Footy Fix: Lethal Lions unlock the Pies... but it was easier said than done

By Tim Miller / Editor

It would be incredibly easy to look at a strange night at the Gabba and draw some quite sizeable conclusions.

Collingwood’s bubble has burst, would be one of them. Brisbane, after an 33-point win after a week of media criticism, are back as a premiership contender, is another you can probably expect to see. And most obviously – the question of whether the Pies, after three weeks as the presumptive flag favourite across most of the footy world, have been worked out.

No side in footy history has been perfect – the Pies have weaknesses, and someone at some point was going to exploit them. Brisbane certainly did on Thursday night. But there’s a difference in knowing what works against Collingwood, and actually pulling it off. Not every team will be able to do what the Lions managed.

That’s also not to say that the Lions are outstanding – far from it. They played as high-risk high-reward a game as I can remember, one as far removed as possible from the lethargic, no-risk footy they slogged through in last week’s loss to the Western Bulldogs.

That it worked will leave them not just immune to criticism, but praised for ingenuity: had it not, their forwards would likely have been slammed for cheating out the back rather than presenting towards the ball, the running defenders criticised for pressing too high, and the midfield for being too aggressive with their kicking and inviting turnovers.

So let’s just say this, for now: Brisbane were excellent, the Magpies unable to go with them, and none of it gave even the slightest indication it could be emulated.

On another day, the Pies don’t kick for goal as waywardly in the final quarter and make a game of it, or the Lions fumble once or twice on the counterattack and allow the Magpies time to get back and fill dangerous space. We probably don’t give enough credence to how even in comfortable victories, fundamentals like poor kicking for goal or the odd dodgy pass can have on a game.

Previously in 2023, the Pies have made an art form of winning all those moments, kicking superbly for goal when it truly mattered, and gathering momentum with every contest win and every fast break. They didn’t get that on Thursday night, and it left them incapable of addressing the Lions’ 10 goals to nil surge on either side of half time that decided the match.

The elephant in the room was always going to be the Magpies’ lack of a ruckman; in the end, though, they outscored the Lions from stoppages and won centre clearances 12-14. Daniel McStay’s comfortable hitout loss to Oscar McInerney wasn’t the deciding factor in this game, and nor was his absence up forward, with Brody Mihocek seemingly relishing the extra space and playing his best game of footy since at least 2021.

Not every McInerney tap was as poor as the one below, but it wasn’t like he was Max Gawning it down Lachie Neale’s throat every two minutes.

The ultimate difference was the Pies going from the third-best contested possession team after three rounds of the 21st century, to losing the count, albeit narrowly 137-136.

Tom Mitchell, so industrious at the coalface in his first three games in black and white, was sat on by a team combination of Jarrod Berry and Josh Dunkley – of his 20 disposals, just five were contested and only two clearances, robbing the Pies of one of their biggest ball-winners at the source.

Ditto Steele Sidebottom, a winger in name only for the first few rounds, whom the Lions nullified by forcing him to defend wider; winning it at the source, Darcy Wilmot, shifted up the ground, constantly fanned wide, forcing Sidebottom to chase with the Pies not in possession.

Again, high risk, and while Wilmot hardly touched it – just eight possessions in his sacrificial role, albeit with a goal – Sidebottom had just 12 disposals, half of them in the final term with the Pies going for broke, and just one kick to three quarter time.

That put extra pressure on Jordan De Goey to win his own ball, rather than the Dustin Martin-style all out attack dog role he’s performed exceptionally to start the year. 21 disposals and one goal is a stat line you’d take every week with a player of De Goey’s stature – six clearances and 13 contested possessions, while still a fine game, is definitely where you’d rather him getting his footy.

It was only when Nick Daicos was injected onto the ball for a 16-disposal, four-clearance third quarter (I’ve seen some critics of his game and of him getting cheap touches in recent weeks. May I present this game to kill all future arguments) that the Pies began to turn the screw; it was no coincidence the second it happened, the Pies won the contested possession count by 8 for the rest of the quarter, and with it got their running game going again for three of the last four goals for the quarter.

On the other side of the coin, the Lions were clean and efficient: those traits are basically Lachie Neale’s default settings, Josh Dunkley’s big body was too much for the Magpies to handle over the ball with seven clearances and 14 contested possessions, and with 11 and 16 (both match-highs), McInerney was at his best when he shoved McStay or Ash Johnson out of the way, grabbed the ball and either dished off to a running midfielder or bashed it long himself.

Just as impressive was Will Ashcroft; it’s one thing for a youngster to win the hard ball, but his composure in traffic was a sight to behold. Seldom wasting a possession, his 26 disposals, five clearances and 11 contested possessions are numbers from a hardened midfield warrior, not a third-gamer. It was the sort of game I remember Trent Cotchin playing a lot of before he sacrificed his game to become a triple-premiership captain instead of a Brownlow contender.

Winning the hard ball isn’t vital for the Magpies – they were near the bottom of the tree in that stat last year and still turned out fine – but losing it means their ability to score now centres on playing counterattacking footy out of their defence. That invites risk by positioning offensively, further up the ground, and the Lions had a plan to make them pay for it.

I lost count of how many goals the Lions scored out the back – marking balls kicked over the Magpies’ defensive press close to goal and making no mistake from set shots. I’ll watch the highlights again to be sure, but my standing count is at 11.

Charlie Cameron, with six goals, was a colossal beneficiary – too fast for Isaac Quaynor, he spent most of the night as the Lions’ deepest forward, but far further afield than a usual deepest forward tends to sit. If the ball was in the Pies’ attacking 50, he’d find himself on the wing or even higher; then, when the turnover happened, off he’d dash, sprinting to goal, with full confidence his team wouldn’t turn it over.

Even if a stoppage was forced in midfield, the Lions would keep space open in their forward line, pushing an extra player around the ball, setting Joe Daniher to play as an old-fashioned centre-half forward – a task, by the way, he performed superbly – and setting free leading lanes for Eric Hipwood to run into, rather than needing to battle defenders one-on-one with the ball sat on his head as he did against the Bulldogs.

Oh, and there was also Cam Rayner.

I’ve been baffled all season by the Rayner move to half-back, and tonight I’m even more so. Best afield by the length of the straight, the 2017 No.1 pick just looks so much more assured of his role ahead of the ball.

He’s strong – two of his shots at goal were set up by strong pack marks, including a speccy in the first term to get the Lions going after some early Magpies dominance. He’s not an elite endurance runner and probably never will be, but as a burst player he’s just as dynamic as De Goey or even mid-career, pre-Brownlow and Norms Dustin Martin.

He’s an exceptionally smart footballer in an old-fashioned way, a way poorly suited to the smart ball use and quick thinking required to be a half-back. Rayner is a player built on instinct, and here’s hoping he’s able to use those traits in attack for the rest of the season. Please, Chris Fagan.

Daniher’s move further afield was almost as influential: not only did it leave ample space in attack for Cameron and Hipwood to work their magic, but I’ve seldom see him play with more confidence.

Joe’s weaknesses are clear – just ask Essendon fans. He shanks set shots, he doesn’t defend, he drifts in and out of games. He’s just about the only key forward to fit that tired old cliche of putting them into the ruck to try and get the footy in his hands.

With Darcy Fort partnering McInerney last week, Daniher sat deep in attack for the whole game. He missed a swathe of shots in the first quarter, and never looked likely again. Liam Jones outbodied him frequently under the high ball, and the Lions’ stodgy ball movement gave him few chances to get a run and jump at the footy.

Further afield, he went from the final link in the chain to being a key distributor. His six inside 50s were an equal game-high, and four of them came in the first half. With 13 touches in that half as well, no player on the ground had had it more – remarkable for a key forward.

Around the ground, he competed as well as he has for quite some time, reeling in two important contested marks, including one in the last quarter off a high ball coming out of defensive 50 that could easily have been punted back in by the Pies. Whenever he moved closer to goal, Darcy Moore seemed drawn to him as well, and saw him function almost as a decoy, with other forwards finding space away from the Pies’ intercept king to take 16 marks inside 50.

Rayner won’t always have a day out like this; Daniher won’t always look so damaging up the ground; Cameron won’t always kick six goals by doing exactly what pundits have hated forwards doing for generations. But that doesn’t make it any less impressive they were able to pull it off against the premiership favourites.

Defensively, the Lions looked far better suited to putting pedal to the metal – yes, the Pies could have punished them even further had they kicked accurately, especially later, but part of beating Collingwood will be needing to outscore them.

Sports opinion delivered daily 

   

Conor McKenna, especially early, had his best game as a Lion; freed to dash off half-back, he and Keidean Coleman had 25 touches and more than 500 metres gained between them for the first half, and just as importantly, got it forward quickly.

So there you have it. That’s how you beat Collingwood. Smash them for contested ball, move it quickly and with purpose, hit your targets, get your out-of-form key forward playing like Gary Dempsey, tell your fastest small to sneak out the back, get your half-back to turn into a contested-marking forward, and then hope they kick inaccurately too.

Simple, right?

The Crowd Says:

2023-04-09T12:02:10+00:00

Flagpies

Roar Rookie


Hopefully they don't!

2023-04-09T11:52:02+00:00

Flagpies

Roar Rookie


Maybe a Lil pessimistic but I view that loss as 'a little off'. But that's all it takes, a good enough team that is willing to take the risk, every dog and its bowl knows we're far far from talent laden, a list like the Lions, and the Pies are exposed. Yeah OK bad kicking is bad footy, nonetheless our one wood was taken away, from the 2nd Brisbane beat us at our own game, many other teams will do the same. We're overrated and think we'll struggle, 1st 3 rounds a flash in the pan.

2023-04-08T05:54:01+00:00

DTM

Roar Rookie


You're on the wrong site - this is a sports site. You should type into Google "Comedy" or "Ridiculous Conspiracy Theories".

2023-04-08T00:45:42+00:00

kieranbutler

Roar Rookie


The funniest thing about this game was James Brayshaw saying it is not going to script for Collingwood. Yes James, we know it is scripted entertainment and not sport. We also see the umpires receiving instructions at each centre bounce. If you bet on AFL, you might as well bet on the latest Marvel Universe movie before it comes out. The AFL will not allow Collingwood to win a premiership if they can manage it. 2018 was proof of that. McRae knows this. Buckley does too, but he is still in denial. That is why Collingwood plays to entertain. Who wins is decided by the AFL. This is a product for consumption. Nothing more. Nothing less.

2023-04-07T23:28:16+00:00

Don Freo

Roar Rookie


Now you use something like Aspergers as an insult? What kind of person are you?

2023-04-07T23:24:35+00:00

whale

Roar Rookie


Geez mate. It must be difficult living with aspergers. Got no friends, hey?

2023-04-07T21:27:59+00:00

Don Freo

Roar Rookie


How many bounces would a player need in a 400 metre run during a game?

2023-04-07T20:37:16+00:00

Maxy

Roar Rookie


Bagshaw is Sturt royalty .Obviously Davies.My main memorys are the Michael Graham Peter Motley John Panyter days .But can remember bits of Bagshaw/Davies types

2023-04-07T19:48:29+00:00

Roger of Sydney

Roar Rookie


Moved to Sydney before foxtel so one Crows game on TV a year. Swans were like Bronco's back then, never gave up until the last second so easy choice. Swans v Sturt still go Sturt thought, more of a Paul Bagshaw man.

2023-04-07T18:35:16+00:00

Maxy

Roar Rookie


Jumbo Prince fan huh.Man from Unley moves to Sydney and swears allegiance to the Swans!!Pre crows days I take it

2023-04-07T11:07:43+00:00

Don Freo

Roar Rookie


Sounds like a playground taunt.

2023-04-07T06:55:57+00:00

Don Freo

Roar Rookie


That's weird. Stalker?

2023-04-07T06:42:50+00:00

Yattuzzi

Roar Rookie


The problem is Cats and Hawks at the Gee is always a 50/50 no matter ladder position.

2023-04-07T06:35:21+00:00

Greg

Roar Rookie


Firstly, I would like to admit to a Collingwood bias. It's a birth defect. Brisbane was outstanding, and they denied Collingwood time and space all over the ground. Rayner set the tone early with his high mark and strong running goal. Daniher decided to be part of the team at last for them, regardless of what the Coach said later. His attitude to his peers has been on display to his detriment. With such a positive inclusion, he bought in other players, and as so often happens in good teams, others were able to reap the rewards. Very good teams, such as the triple premiership Brisbane team, have a greater percentage of dominating players within them than other teams. Brisbane is not there yet, but time will tell if they can perform at a consistently high level. I thought Brayden Maynard was outstanding. He played hard as always, and he was a leader and an inspiration. Ash Johnson gave it his all, and he has class. Mihocek has an indomitable spirit to compete. The old skipper was as always. I know it’s sacrilege; however, the Daicos brothers didn’t impress me, especially during that period of ten unanswered goals, regardless of their statistics. I thought Nick let the pressure and aggression from the likes of Zorko get to him. He’s young, we know, and he’s a high-quality talent, so he is more likely to learn from examining his game. Significantly, I think that the flag wasn’t flown in support of him. The other players had their hands full, but this must not be allowed in the future. The ghost of Murray Weideman must have rotated at the lack of protection provided in the game. In response to the article with the editor prior to the game, I suggested that Ash Johnson and young Reef McInnes share the rucking duties off the bench and have Markov or young Steene. I was pleased with Markov’s input. But not the way the hole caused by the lack of a specialist ruckman was covered. It caused the team structure to be deconstructed. I don’t particularly like the use of the word structure in football, but it is applicable when you see what happens to the rest of the team. I haven’t found criticism of what the coaching panel has done since they took over; however, I think their tactics and strategy were mistaken and resulted in the deconstruction of the team. Whether it was Johnson and McInnes or any other combination of those in fixed structural positions should only have been used when there was a lack of an alternate for a short period. A selfless effort may have exhausted those players used, but the service may have proved to be invaluable. I feel it should have been approached with the intention of creating a straw man ruckman competing with the intention of the midfield rucking to the opposition. Other sides will look at the tactics and plan their assault on our side. Whether it’s Brisbane or any other team, the method used didn’t work, and they need to readjust their, dare I say it, structure.

2023-04-07T06:20:42+00:00

whale

Roar Rookie


Just a bit of fun, Don. Sheesh. Had a browse of your history. Now I understand that you have too much time on your hands! Lighten up.

2023-04-07T06:05:45+00:00

Naughty's Headband

Roar Rookie


I thought Collingwood looked totally exposed at tines last night; the back flankers push up to the ball at centre bounces and if they lose possession there’s opposition players everywhere in the forward line. If you get the ball free of their corridor pack, again, players everywhere. Theirs is a game plan built on dominating possession; they lose the ball and players are lining up to kick a goal. This plan wont work against the good teams; for example, Melbournes centre bounce dominance could see them to put Collingwood away in a quarter, just like how Brisbane did last night. Forget about skills and missed shots, there was a lot more going on last night.

2023-04-07T06:05:19+00:00

Peter the Scribe

Roar Guru


We ran you close up there last year Dingo but you had us covered last night . Maybe the Lions need to make a GF and lose one before you win one?

2023-04-07T05:55:39+00:00

Boo

Roar Rookie


Yattz we are outsiders for sure .If we don't bounce back in a big way against Hawthorn the era may be over prompting a reset .Bit disappointed Scott didn't drop a few more players Close and Stengel need a run in the twos to regain confidence .

2023-04-07T05:44:22+00:00

Don Freo

Roar Rookie


Sad man whale. Add you to the Richmond 6?

2023-04-07T05:29:35+00:00

Yattuzzi

Roar Rookie


Are the Cats an outsider now?

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar