Six questions to come from Round 14

By Jono Baruch / Roar Guru

The byes are now over, which means the second half of the year really clicks into gear.

With all of that, the questions, big or small, become more hotly debated. Two players proved that they were indeed worth the big bucks, a sleeping giant woke up and one team played at their very best for the first time this year. All the while the regular footy debates such as four umpires, noise of affirmation and the state of the game continued long into another week.

1. Where has that been?
What the Bombers did in the first half against West Coast was their best football since their game against Port Adelaide in Round 12 last year. They were all over West Coast from the very first minute.

While the Eagles were missing two very important players in Josh Kennedy and Jack Darling and their young and exciting kids couldn’t get going, it didn’t really matter, because for the first half of the game they hardly had the footy.

Where has that been, Essendon? On the road against the top-of-the-ladder side and the noise of affirmation and they produce their best performance of the year. Dyson Heppell, Brendon Goddard, Zach Merrett, Anthony McDonald-Tipungwuti, Cale Hooker, Michael Hurley were all outstanding.

With their big recruits all firing and their youngsters playing really exciting footy too, while Essendon face a mountain to climb to make the final eight, if they keep playing like that, this team could cause some havoc on the run home.

(Daniel Carson/AFL Media/Getty Images)

2. What is really wrong with the game?
Port Adelaide are living up to the hype their off-season free agent spree promised, with another win further pressing their top-four credentials. Despite not getting it done in prime time, Melbourne didn’t lower their colours either.

It was a low scoring game. It ebbed and flowed, and like the way modern footy is being played, it was a little bit congested and the pressure was enormous. The way that two top sides play the version of the game is exhilarating and is an exciting contest – just like Friday night was.

If you ask me what the biggest problems with the game is, it’s that it is over-coached, over-umpired and, because it is such a brutal competition in the highly pressurised and analysed, players are scared and confused to take the risk and kick long because they would rather stick to their team structure and stay in line.

(James Elsby/AFL Media/Getty Images)

3. Who is the biggest sleeping giant in the race to the finish?
That would be the Hawthorn Football Club. Sitting just outside on percentage and with an extremely favourable run home the Hawks are most definitely in the discussion for the final eight. While they accounted for Gold Coast relatively easily, it is bound to get even easier as the weeks roll on without facing a single team currently in the eight.

With Clarkson as coach and a potent on-ball brigade as they have, big things can start to happen down at Waverley as only this powerhouse of a club knows how.

(Quinn Rooney/Getty Images)

4. To card or not to card?
We all love the random idiosyncrasies in our game that make it great, but one of the biggest talking points that reared its ugly head again this week is that of having a send-off rule and red cards in the AFL.

In every football discipline there is a card system where players can be sent off at the umpire’s discretion for various misdemeanours and incidents. All except the AFL. It’s a fair question. How is Jeremy Cameron allowed to stay on the field and complete the game after what he did (intentionally or not) to Harris Andrews, who as a result of Cameron’s actions could not do so himself?

We want to grow the game and promote the game as a sport that all kids want to get involved in. While they would only be saved for extreme circumstances, do instances like this one call for the introduction of the cards?

(AAP Image/Julian Smith)

5. How many Roos could finish All Australian?
At the moment it is looking like a good handful. Ben Brown and Shaun Higgins are close to locks while there are plenty of others around them putting their hands up. Ben Cunnington is producing some amazing numbers this year. He has been good for a number of years but has done it more consistently this season producing big game after big game.

Another one like him to go to another level is Robbie Tarrant, someone who was in the conversation last year and unfortunately couldn’t finish off as strongly as he wanted too. It would have to be a mighty fine answer or player to deny any of those two this year. Jack Ziebell would be close as well. His new role this year as captain of that football club has helped make them more dynamic and as such are in the position they are in today.

[latest_videos_strip category=”afl” name=”AFL”]

6. Why do you pay to go to the footy?
The result of the game was a foregone conclusion probably a couple of weeks out. Carlton supporters wanted to see a response. Collingwood fans wanted to see them continue on their merry way and munch on their biggest rivals at one of their lowest points.

While the game might have proved an ugly and mostly one-sided affair, there are some players that are worth the price of admission alone. Charlie Curnow, Patrick Cripps, Scott Pendlebury, Jordan De Goey and Jaidyn Stephenson are exactly that. For most of the day Cripps and Pendlebury went head to head, and what a battle it was just by the way with both superstar captains making a massive imprint on the game, while the youngsters in Curnow and Stephenson lit it up.

Both fresh off contract extensions, both of them make things happen when they are near the ball and both of them more than justifying the hype that they bring. They are players who you would pay to go see play, particularly in September. Stephenson will be there this year and boy are we excited to see what he can do.

The Crowd Says:

2018-06-26T08:08:22+00:00

Raimond

Roar Guru


elicebmi

2018-06-26T03:08:59+00:00

AB

Guest


"Shiel should have gone harder at the ball".. that is one of the stupidist thing I have read on this site. What I think you meant was Cotchin should have gone harder at the ball and not the man.

2018-06-26T01:05:08+00:00

IAP

Guest


Shiel should have gone harder at the ball. Cotchin went hard, Shiel got hurt. Nothing in it, unless you're a pansy GWS pretender.

2018-06-25T13:26:03+00:00

shiftyxr

Guest


I don't trust umpire's to make the correct free kick call, let alone send a player off.

2018-06-25T09:08:58+00:00

Timmuh

Roar Guru


There is already far too much emphasis placed on the result and not the act itself. The thing is the send off is part of the rules of Australian Football, with a clause excepting the AFL from its own rule. It needs to be only blatant and violent. Cameron's act would not pass the send-off bar in my view. Very few at AFL would do so, but having it in place as an option would do no harm. Basically, at AFL level change Law20.2(f) to include the word "highly": an act of misconduct if the Umpire is of the opinion that the act constituting misconduct is highly serious in nature.

2018-06-25T06:41:54+00:00

Raimond

Roar Guru


"RMIT University" ROFL

2018-06-25T06:40:19+00:00

Raimond

Roar Guru


Twitter user @Mattys123 has a different view: I was sitting 5 rows from the front on that wing. Cotchin never looked at the ball. His eyes were on Shiel. He hits Shiels head. Shiel is out for rest of game. Yeah. They got that one wrong

2018-06-25T03:53:32+00:00

XI

Roar Guru


The League trusts juniors and local seniors to make that call so I don't see why the pros couldn't.

2018-06-25T02:17:24+00:00

Bretto

Guest


Pretty ugly, definitely not one-sided. Carlton were in it nearly until the end.

2018-06-25T01:09:01+00:00

Col from Brissie

Roar Guru


Dave, do you think they would have got the Cameron one wrong?

2018-06-25T01:07:42+00:00

Col from Brissie

Roar Guru


Exactly Liam. The NRL referees can refer to the 'bunker' for decisions on sending players off (it happened last night in the State of Origin) and it would be just as easy for the AFL to allow the umpires to refer any incident upstairs. The game does not have to stop and in the Cameron case the umpire just need to inform Cameron he is on report and the incident is being adjudged as to whether a send off is deserved. The game does not have to stop but once a decision has been made the player is sent off at the next stoppage.

2018-06-25T01:04:03+00:00

Dave

Guest


But the bloke upstairs gets it wrong too often so he can't really be trusted either.

2018-06-24T23:35:35+00:00

Liam

Guest


You've got the bloke upstairs that does the goal review adjudications, get him to review the footage and send someone off from the next stoppage. It's not so hard to work out, one shouldn't think.

2018-06-24T23:34:05+00:00

Liam

Guest


"While the game might have proved an ugly and mostly one-sided affair..." Dunno which match you were watching.

2018-06-24T23:15:31+00:00

Paul D

Roar Guru


I wouldn't have it like that - I'd have players getting reported as usual - and then, if the injured player fails a concussion test and fails to return to the field, then and only then is the reported player removed from the field. Edit: because no I don't

2018-06-24T23:08:39+00:00

Wayne

Roar Guru


Honest Question. Do we (the collective fans) trust the Umpires to make split second decisions to send players off?

2018-06-24T22:56:58+00:00

Paul D

Roar Guru


Cameron's assault was far worse than Cotchin's

2018-06-24T22:07:34+00:00

Cat

Roar Guru


Non-Victorians are judging individual incidents on geography all the time.
Fixed it for you.

2018-06-24T22:04:33+00:00

Peter the Scribe

Roar Guru


Stephenson is a freak talent for a first year player. Has the Rising Star sewn up one would think. Probably should have a spell before September, he will be dangerous on the hard fast spring grounds. Sam Murray must come back in too.

2018-06-24T22:01:19+00:00

IAP

Guest


Gawd, there was nothing in that

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar