Across the eras of rugby league: V'landys-ball, premiership thefts, field goals and the NRL’s all-time power rankings

By Redcap / Roar Guru

If you somehow travelled back in time to the probably smelly streets of Sydney in the early 1900s, you might happen across some of rugby league’s pioneers playing a game with its own style, but a game which still looked a lot like the one they fled, rugby union.

Rugby league evolved slowly after it arrived in Australia and, in some ways, reflected events at a societal level. It was established not long after federation, and both the ‘league game’ and ‘indissoluble’ Commonwealth lived tenuous lives at first.

Then World War II came along and, despite everything, both boomed, with league’s momentum hastening the first epochal divergence from union through limiting tackle counts in 1967, and then the second when it separated attack and defence by 10 metres during the 1993 season.

The Dolphins celebrate beating the Roosters in their first ever NRL game. (Photo by Chris Hyde/Getty Images)

So, there are a few distinct eras in rugby league history – at least four of them. Some folk will tell you comparisons between these eras should not be made, but such folk are mostly trying to avoid the strain of thinking about things.

Comparisons between eras can and should be made, with due care and attention, of course. How else are we to understand the history of the game and where we stand in it?

The past may not always have predictive value, but it is relevant experience and you never know when a little piece of history or even trivia might connect with something rattling around in your head and spur an insight.

How else could we recognise that a fifth era of rugby league in Australia might just have commenced?

The fifth era

Some have dubbed this fifth era of rugby league ‘V’landys-ball’, given it covers everything after May 2020 when the NRL Commission and its Chair Peter V’landys ratified rule changes, including removing one on-field referee and replacing many penalties with a six-again call.

Manly’s Brad Parker celebrates after scoring a try with teammates. (Photo by Mark Metcalfe/Getty Images)

V’landys himself expected the changes to “significantly reduce the number of stoppages in games and showcase more open unstructured play for the benefit of fans… address the issue of wrestling… speed up the ruck and create more free flowing rugby league”.

“No team is going to want to defend multiple sets of tackles without a stoppage in play. This is the greatest disincentive for what has become habitual ruck infringements.”

Four seasons in, even with the tweaks introduced since, ‘V’landys-ball’ can claim some successes. The ball is in play more, ruck-wrestling is no longer rife, and point-scoring has spiked significantly from 2019 levels.

But point-scoring is not yet at historic levels on a prorated basis, the game’s mini Machiavellis (coaches) have moved on to gaming the nexus between penalties and six-agains and many don’t seem to mind defending repeat sets near their own line.

The defining characteristic of this fifth era is something else. Consider the following chart showong the trend in points per game since 1908, along with two lines which indicate the average difference between the best teams and the rest of the field since 1937.

There are some important caveats. The sample is four seasons and 784 games from a total of 116 seasons and 14,417 games. Penrith’s defensive performance since 2020 is nearly off the charts, skews the sample a little and will surely regress toward something more typical, eventually.

The team lines are mere indicators; a reasonable expectation of what the best teams might do on any given day, before some combination of talent, team quality, fatigue, luck and randomness sweep games to their actual end point.

But still, the nascent trend is remarkable – there have been some fluctuations before, but nothing even remotely like the trend since 2020.

A reasonable expectation since is more frequent and intense blowouts. While there are some structural factors at play – teams at different points in their cycle and teams who struggle to attract high-end talent – nobody is immune. Look at the 2023 finals series. The Wests Tigers put 66 points on the Cowboys earlier this season. Penrith have even been touched-up, very occasionally.

Penrith’s defence is stopping opponents at record pace. (Photo by Brendon Thorne/Getty Images)

The biggest single-year spike in point-scoring during the 20th century was 1935 when Canterbury joined the league and boosted everybody’s points differential. In the fifth era, almost anybody can become 1935 Canterbury on any given day, and then play against 1935 Canterbury the following weekend.

Useless trivia

You never know when some useless and arcane trivia might come in handy, so here goes.

Field goals are back in vogue. After falling to a 24-year low (per game) in the COVID-affected 2020 season, one-pointers spiked in 2023 to a very meaningful total of 42, or 0.197 per game. While we may never revisit the golden age of the field goal (1968, 1.49 per game), the conditionally resurrected two-point field goal rule seems to be having an effect.

The league passed 90,000 total points in 2023, and the man who crossed the threshold was Brisbane’s Herbie Farnworth when he crossed the try-line during the Broncos’ preliminary final victory over the Warriors.

It was all happening in round 13 when Newcastle recorded their 400th win, which was also Manly’s 700th defeat. Not to be outshone, North Queensland recorded their 400th defeat the same weekend.

The Cowboys did record their 300th win in round 17 and, unless they forget their way to the try-line, will go past 15,000 points scored in 2024. Penrith will go past 25,000 unless they forget how to score points entirely.

After years of decline, St George Illawarra fell into the red for the first time in 20 years. They’re now 303-316-6 but do still have a positive points differential. On their current trajectory, that will be erased in early 2025.

Herbie Farnworth. (Photo by Bradley Kanaris/Getty Images)

Which brings us to the curious case of the Cronulla Sharks, the NRL’s ‘even-Stevens’. They both scored and conceded their 25,000th point in 2023 and are now 670-675-24. A bad season in 2024 could see them become pure even-Stevens. We can only hope.

Regardless, the 2023 season was always going to be interesting because of a new team. While the Dolphins’ precise provenance remains a mystery, they did achieve something of note, becoming just the fourth expansion club since 1908 to win on debut. Everybody knows about the Broncos in 1988, but do you know the other two expansion clubs who won their first premiership game?

There was something else about the Dolphins, though.

Unofficial business

If you read my article last year about the 22 unofficial champions of the NSWRL/ARL/NRL, you may have concluded that the concept is absurdly trivial, entirely meaningless and the product of a deranged imagination. I might contest one of those conclusions.

Whatever you think of the concept, the Dolphins became the 23rd unofficial champion after they beat the Warriors in round 27 and, like all bar one of the other unofficial champions, missed the finals. Nobody, with the obvious exception of Souths in 1908, had ever won anything, official or unofficial, in their first season, so kudos to the Dolphins.

The only unofficial champion who played finals football was the 2009 Parramatta Eels, who retained their title by way of the Melbourne Storm’s salary cap rort and subsequent punishments. The nefarious Storm were stripped of five official titles – three minor premierships and two major premierships – none of which have ever been officially filled.

The Melbourne Storm celebrating winning the NRL final inn 1999, with Steve Anderson as their assistant coach. Photo: NRL

Just like nature, the all-time power rankings abhor a vacuum, especially now that the shameless Storm have taken to celebrating premierships rightly stripped. Those titles should be awarded to somebody who deserves them, and they have been in the all-time rankings to follow.

Two of the minor premierships go to Manly (2007 and 2008), with the other awarded to Canterbury (2006). As for the major premierships, it seems rugby league’s unofficial gods have a sense of justice and purpose, because not only was there an unofficial champion in 2009, there was another in 2007: the Sydney Roosters.

The all-time NRL power rankings, 1908-2023

With the vacant titles unofficially filled, the time has come to decide who is the greatest team of all. For those unfamiliar with the all-time rankings, this is how it works.

The concept is borrowed from Spanish football, where the Madrid-based tabloid Marca lovingly maintains a table of every team’s performance in La Liga since 1929. Hence, all 34 teams to play in the NRL and its predecessor competitions are included.

The rankings are determined by four measures. The first is ‘actual results’, which is simply the proportion of available competition points won across a team’s history. If your team played ten games, won four, lost four and drew two, their actual results figure is 50%

The second is ‘potential results’. This is a form of points differential expressed as the proportion of results a team could conceivably have gained based on their attacking and defensive records. This is also where the aforementioned ‘due care and attention’ is rigorously applied, with team data separated and compared only within the eras in which they’ve played.

The Roosters hold aloft the 2019 NRL Premiership Trophy. (Mark Metcalfe/Getty Images)

The third is ‘dividend’, essentially titles won as a sort of return on investment. For the sake of simplicity, the total number of titles won by each team is listed rather than the dividend. As at the end of 2023, a total of 251 titles have been awarded. This is every premiership, minor premiership and City Cup since 1908.

Finally, every team has a ‘I-rating’. The ‘I’ stands for Immortal. Long story short, part of calculating potential results involves establishing a comparison group of seven hypothetical teams within each era, ranging from the ‘Invincibles’ through the ‘Medians’ to the ‘Untenables’.

Taking this a step further creates a hypothetical team called the ‘Immortals’. While it is impossible to know how the 13 actual Immortals would fare if they formed a team and played a few thousand games against all-comers over a century or so, the hypothetical Immortals are probably not far off their level. Every team’s I-rating is how they compare to the Immortals.

After all that number crunching, and despite having five titles stripped from them, Melbourne is still statistically the best team in rugby league history. At some point they’ll go into decline, right?

All-time NRL power rankings 1908-2023

Team Games Actual Results Potential results Titles I-rating
Immortals 2397 73.8 84.0 64 100.0
1 Melbourne 682 66.7 69.2 9 74.4
2 St George 1586 59.9 65.0 31 73.4
3 Easts 2397 55.3 60.5 38 70.7
4 Souths 2324 53.6 59.2 42 69.4
5 Manly 1708 57.5 62.2 19 69.2
6 Brisbane 903 60.2 63.8 10 68.3
7 Balmain 1766 53.1 57.9 20 63.4
8 Canterbury 1951 51.5 53.5 16 60.7
9 Canberra 1043 51.8 56.7 4 57.6
10 Glebe 354 56.4 58.3 2 57.3
11 Penrith 1359 47.1 55.2 10 57.0
12 Parramatta 1761 47.6 53.4 10 56.9
13 Cronulla 1369 49.8 55.3 3 56.3
14 Newtown 1364 46.9 52.8 11 54.6
15 Wests 1749 44.8 50.5 12 53.5
16 St George Illawarra 625 49.0 52.1 3 52.7
17 Newcastle Knights 875 47.8 52.5 2 52.0
18 Norths 1730 43.1 51.3 6 51.9
19 NZ Warriors 706 45.6 49.2 1 48.3
20 Newcastle Rebels 20 45.0 53.2 0 47.1
21 North Queensland 714 43.0 48.0 1 46.4
22 Illawarra 396 40.3 49.5 0 44.2
23 Wests Tigers 585 40.9 45.0 1 43.6
24 Northern Eagles 76 40.1 47.3 0 42.1
25 Hunter 18 38.9 48.3 0 41.8
26 Western Reds 61 40.2 45.6 0 41.2
27 Gold Coast Titans 410 39.4 44.2 0 41.2
28 Dolphins 24 37.5 40.7 0 37.5
29 Adelaide 42 32.1 38.9 0 34.1
30 Gold Coast-Tweed 246 23.4 29.3 0 25.6
31 University 283 22.1 25.8 0 23.4
32 South Queensland 65 20.8 26.0 0 22.5
33 Annandale 163 17.8 20.9 0 18.7
34 Cumberland 8 12.5 14.0 0 12.7

The Crowd Says:

AUTHOR

2024-01-12T03:34:44+00:00

Redcap

Roar Guru


I almost forgot, but just a few weeks back RL Digest revisited the Crushers, Chargers and Reds – interesting stuff: https://shows.acast.com/therugbyleaguedigest/episodes/the-super-league-war-chapter-39-crushed

2024-01-12T01:26:21+00:00

mushi

Roar Guru


Mine was that if you were bored and hungover you go to maccas in the city and see if you could tear the free crushers passes out of the courier mail. Sometimes it felt like you were luckier if someone else had beaten you to it.

AUTHOR

2024-01-11T05:58:15+00:00

Redcap

Roar Guru


As long as they're only given against Manly, I'm happy enough. :silly:

AUTHOR

2024-01-11T05:11:12+00:00

Redcap

Roar Guru


Easts had a few dominant peaks, 1911-13, mid-1930s and mid-1970s. The Tricolours of Dave Brown, Ray Stehr and Co. didn't lose a league game for almost three years (1935-38). Their peaks didn't last very long, but nor did their troughs.

2024-01-11T04:43:27+00:00

Forty Twenty

Roar Rookie


DCE got penalised for milking while in possession a few years back. I don't think I've seen one since or before. I don't get why refs bring out these ''rare as hens teeth'' rulings once every hundred years.

AUTHOR

2024-01-11T03:32:31+00:00

Redcap

Roar Guru


I think there are longer stoppages now, because of concussion protocols, the bunker checking more things, milking penalties, etc, etc, and the number may well have gone up since the early years of V-landys-ball when teams were deliberately giving away six-agains in the opponent's half, forcing the tweaks we've seen since. Can't say I have any data on that, though. Maybe Mike does...

2024-01-11T02:31:59+00:00

Forty Twenty

Roar Rookie


I'd be surprised if there were more stoppages now but it's only a guess. Even if its true , all stoppages aren't equal , not even close to being equal. Look at the tackles leading up to Cleary's GF game winning try. The Broncos were allowing quick play the balls in preference to giving away six more tackles. Before the rule changes they would have been slowing the play the balls down and giving away penalties because the penalty would halt momentum and allow the defence to regroup.

AUTHOR

2024-01-11T02:17:27+00:00

Redcap

Roar Guru


Yes, the '93 Seagulls. That would surely be the gold medallist for all-round on-field and off-field, disastrous, billowing toilet fire season of all. I still loved 'em, though.

2024-01-11T02:01:36+00:00

Tim Carter

Roar Pro


Knights 2015, Magpies 1999 (despite 3 wins), Seagulls 1993 were pretty awful too.

2024-01-11T01:40:00+00:00

matth

Roar Guru


Thanks for that explanation. Fair enough on the Cups being a % of opportunity. that’s a good solution. As for the weighting, well it’s your party! :laughing: :laughing: Maybe 50/50, but that’s a fair fence sitting cop out effort on my part :stoked:

AUTHOR

2024-01-11T01:35:08+00:00

Redcap

Roar Guru


But that means that teams who competed in the City Cup era get a double chance No, I was wary of that too, so participation in the City Cup counts as an 'opportunity'. For example, Souths have 42 titles from 131 opportunities; Easts have 38 from 133; the Dolphins have 0/1 (sorry, I'm not giving them their unofficial gong unless it's subsequently revealed that Penrith were up to no good). For the FPTP seasons, the minor premier is deemed to be the major premier, considering there was generally a playoff final in the seasons when two teams finished level at the top. I’m not certain that the formula should be skewed so heavily in favour of winning % compared to Dividends Yeah, quite possibly, though it's results % + points differential, and I am probably a bit biased toward the 'league table' rather than the championship. What do you think the weighting should be?

2024-01-11T01:18:11+00:00

matth

Roar Guru


But that means that teams who competed in the City Cup era get a double chance to increase their score compared to single premiership eras. I guess you also have the eras where the premiership was first past the post and there was no 'major premiership' as such. Tricky stuff. I'm not certain that the formula should be skewed so heavily in favour of winning % compared to Dividends, given that the Dividends is why teams compete in the first place?

AUTHOR

2024-01-11T01:14:34+00:00

Redcap

Roar Guru


Good questions! how much much weight is given to the Dividends? Not a lot. Actual results and PR/PD are weighted about .85 to .15 in the initial formula. There's also a longevity credit/concession applied after that to try and even out sample size. I changed the methodology this year because I've started doing this for the BRL/Q-Cup (probably a long way off submitting anything due to some large but manageable data gaps) - and basically, Natives were a problem. Are premierships, vs minor premierships vs City cups given different weightings? Is winning an 8 team comp given less weighting that a 16 team comp? No and No. I've certainly considered these issues, but ultimately decided that the different eras in the game's history, changes in competition composition and strength are better dealt with through the PR/PD measure. I would consider many minor premierships to be more significant achievements than many major premierships, and in some cases the opposite is probably true, plus the City Cup was for much of its history essentially a 'Clausura' (a second season) to the premiership (Apertura), and was arguably harder to win, especially in the 1920s. If we are including City Cup, then why not the Amco Cup et all mid week knockout competition from the 1970’s to 1980’s? The mid-week competitions commonly included teams from outside the premiership so they are excluded. Again, the City Cup was a bit more than a knockout cup tournament for much of its history.

2024-01-11T00:57:13+00:00

matth

Roar Guru


Question is, how much much weight is given to the Dividends? Are premierships, vs minor premierships vs City cups given different weightings? Is winning an 8 team comp given less weighting that a 16 team comp? If we are including City Cup, then why not the Amco Cup et all mid week knockout competition from the 1970's to 1980's?

2024-01-11T00:02:31+00:00

Nat

Roar Guru


Looking at those PR, it is impressive that the top 3/4 are inaugural clubs. You understand when Souths and Saints have their very dominant periods but Easts must have very consistent to maintain those numbers for 115yrs.

2024-01-10T23:49:19+00:00

Nat

Roar Guru


I think they would rather count time as ‘ball in play’ rather than the stoppages.

2024-01-10T23:38:10+00:00

andrew

Roar Rookie


Hey Redcap. My one indelible memory of the Crushers is Mario Fenech's falcon.

AUTHOR

2024-01-10T23:30:19+00:00

Redcap

Roar Guru


Thanks Arcturus. I would maintain that Melbourne are actually a joint venture of the Hunter Mariners and Western Reds, though I suppose they made a cleaner break than most.

AUTHOR

2024-01-10T23:28:42+00:00

Redcap

Roar Guru


I think the '96 Crushers are on the short list of the worst single-season teams in RL history, along with the 1909 Magpies, the '35 Berries and almost every Annandale season, though it's very hard to actually be worse than the 'Dales, or Cumberland.

AUTHOR

2024-01-10T23:24:58+00:00

Redcap

Roar Guru


You need to demonstrate experience of at least 864 first grade games to qualify. I reckon Albo might might veto the Royal Commission.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar