UK View: 'Cricket equivalent of parking the bus' - Poms hail 'death or glory' gamble, condemn 'un-Australian' tourists

By The Roar / Editor

England’s media hailed their cricket team’s aggression on an “astonishing” opening day of the Ashes series while reacting with surprise to perceived negative tactics from Pat Cummins’ Australians.

The five match battle got underway in thrilling fashion with England powering to 393-8 before a declaration caught everyone by surprise – with Joe Root batting beautifully on 118.

“A declaration, with Joe Root still at the crease? Count it as the most astonishing moment of an unforgettably fearless opening day of England’s Bazball era,” wrote Oliver Brown in the UK Telegrapgh.

“When you style yourselves as the great daredevil entertainers, you can either conjure cricket of the gods or fall flat on your face. Such is the crude binary for England, a team fast proving that they are oblivious to any middle ground between triumph and calamity.

“Theirs is an ethos founded, fundamentally, on death or glory. And on an auspicious, sun-drenched day here at Edgbaston, Ben Stokes’s players proved beyond the faintest vestige of doubt that they intend to make this a glorious summer.”

Brown said England’s decision to declare “mere moments after Root reached his century took audacity to previously unheard-of levels, standing as testament to their refusal to die wondering.

“All around Edgbaston, acclaim for the decision mingled with palpable incredulity.

“This was the moment when England’s reinvention under Brendon McCullum could have collided headlong with unpleasant reality. It was the moment when, freighted by the expectation of a nation, their heedlessness to risk could have been shown to be less courageous than plain foolish. And yet, true to the insatiable, buccaneering spirit they have displayed over these past 12 months, they ran towards the danger, staring down Australia’s quicks and the enigmatic variations of Nathan Lyon to produce a first day as stirring as any in Ashes history.”

Nick Hoult, also writing in the Telegraph, raved: “What a first day. Ashes cricket has run for 140 years but a series cannot have had a start as exhilarating as this before.

“It was like lift off at Cape Canaveral, the Ashes rocket firing into the stars in a cloud of fire and smoke. Joe Root’s hundred, his first for eight years against Australia, was greeted with a full throated Edgbaston roar but the crowd fell into a stunned silence when moments later Ben Stokes declared.”

The tone was set when Zak Crawley hit the first ball of the series for four, and Australia surprised by opting for negative field placings from the start, that may have played into the hosts’ hands.

“Australia’s ground fielding was ragged, they dropped two catches and failed to review a feather behind from Crawley. It is ominous that even in these conditions, and with such defensive fields, they created so many openings,”warned Hoult.

Barney Ronay, in the Guardian, was gushing in praise for Root.

“Root got to 50 off 74 balls to his hundred off 145 as the sun began to dip a little above the floodlights, and just before England’s declaration (er, what?) at 393 for 8. He has more than 1,200 runs now in the Stokes era, at an average of 70, with five hundreds. This is an all time talent, blooming again just as Test cricket reaches its own watershed moment,” Ronay wrote.

England’s Joe Root celebrates reaching his century. (Photo by Mike Egerton/PA Images via Getty Images)

“For all the strange, jittery psychic energy of England’s cricket, the warmth, the man-feelings, Root’s post-captaincy bloom has been one of its simpler, happier storylines.”

David Lloyd, in the Daily Mail, commented on the brazen declaration.

“To go and declare on the first day of an Ashes Test match is unprecedented! The sheer effrontery of it by Ben Stokes.

“But are we at all surprised? It’s nothing new. The extraordinary thing is that he’s got Joe Root in unbeaten on 118 so it is a huge call. This England side is turning Test cricket on its head!”

The BBC’s Stephan Shemilt summed up the general reactions around Stokes’ declaration decision.

“England piling up 393-8 at more than five runs an over was made all the more compelling by Australia’s attempts to contain them, but that was nothing compared to Ben Stokes’ jaw-dropping declaration half an hour before the close,” he wrote.

“The deep point fielder posted on the boundary for the very first ball of the day was a sign of things to come. Rarely less than three men back, often four or five. If Cummins could have done, he would have had a boundary-rider in Balsall Heath and a sweeper in Sparkhill.

“On the one hand, it was un-Australian. Not fighting fire with fire, but trying to avoid it by diligently completing a risk assessment. On the other, pragmatism can be seen as a sign of strength, having enough confidence in your team to adapt to the situation.

Pat Cummins of Australia speaks to his players during the opening day of the Ashes series. (Photo by Ryan Pierse/Getty Images)

“It did mean Travis Head and Nathan Lyon were chosen to spend pretty much all day on the fence, closer to the rowdy England fans than their own team-mates.

Head got serenaded for dropping an admittedly tough chance off Harry Brook, Lyon the subject of a rude comparison with Moeen Ali from the Hollies Stand.

“Both will go to sleep with Edgbaston ringing in their ears.

“Was it successful? As ever, these things only reveal themselves in the fullness of time.

“However, the facts are this. England took 54 singles in the first session, the most ever recorded in the history of Test cricket. Australia didn’t manage a maiden until the 37th over of the day and bowled only one more.”

Oliver Holt, in the Daily Mail, shaped his thoughts around the Crawley boundary that launched an intriguing series.

“Stokes had insisted throughout the build-up to this match that England would not compromise their new approach just because this was the Ashes and this was Australia. Here, now, in one shot, was the proof of it,” wrote Holt.

“It would be nice to think it will set the tone for the rest of the series. It certainly set the tone for the day. Initially, that meant intimidating Australia into uncharacteristically defensive field placings. The third slip disappeared midway through the second over and never returned. And the presence of a deep extra cover for Crawley and Ben Duckett said a lot about the contrasting approaches of the two teams.

(Photo by Ryan Pierse/Getty Images)

“Australia put four men on the boundary, sweepers on the onside and the offside. It was the cricket equivalent of parking the bus.

“Many expressed disappointment and surprise that Australia had reacted so negatively. In the commentary box, former England ODI skipper Eoin Morgan said Australia had blinked first. Crawley’s first-ball boundary and all the intent it signalled seemed to have spooked Cummins and his side.

“There were times during the day, of course, when momentum swung and Australia seemed to be getting the upper hand. Losing Harry Brook and Stokes in quick succession in the session after lunch was one of those spells. But England never lost their intent. They did not lose their ambition or their desire to entertain and attack.

Former England captain Nasser Hussain, also in the Daily Mail, said fans should strap in for a wild ride.

“At the start of this Ashes series everyone was looking to see how Australia would react to England’s style of cricket: whether they would actually say ‘you can’t do that against us,’ set normal fields and wish them the best of luck,” he wrote.

“In fact, by posting a deep point as early as the first over it looked like they were admitting ‘we know you can do that against us, and we are going to have to set the field accordingly.’

“They were reacting before anything had happened in effect and it was a surprise in some ways to see Australia blink first.

“The opening day has shown us what this summer has in store for us – there will be times when we will think that this Australian side is too good and England can’t play Bazball against them and others when they prove they can do it no matter the opponents.

“This Ashes will go one way and the other, and very rarely can you say such a thing with confidence.”

The Crowd Says:

2023-06-19T03:24:34+00:00

Pop

Roar Rookie


Thanks for reminding me. I can’t see an opposing captain agreeing to it. Definition Technically speaking, an underarm delivery is one in which the bowler's hand does not rise above the level of the waist. The Laws of Cricket now (2000 Code) declare that an underarm delivery is illegal unless otherwise agreed before the match.[4] A delivery is a no-ball if it bounces more than twice before passing the popping crease: an underarm delivery cannot be performed rolling along the ground. A pitched underarm delivery is a good ball, providing it only pitches once, and providing the opposing captain has agreed beforehand that the style may be used. It is unlikely that any bowler would reintroduce the style, given modern pitch conditions.

2023-06-19T03:04:07+00:00

Censored Often

Roar Rookie


Couldn't possibly, it's no longer a legal delivery.

2023-06-19T03:03:14+00:00

Censored Often

Roar Rookie


Saffa didn't trouble anyone but the other bloke did ok.....

2023-06-18T12:03:02+00:00

Pickett

Roar Rookie


Stokes is an intimidating, larger than life figure like Botham or Wally Lewis. England should thank their Kiwi captain and coach. :happy:

2023-06-18T11:56:31+00:00

Pickett

Roar Rookie


I reckon Bazball is great for test cricket. Although the concept has been around for a while - in modern times, you could’ve called it Chappellball, Lloydball, Taylorball and Pontingball(to some extent). Most certainly Waughball was the zenith. Still, the field placements have been totally original. Great to see. This is going to be a great series.

2023-06-18T04:10:00+00:00

HR

Roar Rookie


If they were able to do so, it would be a legitimate tactic in view of the schedule, the opposition bowling stocks and the fact that they're the current holders of the Ashes. Testing the fitness and resilience of the 40-year-old Anderson and the 36-year-old Broad and the questionably-fit Stokes by having them bowl for three days, perhaps in the hope that Stokes tries to take the whole game on his own shoulders and breaks down as a result. This England team without their talisman and their senior bowlers would be a much-reduced force.

2023-06-18T04:03:37+00:00

HR

Roar Rookie


Ah, you haven't heard of the accent rule it seems :happy:

2023-06-17T13:20:47+00:00

ojp44

Roar Rookie


Don’t want to put the mockers oh well... I'm sure it wasnt you GfBS

2023-06-17T10:44:29+00:00

Nine out of ten

Roar Rookie


Very drôle...

2023-06-17T10:43:44+00:00

Nine out of ten

Roar Rookie


How many of those 700 runs will Warner & Labushagne, the South African number three, contribute?

2023-06-17T10:21:03+00:00

Jeff

Roar Rookie


I thought Aus was well off their best yesterday (skills execution and tactically) - yet had England 5 for less than 200. So to come out of day 1 of the series chasing less than 400 on the first innings is positive sign for me re the rest of the series :thumbup:

2023-06-17T10:15:23+00:00

Just Nuisance

Roar Rookie


Agreed Jeff! But hey its early days . Australia still have to produce. England have the runs on the board .. Just to make this series a bit interesting for myself I've pinned my colours to Aussies mast . Better not dissapoint me . I've so often predicted that Aus will dominate this series here on The Roar as well as exposing Bazball as nothing more than a fad that I'm going to look rather silly if England persevere . But its certainly elevated a very tedious Test set up globally and that's so needed for all of us . Afraid the Test Championship didn't do it for me . Series like this the real deal . Suspect we still gonna chat plenty next few weeks . :cricket:

2023-06-17T10:06:22+00:00

Doctor Rotcod

Roar Rookie


Wasn't the first time a team has 400 in a day, won't be the last.

2023-06-17T09:53:58+00:00

Jeff

Roar Rookie


For Cummins, probably "geez why" for about 45 seconds, then "thanks we'll take it" for the rest of the Test. Which about sums up the pointlessness of Stokes' approach. It provided a sugar hit of "boldness" for a moment which ultimately is completely irrelevant in actually winning the game, then once that had worn off, what had they actually achieved other than scoring less runs than they could have with plenty of time left in the match?

2023-06-17T09:39:54+00:00

Just Nuisance

Roar Rookie


Let's look at this another way. When England declared what do you think went through Pat Cummins mind and the rest of the Australian team ? I'm guessing something like ...Jeez why ? Or possibly ..Thanks we will take it !

2023-06-17T09:09:14+00:00

Doctor Rotcod

Roar Rookie


At Edgbaston in 2001, Trescothick hits 90, England get to 427 for the day. At Edgbaston in 2005, England get 407 for the day. At Edgbaston in 2023, England and Australia get 407 for the day. This is unheard of? Check your Wisdens, boys and girls.

2023-06-17T08:05:30+00:00

Ben Pobjie

Expert


Everything is relative. Set more attacking fields, might’ve bowled them out for 200, might’ve finished the day 4-500.

2023-06-17T07:50:53+00:00

Jeff

Roar Rookie


Yeah, but sneaking wickets late on the day prior to stumps is old thinking. If they thought they could get 1 or 2 wickets late day 1, follows they could achieve the same any time on day 2. Does Stokes think he doesn't need runs in England's 2nd innings? Otherwise why leave the runs out on the field in their 1st innings? The declaration mostly reeks of "look at me and how clever I am at surprising you" by Stokes. Once that (rather pointless) statement has been made, then what? Score enough runs to then take 20 wickets is still a fundamental of the game. Stokes demonstrated a failure of understanding cricket 101 on day 1 of the series. Will be delicious if Aus wins the Test by 1 or 2 wickets late on day 4.

2023-06-17T07:47:33+00:00

Cam

Roar Rookie


8 wickets on day one is always a pass mark, giving up 393 runs at 5 an over and allowing the Poms to set a test record of 54 singles in the first session isn't great darts though. We have always been the team to play aggressive cricket and dictate terms, but that wasn't the case during day one. There is plenty of cricket to be played and Cummin's captaincy may yet prove to be genius.

2023-06-17T07:30:02+00:00

Cam

Roar Rookie


Yep Boland moved a few balls and my gut feeling is the English bowling attack might prove it isn't a "complete road". It's a good chance now for Smith/Marnus/Warner to make a statement.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar