Matildas humbled by ruthless Dutch

By Ben McKay / Wire

A record Dutch crowd for a women’s football match has jammed into Eindhoven’s Philips Stadion to see the Netherlands thrash Australia 3-0.

The Matildas will enter the World Cup on their worst losing run in three years after a 3-0 thrashing to the Netherlands.

Australia showed spark but lacked the clinical finishing of the Dutch in Eindhoven earlier on Sunday morning, in front of a national record crowd for a women’s football match.

A brace from best afield livewire Shanice van de Sanden and Vivianne Miedema’s sharp effort sent the Netherlands to the World Cup on a high and condemned the Matildas to a confidence-sapping defeat.

The result follows a 5-3 loss to world champions USA in April.

Not since 2016, when Australia lost to Brazil and Canada in Brazil for the Olympics, has the world No.6 side lost back to back matches.

At the Philips Stadion, Ante Milicic saw plenty of bright positioning and ball movement from his team, and a decided lack of composure at the back.

Australia shaded the first half but received no reward.

The best chances fell to Hayley Raso, who put two efforts – from a Sam Kerr cross and Tameka Yallop’s cutback – straight at the Dutch goalkeeper.

The Netherlands were finding joy out wide, where former world player of the year Elise Martens and van de Sanden were beating full-backs Steph Catley and Ellie Carpenter regularly.

Van de Sanden was troubled more often by the offside flag than the Matildas defence, and broke through in first-half injury time.

The 26-year-old peeled off Emily van Egmond at the back post to head home Sherida Spitse’s free kick.

Five minutes after the break, Miedema turned Carpenter before firing past Lydia Williams.

Australia carved out chances to get back in the game.

Both Raso and Yallop were through on goal only to botch efforts, before van de Sanden thundered a volley to give the match an emphatic scoreline.

Given Milicic fielded close to his best team, without injured midfielder Elise Kellond-Knight, the Australia boss plainly has some thinking to do before the World Cup opener with Italy next Sunday.

The Crowd Says:

2019-06-03T10:40:16+00:00

reuster75

Roar Rookie


I like what Ante is trying to do and he seems to be a good mix of Ange Postecoglu and Tony Popovic. The problem is the lack of time he has had. The warning signs have been there for a while now but the FFA were asleep at the wheel. Our performance at the Olympics was poor, we played a couple of great matches in a glorified friendly tournament in 2017. 2018 Algarve cup we were terrible and although only glorified friendlies again when combined with a really really poor Asian cup a pattern had emerged. That was when the change should've been made as I felt Stajic had taken them as far as he could. However I still believe we can make the semi finals as our group is reasonably straightforward and a likely quarter final against the Netherlands on neutral territory is a different matter. And that would constitute a success.

2019-06-03T10:26:06+00:00

reuster75

Roar Rookie


A contributing factor to your point about the world catching up in women's football is the full home and away qualifying UEFA nations had. The Netherlands played 12 matches to qualify. Add this to the 6 matches at Euro 2017 and that's 18 competitive matches in 2 years compared to 6 for Australia. When you combine this with a lot of European nations now investing in youth development for the women's game the same way they've done for the men's game it spells trouble for Australia. To be fair to Stajic this was a problem he was well aware of and spoke about often prior to his sacking.

2019-06-03T03:46:32+00:00

Will

Guest


I feel the Matildas needed a tactically astute coach i feel with Milicic who is a talented coach in his own right prefers to take risk on both sides of the ball (noticed how high their offside line was!). With this team its clear we have the attacking talent but defensively we are a bit lose and then the crunch comes to shove in the knockout stages we can't afford to make the same mistakes as in close games one mistake will cost us. To win a world cup you need the right balance on both sides of the ball structurally and tactically in games if you want to give yourself the best chance to win. I feel this current approach with Milicic might prove us costly given the last 2 friendly games but we will see when the world cup begins and we will learn from then onwards.

2019-06-02T23:09:16+00:00

Stevo

Roar Rookie


He was given a leave pass by his club because they had a bye but he promised to be home by Monday!

2019-06-02T10:49:36+00:00

Lionheart

Roar Rookie


I watched a bit of the England-NZ game but not all. England seemed to be struggling again, and they did, NZ winning 0-1. A quick look at the NZ press shows some very satisfied Kiwis. Good on them. Under their new (Scottish) coach, they're doing well. Meanwhile controlling Japan, but not overly so.

2019-06-02T10:08:14+00:00

jupiter53

Roar Pro


Late night and busy day so I have only just finished watching the game. It is easy and correct to say that it is only a friendly. However the defence looks a worry. And by that I do not mean just the defenders, I mean the overall defensive plan of the team. A high line makes sense if you have a tight back 4 who are all going to step up together, and who are also very quick in recovery if they get it wrong. AC Milan with Baresi, Costacurta, Maldini and Tassotti were this; the Matildas are not. The other version of the high line is to push up together but then drop back in a co-ordinated way before the ball is hit over the top. The Matildas did not do that either. But the problems were not just the last 4 defenders. I thought that the midfielders and forwards exerted good pressure at times, but when given time the Dutch midfielders [and Bloodworth from centre back]hit very good passes forward. They need to do better so that the defenders are not so exposed. And the lack of organisation for the first goal was appalling. As other posters have stated, on another day the Matildas are likely to have converted some of their chances, and at least there were a few. However the overall quality of crossing was pretty poor, and there were too many poorly chosen and poorly directed passes. I think there is enough quality in the team to get out of the group, but there will need to be a fairly big improvement to progress in the knockout games.

2019-06-02T09:10:10+00:00

Nemesis

Guest


Our defence was slaughtered. The Dutch defence was slaughtered. But, whereas the Dutch attackers, after slaughtering the Aussie defence, took the next step and put the ball in the net 3 times; Aussie attackers, after slaughtering the Dutch Defence had insipid shots, scuffed shots, off-target shots or just a poor final pass. I saw absolutely no greater weakness in the Australian defence compared to the Dutch defence. But, I saw a significant difference in the Australian finishing compared to the Dutch finishing. In the same positions, Australia would have not scored any of the 3 goals the Dutch scored. That's the difference we need to fix if we want to stick around France for the knock-outs.

2019-06-02T09:02:59+00:00

The Ball Bobbled

Roar Rookie


well you definitely have a valid point but our defence was slaughtered as well. the Matildas have become disjointed im afraid.

2019-06-02T08:44:40+00:00

The Ball Bobbled

Roar Rookie


Whoever beats this Orange mob will win the W C

2019-06-02T08:43:53+00:00

The Ball Bobbled

Roar Rookie


but not that many!!

2019-06-02T06:34:23+00:00

Redondo

Roar Rookie


Deja vu all over again. Like watching the men play. Hopefully in the Cup itself Milicic will mix it up a bit and not make our weaknesses so easy to exploit.

2019-06-02T05:42:15+00:00

Mister Football

Roar Guru


Children of migrants such as myself have always appreciated how big the world game is.

2019-06-02T04:11:25+00:00

Griffo

Roar Guru


I’d have Gielnik in instead of Yallop but she has had great impact as a wide attacking sub. Kerr and Foord are good enough to work around the attention but they do need their front line to up their game to ease the pressure. Raso has been good here but Dutch defence were good enough, even with the tactical ploy of putting the sun in the Dutch keeper’s eyes first half.

2019-06-02T04:05:12+00:00

Griffo

Roar Guru


Defensively near end of Staj era we were becoming suspect but this morning there are some serious issues. Zonal marking only works if you cover all zones including the ones behind you - that first goal showed this. Also your wing backs can’t bomb forward and not return to cover, or have cover while attacking. Quality ball to attackers needs to be found or a heavily marked Kerr is going to struggle to score all goals. I think it might be a quiet cup for her. Too many turnovers in defensive third: playing out is okay but it falls apart with heavy pressure. A few players may not be in their ideal position as a means to fit form players into the squad. We also look like we are still getting to grips with different playing patterns heading into a World Cup. Dutch are quality and show the narrow margins of top 10 over the last few years. All talk and expectations of Matildas progressing beyond quarter finals just had a reality check and it should just be game by game.

2019-06-02T03:50:20+00:00

Lionheart

Roar Rookie


Most Australians just don't appreciate how big the game is and how countries get behind their national football teams. We are poor, really poor, in comparison. But great to see, following this game I switched across to watch the Liverpool match and was surprised when the NRL's Robbie Farrah popped up on camera outside the stadium. The Optus team grabbed him and had a chat, big Liverpool fan and with a bye this weekend he flew to Madrid for the game. Wonder if his coach knew (next game Friday night).

2019-06-02T03:10:11+00:00

Lionheart

Roar Rookie


Well done to the Dutch. What a great sendoff for their girls, and to think they're the team we beat for a seeded position in the draw. I don't think our defence, rather our defenders, deserve to be raked over because of the score. Two of the three goals came from set pieces, and the third was a masterpiece from Miedema (doubt any team would have stopped her). Interesting though that Van Egmond was closely involved in two of them, doing exactly what JB alludes to above, and giving the player far too much space. I can't see how she keeps getting a start as she's been lacking for a year or so now, in my opinion anyway. Kerr and Foord were both heavily marked and they have to learn to live with that, it's not as if it's new for them but this morning I think Raso, Carpenter and TButt (Yallop) let us down as much as the strikers, for their missed chances. Our long balls are not as good as they once were either, too many players involved in moving the ball forward quickly on the counter. The Dutch beat us at our own game there, finding lots of space with their long (& accurate) balls. I was surprised there wasn't more movement off the bench but obviously Ante sees this as his strongest side, K Knight aside hopefully (apparently she was injured this morning).

2019-06-02T02:42:32+00:00

Waz

Roar Rookie


To be fair, the writing has been on the wall for the last year or so. Stajic’s Reign had its problems too

2019-06-02T02:10:01+00:00

Brainstrust

Roar Rookie


Milicic is a loser and a fantasy island special. The Europeans teams will mark Kerr out of the game, his midfield is a joke starting with Van Egmond. The difference is there were no defenders applying any pressure to the Dutch when they had their chances.

2019-06-02T01:49:32+00:00

Mister Football

Roar Guru


This match is making plenty of news in the Dutch media: Vandaag de #oranjeleeuwinnen met 3-0 zien winnen tegen #Australië. Daarna de voetbaldames uitgezwaaid, volgende week start het WK dames in #Frankrijk. I love the nickname: oranjeleeuwinnen. They are a team to watch.

2019-06-02T01:09:24+00:00

jbinnie

Guest


Nem- There is an old song that covers this latest comment of yours," When will we ever learn?. Tactically there are many ways to win games, but "missed chances" is not normally included in these descriptions, rather it comes under another description "bad play". If one wanted to be really critical of the Matildas one could point out that some very dubious off side calls by the officials probably resulted in Holland only getting one goal for 45 minutes effort while the Matildas should ,or could, have had one. Today our game has entered a phase of tactical development where a team is firstly taught how to defend, and then, after that has been mastered, the attacking function is worked upon. One of the main aims in defending well is to wipe "ball watching" out of the minds of players, and have them "man marking" as a potential block to successful attack. The first Dutch goal was a classic example of this error in our girl's play. Here in Australia we appear to be lagging far behind in both these functions of football. Our men's team struggle with exactly the same problem, we cannot convert possession into penetration fast enough to unsettle organised defences , andthis "proof" has been on show now for some time in the recent past. It has now made a appearance in our women's team, they struggle to score goals despite having one of the world's best strikers in the side, but who struggles to get the service she requires. Our ladies team has come a long way in recent years,but it should be becoming obvious to all interested parties that the "world" is catching up with the top teams and there is little doubt we are now one of the countries being "caught". Cheers jb.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar