The Wrap: Contrasting semi-finals set the scene for an epic Super Rugby Final

By Geoff Parkes / Expert

It’s hard to imagine two more contrasting semi-finals; one a gob-smacking, Blues-spanking no-contest, the other a tense arm-wrestle only decided in the final few minutes.

What we’re left with are the competition’s two best sides; the Chiefs with the advantage of hosting, the Crusaders with the advantage of, well… being the Crusaders.

In all of their 29 consecutive home play-off wins, it’s hard to remember one containing a first half of such brutal and clinical efficiency. As off as the Blues were, they were simply never given a chance.

With an injury list that would have cruelled any other franchise, the Crusaders were, in many tipsters’ eyes, deemed a risk. But so strong is their system, so well prepared their squad, the only risk was to the scoreboard attendant, from slipping a disc in his back, having to rapidly change the numbers.

At 32-3 by half-time, the match was decided long before Leicester Fainga’anuku took centre-stage from a planned lineout move; what Sky NZ commentator Karl Te Nana colourfully described as “gashing them”.

If Fainga’anuku wasn’t in Ian Foster’s All Black squad before his spectacular try – and given his announced departure to Toulon there were people happy for him to be overlooked – he most certainly was now.

As ever, it all started up front, the Crusaders’ pack hunting as a unit, the accuracy and speed of their cleanout and recycle too much for the Blues to deal with. And with the front foot conceded to Richie Mo’unga, both the mercurial flyhalf and Braydon Ennor took full advantage.

If anything, the Crusaders’ intensity was even higher in defence. The Blues were never allowed to settle and, always finding themselves half a step behind, dangerous players like Mark Telea were always working in heavy traffic.

The overwhelming sense was one of cohesion; testament to a carefully built and maintained system, that allows for new players to be introduced already having complete clarity around their role, and the discipline and skill base to perform it.

There was a lot to like also about the Crusaders’ hard-edged mentality; at 49-8 up in the 78th minute, electing to kick a penalty goal. In terms of the result of the match, the three points were meaningless, but tipping the scoreboard over 50, to live in perpetuity, to be referred to in the future by players and fans, was entirely meaningful.

What’s interesting about the Blues is that, in their quarter-final win against the Waratahs, it was difficult to gauge how well they had played, or how much of the result was down to their opposition’s failings.

This week, it was difficult to gauge how poorly they played, or how much of the result was down to the excellence of the Crusaders.

(Photo by Joe Allison/Getty Images)

What we do know is that if any side – no matter how many Test caps among them – takes the field against the Crusaders in a home final even just a tiny bit off the pace, lacking the smallest amount of aggression, conceding anything at all in the collision or breakdown, then they will be wiped. Gashed, even.

The Blues paid for their lack of abrasion at the All Blacks’ selection table; Akira Ioane and Hoskins Sotutu at least, with Finlay Christie and Beauden Barrett arguably lucky not to join them on the outer.

By contrast, Ennor was rewarded, along with Dallas McLeod; notionally the only bolter in the squad, but who appeals as a skilled player with a low error rate. With fullback already well covered by Will Jordan, Damian McKenzie and Barrett as back-up, McLeod nabbed the spot most thought belonged to Shaun Stevenson, because his utility (wing/centres) suits this squad more than Stevenson’s (wing/fullback).

The second semi-final was framed firstly by the Hamilton rain, then by the defensive excellence of both sides. At least this was a match where both sides turned up to play, albeit the traditional ‘softening-up’ period seemed to drag on forever, with both sides looking to play for field position, wary of making errors in their own half.

What this represented was two defences being afforded the utmost respect by their opposition and, when put to the test, the defences delivering. With both teams repeatedly sending runners down the 10-12 channel, only to be blocked, time after time, this always felt like a one-score game.

Just before half-time, the Chiefs felt they had that score in their grasp, camped on the Brumbies’ try-line, but a combination of bad luck, terrific defence and a loss of composure around their decision making, conspired against them.

Surely the Chiefs had watched the end of the Brumbies’ quarter-final against the Hurricanes the week before? No matter Samisoni Taukei’aho, like Ardie Savea last week, believing he had scored, trying to dot the point of the ball down on a post-it-note, in a mass of bodies, is a flawed strategy.

Incredibly, the Chiefs were gifted another opportunity when Tom Wright somehow failed to drop-kick the ball out, but when the Brumbies held firm again, they took a truck-load of self-belief into half-time, only 6-3 down.

Wright’s faux pas offered up a whole raft of talking points. For a start, having been critical of Wright’s one-on-one defensive positioning and execution in recent weeks, it’s important to note that Test selectors and coaches typically take a longer-term view than fans. They know what players are capable of. What is coachable and what isn’t.

A bad mistake or two, or an unhappy match is usually just that, not a trigger for Eddie Jones to yo-yo a player like Wright in and out of the selection frame.

That said, this was a poor piece of rugby. Even with the siren having sounded, Wright was not permitted to drop kick the ball out on the full from the goal-line, to end play. This would have seen the Chiefs offered the choice of a 5m scrum or 5m lineout.

But with the dropout only required to travel five metres, Wright should have been able to wander over towards the sideline, blast the ball into touch on the bounce, and head for the sheds.

As it was, the world’s longest arm-wrestle continued until the 72nd minute, when a superb 50m penalty from McKenzie saw the Brumbies needing to score a converted try to win.

Noah Lolesio kicking out on the full however, let the Chiefs straight back in, and when McKenzie crafted a rare line break, and stayed in support, the surge to the line for Brodie Retallick to score was too much for the Brumbies to handle.

(Photo by Hannah Peters/Getty Images)

The 19-6 score-line was neither here nor there. The Brumbies had given plenty, but with the Chiefs neutralising their 5m lineout maul, they had come up just a tiny bit short; not unlike the Reds the week before.

That, of course, is finals football, where small errors carry a greater cost than they do in the regular season, and where a 78-minute effort, no matter how honourable, is not enough.

It’s also a fair reflection of home ground advantage, proven over the years in Super Rugby finals to be an overwhelming success indicator, and in this case, a rueful reminder of the Round 13 match the Brumbies dropped in Perth.

One silver lining is that with all Australian sides now out of business, Jones gets to welcome more players into the Wallabies’ Gold Coast camp, sooner. No word yet on when the current group will be trimmed down via a formal Wallabies squad announcement, but with the Rugby Championship looming, and Jones and his players still relatively unfamiliar with each other, the extra week will be useful.

So, to next week’s final, and what looks like a genuine, high quality, 50/50, ‘too hard to call’ kind of match. The Crusaders, no matter their missing men, have form and momentum on their side. Proven winners, they’ll be desperate to send Razor Robinson off with another title.

The Chiefs boast a miserly defence, the best four-man attacking threat from the back in the competition, and are no slouches up front either, with Brodie Retallick warming into his work over the last fortnight. They also have home ground advantage.

Those without a dog in the fight can relax and look forward to what should be an epic Final. Supporters of either side, meanwhile, face a nervous week ahead.

Others, like World Cup-winning coach Steve Hansen, can get on with watching the NRL.

Sports opinion delivered daily 

   

The Crowd Says:

2023-06-20T14:19:48+00:00

Rugby Tragic

Roar Rookie


Good post Ken, thank you. Enjoy the final, it should be a beaut.

2023-06-20T13:07:04+00:00

Ankle-tapped Waterboy

Roar Rookie


IIRC it was almost exactly a century ago that the North Otago locality of Cartigi likewise had its name revised from the local accent to fit the North Island form.

2023-06-20T09:03:25+00:00

Muzzo

Roar Rookie


Yep agree Colvin, & Phar Lap, was born at Washdyke!! Where the racecourse is in Timaru. Actually our friend Jeff hasn't answered another question I put to him, about how the name ' Otago' originated. Many still don't know that Lol :laughing: :laughing: :laughing:

2023-06-20T07:42:12+00:00

Colvin Brown

Roar Guru


And for the record Muzzo, just so there is no mistake, Otago's Palmerston had the first claim to the name, its surveying dates from 1862, whereas Palmerston North did not receive its name until 1871. We don't want to get into another never-ending debate like when Aussie claimed they invented Pavlova when we did. Or that Phar Lap was born somewhere other than in NZ.

2023-06-20T05:27:06+00:00

Muzzo

Roar Rookie


Yep at the start of the ' Pig Route' up into Central, but then we have Palmerston North, in the Manawatu.

2023-06-20T05:19:17+00:00

Muzzo

Roar Rookie


Hopefully things will change under Ellis, Otago!

2023-06-20T05:07:01+00:00

Jeff

Roar Rookie


The Blues definitely prove it. Spent money taking props from other franchises and then bucket loads of money on BB and RTS. Where has it got them,

2023-06-20T04:10:30+00:00

The World in Union

Roar Rookie


Simon, my view is the opposite of yours and I really don't want to get into a lengthy debate because this is why I limit my comments on the Roar - it's like groundhog day, going round and round and not reaching agreement, so we just have to agree to disagree. I am happy with RA's direction. Australia in isolation is a poor rugby nation. The only way to uplift ourselves is by leveraging off rugby's international strengths and especially our Kiwi neighbours who have international brand appeal. Ultimately I'm hoping that international club rugby gets its act together so that top tier rugby players can earn 10x what league players can earn. We will always struggle to compete with the money in Europe and Japan but if international club rugby can take itself to another level then the whole rugby world including Australia will benefit from that albeit not in the way that some people may want.

2023-06-20T03:15:38+00:00

Ankle-tapped Waterboy

Roar Rookie


Palmerston is just north of Dunedin.

AUTHOR

2023-06-20T02:59:24+00:00

Geoff Parkes

Expert


I think the Boks, Frogs and Micks would have something to say about that, mate...

2023-06-20T02:48:41+00:00

Colvin Brown

Roar Guru


Moaman, if you're born in Otago or Southland and you're a rugby man (or have other notable achievements, cricket etc.) you will be defined as a Great Southern Man from the Deep South. It's that's important. Of course, we have extended qualification for the title to suit our purpose, for example, those who come south for education or work can qualify. Oh, it's not in our DNA to eat humble pie, moaman.

2023-06-20T02:31:52+00:00

Simon_Sez

Roar Guru


TWIN, ok, so you think it won’t work as there will be no support from corporations? Is that right? Why do you think that as it’s not too late yet? So what’s your idea, keep things as they are? It’s time to act and not let international rugby competitions get away from us like they have with soccer? It’ll be like I should have bought that house yesterday, now the market has jumped in value and I can’t afford to buy. Rugby in Australia has to get into the market .

2023-06-20T02:09:11+00:00

Colvin Brown

Roar Guru


And it seems Muzzo and Jeff were both right, except Richie was born in Otago Jeff (Oamaru), and that makes him a great Southern Man.

2023-06-20T02:08:56+00:00

The World in Union

Roar Rookie


Sorry mate, can't see it happening. Japan is not a good example. I think in Japan it started the other way around. The comp started based on corporations competing with each other. I don't think the corporations viewed it as a way to get value due to increased market power. Japanese rugby is changing now but ironically the corporate influence in diminishing. In Australia, Westpac wouldn't get any extra value by having a team called Westpac Western Harbour so why would Westpac choose to be a sponsor? More importantly, and I suspect you'll beg to differ, a local broadcasting deal would be worth very little because broad market appeal just isn't there for rugby in Australia. Perhaps your proposal could have succeeded in 1995 when professional rugby was an exciting concept (and League and AFL hadn't saturated the market), but that ship has sailed. That's not to say rugby can't claw its way back but it would take many years and the corporates are not going to enable it to happen, rather they will jump in when rugby offers market value by being popular enough.

2023-06-20T01:54:19+00:00

Jacko

Roar Rookie


So how much do the crusaders spend compared to the highlanders?

2023-06-20T01:38:41+00:00

Simon_Sez

Roar Guru


TWIN, the question is could one get Australian corporations to back domestic club rugby, like they have in for example in Japan? Hino this Toyota that etc. Wouldn’t the proposal to the corporation would look like this: you get to put your name on the club, e.g. “Santos GPS” in QLD or “Westpac Western Harbour” - Sydney to lift your name awareness, the player salaries are tax deductible, and you get a share of the broadcasting money. How much broadcasting income will be generated? A lot more than $40m than is being received by RA for participating in SRP. If it were me I would have the RA’s marketing team market the proposal, acting as agent, to the corporations, get the clubs who want to participate together, and negotiate the broadcast deal. As agent RA would then be entitled to a share, say 10% of income, as an annual fee. There are at least 200 corporations on the ASX, plus another 1,000 if you wanted to expand you could start with in a marketing program. That’s how I see the deal being put together. All the resources are already in place, it’s just a matter of having a business plan and to bring it all together. It’s a much better proposition than SRP is for Australian rugby.

2023-06-20T01:37:11+00:00

Colvin Brown

Roar Guru


After reading Jeff's comments Geoff I checked that the Abolition of the Provinces Act came into force in NZ on 1 November 1876 and that since then Otago has been defined as a Region not a province. They never told us, and until yesterday I considered Otago to be a province. But I can settle with Region because Otago Region sounds OK and it covers the same territory. I guess we always considered it a province because rugby kept that title, say if Waikato came and played Otago at Carisbrook it was known as a provincial match. Sounds better than a regional match. But I can update my thinking even if I'm 147 years late. To confirm though, Richie was born in Oamaru, and Oamaru is in Otago (Region)

2023-06-20T01:33:02+00:00

Jacko

Roar Rookie


Bilksem if an AFL player wants more money than he is being offered, where ford he go? If a aus or NZ rugby player wants more than he is offered he has many options. Also how do you differentiate between a Tongan, Samoan, Fijian, Aus or kiwi test player? How do you value each one for a cap?

2023-06-20T01:21:24+00:00

Colvin Brown

Roar Guru


Jeff, I agree with you on that one. North Otago was a separate rugby union, although it was talked about as "not quite" a real union although it was. All Black Phil Gard came from North Otago, not Otago. Yes, and that game I played was officially in the Almanack.

2023-06-20T00:57:55+00:00

Bliksem

Roar Rookie


Jacko, the lack of a salary cap is the most obvious disparity to point it. It should be obvious (surprisingly not to all) that it is unfair to expect a Manu Pacifica to compete with a squad that is paid millions less than the well-resourced teams. That is an obvious first step. I look at AFL as a successful competition. There is vertical mobility build intop the competition so that every team has their highs and lows. Every team has reached the finals in a 10-15 year window. Although West Coast won the competition in 2018, they are at the bottom of the log today rebuilding. It had no impact on membership as the members know that they can look forward to better times. In Superugby the also runs can hope for is an upset every year and maybe make the finals once in a decade but has no chance to win the competition. If we want a Superugby competition where (almost) every game matter, where supporters' loyalty gets rewarded then we need vertical mobility so that every team has a realistic chance to win the title within say a 10-year cycle. If that is what we want, we must tackle the systemic issues that undermines the competition.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar