Head has one foot in the Aussie Test team

By Ronan O'Connell / Expert

Travis Head looks to have one foot in the Australian Test team after yesterday playing his second impressive knock in a row in India, while Test incumbent Peter Handscomb continued his wretched form.

Handscomb made just eight against India A yesterday, while Head (68), Mitch Marsh (86no) and Michael Neser (44no) flourished to help guide Australia A to a solid total of 6-290 at stumps on day one.

Handscomb has now averaged just 18 from his last eight first-class matches, meaning he likely will be dropped for the first Test in the UAE in four weeks from now unless he produces a big score in the second innings of this match.

The three main contenders for his Test spot seem to be Head, Kurtis Patterson and Marnus Labuschagne, by virtue of them being involved in this current series in India.

Head always shaped as the most likely Test candidate out of that trio due to his popularity with the Australian selectors, who have backed him in ODI cricket over the past two years.

Yesterday the 24-year-old left-hander made 68, following on from his 87 in the second innings of the first match against India A.

He also struck a ton in the preceding one-day series and has been in good form in ODIs averaging 42 from his past 25 matches. Head has also scored 1,383 runs at 45 over the last two Sheffield Shield seasons.

Now, it would seem, it is up to one of Handscomb, Patterson or Labuschagne to shine in the second innings of this current match to keep Head out of the Test side.

Meanwhile, Marsh’s unbeaten 86 has sewn up his Test spot. The Australia A captain failed in both innings of the first match but, realistically, was probably a lock in the Test team anyway. With Australia expected to play two specialist spinners, the selectors will want a decent third pace option, which Marsh provides.

Australia A were in trouble at 6 for 180 yesterday when they were rescued by an unbeaten 110-run stand between Marsh and Neser (44no from 108 balls). It was Neser’s all-round ability which earned him an ODI debut in England in June, and it could again be that ability with the bat which vaults him into the Test team.

Mitch Marsh (AAP Image/David Mariuz)

The 28-year-old Queenslander would have entered this series behind Victorian quick Chris Tremain in the Test pecking order. But he outperformed Tremain in the first match, grabbing 4 for 75, compared to Tremain’s return of 1 for 65.

The Australian selectors have made it clear they consider the batting ability of their tail in Test cricket and this could help Neser, who averages 24 with the bat in first-class cricket and has made 44no and 25 in his past two knocks.

Neser’s batting ability could be of particular interest to the selectors if they overlook spin all-rounder Ashton Agar and instead pick Jon Holland, who took nine wickets in the first “A” match but is a batting bunny.

In that case the selectors may believe that Neser’s batting would help avoid having too long a tail. Australia’s consistent batting struggles away from home has meant the selectors have needed to consider the runs they can squeeze out of the tail.

The second Test pace spot, supporting Mitchell Starc, looks to be a two-way race between Neser and Tremain, who has been the leading wicket-taker across the past three Sheffield Shield seasons. Holland, like Head, is probably pencilled in for the first Test after his dominant performance in the first “A” match.

Agar, you would think, will need to be very impressive with the ball over the next three days if he is to edge out Holland. But first Marsh and Neser will this morning have a chance to build on their crucial stand and bat Australia A into a strong position.

The Crowd Says:

2018-09-11T00:48:25+00:00

13th Man

Roar Rookie


I'd be picking Finch over Head if I had the choice. For mine both make the squad but i'd play Finch in the middle order. My side would be Renshaw Burns Khawaja S Marsh Finch M Marsh Paine Agar Starc J Richardson Lyon Other squad members Neser Maxwell Head Holland Tremain

2018-09-10T00:35:14+00:00

Sportstragic

Roar Rookie


Yer good point. It shows a lack of depth or class in batsman at the moment. In 20 years time I dont think we will be talking much about the current batsman. The bowlers are a different story.

2018-09-10T00:08:56+00:00

JamesH

Roar Guru


We're definitely a better fielding side with Cummins and Hazlewood vs Tremain and Holland, too.

2018-09-10T00:07:17+00:00

JamesH

Roar Guru


The problem is that Finch doesn't open in red ball cricket. He bats at 5 or 6, so it's not a like-for-like replacement. That said, he deserves consideration in the middle order given the hole we're in.

2018-09-09T23:26:04+00:00

Harvey Wilson

Roar Rookie


Handscomb should be dropped regardless of a big score. 8 innings for 18 runs can't be forgiven, although the Australian selectors have in the past.

2018-09-09T20:58:55+00:00

I no

Roar Rookie


Sportstragic i would drop every player you just mentioned if it were up to me.

2018-09-09T14:23:10+00:00

Sportstragic

Roar Rookie


Strange comment I no. I actually think you dont know. So your not happy with an average of 37 after 12 tests. Are you happy with Mitch Marsh average of 27 after 28 tests? Or Matt Renshaw average of 33 after 11 tests? Or Glen Maxwell average of 26 after 7 tests? Or Shaun Marsh? Or Cameron Bancroft maybe? Or...

AUTHOR

2018-09-09T12:38:31+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


I rate Head highly as a top order bat in ODIs but yet to be convinced by him otherwise.

AUTHOR

2018-09-09T12:37:33+00:00

Ronan O'Connell

Expert


Patterson may have missed his opportunity here, he's yet to pass 50 for the series.

2018-09-09T10:17:31+00:00

badmanners

Roar Rookie


Absolutely agree that the batsmen don't value there wickets enough and Langer should have strong words with them. But he used to be filthy when he got out as a batsmen because if you ask him he was never out!

2018-09-09T08:40:58+00:00

Steele

Guest


Finch should be Warner’s replacement. It’s such a no brainer, but unfortunately common sense has never been a pre requisite.

2018-09-09T07:04:24+00:00

I no

Roar Rookie


I meant 30s

2018-09-09T06:35:57+00:00

BurgyGreen

Guest


Tremain is ok but Cummins is vastly better, and Hazlewood is a fair bit better than Holland, so yes that tail would be weaker.

2018-09-09T06:17:32+00:00

I no

Roar Rookie


Tremain is always getting 20+ scores and has often got Victoria out of trouble in shield matches with 50s.

2018-09-09T06:13:44+00:00

mrrexdog

Roar Guru


Tremain’s no mug with the bat either, he scored a shield century a couple seasons ago. Would a tail end of Starc, Tremain, Lyon and Holland be any weaker than Cummins, Starc, Lyon and Hazlewood. I wonder if Sayers is in contention, given he’s an incumbent in the test XI.

2018-09-09T04:58:51+00:00

maverick

Roar Rookie


Spot on Bunney.Averages don't always tell the story.Neser is a fine player.And I hope he gets picked for the UAE tests.

2018-09-09T04:50:23+00:00

BurgyGreen

Guest


Mitch Marsh has brought up a ton. Good to see that he's in decent form with the bat

2018-09-09T04:42:00+00:00

I no

Roar Rookie


But thats just what the Sunday telegraph says. They reckon the selectors will name the side on late day 4 or the day after the A clash thats so all the States can name there one day squads.

2018-09-09T04:37:39+00:00

I no

Roar Rookie


You would have to say Tremain is in front of Siddle hes got way more wickets in shield cricket in the last few years.

2018-09-09T04:25:35+00:00

BurgyGreen

Guest


That looks about right, though Tremain will certainly be in the mix. I hadn't thought about Siddle, but he's only 33, still fit, and tearing up county cricket at the moment. Personally I wouldn't pick him, he's not sharp enough for Test cricket anymore IMO, but I can see the selectors seriously considering him. Could be a handy backup for the Ashes next year.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar