Six talking points from Wallabies vs Springboks

By Oliver Matthews / Expert

It’s a special time isn’t it – the start of a new international rugby season? Even more so in a World Cup year. All the hope and dreams, the thoughts of what could be and that maybe, just maybe they could go all the way.

Well those dreams might still exist in many Wallabies fans but they certainly took a dent in the very first outing for the team as they lost to the Springboks in Johannesburg in Round 1 of the Rugby Championship.

Now in honour of those hopes and dreams let’s try and find a balanced set of talking points and not focus completely on the frustrations and disappointments. It won’t be easy…

Offloading everything is not a good idea!
So one can assume that in the Wallabies’ training camps over the past few weeks there has been a big focus on the importance of offloading.

Given the size of some of the Boks pack it makes sense that the Wallabies would want to play a high tempo game and keep the ball alive.

However perhaps they haven’t quite reached the teaching point yet that says that offloading is not always the right play.

Time and time again forwards and backs forced passes or offloads when they a) didn’t need to, and b) the passes had no chance of actually finding a teammate.

From the second minute when Folau Fainga’a tried offloading to Bernard Foley despite the fact that there were three Springboks in between the two Aussies right up until the end, player after player gave away the ball when they really didn’t need to.

Michael Hooper did it, Foley did it (a few times) and of course Dane Haylett-Petty did it – and those are just the ones that immediately come to mind.

Not a single one of them worked and the repercussions were one of two situations – the Wallabies lost the ball to the Boks, or, the Aussie player receiving the poor pass was immediately put under a huge amount of pressure.

In a couple of instances the Boks not only got the ball back but soon turned that possession into points.

Now of course there is a new attack coach in place and Shaun Berne should be given some time to get the team playing the way he wants.

But surely these professional rugby players have the ability and experience to know that while the overall strategy might be to offload a lot to keep the attack flowing, if the pass isn’t on then it simply isn’t on and you go to ground with the ball and make sure possession is retained.

Speaking of game plan…

(Photo by Sydney Seshibedi/Gallo Images/Getty Images)

What actually was the game plan?
This isn’t meant to sound as though it looked like there wasn’t a game plan but more that it was tricky to figure out how the selections and the game plan the team played aligned.

Michael Cheika and his fellow selection panel mates had got some decent sized players in the back row and centres.

Lukhan Salakaia-Loto, Isi Naisarani, Samu Kerevi and Tevita Kuridrani bring over 440kg of muscle and power to the party and so you’d assume that we’d see plenty of plays where Nic White and Foley gave quick flat ball to these weapons who were taking the ball at pace and crashing into the defensive line.

The 88kg of Elton Jantjies must have had a few cold sweats when he saw the Wallabies team list and thought about the juggernauts that were likely to be coming down his channel time after time.

But that didn’t happen. The ruck speed was just that bit too slow and the passing not flat and crisp enough and the runs just not there.

The Boks meanwhile made great ground by sending their big men at Foley. To be fair to the Aussie flyhalf he stood up pretty well but he couldn’t stop the home side making important metres and sucking in a second or third defender.

The Wallabies passing and running game was just too lateral. Curiously it was Kurtley Beale who brought some direct running and really cause the South Africans some problems after he came on.

Beale has far too often been caught doing an impression of a crab as he scuttles sideways for the Waratahs this season, but against the Boks his change of pace, good running lines and quick feet saw him slice through the opposition a few times. Shame he hadn’t been brought on earlier.

Great news about Dane Haylett-Petty
It’s great news – DHP has got the worst game of his life out of his system before the World Cup! Isn’t it wonderful?

The Wallabies No.14 did score a try to be fair but fans and Dane alike will remember this game for what he did wrong than the five-pointers he scored in the first half.

Passes that went behind teammates and out into touch, forced offloads that turned over possession and led to Springbok scores minutes later and of course there was that time he dropped the ball over the goal-line and botched a certain try.

One thing that he did highlight was that he’s not a winger. In the 62nd minute the Boks had a ruck about 20m from the Wallabies line and about 3m from the touch line.

DHP was there and covering the short blind side. Instead of holding his position in defence and forcing the Boks to take the ball back towards the open side where the Aussie’s defence was waiting, DHP tried to compete at the ruck – a ruck already won by the home side – and ended up leaving an impossible to resist hole down that blind side.

Herschel Jantjies couldn’t believe his luck and scampered away to score his second try on his debut.

Whether another winger would have made the same mistake is obviously just speculation but DHP has shown that he’s not perfectly at home on the wing and the selection panel are going to need to think about whether his utility value is worth the risk of him not being a specialist.

(Photo by Chris Hyde/Getty Images)

The set-piece was actually pretty good
It wasn’t all doom and gloom though. The Wallabies line out was a key area of discussion ahead of the game.

The Brumbies line out and driving maul had been a great weapon in their impressive Super Rugby season and fans were hoping this would be repeated at international level.

The line out didn’t lead to any tries unfortunately but it was solid and they only lost one of their twelve throws.

Unfortunately they didn’t really get much chance to use it as an attacking weapon but it was reliable and Rory Arnold also made himself a pest on the Boks’ own throw.

The scrum unfortunately wasn’t as solid. There were times when it was properly monstered by the Springboks and other teams will have been paying attention to this.

However to give them their due, the Wallabies pack fought back hard at the scrum in the final 20 minutes or so and managed to regain some pride.

Against the All Blacks and Pumas though they will be put under more pressure again and will have to be better.

One thing that will frustrate the Australian coaches is the number of turnovers. The Wallabies conceded almost 20 turnovers in the game and that just kept taking any momentum or rhythm out of their attack and gave the Boks precious possession when they needed it.

The Wallabies back row is going to have to work harder in the rest of the Championship if they want to build pressure on their opponents.

Just too many silly errors
In any international game the margins are pretty slim. Mistakes can be punished and if you make a number of them then you really are making the game so much harder for yourself. The Wallabies were their own worst enemy at times and this has to stop.

Whether you want to pick Taniela Tupou’s pointless hit after the whistle had gone that led to him being sin-binned, or DHP’s long list of mistakes, or Isi Naisarani’s fumbled pick up from the base of a scrum that led to a turnover or… you get the idea.

No team is perfect of course but so many of the Wallabies’ errors were ones where the player had made a deliberate decision – it wasn’t poor skills or an unfortunate error. This poor decision making under the pressure of Test rugby has got to disappear from their game.

(CHRISTIAAN KOTZE/AFP/Getty Images)

Nic White offers something new
Let’s end on a positive note – Nic White had a pretty good game. He’s not yet challenging Will Genia for the starting spot but he’s a better back up than Nick Phipps (maybe it’s the absence of the “k” that makes the difference).

Early on in the game White used his sharp kicking game well and in the eighth minute he showed some great awareness when he spotted that his previous high ball kick had drawn the Boks winger up into the front line and so at the very next ruck he kicked again into the space left in behind the Boks and pinned them right back deep in their 22.

As mentioned earlier in this article, he wasn’t able to get his big forwards making some big runs but that’s partly down to the slower rucking from the pack that meant the defence was well organised by the time he got his hands on the ball. That being said he’ll want to get his distribution a little bit quicker in the next few games.

It will be interesting to see how he plays as a sub and if he can bring something exciting later in the game when he comes off the bench but it’s good to see that the Wallabies are closing the gap between their best two scrum halves.

Overall, it wasn’t a great performance from the Wallabies and when you consider that the Springboks team was missing several of their best players, the loss becomes even more concerning.

Watching the intensity of the Pumas or the resilience of the All Blacks in the second game of Round 1 should also scare Aussie fans as the rest of the Rugby Championship is going to be very tough.

However, it’s not all doom and gloom and if the Wallabies can tighten up their scrum, use their big runners better and stop forcing passes then they will be a much harder team to beat.

The Crowd Says:

2019-07-23T07:42:46+00:00

DaveR

Guest


Agree with both comments. DHP had a good season for the Rebels at full back, with some stand out games. So lets select him for the Wallabies at ....wing. He has limited skills at that position. Rules for picking Wallabies: 1/ Pick in-form players who have had a full, injury-free Super Rugby season (or equivalent) only 2/ Pick players only in their specialist positions

2019-07-22T23:53:09+00:00

piru

Roar Rookie


He's doing his best, but how stressful must it be knowing you are keeping better players at that position out, while unable to perform at the top level? Likewise, what do you do as a player when the Wallaby coach tells you you're on the wing? You do as you're told. DHP's skill is at FB, he's a kicking, highball taking, considered running player - if he's not there, get him off the pitch - I hate to say it but if he wasn't immediately put at 15 when Folau left, why is he still there?

2019-07-22T20:06:29+00:00

jgeres

Roar Rookie


I watched the replay of that clean out 5 times yesterday, Tupou was clearly in motion before the whistle.

2019-07-22T10:10:23+00:00

Waxhead

Roar Rookie


@piru Totally agree mate and it's not fair on the guy cos he's actually a bloody good FB. He did his best on the wing and is probably having nightmares this week. But it's exactly this kind of crazy picking guys out of position that Chieka will forever be famous for. Has he ever picked a team without at least 1 player picked out of position ??

2019-07-22T10:02:49+00:00

Waxhead

Roar Rookie


Yes Suzy - fully agree :)

2019-07-22T07:17:23+00:00

Olly

Roar Rookie


Watch it again, he ran to the line and kicked through the rush up defence turning them around. 101 turning a defensive line around. Also, the Foley try lead up. Foley did his typical play of passing to the guy next to him, it happened to be Toomua with shoulders turned in, angling his run between the rush up defence, makes some metres and pops the ball off the ground to Genia (fastball with a defensive line now going backwards removing the rush up defence speed) Genia delivers to Beale with again shoulders turn in on receiving the ball (note that he is in first reciver in this play with shoulders turned in, 101 dealing with rush up def again). Foley is a fullback playing 10.

2019-07-22T07:03:11+00:00

Olly

Roar Rookie


You have to be kidding me right? With a man in the bin, Toomua shuts down a 3 on 2 situation due to the slow Wallabies inside forward (Arnold), makes the tackle and you are blaming him, not the winger who was marking that space who pointlessly joined the ruck when the Wallabies are down to 14...... If Toomua touch Herschel it would have been a penalty try and we would have been down to 13 players. It was a prime example of Toomua football awareness next to a winger without football awareness.

2019-07-22T06:56:37+00:00

Suzy Poison

Guest


Boks are ranked 5th and AB's ranked 1st. Clear difference. However since in 2018, the games have evened up. Rassie Eramas one win versus Steve Hanson one win. In fact over the course of two 2018 games it's 66points each. The Boks are clearly improving. We will see just how much, this weekend Waxy. AB's had four or five starters against Argentina, and looked slightly uncomfortable. B Barret, the two smiths, Sam Cane etc. Not often AB's held scoreless in a second half.

2019-07-22T06:50:23+00:00

Olly

Roar Rookie


Spot on PeterK

2019-07-22T06:08:28+00:00

Objective

Guest


One of the worst aspects for mine was the inability to adapt to the Saffas' rush defence. No variation; no means to put the defence into two minds. Just unlimited tackle league, trying to do things beyond their skill level & hoping for the best. I'm sure they tried hard. And the coach reckons they spend little if any time analyzing the opposition. But what does he focus on? The YC. Teams have a funny way of mimicking the demeanour of the coach. Excuses & blame games get them off the hook - consciously or sub-consciously. Conversely, look at Macqueen's teams. If it wasn't Australian Rugby you'd be surprised.

2019-07-22T05:57:08+00:00

Smiggle Jiggle

Roar Guru


The double round should be deleted from the Wallabies playbook. It is so predictable and easy to read, and given Foley does this every 2nd phase, it was stupid rugby.

2019-07-22T05:24:17+00:00

Short Arm

Roar Rookie


Thanks for the laugh HiKa, made my day

2019-07-22T03:59:18+00:00

Markus

Roar Rookie


Not sure what hatred was being expressed here. Sio and Alaalatoa were two of the top three Aus props this season (the third being Slipper), and once fit are a given for the matchday 23. Simmons is not an impact player so either starts for 80 minutes (in place of Rodda) or misses out entirely. Fair enough for the suggestion of Wright in over Hooper, but our forward pack is struggling to slow opposition ball and secure our own ball in attack, again, and it needs to be addressed somewhere in the selections.

2019-07-22T02:50:50+00:00

Oblonsky‘s Other Pun

Roar Guru


Haha!

2019-07-22T02:44:58+00:00

Objective

Guest


No comment, just applause.

2019-07-22T02:34:34+00:00

terrykidd

Roar Pro


Morahan is not eligible but Cam Clarke is, and would not let anyone down.

2019-07-22T02:33:20+00:00

terrykidd

Roar Pro


I have said many times that Toomua is no flyhalf.

2019-07-22T02:32:40+00:00

terrykidd

Roar Pro


What was embarrassing about Hooper questioning the ref about Tupou? Tupou's cleanout was not dangerous. Notice the ref did not explain why it was dangerous? The TMO got the call wrong. It would have been embarrassing had Hooper said nothing.

2019-07-22T02:30:34+00:00

terrykidd

Roar Pro


My thoughts ........ Tupou was a tad late on the cleanout but it was no shoulder charge. It was front on, no shoulder leading and arms wrapping. The Bok player who got cleaned was however guilty of a shoulder charge cleanout. Very poor decision by the ref and TMO. Faiinga threw straight but offered nothing else. Ineffective. White had a good game, very difficult to fault him. Foley did ok behind a backpeddling pack. Did not shirk his task in defence and always looked for the short ball inside and out (as per game plan I reckon), not his fault the runners were not there. Kerevi ..... good game. Rodda very quiet. Kepu quiet, although hit a lot of rucks. LSL too slow to reload in defence but did ok carrying the ball and in the lineouts. Arnold did his job. Was ok. Naiisarani good in ball carrying and lineout. Did not hit rucks. Defended ok. Hodge is not a winger and is too slow. DHP had a shocker. Never to be selected again. Banks did ok without offering too much in the way of attack. Overall lack of pace in the team. Foley was only player who followed up Hodge's toe thru, yet 3 defenders got back. If 3 defenders can turn and chase, and get back to help out, why can't our players get up there to pressure them. Foley was left to do it on his own. HJH did ok in his few minutes on the park. Beale was very good in his few minutes. If the Wallabies wish to persist with a back three who can run, have pace, can kick and take a high ball then possibly we need Banks, Beale and Cam Clarke ..... in the absence of other genuine wingers.

2019-07-22T01:51:29+00:00

PeterK

Roar Guru


very easy answer. The game was at altitude. The opposition used a rush defence. Foley kicked all of 3 times Janties 16 times. Foley was very predictable with no game management, no variation and little vision. Foley did the same thing over and over again.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar