Better than Davidson? Up there with Akram? Where does Starc rank among left-arm legends?

By Matt Cleary / Expert

From ball one of the 2015 World Cup final, Mitchell Starc owned New Zealand like Donald Trump owns things made of gold.

Starc owned everybody that tournament. From over the wicket or around, wide out or close to the stumps, his yorkers were devil-balls. He was unplayable.

In eight matches he took 22 wickets at 10.18. In a modern game of thick-edged bats and massive attack, his economy rate was 3.50. He took a wicket every 17 balls. He was a runaway Player of the Tournament.

And, in the way of these things, he was afforded the ultimate accolade for the left-handed leather man: comparison with Wasim Akram.

Akram is the greatest left-arm quick there’s ever been. Kapil Dev reckons greatest ever, “left-arm, right-arm, all arm.”

Akram would hustle to the crease, little steps, then muscle the ball, fast, with a shoulder action that was almost pneumatic. He could do you from everywhere, over or around, near in or wide out.

And that late swing, both ways, conventionally, Irish … incredible skill. As Kapil would tell you: “He was a magician with the ball.”

They reckon another Pakistani great, Sarfraz Nawaz, was the first to dally and then master ‘reverse’ or ‘Irish’ swing (though he didn’t share it with anybody, team-mates included).

Swing Svengali Terry Alderman has said he had it going ‘Irish’ a couple of times by mistake.

But Wasim and his partner Waqar Younis, those guys made the Kookaburra sing.

Now, I’m not saying Australia’s latest 300 Test wicket man Mitchell Starc is the New Wasim Akram, because there’ll be only one Wasim Akram. He was a freak.

But when Starc has the pill hooping about at speed, and zapping into the toes at high speed, well, you can’t rattle bails better – as the deliveries that secured his 300th Test pole and the first one of the recent Ashes series showed.

 (Photo by Matt King-ICC/ICC via Getty Images)

Wasim remains alone, top of the pops however. Question is: is Mitchell Starc now Australia’s best left-arm quick?

There’s been a few good ones. Bill Johnston played third fiddle to Ray Lindwall and Keith Miller, but not by much.

There was, of course the frightening, if enigmatic Mitchell Johnson. Old mate “Caviar” ran so hot in 2013-14 against the Poms he was DK redux. DK with Thommo’s fear factor. He was unbelievable.

Other summers he was on the verge of giving it up. Tremendous bloke. And he had plenty of white line fever. But he’d agree he could run a little cold, and skittish.

Another leftie was the gangling, death-from-above Bruce Reid. Never the fastest, never had to be: Reid’s height and proximity to the wicket at delivery gave him bounce and odd angles. He went across the chest of the world’s best bats. Problem for Bruce Reid was there nothing of Bruce Reid – his limbs were held together by sinews like gossamer.

So, we can pretty safely posit that Starc has surpassed all those worthies and entered the pantheon of Australia’s left-arm leather men. Only one man remains, arguably, above him: the great Alan Davidson.

In 44 Tests Davidson took 186 wickets at 20.53. He took 11 wickets in the first Tied Test – with a broken finger. He bowled out the Poms in an Ashes series with a bad back. The ICC put him in the Hall of Fame.

In 74 Test matches Starc has 301 wickets at 27.20. Where it gets messier in your head-to-heads is that Starc’s played 107 ODIs (for 211 wickets) and 58 T20is (73 wickets).

Davidson played 193 first class matches and took 672 wickets at 20.90; Starc’s played 125 first class matches and taken 477 wickets at 26.59.

So maybe just Davidson? Maybe just Starc? Cigarette paper between them. Nuffies can discuss.
Starc is definitely our best left-arm white ball bowler.

In 2015 he was signed by the exotically-named Royal Challengers Bangalore (no Delhi Daredevils, but still) in the Indian Premier League for the then-princely sum of $900,000.

Doing the maths, it meant in the 13 matches Starc sent down 258 balls worth $3488 each. His 20 wickets were worth $45,000 a piece.

For five weeks of steamy T20 big whack action, he scored 11 runs – you do the maths.

CLICK HERE for a seven-day free trial to watch cricket on KAYO

Fun cricket, stupid money. Sick money. Handy though if you’re a mate. Starc and some pals once ate at Robert de Niro’s ‘Nobu’ in Dubai. Big feed, all the drinks, nice wine – bill came to three grand US. Starc insisted on picking up the bill.

“Let me get it,” he said. “It’s one ball in the Premier League.”

For in this mixed-up world of Kolkata Knight Riders and Caribbean mercenaries and Warney and Sachin playing cricket in New York City, whatever that was, this is the coin the world’s premier white ball fast bowler can command.

Starc, following his irrepressible and just about unplayable fast bowling in that 2015 World Cup, became a hotter property than Balmoral beachfront (where he not coincidentally purchased a place, and for quite a bit more than $900k).

Today he remains, at 32 years old, a global superstar. Among the best and fastest bowlers in the sporting nation state of Australia where cricket remains the national sport if not obsession. And for mine, with the great Alan Davidson, Australia’s equal-greatest left-arm quick.

The Crowd Says:

2023-01-08T22:55:18+00:00

JamesH

Roar Guru


Depends a bit on the injury. Reid had back issues because he had a mixed bowling action, similar to Cummins. We know a lot more about biomechanics than we did back in his day. Harris' knee injury wasn't all that stopped him playing more tests. He wasn't good enough early in his career. By his own admission he tried to bowl too fast and was too erratic. It wasn't until later that he became the line and length bowler that got him into the test side.

2022-12-23T02:53:18+00:00

Brett Allen

Roar Rookie


I could be wrong, but the bats were still twigs.

2022-12-23T02:49:24+00:00

Purdo

Roar Rookie


Brett Allen, are you sure that Davidson played on uncovered pitches? I have been listening to and watching test cricket at least since 1960/61, and I think I recall that wickets were covered during all of that time.

2022-12-23T00:36:55+00:00

Pierro

Roar Rookie


Sometimes it's just terrible injuries that take away a bowlers prime reduce a bowlers numbers though ie Ryan Harris or lately jhye Richardson or thommo or alderman. sometimes sports science and medical developments could help not always clear cut

2022-12-22T23:35:28+00:00

JamesH

Roar Guru


Yep, Bruce Reid especially. Had he been 20 years younger he might have had the sport science support to successfully adjust his bowling action, the way Cummins did.

2022-12-22T23:06:22+00:00

Brett Allen

Roar Rookie


Flintoff, Kallis, Imran, Kapil Dev, Botham, Sobers, couldn’t really go wrong with any of them

2022-12-22T22:50:05+00:00

jammel

Roar Rookie


yeah Flintoff not a bad shout. If it was a bowling allrounder we wanted, I'd opt for Imran. But on balance still probably Kallis at #6 just for the sheer weight of runs. I'd go for more of a batting allrounder.

2022-12-22T22:30:31+00:00

Brett Allen

Roar Rookie


Yes, but he still faced some pretty decent batsmen in his time. Root, Williamson, Kohli, Pujara, Cook, Babar, Chandimal, De Villiers, Du Plessis, Stokes, Bairstow, not to mention a string of openers whose careers have been cut short because of his ability to get an early wicket. That ability is priceless, I’m sure every captain he’s played under would agree. It’s almost worth his place in the side alone.

2022-12-22T22:23:45+00:00

Brett Allen

Roar Rookie


Marshall, Lillee, Akram, Warne, Flintoff

2022-12-22T21:09:09+00:00

jammel

Roar Rookie


Bracken too

2022-12-22T21:07:59+00:00

jammel

Roar Rookie


Brett - so who's your all-time attack from the players you've seen? For me, it is Lillee / Marshall / Akram / Warne (Kallis would probably be the allrounder)

2022-12-22T21:03:12+00:00

jammel

Roar Rookie


Bruce Reid was quality. Test average in the 24-25 range if i recall correctly. From players I've seen, our Test left-handed XI from like 1988 onwards would be quality!! Hayden MTaylor(V) Langer Border(C) MHussey Bevan Gilchrist(+) MJohnson Starc BHogg Reid (no room for Lehmann Katich Warner Whitney; Bevan makes it because of his option as the true second spinner)

2022-12-22T21:00:06+00:00

jammel

Roar Rookie


I never saw Alan Davidson. But Akram was miles miles miles better than MJ or Starc. Just like Ambrose was > McDermott or Hazlewood etc. Personally i have Johnson over Starc in my list of Test quicks for Australia.

2022-12-22T20:58:24+00:00

jammel

Roar Rookie


This is a valid point - ie fewer wickets to share around. It is relevant in eg the Murali vs Warne debate (Warne had fewer wickets to share in, and usually came on once McGrath/Lee/Dizzy had taken 3 or 4!). But the counter argument is that having other really good bowlers helps someone take wickets! Ie the pressure is always on, and when you come on you're not trying to reign in the batting! Good article. I was chatting in the pub with my mates on the MJ vs Starc debate just yesterday!

2022-12-22T08:01:47+00:00

Micko

Roar Rookie


None of which is his fault, but something you need to assess when considering his "greatness" in comparison with others Brett. :thumbup:

2022-12-22T07:29:32+00:00

All day Roseville all day

Roar Guru


Fair enough, and the 1950s and '60s comprised mostly attritional cricket with lots of drawn matches. The Tied Test series was a bit of an outlier. Fortunately Chappelli and co shook things up from 1971 onwards.

2022-12-22T07:19:35+00:00

Brett Allen

Roar Rookie


The difference in bats and quality of pitches has a lot to do with that

2022-12-22T07:18:30+00:00

Brett Allen

Roar Rookie


None of which is his fault

2022-12-22T07:15:48+00:00

Don Freo

Roar Rookie


The sandpaper made no difference to any of Australia's bowlers. We got caned and the ball did nothing.

2022-12-22T06:05:25+00:00

Don Freo

Roar Rookie


And Ussie and Gurinder…oh, and the world’s batting GOAT, GS Chappell.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar