Just a month ago I predicted that the 2019 NRL premier would come from the usual suspects, with my tip being the Roosters to be the first side to go back to back since the Broncos in 1992-1993.
Now, after just one round has been played, the stats show just who is really likely to be there when the whips are cracking and just who will be getting the spoon.
And the stats are surprisingly compelling.
Let’s look at who will be this year’s likely wooden spooner first.
First up, you get a good guide to who’ll come last each year by looking at how sides placed the previous season.
Year | Wooden Spooner | Previous season finish |
---|---|---|
2018 | Eels | fourth |
2017 | Knights | Wooden Spoon |
2016 | Knights | Wooden Spoon |
2015 | Knights | 12th |
2014 | Sharks | Fifth |
2013 | Eels | Wooden Spoon |
2012 | Eels | 14th |
2011 | Titans | fourth |
2010 | Cowboys* | 12th |
2009 | Roosters | fourth |
2008 | Bulldogs | sixth |
2007 | Panthers | 12th |
2006 | Rabbitohs | 13th |
2005 | Knights | 10th |
2004 | Rabbitohs | Wooden Spoon |
2003 | Rabbitohs | Fewest wins** |
2002 | Rabbitohs** | Not in comp |
2001 | Panthers | fifth |
2000 | Cowboys | 16th |
1999 | Magpies | Wooden Spoon |
1998 | Magpies | Ninth*** |
*While the Storm were officially last in 2010, the Cowboys had the fewest wins.
**While the Bulldogs were officially last in 2002, the Rabbitohs had the fewest wins.
***Split competition in 1997
What observations can we make from this?
Nine of the 21 spoons on offer have been won by just three clubs (42.8 per cent). That number increases to ten if you factor in that the Rabbitohs had the fewest wins in 2002.
Five times the winners of the spoon won it the previous season (23.8 per cent). So almost a quarter of the time the previous year’s spooner has got more cutlery.
On only six occasions have sides that made the finals the previous season won the wooden spoon (30 per cent). None of those sides were ranked above fourth place at the end of the home-and-away season.
In total, 14 of the 20 times the eventual spooner was not in the previous year’s finals series (70 per cent).
Eight times the wooden spooner finished in the bottom four the previous season (40 per cent).
That starts giving us a pretty good picture of who the likely 2019 winner of the spoon will be. Now consider this following table:
Year | Wooden spooner | Round 1 result | Margin |
---|---|---|---|
2018 | Eels | Loss | 10 points |
2017 | Knights | Loss | 4 points |
2016 | Knights | Loss | 18 points |
2015 | Knights | Win | 10 points |
2014 | Sharks | Loss | 6 points |
2013 | Eels | Win | 30 points |
2012 | Eels | Loss | 12 points |
2011 | Titans | Loss | 9 points |
2010 | Cowboys* | Loss | 6 points |
2009 | Roosters | Loss | 40 points |
2008 | Bulldogs | Loss | 8 points |
2007 | Panthers | Loss | 18 points |
2006 | Rabbitohs | Loss | 18 points |
2005 | Knights | Loss | 38 points |
2004 | Rabbitohs | Loss | 10 points |
2003 | Rabbitohs | Loss | 8 points |
2002 | Rabbitohs** | Loss | 34 points |
2001 | Panthers | Loss | 36 points |
2000 | Cowboys | Loss | 13 points |
1999 | Magpies | Loss | 18 points |
1998 | Magpies | Loss | 18 points |
*While the Storm were officially last in 2010, the Cowboys had the fewest wins.
**While the Bulldogs were officially last in 2002, the Rabbitohs had the fewest wins.
So what can we extrapolate from this?
In total, 19 of the 21 wooden spooners lost in first round, with 11 of those losses by 13+ (53 per cent).
In the two aberration wins that occurred, on both occasions the side was at home and playing a non-finalist from the previous year (the Warriors in both instances).
To summarise, the 2019 wooden spooner will most likely not have finished the 2018 home-and-away season in the top three spots on the ladder (Roosters, Storm and Rabbitohs). Most likely they will have lost in Round 1 and will have not made the finals in 2018 (Bulldogs, Sea Eagles, Titans).
Most likely they will have finished in the bottom four in 2018 (Titans, Sea Eagles) and will have won a wooden spoon in the NRL era (Titans)
So, according to the trends on display, while the Bulldogs and Sea Eagles are also a good chance, the Gold Coast Titans are the most likely side to win the wooden spoon in 2018.
So who do the tea leaves left after Round 1 indicate will be the 2019 NRL premiers?
Well, unlike the wooden spooners, winning in the first round has not been essential in the NRL era, with eleven of the eventual premiers not winning:
Year | Premier | Round 1 result |
---|---|---|
2000 | Brisbane | draw |
2001 | Knights | lost |
2003 | Panthers | lost first two |
2005 | Wests Tigers | lost |
2006 | Broncos | lost |
2008 | Sea Eagles | lost first two |
2011 | Sea Eagles | lost |
2013 | Roosters | lost |
2015 | Cowboys | lost first three |
2016 | Sharks | lost |
2018 | Roosters | lost |
What we draw from this is that 52.4 per cent of the time the eventual premier has lost in the first round, but on only three occasions has a side lost their first two games and gone on to win the premiership (14.3 per cent).
The Cowboys are the only side to have lost their first three matches and go on to premiership glory that season in the last four decades.
So all is not lost for the Roosters, Broncos, Sharks, Dragons or Panthers. The stats show that if they get a win this weekend there is no need to panic – yet.
However, we can narrow down the likely premiers a bit more using the following stats.
Only four times (19 per cent) in the NRL era has the premier not recently played in a GF or preliminary final: Sharks 2016, Cowboys 2015, Wests Tigers 2005 and Panthers 2003.
On only three occasions (14.3 per cent) was the premier not in the finals the previous year: Panthers 2003, Wests Tigers 2005 and Roosters 2013.
Only five of the eventual premiers (24 per cent) had 13+ wins first up: Broncos 1998 = 16 points, Storm 1999 = 22 points, Roosters 2002 = 34 points, Bulldogs 2004 = 34 points and the Rabbitohs 2014 = 20 points.
History shows us that the top eight changes by only two or three sides each year, with at least five sides returning for September action from the previous season.
As always, there are a few outliers for the eventual premiers in the stats. In 2002 the Roosters won their first round match and then lost four straight.
In 2014 the Rabbitohs won their first game and then lost three straight, and the 2005 Wests Tigers had never played finals football before.
However, our likely premier in 2019 will have the following characteristics.
They are likely to have played in last year’s finals (Roosters, Storm, Rabbitohs, Sharks, Penrith, Broncos, Dragons, Warriors).
They are most likely to have played in a preliminary final or grand final within the last four seasons (Roosters, Storm, Rabbitohs, Sharks, Raiders, Broncos, Cowboys, Raiders)
They may not have won big or even won last weekend – but if they didn’t win then they must win this weekend, which puts big pressure on: the Dragons to beat the Rabbitohs, the Broncos to beat the Cowboys, the Sharks to beat the Titans, the Roosters to beat the Sea Eagles and the Panthers to beat the Knights.
However, right now with a first up win under their belts, it is the Storm, Rabbitohs and Raiders that are the best placed sides historically to win the 2019 NRL premiership.
Given that the Storm have played in nine of the 21 NRL grand finals so far – and seeing how well they played last weekend – it is hard to go past the Purple Horde this year.
However, we await the results from Round 2 to really narrow the field.
Roy
Guest
Expert??????
Paul
Roar Guru
There has to be something in the air or water that turns perfectly sane & rational people into paranoid conspiracy theorists. My father happily lived in NSW for years, but moved north of the border and is now convinced that anything that might affect Qld is brought on by those "***ing southerners".
MadgicSH
Roar Rookie
And did you enjoy it?
MadgicSH
Roar Rookie
Math suggests they need about 15 or 16 wins to make the finals; when I went to school 3 wins was 20%, NOT 50%! I really hope you're right but get a grip.
MadgicSH
Roar Rookie
As a born and bred Brisbaneite I couldn't agree more! BUT you will stir up the usual paranoia - "it's a plot by Southerners" etc. My father was a bit of a star in his work and generally held to be a genius, yet he subscribed wholeheartedly to the theory that "the South" hates Queenslanders. Of course, in my case, he was right.
Dogs Boddy
Roar Rookie
Great to see you managed to fit the Raiders into the top chances. Let's just overlook the whole not played in a grand final since 1994 thing.
Steve Franklin
Roar Rookie
Statistics what a lot of rubbish they are and they tend to make people look like dopes, i hsve seen hundreds of games of all sports and there have been many many games where teams have won the penalties, the possessions, field play, had the ball more than their opposition, inside the opposition half and 25 mtrs by along way statistically and have been beaten by 30 pts statistics are false and misleading and are a load of rubbish. The only statistic in the last 3 or 4 years that has been 100 % correct is that Winx will keep winning.
AE47
Roar Rookie
Shhh between you and I I’ve tipped the upset , and Manly cause no Cronk no soup
Geoff from Bruce Stadium
Roar Rookie
Felt like one of my third year high school maths classes where I lost concentration after a couple of minutes listening to the teacher and defaulted to watching the girls walking by. Don't mind the conclusion that the Raiders are one of three teams that can win the comp though - looking forward to the Raiders game up against the Storm tonight
Beastie
Roar Rookie
You are right. Brisbane doesn't need, nor do they want a second team. The NRL, however, do need a second Brisbane team. In the end, shouldn't we do what's best for the NRL rather than what's best for a single team?
Drew Lawrence
Roar Rookie
Fourteenth % of people know that
The Barry
Roar Guru
You’re right mate - Moore in 09 and Des in 12.
peterj
Guest
Have't they won a few coach of the year awards too? Kevvie Moore and Des?
Paul
Roar Guru
fair cop Kimbo, I apologise as I hadn't seen any of those comments. I just wonder how many Broncos fans either saw these remarks or agreed with them? If this forum is anything to go by, I suspect there'd be a great deal of resistance, even if the Bronco's hierarchy were on board. I still don't believe there needs to be a relocation of sides, rather an expansion for now of 2 new Clubs and let sides fall by the wayside once they become unviable financially. I'm also not convinced about the examples from the AFL either. The AFL has thrown massive amounts of money at these Clubs and has also given them some incredible advantages in terms of draft picks and salary cap space. Sure the Lions and Swans did well with re-location but there was no way they were on a level playing field with the other Clubs .
kimboinbrisbane
Roar Rookie
Paul. Early this month Paul White (CEO Broncos) said Brisbane was big enough to have two NRL clubs. In this morning’s Courier Mail, Karl Morris (Broncos chairman) was quoted as saying “a relocated club as a second Brisbane team would stand more of a chance than a start up venture.” He also said “the Broncos had planned for quite some time for how to operate in a Brisbane metropolitan market with a second team”. How does the above reconcile with your assertion that the Broncos “don’t care about the game” and “only care about the money they would lose if a second team came in”? What is required is a mature debate about this issue. There is no easy answer to expansion. I personally am not convinced that there are enough NRL standard players available to support an additional two teams. That leaves relocation of two existing clubs. Unpalatable as that would be to club supporters, it can be done successfully - look at AFL with the Swans and Lions - both came from relocated Melbourne clubs.
JOHNY BULLDOG
Roar Rookie
Ha ha mate,you can see it a mile away :)
JOHNY BULLDOG
Roar Rookie
Ha ha Bazza,I think our old mate BIGJ is back ;)
Tim Gore
Expert
44.23% actually
Shane
Guest
42.7% of all statistics are made up on the spot.....
The Barry
Roar Guru
You can’t spell Rick James without a Big J...