Money matters a huge concern for Castle and RA

By Will Knight / Expert

Raelene Castle no doubt thought she had helped to position Rugby Australia nicely for a solid shot at a decent broadcast deal.

It was eight months ago, in mid-March, when SANZAAR announced their Super Rugby update that Japan’s Sunwolves would be axed from the competition at the end of the 2020 season.

Super Rugby would revert to a 14-team competition from 2021 onwards.

The all-important market research and focus group data was in. The unpopular 15-team conference system was out and the round-robin competition model would return with four Australian teams, five New Zealand teams, four South African teams and the Jaguares from Argentina.

It continued a head-spinning period in which the numbers of teams and format of the competition had changed for the fourth time since 2015.

But early resolution regarding the structure of Super Rugby meant that RA and Castle had shown the decisiveness and clarity that broadcasters were seeking, right?

Like any industry, media want certainty as they compile massive multi-year deals worth hundreds of millions of dollars.

Mind you, even though rugby fans were being asked to provide their feedback on Super Rugby and what it should look like in the future, you can be sure that the broadcasters held more sway.

After all, broadcast revenue – which amounted to about $275 million over the soon-to-expire five-year cycle – contributes more than half of RA’s revenues. That’s a fair bit of muscle at negotiation time.

“Do we believe that this structure gives us the best platform to negotiate a good outcome with our broadcasters and commercial partners?” Castle pondered in March.

“Yes we do.”

There was talk Australian rugby should break away from the SANZAAR alliance given interest waned during away games involving Aussie teams played in the middle of the night, plus a few of the South African franchises were eyeing a move to the Pro 14 competition in Europe anyway and so it was a good time to brush them.

Castle reiterated that the SANZAAR alliance was crucial in “delivering outcomes” for Super Rugby but also “when you’re sitting around the World Rugby table”.

This was a strategic position particularly relevant when the World Nations Championship concept – a global Test competition administered by World Rugby and valued at around $A10 billion over 12 years – was still alive and kicking.

That died. Then the Wallabies exited early at the World Cup. A post-World Cup buzz would’ve given Castle and RA a bit of swagger in TV talks, but that didn’t work out.

Nonetheless, Castle was clear and transparent. Some tough decisions had been made over the years, including the axing of the Western Force, and external factors such as the player drain to Europe and Japan was hurting the local game.

But business was in reasonable order for a strong pitch to broadcasters for the rights to Super Rugby, the National Rugby Championship and Wallabies Tests, wasn’t it?

How do the Wallabies rebuild? (Cameron Spencer/Getty Images)

No way. It’s been doom and gloom, deepening the depression from the Wallabies’ World Cup failure.

Fox Sports, who have shown Super Rugby for 25 years, have reportedly pulled their offer for the next broadcast rights. Optus are said to be interested but their deal is around $30 million a year. That’s a serious blow given the last cycle reaped $55 million a year.

“Rugby Australia will be hit by an economic tsunami,” Allan Jones wrote in his The Australian column today.

“The last time Rugby Australia said they had to cut costs, they axed the Force. Which franchise will go next?”

Earlier this year, Foxtel said it would cut spending on “non-marquee sporting content” following the announcement of a $417 million loss last year.

Rugby union is in that at-risk category, lagging well behind the AFL and NRL in commercial strength.

Facebook, Amazon and Netflix – some of the beastly tech firms that are apparently keen on acquiring sports rights – aren’t going to be interested in rugby union.

So it’s a small market that RA have to source the majority of their revenue and it’s not looking positive.

Foxtel threatened to walk away from cricket broadcast rights in 2018, but eventually agreed to terms. They’re happy to give negotiations some public airing to boost their bargaining power, mostly because sentiment should favour the incumbent broadcasters who have a significant history with the code.

The guide to Optus’ ambitions – and RA’s hopes of stirring a bidding war – are to be found in CEO Allen Lew’s comments a few months ago.

Optus stunned the media market last year by bagging the exclusive Australian rights to broadcast the English Premier League for the 2019-2022 seasons, a competition that used to be shown on Fox Sports.

“Our focus right now is to see what we can do beyond soccer,” Lew said in August.

Castle needs to lock a deal away that’s well above the dire forecast of around $30 million a year. If not, rugby union’s problems will grow well beyond a stronger player drain to Japan and Europe.

The Crowd Says:

2019-12-08T21:34:42+00:00

BT

Roar Rookie


Hang on. I thought Foxtel offered $25 mill, the same as last broadcast deal. The extra in that deal came from the pay TV rights war in the UK plus broadcast deals with SANZAAR partners. Foxtel didn’t offer $55 million this time, they offered a roll over deal. So if Optus offered $30 mill, isn’t there that rise? Let me know if I’m wrong. I tell you though, if Optus offers Rugby for $5 per month, my Foxtel subscription will be goooooooone!

2019-12-03T04:45:23+00:00

Mango Jack

Roar Guru


I get that, but the vast majority of qualified experts agree that the GBR is in trouble, and that is largely caused by ocean warming leading to bleaching to levels that are irreparable. It’s not the “left” media at all, it’s mainstream scientists. You can always find an “expert” to validate your opinion, but this person is very much in the minority.

2019-12-02T06:57:01+00:00

Bobby

Roar Rookie


Girls have done well , once, big-time. Blokes are hopeless at top level. Sure, every now and again, they win a little bit, but never gold.

2019-12-02T06:07:52+00:00

Vman2

Roar Rookie


And never be in contention for Commonwealth Games or Olympics - a key advantage over NRL and AFL. Frankly the 7s is a bargain at $7million.

2019-12-02T05:16:20+00:00

RogerTA

Roar Rookie


How sad you are.

2019-12-02T04:23:22+00:00

Vman2

Roar Rookie


Personally I think the all or nothing broadcast model is doomed and the writing has been on the wall for a few years.

2019-12-02T04:16:51+00:00

Vman2

Roar Rookie


It seems that you are shooting the messenger with your suspicions and not addressing the message. "Chief executive Jaimes Leggett, who has had a lifelong love of the code, said Rugby Australia needed to urgently arrest its image problems and remind supporters why they loved the sport." “The administration has ­allowed themselves to be the focal point for too long,” he said. Perhaps no one can argue with that so they just attack the messenger. Personally I think he summed things up very well.

2019-12-02T00:54:39+00:00

piru

Roar Rookie


Quote then - apologies I read this on Friday and responded this morning, I had remembered it as a link. What is GH is that new like the many other attempts to make the name sound more and more dangerous I don't know what this is supposed to say so won't respond

2019-12-02T00:49:59+00:00

stillmissit

Roar Guru


piru what link? I posted no link..What is GH is that new like the many other attempts to make the name sound more and more dangerous?

2019-12-02T00:42:10+00:00

Jeansyjive

Roar Rookie


The problem is super rugby. Its clear in Australia that people connect more with domestic competitions. Look at AFL, NRL, BBL, A-League, NBL. Local teams playing local teams and friendly times. Yet Australian rugby still persists with a competition played across 3 continents (down from 4) and wonder why they don't attract any new people. Flogging a dead horse comes to mind. Most non-rugby people don't even know it exists. The comp has zero penetration to non-rugby people and even rugby people have lost interest.

2019-12-02T00:34:56+00:00

piru

Roar Rookie


Gray: Proof that you do not understand what you are talking about… Proof rather that you didn't read your own link, GH is 100% correct. And yet you're out here on your soapbox lecturing us all on thinking for ourselves.

2019-12-02T00:32:10+00:00

piru

Roar Rookie


This is an example of competing ‘facts’. No, it is not. It is a case of different interpretations of data, the facts are the same regardless of how they are understood. Please stop - this is a ridiculous argument

2019-12-01T23:26:23+00:00

Train Without A Station

Roar Guru


No. Nobody here owes anybody anything. Except maybe willingness to live by the same standards we expect of anybody else.

2019-12-01T23:21:22+00:00

Paul D

Roar Rookie


Alan Border? From the little picture it always looked like Clint Eastwood to me. I hadn't looked at the bigger version of the picture before.

2019-12-01T22:53:32+00:00

Ex force fan

Guest


What is 3 x $6 million for you TWAS?

2019-12-01T22:49:37+00:00

Ex force fan

Guest


Looking forward to your last post. Your view will be missed and was always different with something to think about instead of nit picking of others post or misconstrued interpretations of others posts. I value those that aspire to more from players and administrators instead of just accepting mediocre decisions and performance.

2019-12-01T21:24:55+00:00

stillmissit

Roar Guru


Gray: Proof that you do not understand what you are talking about...

2019-12-01T21:22:24+00:00

stillmissit

Roar Guru


Yes I do, that is why I quoted it. So that your understanding of how frivolous the aims fo CC are. Go read something from those who disagree with your religious faith.

2019-12-01T17:29:53+00:00

jack

Roar Rookie


Here's why I am concerned: your figures reflect the current broadcast agreement and this year, financial year ending 31 Dec, the forecast loss is $5.5m. Let's say it's the same for next year. Then in 2021, when the broadcast rights are only $20 m instead of $60 m, we will have a $45 m loss - have I missed something here? Equity as at Dec 2018 sits at $26 m.

2019-12-01T11:32:53+00:00

Ankle-tapped Waterboy

Guest


I wrote "unholy" not "unlikely". Cheers.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar