The dying art of digging in: Has T20 wrecked the technique and temperament of the modern Test batter?

By Charlie McCormack / Roar Rookie

As the end of another summer of cricket nears, the narrative surrounding the state of the Test match format has never been more alarming.

While the five-day game has long been regarded as the pinnacle of the sport, its status is clearly under threat, shown by the South African squad to face New Zealand for a two-Test assignment in February.

Black Caps’ openers Devon Conway and Tom Latham would have planned to face Kagiso Rabada and Marco Jansen steaming in with the new rock, but those Proteas stars will be replaced by a team of domestic trundlers after the Cricket South Africa ordered their international stars to miss the Tests for the SA20, the profitable South African domestic T20 competition.

The financial reality of organising Test cricket for nations outside of the ‘big three’ has already been evident, with two-Test series becoming the norm for countries that aren’t India, England or Australia.

Josh Hazlewood celebrating a wicket against the West Indies. (Photo by Paul Kane/Getty Images)

The South African situation laid the reality bare for all to see, prompting outrage from the cricket community to address the revenue sharing model from the ICC to ensure Test cricket can remain healthy.

With talks of a second window of IPL and the likes of Quinton de Kock, Trent Boult and Jason Holder opting out of national contracts to chase the financial lure of franchise cricket, situations like the South African one will surely continue to arise.

And with the next generation of young cricketers seeing where the game is heading, there’s no doubt this is having an impact on batting techniques and temperaments in modern Test cricket. As such, the art of ‘digging in’ and grinding down a bowling attack with rock solid defence, patience and sound shot selection is becoming harder to find in modern long-form batters.

Of the last seven Test matches played around the world, none reached the final day. This included South Africa v India in Cape Town, which saw 23 wickets fall on Day 1 and finish as the shortest Test in the history. We’ve also had the recently concluded match at Adelaide Oval, with Australia’s win over the West Indies the quickest completed Test at the famous venue.

The classic front foot defence, played with a good stride forward and a high elbow, is not on the top of the agenda for young batsmen who know they’re more likely to pick up a franchise contract if they can perfect their power hitting or ramping touch.

Quinton de Kock. (Photo by Steve Bell – ICC/ICC via Getty Images)

This means when batters are playing on juiced up wickets in the longest form, they are often ill-equipped to deal with difficult batting conditions and unable to absorb a period of pressure from the bowlers.

Of the current crop of batters on the international circuit, Cheteshwar Pujuara and Kraigg Brathwaite are two that come to mind as having the mental aptitude to carve out long innings in tough conditions despite their limitations as stroke makers.

Pujara showed himself as a hard man to dislodge in Australian conditions, dominating the 2018-19 series before producing a couple of gritty digs in Sydney and Brisbane in the 2020-21 series, with his bruising knock of 56 off 211 balls at the Gabba one of the bravest innings in recent memory.

Brathwaite is a curious case study. While not the same calibre as Pujara, the West Indian skipper has carved out a solid career at the top of the order through strong defence and application. Despite his limited array of strokes, Brathwaite has compiled 12 Test centuries and has averaged over 85 balls per dismissal since his debut in 2011.

For context, David Warner averaged 63 balls per dismissal, Justin Langer averaged 83 and Matthew Hayden 84, underlining Brathwaite’s stickability as a batter compared to some greats of the game.

Kraigg Brathwaite of the West Indies celebrates a century. (Photo by James Worsfold/Getty Images)

But with the way cricket is heading, players like Brathwaite and Pujara are likely the last of a dying breed of defensively minded red ball specialists. There will surely never be another international player who can match Brathwaite’s feat of having never played a T20 game at professional level.

The idiosyncratic nature of cricket means that lovers of the game can take joy in different things. Whether it’s a batman leaning into a peachy cover drive, or a bowler swinging a ball past the outside edge, there are certain features of the game which onlookers can enjoy.

And while it may not be as sexy or exciting as seeing a batter smash a 50-ball ton, watching someone apply themselves in tough conditions against a good attack and produce a gritty, disciplined innings is one aspect of the game I enjoy seeing.

With T20 dominating the calendar and the number of Test matches declining, particularly outside the big three, it will not be financially or logistically viable for players to be Test specialists.

And with less and less players committed to the red ball game, it means the art of digging could be a thing of the past as the shadow of franchise cricket looms larger than ever.

The Crowd Says:

AUTHOR

2024-02-02T22:42:24+00:00

Charlie McCormack

Roar Rookie


Thanks Dave, agree it was harsh to call Olivier a trundler, looking at his first-class record he's got 540 wickets at under 24 which is a very impressive career. Hopefully he can help lead the Proteas to a competitive showing in NZ.

2024-01-28T05:41:07+00:00

DaveJ

Roar Rookie


Nice article Charlie. One small point - Duanne Olivier isn’t just a domestic trundler. He’s taken 59 wickets @ 21 in 15 Tests, and averages about 23 in all first class, including a lot of county cricket. I’d pick him ahead of Ngidi for SA or Henry for NZ (Test average 37).

2024-01-25T13:31:23+00:00

Doctor Rotcod

Roar Rookie


When you have someone like Bancroft who has faced 22000 deliveries in first-class cricket being castigated for a slow strike rate, you can see that even though digging in is not entirely dead, it is not necessarily rewarded

2024-01-24T22:12:27+00:00

Timmuh

Roar Guru


It may not be T20, or at least T20 alone. Bat tech could play into this as well. Players have adopted techniques for getting the most power out of their bats with larger sweet spots. T20 has probably advanced what players know they can get away with, but to get the most out of the bat opening the stance a little and not getting pad right next to the bat allows a freer swing on attacking strokes. And as those attacking strokes have more room for error on modern bats, they are more common and the risk/reward changes from the days of tight defence first. Both technically and mentally. Without that tight defence, playing a long digging in style innings is much more difficult even if it is a learned habit. And the way junior cricket is set up in some countries, perhaps none more than Australia, with forced retirements and short games - even at the elite level (Victoria's premier colts system is set up to produced Stars and Renegades, not Bushrangers, so T20 definitely plays a role there). A sound defence, technique and mindset, doesn't advance a team like slogging over midwicket. Winners don't defend, and all too often don't get taught a defence when a parent-coach is looking to win.

2024-01-24T12:23:29+00:00

matth

Roar Guru


Bazball!

2024-01-24T01:30:01+00:00

BigGordon

Roar Rookie


I'm not sure batsmen these days have more gears, though it might appear that way because they certainly have way less inhibitions when it comes to shot selection. Khawaja's never really dominated an attack, like a Slater or Hayden could. In recent times, he's also had problems with his batting partners being out of touch, especially Warner and this season I think he's been distracted by other events. so isn't at his best. All of that has combined to slow his scoring rate, but as you say if the circumstances are right, he can certainly motor.

2024-01-24T01:23:04+00:00

All day Roseville all day

Roar Guru


de Villiers, du Plessis, Gayle, Amla...

2024-01-24T00:58:09+00:00

Opeo

Roar Rookie


“I think there are still quite a few guys in Tests who can dig in when circumstances demand it. Australia has Usman, Marnus, and Smith” Yeah, maybe the difference now is that players have more gears. Ussie digs in all the time. If a couple of early wickets fall he scores at a strike rate of about 25 and everyone on sites like this complains about him scoring so slowly. If Australia are in a less precarious position he scores reasonably quickly, he will even score an 10 an over if Australia are in a position of strength and time is an issue.

2024-01-23T22:51:33+00:00

BigGordon

Roar Rookie


I enjoyed your first article Chuck. It was a timely reminder that batting in red ball cricket is not only about scoring runs quickly. I think there are still quite a few guys in Tests who can dig in when circumstances demand it. Australia has Usman, Marnus and Smith, India has KL Rahul and Kohli while England has Joe Root and Ben Stokes. All have the temperament and technique to battle it out when required. The concerning thing is that selectors don't see a place for that type of batsmen, at least not t the moment. Renshaw & Bancroft are on the outer in Australia and any Pom who can't belt the ball miles is not going to get a look-in with the Bazball approach in England. Good batting lineups in Tests need balance. For every Greg or Ian Chappell, a team needs an Ian Redpath. Coaches, players and selectors need to understand that and work with batsmen so they have the skillset to bat long & slow(er) when required.

2024-01-23T21:58:06+00:00

kingplaymaker

Roar Guru


Interesting question: are tactics learned from T20 likely to be more effective than normal test strategy in some cases? You'd have to assume not, but it's not automatic. Of course it could mean that if most players are only able to play smash and bash cricket, the few who can play a longer game will allow their teams to win quite easily.

Read more at The Roar