championship final, there will be 15 world champions crowned in men’s cricket alone in the space of a decade judging by the ICC’s Future Tours Programme released in June.
T20: 2021, 2022, 2024, 2026, 2028, 2030
ODI: 2023, 2027, 2031
Test: 2021, 2023, 2025, 2027, 2029, 2031
The ICC, in its infinite wisdom/greed, has also decided to reintroduce the Champions Trophy eight-team event in 2025 and 2029 to put even more silverware up for grabs in the ODI format.
We’ve reached a tipping point.
It’s too hard for fans to keep track and it’s the kind of schedule which can be overwhelming for players.
Three-format stars are likely to be thin on the ground as the workload and travel toll will be a huge burden for someone like young Australian all-rounder Cameron Green to navigate their way through.
His veteran teammate Glenn Maxwell put his foot in his mouth with his dopey comments after the World Cup which made it look like he and the team did not care about their failure to not even reach the semi-finals in their title defence on home soil.
“Cricket never stops so you don‘t get time to dwell. Maybe when you retire you think back to it would have been nice to win that but it doesn’t mean anything. I wish we had have won, but we didn‘t.”
But what it also shows is that the players are bleary-eyed about the seemingly never-ending schedule where they travel from city to city, country to country, change kit and mindset to the format and are expected to maintain high standards and interest levels no matter what.
The IPL will more and more become the flagship for worldwide interest in cricket, which is another reason why T20s should swamp ODIs at international level.
Due to the smaller margin for error, non Test-playing nations find it easier to be competitive in 20-over contests and cause upsets, as we saw with the Dutch defeating South Africa to deny them a semi-final berth.
This has been a much less frequent occurrence in 50-over tournaments and there’s little point investing too many resources in building up ICC associate nations in the Test arena when it’s highly unlikely they’ll ever be genuine competition for the established teams.
There will be 20 teams in the main draw of the next T20 World Cup in the US and Caribbean in 2024 and in a decade or two, that number could rise even higher.
Distilling international cricket back to a dual calendar of a long-form Test program and the T20 bash-fest to grow the game into new territories should be the priority for the sport.
Judging by the ICC’s scheduling decisions, centred around the rivers of gold in TV ratings revenues that flow from any content involving the Indian cricket team, ensuring international cricket’s quality does not appear to be as much of a priority as the quantity.
Rocket
Guest
I suggest a compromise. Ditch the bilateral ODI series which now attract minimal interest, but retain the World Cup, which remains popular. I would base the qualification process on soccer's world cup. Each region would run a tournament with the number of qualification places linked to the strength of cricket in that region. For example, five spots for Asia, two each for Africa, Australasia and Europe and one for America. The next best two teams from Asia and top teams from the other four regions would play-off for the other three spots in a 16-team ODI world cup.
Ummi
Guest
Go with it if you prefer lottery over real game
Clear as mud
Guest
The straight face is runs off every ball. And if you concede a single on the field it’s not the end of the world I’m pretty sure I’m doing it right
Rellum
Roar Guru
Clearly you are doing it wrong then. You can't say runs matter less in FC with a straight face
Clear as mud
Guest
Complete disagreement. If you are batting you can sleep, lie down. The pace is sleepy You would field the ball once every 20 mins and runs not as crucial. Plenty of tile to switch off between balls.
Rellum
Roar Guru
Not remotely. If you are not on for every all of a FC game you will fail. I don't know we're this myth comes from The only thing T20 cricket does with more intensity is the amount of running players do between balls. That's it. They are not more switched on. They are less switch on as it is much harder to be concentrating on day 4 of a Shield game. Not only do players play less days now they play for much less overs
Clear as mud
Guest
They love him. They don’t deserve him, tho
Tim Carter
Roar Pro
It's pretty clear why the hierarchy of Cricket Australia aren't fond of Maxwell.
Clear as mud
Guest
I think that’s part of the point. T20 must be frenetic. You’re on for each ball in the field especially for a Maxwell. If you bat 3 or 4 you are on for very ball until you bat, and every ball is crucial. There is probably as. Much intensity on 3 hours of that as there is in a 4 day first class game?
Bloke7
Roar Rookie
183 days of cricket in 1986? Luxury! My great great great grand uncle's pal Reg once played 395 days of cricket in 1904 while carrying coal up and down the pitch for the right to get beaten by the Umpire with a hot soldering iron... if he were lucky!
Rellum
Roar Guru
I go on about this all the time. These guys don't play anywhere near the cricket the players used to. They play more matches and travel more regularly but don't actually play that much
@Mick Jeffrey I have watched 3. I like the close games - much as in any form of cricket, a close games gives a shot of dopamine in an otherwise boring evening. When I am watching test or even 50 over cricket I get a beautiful feeling a lot of the time when its two good teams and you know there can be lots of twists and turns, one team dominating for a period, the other team fighting back -- of course there are some blow out mismatchs in the longer forms of the game, but I think you get my drift. T20 is OK. But sorry, it is not a game that will sustain itself beyond the India land -- even the Indians will get sick of it.
Alex
Roar Rookie
Agree. I grew up on Tests and ODIs and I (like many others clearly still are), was reluctant to accept T20 but certainly in the last few years I have warmed to the concept and cooled on ODIs. Besides the obvious appeal of the shorter length and more attacking play for attracting new fans (critical to the entire sports continuity) I am actually enjoying watching the evolution of the concept. The greater specialization of roles, the new stroke play and variance in bowling. Even tactically its rapidly changing which to me is fascinating to watch. ODIs feel stale in comparison. Ultimately ODIs were introduced to be a more aggressive, casual viewer friendly version of Test Cricket and now T20s have taken that role so why continue with ODIs? I know I prefer to watch Tests or T20 now What I would say though is I am NOT a fan of domestic leagues. The governing bodies need to ensure we dont follow Footballs lead and have every international meaningless outside of a 4 yearly world cup.
boes
Roar Pro
I rarely get on board with long winded rants. That was top shelf :thumbup:
Rowdy
Roar Rookie
Liquorbox, you are a cunning linguist.
Rowdy
Roar Rookie
I lost a comment because of a pop ad. The guys that make these stupid ads should meet with a high velocity baseball bat.
Jeff
Roar Rookie
I ranted about those pop-ups for about 6 months. Then I just gave up.
Jeff
Roar Rookie
Every time a bell rings, an angel gets its wings.
Brett Allen
Roar Rookie
TV execs would rather the game finishes on time everyday, not 30 mins late. If there were less ad breaks, they’d just renegotiate the broadcast deal to reflect fewer breaks
Don Freo
Roar Rookie
What cricketer with sub-continental heritage doesn't "twirl it". I'll bet Bumrah has a wrong-un or a doosra too.