Book review: Footballistics

By Mister Football / Roar Guru

Given that the festive season is almost upon us, which happens to coincide with the middle of the AFL off-season, I thought I would take the opportunity to review a couple of footy books over the next week or so.

Book: Footballistics: How the Data Analytics Revolution Is Uncovering Footy’s Hidden Truths
Author: James Coventry (and a team of Footy’s sharpest thinkers)
What: Canvasses the rise and rise of data analytics, number crunching and statistics in footy.

Of particular interest to Roarers is the involvement of our very own Ryan Buckland, which I only discovered upon commencing the book review in earnest.

The sleeve describes Australian football as “the most data-rich sport on Earth”. Whether that is true or not, we’ve come a long way from the early 1980s, which was the Melbourne papers first foray into publishing statistics.

I remember well these early days. It started with the kicks, handballs, marks and goals of each player on each team for each match.

From there, bit by bit, we saw the growth in the stats provided:

Footballistics covers much of this development, but also attempts to answer a series of eternal questions, always relying on the stats. These endeavours are enjoyable to read, even if, at times, the answer is not clear-cut, and/or it becomes smothered in statistics which, shall we say, are not necessarily bedtime reading.

That aside, there were some areas of statistical analysis which I found fascinating. Often these related to the sorts of discussions we have all been involved in, such as the age profile of successful teams, and/or their match experience. Some of my favourite moments in the book follow.

A Model for Shot Difficulty
Goal-kicking accuracy over the ages is one of those questions which comes up frequently. A whole range of statistics are provided on this, season by season, club by club, ground by ground, and even those players who are the most accurate.

Over the long run, there is no era that stands out more than others in terms of goal kicking accuracy (except for the earliest years of footy), although there are some general observations we can make, for example:
– Hawthorn’s more successful eras had a higher degree of accuracy than their less successful eras; and
– as far as grounds go in the modern era, as expected, Docklands has the highest rate of accuracy of all grounds.

Quite rightly, the authors talk at length at the complexity in analysing the accuracy of players because as we know, not all shots at goal are equivalent. We need to assess distance, angle, ground conditions, player fatigue and injury, etc. That’s as far as set shots go, on top of that we have to factor in shots on the run, under pressure, snaps, soccers off the ground, and on it goes.

The authors have developed a model which takes into account all of these factors. A set shot from 30 metres, slightly off centre, has an average success rate of 79 per cent. A snap from just inside the boundary, just inside 50m, has an 18 per cent success rate.

We then are able to compare the expected goals (the Xg) of any particular player, with the goals he actually scored, to know whether he is below or above par.

Thus, in 2014, Luke Breust had 78 shots at goal with an Xg of 42.4 but scored 57 goals, which is the best return above Xg over the 2013 to 2017 seasons.

This idea can be extended to cover whole teams, so that for any given season, one can calculate whether teams lost games for not making their collective Xg, or whether teams over-achieved by surpassing their Xg.

Luke Breust of the Hawks. (Photo by Will Russell/AFL Media/Getty Images)

Score Involvements
This section of the book looks at one of the new areas of statistical analysis, and comes up with a way of summarising a club’s game plan, for example:

The centrepiece forward – used in 2017 by Sydney, West Coast and Gold Coast. Probably the closest thing we have to traditional footy with the ball being directed to a key forward (or two). In the case of the Swans, Buddy Franklin was involved in 36 per cent of the Swans’ scores.

The false forward line – used in 2017 by the Bulldogs, Fremantle and Collingwood. In this case, a lower percentage of the score is channelled through those who ostensibly are playing forward. In the case of Bulldogs, more goals came from their midfield than their forwards.

The midfield monster – used by Richmond, Geelong and Brisbane (to a lesser extent Fremantle and Gold Coast). This differentiates between scoring involvements and score ‘links’, with the latter, we are talking about players having multiple involvements in any score. In Richmond’s case, the 2017 premier, no player typified this more than Dustin Martin.

The launching backmen – used by Carlton, Brisbane, Adelaide and West Coast. In each case, teams had at least two defenders involved in over 18% of scores. Note that the 2018 premier is found here, a reminder of how their grand final winning goal was set up!

Dom Sheed of the Eagles (Photo by Cameron Spencer/AFL Media/Getty Images)

Player Approximate Value (PAV)
Yes, the name of this system is meant to remind you of former Fremantle great, Matthew Pavlich. This idea is influenced by baseball, but the twist is that it’s not a valuation of the individual player himself, but rather a valuation of his worth to the team.

The interesting aspect about this measure is that it allows comparisons across seasons. In 2016, Patrick Dangerfield scored a PAV of 32.0, compared to Jimmy Stynes’ score from his 1991 season of 31.4.

Across a complete career, Robert Harvey has the highest PAV of 352.9.

From there, we can use this measurement to assess drafts. For example, the Bulldogs had a famed draft in 1999 which yielded Robert Murphy, Daniel Giansiracusa and Ryan Hargraves, amongst others. The club ended up with an actual PAV of 772.4 compared to the expected PAV of 263.3.

Geelong’s draft of 2001 holds top position, and you’d think most of this class were involved in a premiership or two later in the decade.

Shared Experience
I found this chapter to be the most interesting because it’s a subject which comes up regularly: is there a precise formula for predicting grand final success (average age, average games, average finals played, etc?

The authors have come up with a means of measuring team cohesion, which basically comprises the number of games any combination of players has played together.

For example, the first time Jordan Lewis, Sam Mitchell and Luke Hodge played together, that’s a shared experience of 3. The second time they all play together, that becomes a shared experience of 6. By the time they won their fourth premiership together, that shared experience may have been upwards of 750.

Luke Hodge (AAP Image/Julian Smith)

A simple enough concept, although for any one of us to measure the shared experience of 22 players at any given moment is no easy matter.

Fortunately, the authors have done the hard work. The team with the greatest shared experience in the modern era is the Geelong team of 2010 with 22,667 shared matches, they are also in second place for the 2009 team. Brisbane’s 2004 team is in third spot.

Interesting that two of the top three actually lost their grand finals. It just goes to show that you can only ever have so much of a good thing, and that the law of diminishing returns means that at some point, it catches up with you.

A team of 28 year olds is good, four years on, and despite the increase in shared experience, most probably they are not quite as good (helps explain Clarko’s willingness to move on the three Hawthorn greats mentioned above).

I close this review with some of the key questions put to the reader on the sleeve (which are covered in detail within the book). I’ll leave it to you to seek out the answers.

Do umpires really favour the home side?

Is Geelong the true master of the draft?

Are blondes unfairly favoured in Brownlow Medal voting?

Are Victorians the most passionate fans?

Final score: I give the book 3.85 beach umbrellas out of 5.

The Crowd Says:

AUTHOR

2018-11-07T21:00:44+00:00

Mister Football

Roar Guru


I have to admit, it's not a title which rolls off the tongue.

2018-11-07T12:05:56+00:00

Chancho

Roar Rookie


It is amazing how it's changed and how sophisticated it's become. I remember in the early days of the Footy Show where Eddie used to go on about hard-ball-gets, and Sam having no idea what was going on... he still doesn't to be fair. I think this might be an interesting read. A while ago I read a book/article about sports betting, but particularly concerned with the premier league and European club soccer and betting exchanges. What I found interesting, especially as someone who doesn't bet, is how you can piece this together and then look for value bets. While I didn't really put it into practice, it did change the way I watch the game and also to try and see where games were won and lost. I know this is about footy books, but a sports book I can recommend is Norman Mailer's The Fight, about the rumble in the jungle... it's such a beautify written book, perfect for summer.

2018-11-07T11:43:08+00:00

Chancho

Roar Rookie


this is a good point, the stats in isolation maybe dont tell you a whole lot, but it's when you put them in relation to another stat to give you a ratio is when it can tell you something. It might be that shared experience to winning percentage in games where you are behind by x points could tell you something? For my two-cents... I loathe the title of this book, what a terribly forced portmanteau

AUTHOR

2018-11-07T03:56:01+00:00

Mister Football

Roar Guru


You'll have to remind me, was that the score of each player out of 10? circa 1984?

2018-11-07T02:17:36+00:00

Munro Mike

Roar Rookie


Bah humbug.....just give me the SunScore ratings any day!!!

AUTHOR

2018-11-06T04:14:28+00:00

Mister Football

Roar Guru


Good comment, I think most would find bits in the book that they connect with and others which they don't, I guess it's true that they don't make the next jump to a behind-the-scenes look at how the game is played: the structures, the new roles, the different positionings and movements, all of it seemingly coming in the past decade; some of the language and terms used would not have been heard of 10 to 15 years ago. It's hinted at, but I guess they are numbers men, they aren't stepping into the head coach's shoes. I remember one bit which came close, where an assistant coach knew after the first 10 minutes of the game that if the numbers continued in the same direction, it was like a 99% probability of defeat. Might have been nice to unpick that a bit. The response was actually one which could have come in any era: change something, anything, just change it, change the pattern of the game, in most cases, doesn't matter what the change is, just make it different to what you started out with. Not overly scientific, but it's probably the extent of my understanding of the modern game.

2018-11-06T03:27:32+00:00

Hamish

Roar Rookie


That's the same take as the comment I just made.

2018-11-06T03:26:24+00:00

Hamish

Roar Rookie


I'd read the excerpt and expected more from the book, to be honest. Thought it would give insight into how the game is played and won but it went down a few random analyses that don't actually shape the game. Some clever fellows that's for sure.

2018-11-06T02:50:45+00:00

Kandeepan Arul

Roar Rookie


Nice. I will check it out.

2018-11-06T02:25:51+00:00

Dalgety Carrington

Roar Guru


The cohesion factor is definitely something I've been interested in for a long time and how it impacts team performance. With any one stat it's never going to give an adequate explanation of such a complex interaction that lead to winning or losing a game or season. Rather than deifying or deriding a stat we need to view them from a lens of what exactly are they telling us and so how can we best us that stat to increase our knowledge. At least with a measure like the "Shared Experience" (SE) indicator, you could see how that might predict success vs say plain old experience (age/games) vs player talent ranking approximators etc. Another thing you're right about is whether there's a point where it becomes less effective. So if for example a high SE score over the past three seasons, would be as good or better than a high SE score established across 5 seasons. I wonder if the measure is sensitive to those variations?

2018-11-06T02:10:52+00:00

dontknowmuchaboutfootball

Guest


Just finished reading this on the weekend, taking a in a chapter here or there over the last few months. Mostly enjoyable and interesting. A couple of chapters in the second half that didn’t hold my interest but some really good ones too (need to flick through it again to remind me which ones). If I’ve got a complaint (one always has to have a complaint) it’s that it ended up being not quite the book I thought it was meant to be. I was hoping for more discussion of how the use of stats was changing the way the game is played. (I had a similar issue with Coventry's other one (Time and Space) which explicitly promised a discussion of how tactics, etc have changed — in other words, a more analytical approach — but ended up focusing more on names/stars and their achievements. ) Taking Footballistics for what it is, though, it is often quite fascinating.

AUTHOR

2018-11-06T01:40:10+00:00

Mister Football

Roar Guru


It's one of those measurements which has intuitive appeal, all things being equal, you'd expect teams with an extremely low shared experience would continue improving as that stat rose, but equally, if they are hopeless to begin with, or poorly coached, the improvement is not likely to be enough to get you into the top 4. With the Suns and Giants, we sort of had a mini-laboratory, and I think the way the giants originally structured themselves, with a greater proportion of 18 year olds than the Suns, arguably, set them up better for continuous improvement off the back of increasing shared experience - which is about to culminate round about now - except for the fact that the Giants has not been able to keep them all together. I agree with you on the law of diminishing returns. So the question becomes: all things being equal, is there a sweet spot, or range, probably no definitive answer, but we might be able to predict that at certain extremities, you are either yet to reach a premiership window, or you've shot past it. The 2004 decider may have been a good example of one team having shot past the sweet spot, and the other having hit it with perfection. 2007 may also have been a case of one team having shot past it (the team which won in 2004), and the other just hitting the sweet spot, which they kept going for another four seasons.

2018-11-05T23:11:45+00:00

User

Roar Rookie


The mythos that surrounds footy is an interesting subject. I would imagine inside a AFL club there would be alot of group think going on and feeding each other, even on a subconscious level. Very much like any large gathering of people who are there for same purpose, a rough comparison is faith healing churches and the way the patrons feed of each other's craziness.

2018-11-05T22:50:07+00:00

TomC

Roar Guru


I'll have to buy this book. I'm a bit dubious about tracking shared experience. I can definitely see why it's valuable, but it would correlate with so many other positives it would be hard to assess it in isolation. I don't think there's much to be gained from looking at the teams with high shared experience and seeing how successful they are. Success will probably lead to shared experience just as much as the other way around, and diminishing returns will kick in at some point. It might have some utility trying to figure out why certain teams underperform.

AUTHOR

2018-11-05T22:35:18+00:00

Mister Football

Roar Guru


I have to admit, I've never come across it, but I'll look it up.

2018-11-05T21:07:50+00:00

User

Roar Rookie


His new book is about Aussie sporting controversial behaviour sounds good. You listen to the Titus and Sergio variety hour podcast?

AUTHOR

2018-11-05T20:57:37+00:00

Mister Football

Roar Guru


Always enjoy Titus' tweets.

2018-11-05T18:27:58+00:00

User

Roar Rookie


Never get sick of seeing Willie or Dom after the premiership goal. Sounds interesting enough but stat focused assessment can be very one dimensional. Hoping that kids(by that I mean wife) gets me the new Titus O'Reilly book it sounds like a cracking read.

Read more at The Roar